Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

sharehunter

Tick Volume in Currency and Commondities Market

Recommended Posts

Dear Friends!

 

My main method is VSA so when I join to currency and commondities market , I feel so difficult. Now I am study about to tick volume to use this like a real volume in stock market. But I am still don’t understand about Tick Volume, please kindly help me about some part of tick volume as bellow:

 

- What is tick volume? How to calculate tick volume and please give me an example

- Please introduce to me some brokers have MT4 platform and providing good tick volume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sharehunter said:
Dear Friends!

 

My main method is VSA so when I join to currency and commondities market , I feel so difficult. Now I am study about to tick volume to use this like a real volume in stock market. But I am still don’t understand about Tick Volume, please kindly help me about some part of tick volume as bellow:

 

- What is tick volume? How to calculate tick volume and please give me an example

- Please introduce to me some brokers have MT4 platform and providing good tick volume

 

one tick = one trade

 

each trade can be in any volume

 

some trades are larger

some trades are smaller

 

in stocks, a minimum volume is 100 shares,

in futures, a minimum volume is 1 contract,

 

in forex... volume can be in any size, and is not usually reported.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had to use ticks/trades as a proxy for volume. I abandoned it as it doesn't perform the same.

 

My next course of action was to access futures data where volume is reported. Ie. Use futures data to make trade decisions, then execute on the forex platform.

 

I never followed through as my research took me in a different direction. But if volume is your thing, that's the way to go.

 

Good Luck!

 

CJForex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
one tick = one trade

 

each trade can be in any volume

 

some trades are larger

some trades are smaller

 

in stocks, a minimum volume is 100 shares,

in futures, a minimum volume is 1 contract,

 

in forex... volume can be in any size, and is not usually reported.

 

In currency futures you can of course see the volume unlike the interbank market, as Tams says. This is where most traders that use Price and volume would ply their trade IMO.

 

If you have a 200 tick chart and it is showing 380 volume for the last bar, and 250 for the previous you can see that the average contract size traded has increased, handy info.

 

Cheers,

 

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Xiao si said:
In currency futures you can of course see the volume unlike the interbank market, as Tams says. This is where most traders that use Price and volume would ply their trade IMO.

 

If you have a 200 tick chart and it is showing 380 volume for the last bar, and 250 for the previous you can see that the average contract size traded has increased, handy info.

 

Cheers,

 

 

XS

 

If you want to get an estimate of volume in the currencies or in any instrument that does not report volume, then learn how to use Market Profile.The original use for MP was to estimate volume on futures when volume was not reported. The MP equation is Time x Price = Volume. If you know 2, then you know the third.

 

Futures volume on currencies is just a sliver of the volume traded. I do not trust that it is a good representation of total volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:

Futures volume on currencies is just a sliver of the volume traded.

 

Of course it is, its 8 hours out of 24hr market for starters. To boot, its contact volume.

 

Still, its the closest thing to true volume in the currency markets.

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i know a little bit about MP but still do a research on it. right now I use tick volume of FXCM to for trading on wyckoff method. it lead to a good performance.

 

but i still dont completely understand what is tick volume and what is high tick volume mean, what is low tick volume mean. how does it stand for low and high activity, why it can be the same meaning with real volume

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
but i still dont completely understand what is tick volume and what is high tick volume mean, what is low tick volume mean. how does it stand for low and high activity,

 

Tick Volume is simply a count of how many trades were recorded during that bar with no accounting for the size of those transactions. Real volume includes the size of trades in the recording.

Across large samples, tick volume correlates pretty well with real volume(especially with spikes) - but there are certain conditions when real volume is the only way to utilize 'volume' measures ...

 

re

  Quote
why it can be the same meaning with real volume

At its simplest, high and low tick and real volumes both show levels of participation and urgency, etc

 

Oanda now has MT4 and I would 'trust' their tick count more than I would FXCM's - but who knows they may be the same... I have never had an FXCM account... any broker using Gain feed (if it's still called that) would also do in a pinch... ultimately you want to get to at least currenex level feed and if you're going to be really dependent on volume measures (ala Wycoff) get to futures and / or out of FX altogether...hth

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
Tick Volume is simply a count of how many trades were recorded during that bar with no accounting for the size of those transactions. Real volume includes the size of trades in the recording.

