Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

daVinciLite

Should a NON-taxpayer Be Allowed to Vote?

Recommended Posts

With no “skin” in the game, should someone who pays no federal income tax be allowed to vote? After all, if current trends persist, how many taxpayers will be left to pay down the record national debt?

 

A non-taxpayer can vote for redistribution with little perceived loss on their end (notice I say perceived).

 

What do you think?

 

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
should someone who pays no federal income tax be allowed to vote?

 

All legal citizens must be allowed to vote. Ultimately all issues come down to the issue of good and evil. The problem is that most people have no idea what good is. Most peoples attitudes tend to gravitate towards their own self interests.

 

The vote is all about the balance of power. Some people will always try to gain more power for themselves. Without the vote, there is no way to balance power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With no “skin” in the game, should someone who pays no federal income tax be allowed to vote?

dVL

 

Interesting question. This is a public policy debate.

 

Same question, but from a personal ethics viewpoint could be:

 

"Should someone who pays no federal income tax vote?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then let's also say anyone without a college degree or perhaps blue eyes or perhaps living only in NYC. Yes, lets take away the vote from the stupid masses who happen not to agree with what we may think.

 

What does a collage degree, having blue eyes or living in NYC have to do with anything? There are plenty of people with those qualifications that pay NO federal income tax.

 

Amazing how people can bring race and education into every political idea.

People of a certain race are NOT smarter and people of a certain education are NOT the “smartest in the room.” In many cases educated people can be a lot dumber then usual.

 

If I hire someone for a job, don’t I get to tell them what to do? We hire politicians for a job. Maybe only the people who pay the bills should have to right to choose who gets elected.

 

At one time you had to own property to vote in the US. Of course this will never happen nor do I want it to, but it is still a curious question.

 

Another question: Can a socialist ever get elected if the people paying the bills were the ones making the voting decisions?

 

Another question: Why do so many US and English citizens get away with paying absolutely no federal income tax?

 

Regards,

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What does a collage degree, having blue eyes or living in NYC have to do with anything? There are plenty of people with those qualifications that pay NO federal income tax.

 

Amazing how people can bring race and education into every political idea.

People of a certain race are NOT smarter and people of a certain education are NOT the “smartest in the room.” In many cases educated people can be a lot dumber then usual.

 

If I hire someone for a job, don’t I get to tell them what to do? We hire politicians for a job. Maybe only the people who pay the bills should have to right to choose who gets elected.

 

At one time you had to own property to vote in the US. Of course this will never happen nor do I want it to, but it is still a curious question.

 

Another question: Can a socialist ever get elected if the people paying the bills were the ones making the voting decisions?

 

Another question: Why do so many US and English citizens get away with paying absolutely no federal income tax?

 

Regards,

dVL

 

Is social or economic class different than race or religion when it comes to voting rights?

Should wealthy individuals not be allowed to vote on issues that are only of interest to the non-wealthy?

 

If you need to scratch your head and wonder were the money goes, look up to the wealthier classes and not to the poor. More money is spent in this country that benefits the wealthy than money that is spent benefiting the poor. Sounds like you might have listened to a little too much conservative radio.

 

It's easy to be a fool if you live a relatively healthy and wealthy life and naive to assume that everyone who receives more than they pay is scamming the govt.

 

Personally, I am completely against paying federal taxes, but have no issue with helping a person in need of financial or medical assistance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What does a collage degree, having blue eyes or living in NYC have to do with anything?

 

 

dVL

 

That's the whole point. What does having money have do do with human rights, human dignity and the ability to play your role in your community.

 

The fact that this "question" is even asked or considered as something that could be debated says a lot.

 

Having money is an attribute just like having blue eyes or a colledge degree. As human beings in a community, deenfranchising anyone, not because of him committing a crime against the community, but because he just happens not to contribute money, quite abhorent to me. Some people make their contributions in other ways: playing music, painting, social assistance and so on. Just because I have a talent for making money does not give me the right to tell everyone how things should be in a society. In a democracy, the majority rules. Any one who doesn't like it can vote with his feet. People seem to be quoting Winston Churchill a lot recently. He said: "democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He said: "democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time".

