Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tradewinds

The Science of Highs and Lows

Recommended Posts

Looking at historical price bars and trend lines on a chart tell very little about the real behavior of price. All kinds of things happen intra-bar that are not readily apparent on a static, historical chart. For example, if the price bar had a lower low; did the price bar have a lower low at the open, and then shoot up and close higher? Did the price bar open high and close with a lower low? Did the lower low occur first or last? Was there a lower low with a close down or a close up? The answer to all those questions provide a more complete picture of what the price behavior really is.

 

Higher lows and lower highs can be particularly tricky. For example, let's say that you see a higher low on this current price bar or an indicator at the open of the bar, and take that as a signal that price is moving up, only to experience the bottom drop out during the last few seconds of the bar formation. You must understand at least two fundamental truths about highs and low's. Highs can't go any lower, and lows can't go any higher; but highs can go higher and lows can go lower. Think about it. Once a new price high has been made, that price high for the bar can't go lower. So if your strategy depends on a higher high being made, then once it's made, it's reliable information. The same with lower lows.

 

Higher lows are important information, but higher lows can not be certain until the open of the next bar. By then you may be to late. Plus you can't tell if that higher low will hold until the second bar. Let's say that this bar looks like it will have a higher low, so you watch it, but low's can go lower, so you don't know until the next bar opens whether it's really a higher low or not. But what do you do in the meantime? And how long do you wait to make a decision?

 

So it's very difficult to time higher low's and lower highs. This illustrates why the open of the next bar is so important, and that there may be a very short window of time when there is any certainty of anything. There are very short windows of certainty followed by longer periods of uncertainty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking at historical price bars and trend lines on a chart tell very little about the real behavior of price. All kinds of things happen intra-bar that are not readily apparent on a static, historical chart. For example, if the price bar had a lower low; did the price bar have a lower low at the open, and then shoot up and close higher? Did the price bar open high and close with a lower low? Did the lower low occur first or last? Was there a lower low with a close down or a close up? The answer to all those questions provide a more complete picture of what the price behavior really is.

 

Higher lows and lower highs can be particularly tricky. For example, let's say that you see a higher low on this current price bar or an indicator at the open of the bar, and take that as a signal that price is moving up, only to experience the bottom drop out during the last few seconds of the bar formation. You must understand at least two fundamental truths about highs and low's. Highs can't go any lower, and lows can't go any higher; but highs can go higher and lows can go lower. Think about it. Once a new price high has been made, that price high for the bar can't go lower. So if your strategy depends on a higher high being made, then once it's made, it's reliable information. The same with lower lows.

 

Higher lows are important information, but higher lows can not be certain until the open of the next bar. By then you may be to late. Plus you can't tell if that higher low will hold until the second bar. Let's say that this bar looks like it will have a higher low, so you watch it, but low's can go lower, so you don't know until the next bar opens whether it's really a higher low or not. But what do you do in the meantime? And how long do you wait to make a decision?

 

So it's very difficult to time higher low's and lower highs. This illustrates why the open of the next bar is so important, and that there may be a very short window of time when there is any certainty of anything. There are very short windows of certainty followed by longer periods of uncertainty.

 

H/H and L/L are great tools but need to used only when it is time to manage a trade. They have very little to do with the identification of a trade entry. It would be easier and probably more effective to throw a dart at a chart for entry rather than price bars. The best way to identify an entry is by staring at the order flow to gauge what side of the market is going to give and act on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the ultimate questions in trading is:

 

  • Where is the Top? and
  • Where is the bottom?

 

And the answer is, that you can never know for sure. But you can determine how probable it is that a bottom or top will occur under certain circumstances. And that is the best you can do.

 

So even though lows can go lower and highs can go higher, but highs can't go lower and lows can't go higher, you can guess at where the top and the bottom might be.

 

I like oscillating indicators because they will only stay on one side of the zero line for so long. Yes, sometimes they fail to go back over the zero line, but they will also only go in one direction for so long. So even if the oscillator fails to cross over the zero line in the opposite direction, it usually only goes in one direction for so long. So you can guess at where the price is in the wave cycle.

 

When I buy highs and sell lows, the profit report doesn't do very well. Oscillators keep me in sync with the price cycle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lows often run into strength and pop high as highs snap from weakness and go lower. As long as you are in the right part of the cycle!!:)

 

Yes, there are strong highs and weak highs, and strong lows and weak lows. For example, you could get a price move down that is average, but a much greater than average selling volume. In that situation, sometimes price "coasts" lower from all that momentum built up from the selling.

 

How do you personally measure strength or weakness? I measure it mostly with the NYSE $TICK for trading the ES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking at historical price bars and trend lines on a chart tell very little about the real behavior of price. All kinds of things happen intra-bar that are not readily apparent on a static, historical chart. For example, if the price bar had a lower low; did the price bar have a lower low at the open, and then shoot up and close higher? Did the price bar open high and close with a lower low? Did the lower low occur first or last? Was there a lower low with a close down or a close up? The answer to all those questions provide a more complete picture of what the price behavior really is.

 

I know this is slightly off topic, but it a really important point which people need to acknowledge when they are looking to see whether a strategy works or not. That's that looking simply at historical charts to get a feel for whether an idea is good or not can be very misleading. The eye tends to be drawn to where the strategy seems to have worked or at least clearly failed. So many things happen while trading that strategies can easily give signals which just get steam rolled in real time. Many people use backtesting(and forward testing) to really work out whether the strategy might work. I'd trial the strategy simulated to be sure though.

 

I think the strong or weak extremities as you put it, in order flow terms are rejections and tests, or responsive activity and the market drying up. They definitely will create different conditions after they have been put in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.