Across large samples, tick volume correlates pretty well with real volume(especially with spikes) - but there are certain conditions when real volume is the only way to utilize 'volume' measures ...

 

re

 

At its simplest, high and low tick and real volumes both show levels of participation and urgency, etc

 

Oanda now has MT4 and I would 'trust' their tick count more than I would FXCM's - but who knows they may be the same... I have never had an FXCM account... any broker using Gain feed (if it's still called that) would also do in a pinch... ultimately you want to get to at least currenex level feed and if you're going to be really dependent on volume measures (ala Wycoff) get to futures and / or out of FX altogether...hth

 

Hi Zdo!

 

you helps me that "Tick Volume is simply a count of how many trades were recorded during that bar with no accounting for the size of those transactions". Please kindly tell me what is "trade"?

 

thanks a lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sharehunter said:
Hi Zdo!

 

you helps me that "Tick Volume is simply a count of how many trades were recorded during that bar with no accounting for the size of those transactions". Please kindly tell me what is "trade"?

 

thanks a lot

 

a "trade" is a transaction.

 

e.g.

 

I entered an order and bought 100 shares of IBM.... that's one trade. (ie. one tick)

 

Zdo can also enter an order to buy IBM, but he bought 200 shares.... that is also ONE trade. (ie. also one tick)

(assuming the order is consummated in one transaction.)

 

 

Hope this makes sense to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
a "trade" is a transaction.

 

e.g.

 

I entered an order and bought 100 shares of IBM.... that's one trade. (ie. one tick)

 

Zdo can also enter an order to buy IBM, but he bought 200 shares.... that is also ONE trade. (ie. also one tick)

(assuming the order is consummated in one transaction.)

 

 

Hope this makes sense to you.

 

thanks Tams!

 

if tick volume calculate like that the meaning of tick volume will be deffirent from real volume

 

for example: I make one trade with lot size is 0.01, you make one trade but the lot size is 1000 lot

 

the tick volume is same (one tick) but the meaning is so different. I hear so many guy, special Tom Wiliam company (tradeguider) said that tick volume in forex market is same meaning with real volume in stock market but i still dont understand why they can assume like that.

 

please kindly helps me

 

thanks a lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sharehunter said:
thanks Tams!

 

if tick volume calculate like that the meaning of tick volume will be deffirent from real volume

 

for example: I make one trade with lot size is 0.01, you make one trade but the lot size is 1000 lot

 

the tick volume is same (one tick) but the meaning is so different. I hear so many guy, special Tom Wiliam company (tradeguider) said that tick volume in forex market is same meaning with real volume in stock market but i still dont understand why they can assume like that.

 

please kindly helps me

 

thanks a lot

 

that's one of the reason why forex volume are seldom reported.

 

read CJForex's post above, forex traders use tick as a proxy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some other friends told me that, number of ticks also depend on how many pips in price change.

 

for example: one trade make price change 20 pip have more than tick another trade only make price change 2 pip

 

i dont know this is right or wrong, please kindly helps

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some good posts here on tick volume, particularly zdo's one.

 

I'm not sure that two points are clear enough:

- tick "volume" is from a source and if the source is a broker then the it represents people in their market place so not only is it a subset of the total but it is likely to be skewed to their customers (losers?)

- the futures markets are very small compared with the total of forex trading so they may also be unrepresentative of what is really happening and may be distorted by manipulation to drag the currency market.

 

So basically its the old issues of garbage in garbage out ... and understand the limitations of your tools. I'd be very careful to qualify the extra edge tick volume offered - our eyes frequently deceive us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not researched, quantified, or applied this but I concluded that tick volume of retail FX is just that – an isolated indicator of retail activity with unsufficient consistent correlation with what the ‘banks’ ,etc are doing.

(and, btw, this thinking isn’t really based on a ‘smart money’ / ‘dumb money’ polarity. )

Based solely on the roots of VSA principles, I would be very hesitant to apply VSA ( or methods akin to VSA) to that data stream of ‘volume’. There are probably long periods of high correlation between the retail and ‘bank’ volume… but it’s when, at important times, those individual setups from the retail stream aren’t reflective at all of what really happening ‘at size’ that would keep me from using retail FX tick volume in those ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sharehunter said:
Dear Friends!