 

I understand your point and I agree in principle, but if there are more people taking from a society then giving, that democracy will cease to exist in the near future. It will turn into some sort of totalitarian state where others are forced to “give” what they have. Cuba has elections and they have a 99% turn out rate, but of course there is only one candidate.

 

Why are you so sure all wealthy people pay taxes? Do the wealthy in Greece pay their share? I am not an expert, but from what I hear the answer is NO. The multinational GE paid very little US income tax last year.

 

You are missing the whole point of the question. It is not about the wealthy or poor telling anyone how to live. It is about fairness and the right for the “rich,” not so rich and even the poor to earn a living in freedom. Again, not all taxes are paid by the wealthy.

 

From what I see people who live on social assistance for a substantial length of time loose their dignity. With there dignity gone, they have a hard time contributing anything.

 

Regards,

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I understand your point and I agree in principle, but if there are more people taking from a society then giving,...

 

Regards,

dVL

 

can anyone say that he is giving more than he takes?

 

can anyone even say, he is giving as much as he takes?

 

from the first day he was born....?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
can anyone say that he is giving more than he takes?

 

can anyone even say, he is giving as much as he takes?

 

from the first day he was born....?

 

Very interesting question Tams. I am looking forward to reading someone’s answer. I have some ideas but I'll keep my mouth closed for now. ;)

 

Regards,

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
can anyone say that he is giving more than he takes?

 

can anyone even say, he is giving as much as he takes?

 

from the first day he was born....?

 

A slave might be able to say that and have it be true. Are their "economic slaves" who are not "legal" slaves? Are there people who get 99% of the pie when they didn't make or bake the pie? Are there people who get 1% of the pie who made and baked the pie?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another hypocrite ... Warren Buffet. He may owe as much as one billion in back taxes:

 

Warren Buffet May Owe A Billion Dollars In Back Taxes - HUMAN EVENTS

 

dVL

 

He would be a hypocrite if he were being investigated for tax evasion and at the same time saying that the rich should pay their fair share. On the other hand, he is disputing the amount he owes based on his interpretation of the tax code. That is something that everyone can do and has the right to do. It is your obligation to yourself to make sure that you pay as little as possible.

 

You are implying that he is a hypocrite because he is saying that the rich should pay their fair share and he is trying to pay as little as possible. Do you expect him to be willing to pay more than he should because of his statements? He wants the tax codes to change so that the wealthy pay more. He is not suggesting that the the wealthy should pay more than they have to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you expect him to be willing to pay more than he should because of his statements?

 

You bet I do. He can take all his income as salary and pay the higher rate but he doesn't because he is a hypocrite. Anything can be rationalized (rational lies) but he is still a hypocrite.

 

Regards,

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You bet I do. He can take all his income as salary and pay the higher rate but he doesn't because he is a hypocrite. Anything can be rationalized (rational lies) but he is still a hypocrite.

 

Regards,

dVL

 

He is paying his fair share. You are paying your fair share. His fair share is a smaller percentage of income than your fair share. No one is going to pay more than what the law makes them pay. The law has been on the side of the wealthy. That is sort of his point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He is paying his fair share. You are paying your fair share. His fair share is a smaller percentage of income than your fair share. No one is going to pay more than what the law makes them pay. The law has been on the side of the wealthy. That is sort of his point.

 

Because of the graduated tax tables, the rich pay more than their fair share. A fair share is a flat percentage. And the fairest way to collect taxes it a flat consumption tax. A tax on income also gives the gov the intrusive ability to modify behavior through tax credits and deductions.

Distribution of Major Federal Taxes 2000

51% of Americans Pay No Federal Income Taxes - Derek Thompson - Business - The Atlantic

 

But to respond to the original question, "Should a NON-taxpayer Be Allowed to Vote?", if we had a federal consumption tax instead of a federal income tax, the question would be moot; everyone would be a tax payer. However, if we don't repeal the 16th Amendment, and more than half of the population pays no income tax and can still vote, the balance of voters has tipped to those who would redistribute the wealth of others. A democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.

 

Disallowing the right to vote to those who pay no taxes might stem the tide toward socialism, something we must do because, as Margaret Thatcher once said, you eventually run out of other people's money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Because of the graduated tax tables, the rich pay more than their fair share. A fair share is a flat percentage. And the fairest way to collect taxes it a flat consumption tax. A tax on income also gives the gov the intrusive ability to modify behavior through tax credits and deductions.

Distribution of Major Federal Taxes 2000

51% of Americans Pay No Federal Income Taxes - Derek Thompson - Business - The Atlantic

 

But to respond to the original question, "Should a NON-taxpayer Be Allowed to Vote?", if we had a federal consumption tax instead of a federal income tax, the question would be moot; everyone would be a tax payer. However, if we don't repeal the 16th Amendment, and more than half of the population pays no income tax and can still vote, the balance of voters has tipped to those who would redistribute the wealth of others. A democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.

 

Disallowing the right to vote to those who pay no taxes might stem the tide toward socialism, something we must do because, as Margaret Thatcher once said, you eventually run out of other people's money.

 

If you were attempting to achieve objectivity, you missed the mark by posting conservative propaganda, Both liberals, conservatives, and, additionally, tea partiers, all want to spend money. The only difference is who they want as a main beneficiary of the spent funds.

 

If you examine the accumulation of debt under the various administrations you will note that both liberal and conservatives were responsible for overspending. Percentage increases in national debt is tipped more in favor of republicans. If the wealthy, on balance, support the republican party, then they have benefited more greatly from policy than the middle and low income population.

 

In addition, the effective tax rate of the super wealthy over the last 2 decades has decreased dramatically.

 

Effective Tax Rates for Taxpayers with the Top 400 Adjusted Gross Income, 1992-2007

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you were attempting to achieve objectivity, you missed the mark by posting conservative propaganda, Both liberals, conservatives, and, additionally, tea partiers, all want to spend money. The only difference is who they want as a main beneficiary of the spent funds.

 

If you examine the accumulation of debt under the various administrations you will note that both liberal and conservatives were responsible for overspending. Percentage increases in national debt is tipped more in favor of republicans. If the wealthy, on balance, support the republican party, then they have benefited more greatly from policy than the middle and low income population.

 

In addition, the effective tax rate of the super wealthy over the last 2 decades has decreased dramatically.

 

Effective Tax Rates for Taxpayers with the Top 400 Adjusted Gross Income, 1992-2007

 

It's true that republicans are no better than democrats when it comes to gov spending, so don't confuse republican with conservative. My point is that a flat % tax is a conservative concept. Redistribution of wealth is a liberal concept, and a graduated tax table is one way to accomplish that.

 

Throw out the current tax code and replace it with a flat tax and then everyone pays their fair share.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's true that republicans are no better than democrats when it comes to gov spending, so don't confuse republican with conservative. My point is that a flat % tax is a conservative concept. Redistribution of wealth is a liberal concept, and a graduated tax table is one way to accomplish that.

 

Throw out the current tax code and replace it with a flat tax and then everyone pays their fair share.

 

A dramatic change like that would have many unintended consequences. It is also doubtful that we can encourage lawyers to create new laws that will have a negative impact on lawyers. I agree that conceptually it sounds good and I would certainly benefit, but I suspect that a flat tax will remain on the drawing board for a long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

regards taking away the ability of a non tax paying voter....

IMHO - take such a suggestion to the extreme to see why if you wish to have a caring/fair/compasionate society, you really should never take away certain rights from anyone in that society. One of these rights in a democratic and free society is the right to vote.

Why not say to people, for every percentage of your income that is paid in tax you get a vote, that way a 50% tax payer gets 50 votes, and a 10% tax payer gets 10 votes.....you might find more secretaries having more votes than their hedge fund managers :)

What about companies - they (supposedly) pay taxes - do they get a vote too? and all their subsidiaries.