 

My main method is VSA so when I join to currency and commondities market , I feel so difficult. Now I am study about to tick volume to use this like a real volume in stock market. But I am still don’t understand about Tick Volume, please kindly help me about some part of tick volume as bellow:

 

- What is tick volume? How to calculate tick volume and please give me an example

- Please introduce to me some brokers have MT4 platform and providing good tick volume

 

Hi Sharehunter,

You can get an understanding of why volume is so important, whether in stocks, futures or Forex, because it its release is either delayed (except to the Big Boys/Girls) or costs an arm and a leg to buy! In Forex, MT4 shows tick volume, which while it does not tell you just how much was traded, it tells you the RELATIVE amount of traded on that bar compared to volumes on all other bars. And, as 90% of the volume is due to Smart Money, one should pay attention to the volume!

 

If high volume on an upward move does not result in further rises, then it shows that a lot of that volume was selling by Smart Money too, putting a cap on the market and probably indicating a reversal, or at least a pullback to test a previous level before continuing up. Now you know why Smart Money does not want you to know what they are doing and why real volume is an expensive secret :-)

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  blott said:
Hi Sharehunter,

You can get an understanding of why volume is so important, whether in stocks, futures or Forex, because it its release is either delayed (except to the Big Boys/Girls) or costs an arm and a leg to buy! In Forex, MT4 shows tick volume, which while it does not tell you just how much was traded, it tells you the RELATIVE amount of traded on that bar compared to volumes on all other bars. And, as 90% of the volume is due to Smart Money, one should pay attention to the volume!

 

If high volume on an upward move does not result in further rises, then it shows that a lot of that volume was selling by Smart Money too, putting a cap on the market and probably indicating a reversal, or at least a pullback to test a previous level before continuing up. Now you know why Smart Money does not want you to know what they are doing and why real volume is an expensive secret :-)

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Mike

 

Hi Blott!

 

In stock market, i do a research on wyckoff method and using it as my main method now. as i know Tom Wiliam said that we can use esignal tick volume with the meaning as real volume in stock market so i would like to know what is tick volume and why is tick volume in forex market same meaning with real volume in stock market. really, until now, i still dont understand clearly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tick volume is NOT a proxy to volume in FX markets. Sorry. If you discover something profitable in tick volume,

good for you, but it is not because you can somehow correlate tick activity to volume.

 

When price ticks up or down, it DOES not necessarily mean a transaction was consumed. It might be a change in

bid/ask, certainly change reflected on your chart data feed.

 

Also, the tick activity is a product of who is providing you with chart data feed. Each vendor will report different tick

volume depending where a vendor is sourcing its data. Sources send indicative prices, which will be reflected

in tick activity.

 

I think the the FX market structure is just a bit different, decentralized, but with EBS/Reuters driving

dealable prices and banks providing data feeds and sending indicative prices.

 

Good Luck.

Cable.Trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cable Traders,

While I can't say I'm an expert on the finer points of what tick volume is, I do believe the clue is in the latter part of the name:)

 

If you care to take a look at the attached eurousd M1 chart, you will see clearly the correlation between volume and Smart Money activity (I am reliably informed that 95% of volume is produced by Smart Money activity, the rest by The Herd).

You will see that a relatively high volume spike, or a relatively low volume bar (i.e. no interest by SM to go in that direction), usually preceedes a change in price.

 

I have drawn in some RSI (4) divergence lines to help with decisions.

 

For other non-believers in the importance of volume to future price direction, may I suggest either buying your volume data from a commercial source (expensive; one wonders why...) or finding Tom Williams' YouTube videos (cheaper) to find out what is really happening in the markets.

 

Trading with volume is not a case of belief, like Religion; this is fact based on what one sees in front of one's eyes.

 

Kind regards,

 

 

blott

5aa710b4b2183_eurm1volume.thumb.gif.8573a873d30519db081f7a9e68dfd512.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.