(arguably Corporations help set policies via lobbying anyway - better than a vote, just make sure that you can buy who ever gets voted in :))

 

and given that voting in the US is not enforced, and the rates of voter turnouts at elections is pretty poor - who is it that chooses not to vote when they are given the chance - it probably is already they poor folk who pay no taxes anyway!

Ahhhh...the never ending quest for the perfect system. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 4th April 2025.   USDJPY Falls to 25-Week Low as Safe Havens Surge and Markets Eye NFP Data.   Safe haven currencies and the traditional alternative to the US Dollar continue to increase in value while the Dollar declines. Investors traditionally opt to invest in the Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc at times of uncertainty and when they wish to avoid the Dollar. The Japanese Yen continues to be the best-performing currency of the week and of the day. Will this continue to be the case after today’s US employment figures?   USDJPY - NFP Data And Trade Negotiations The USDJPY is currently trading at a 25-week low and is witnessing one of its strongest declines this week. The exchange rate is no longer obtaining indications from the RSI that the price is oversold. The current bullish swing is obtaining indications of divergence as the price fails to form a higher high. Therefore, short-term momentum is in favour of the US Dollar, but there are still signs the Japanese Yen can regain momentum quickly.       USDJPY 1-Hour Chart     The price movement of the exchange rate in both the short and long term will depend on 3 factors. Today’s US employment data, next week’s inflation rate and most importantly the progress of negotiations between the US and trade partners. If today’s Unemployment Rate increases above 4.1%, the reading will be the highest seen so far in 2025. Currently, the market expects the Unemployment Rate to remain at 4.1% and the Non-Farm Payroll Change to add 137,000 jobs. The average NFP reading this year so far has been 194,000.   If data does not meet expectations, US investors may continue to increase exposure away from the Dollar and to other safe-haven assets. Previously investors were expecting only 2 rate cuts this year from the Federal Reserve, however, most investors now expect up to 4. If today’s employment data deteriorates, economists advise the Federal Reserve may opt to cut interest rates sooner.   Therefore, it is important to note that today’s NFP will influence the USDJPY to a large extent. Whereas in the longer-term, trade negotiations will steal the spotlight. If trade partners are able to negotiate the US Dollar can correct back upwards. Whereas, if other countries retaliate and do not negotiate the US Dollar will remain weak.   USDJPY - The Yen and the Bank of Japan The Japanese Yen is the best-performing currency in 2025 increasing by 6.70% so far. Risk indicators such as the VIX and High-Low Indexes continue to worsen which is positive for the JPY as a safe haven currency.   Yesterday Japan released March business activity data that came in weaker than expected: the Services PMI dropped from 53.7 to 50.0, while the Composite PMI fell from 52.0 to 48.9. The data is the lowest in two years. These figures could hinder further interest rate hikes by the Bank of Japan. However, most economists still expect the Bank Of Japan to hike at least once more. It's also important to note, that even if the BOJ opts for a prolonged pause, a cut is not likely.   Additionally, a 24% tariff was imposed on Japanese exports to the US yesterday. Prime Minister Mr Ishiba expressed disappointment over Japan's failure to secure a tariff exemption and pledged support measures to help domestic industries manage the impact.   Key Takeaway Points: US Dollar Weakens, Safe Havens Rise: The Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc continue to gain as investors shift away from the US Dollar. USDJPY Under Pressure: USDJPY trades at a 25-week low, with short-term momentum favouring the Dollar but long-term trends pointing to potential Yen strength. NFP and Unemployment Crucial: Today’s Non-Farm Payrolls and unemployment figures will heavily influence short-term USDJPY. On the other hand, trade negotiations will dictate longer-term trends. Japan Faces Mixed Signals: Despite weak PMI data and new US tariffs, the Japanese Yen remains strong. Economists expect at least one more rate hike from the Bank of Japan, but no cuts are in sight. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • YUM Yum Brands stock, nice breakout with volume +34.5%, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?YUM
    • Date: 3rd April 2025.   Gold Prices Pull Back After Record High as Traders Eye Trump’s Tariffs.   Key Takeaways:   Gold prices retreated after hitting a record high of $3,167.57 per ounce due to profit-taking. President Trump announced a 10% baseline tariff on all US imports, escalating trade tensions. Gold remains exempt from reciprocal tariffs, reinforcing its safe-haven appeal. Investors await US non-farm payroll data for further market direction. Fed rate cut bets and weaker US Treasury yields underpin gold’s bullish outlook. Gold Prices Retreat from Record Highs Amid Profit-Taking Gold prices saw a pullback on Thursday as traders opted to take profits following a historic surge. Spot gold declined 0.4% to $3,122.10 per ounce as of 0710 GMT, retreating from its fresh all-time high of $3,167.57. Meanwhile, US gold futures slipped 0.7% to $3,145.00 per ounce, reflecting broader market uncertainty over economic and geopolitical developments.   The recent rally was largely fueled by concerns over escalating trade tensions after President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping new import tariffs. The 10% baseline tariff on all goods entering the US further deepened the global trade conflict, intensifying investor demand for safe-haven assets like gold. However, as traders locked in gains from the surge, prices saw a modest retracement.   Trump’s Tariffs and Their Market Implications On Wednesday, Trump introduced a sweeping tariff policy imposing a 10% baseline duty on all imports, with significantly higher tariffs on select nations. While this move was aimed at bolstering domestic manufacturing, it sent shockwaves across global markets, fueling inflation concerns and heightening trade war fears.   Gold’s Role Amid Trade War Escalations Despite the widespread tariff measures, the White House clarified that reciprocal tariffs do not apply to gold, energy, and ‘certain minerals that are not available in the US’. This exemption suggests that central banks and institutional investors may continue favouring gold as a hedge against economic instability. One of the key factors supporting gold is the slowdown that these tariffs could cause in the US economy, which raises the likelihood of future Federal Reserve rate cuts. Gold is currently in a pure momentum trade. Market participants are on the sidelines and until we see a significant shakeout, this momentum could persist.   Impact on the US Dollar and Bond Yields Gold prices typically move inversely to the US dollar, and the latest developments have pushed the dollar to its weakest level since October 2024. Market participants are increasingly pricing in the possibility of a Fed rate cut, as the tariffs could weigh on economic growth.   Additionally, US Treasury yields have plummeted, reflecting growing recession fears. Lower bond yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold, making it a more attractive investment.         Technical Analysis: Key Levels to Watch Gold’s recent rally has pushed it into overbought territory, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) above 70. This indicates a potential short-term pullback before the uptrend resumes. The immediate support level lies at $3,115, aligning with the Asian session low. A further decline could bring gold towards the $3,100 psychological level, which has previously acted as a strong support zone. Below this, the $3,076–$3,057 region represents a critical weekly support range where buyers may re-enter the market. In the event of a more significant correction, $3,000 stands as a major psychological floor.   On the upside, gold faces immediate resistance at $3,149. A break above this level could signal renewed bullish momentum, potentially leading to a retest of the record high at $3,167. If bullish momentum persists, the next target is the $3,200 psychological barrier, which could pave the way for further gains. Despite the recent pullback, the broader trend remains bullish, with dips likely to be viewed as buying opportunities.   Looking Ahead: Non-Farm Payrolls and Fed Policy Traders are closely monitoring Friday’s US non-farm payrolls (NFP) report, which could provide critical insights into the Federal Reserve’s next policy moves. A weaker-than-expected jobs report may strengthen expectations for an interest rate cut, further boosting gold prices.   Other key economic data releases, such as jobless claims and the ISM Services PMI, may also impact market sentiment in the short term. However, with rising geopolitical uncertainties, trade tensions, and a weakening US dollar, gold’s safe-haven appeal remains strong.   Conclusion: While short-term profit-taking may trigger minor corrections, gold’s long-term outlook remains bullish. As global trade tensions mount and the Federal Reserve leans toward a more accommodative stance, gold could see further gains in the months ahead.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.