Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Tape Read (Time & Sales) Strategies

Recommended Posts

I'm hoping that someone like dVL will provide some strategies. All I need is a strategy and then I can go away and program it in Excel.

 

The best strategy is market understanding and the ability to put price in context of the current trading bracket, both long term and short term, along with reading the order flow.

 

The ability to think in probabilities and possible scenarios is something that is completely unnatural - especially for technical people like us. So learning that is a gradual process.

 

I am a discretionary trader first and foremost. But I can't stop myself from creating a mechanical system that builds on my discretionary tools because I am still a programmer at heart. I do have some free stuff for Sierra Chart users that I posted in the SC message board under (Warrior Trader).

 

Regards,

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The best strategy is market understanding and the ability to put price in context of the current trading bracket, both long term and short term, along with reading the order flow.

 

 

dVL

 

I'm working on that mate....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosu, that I would agree is a problem. One way to overcome that problem is write an excel formula to alert me to the frequency of bids/asks. I understand that when large institutions start to accumulate they do so in small lots. So, I will write a program that will watch for that kind of action. Other than that I have don't know how to deal with that issue.

 

I should add if you have any suggestions as to what I should watch out for I would love to hear them. At the moment I'm just studying the Tape with a simple setup. Once I see a pattern I will write a program for it. I'm just looking for patterns right now.

 

I'm hoping that someone like dVL will provide some strategies. All I need is a strategy and then I can go away and program it in Excel.

 

I have no suggestions as to how to overcome the problem of hidden volumes on the bid and ask. GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts. That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.

 

Another thing to consider regarding the usefulness of the bid/ask volume as a trade signal is that at any given time there are potential market orders that can overwhelm the inside market without first being bid or offered. In my view, potential volume from "invisible" market orders far exceeds that of the limit orders visible on the inside market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no suggestions as to how to overcome the problem of hidden volumes on the bid and ask. GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts. That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.

 

I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

Another thing to consider regarding the usefulness of the bid/ask volume as a trade signal is that at any given time there are potential market orders that can overwhelm the inside market without first being bid or offered. In my view, potential volume from "invisible" market orders far exceeds that of the limit orders visible on the inside market.

 

Ditto the above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosu, that I would agree is a problem. One way to overcome that problem is write an excel formula to alert me to the frequency of bids/asks. I understand that when large institutions start to accumulate they do so in small lots. So, I will write a program that will watch for that kind of action. Other than that I have don't know how to deal with that issue.

 

I'm not trying to discourage you, but big institutions hire very smart, highly educated people and pay them well to write complex algorithms that are designed solely for the purpose of hiding their intentions. It's not as simple as "a bunch of 1 lots means someone's buying big." Now, we may see large volume come into the market and base a trade decision on that information--I do this a lot. However, it is pretty safe to say that it's impossible for you to write a program that will discern the intention of a large buyer or seller, whether it be accumulation or whatever you want to call it. Some algos operate on a sub-second time frame; others on a minute, or hourly basis. There are simply too many variables, and the orders far too complex, for you to "figure out" what's going on. And this has nothing to do with reading the tape by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

 

 

Ditto the above.

 

Josh, is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Josh, is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

 

Cheers

 

Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

clts.thumb.PNG.03a33a291d8d09fe0d081324bbbb0679.PNG

tsprops.PNG.5dbbb7ace085d835ce397a993c7936ac.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

 

Thanks Josh,

 

I use Esignals advanced a charting software.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

 

Josh, I think I've been bit of a numpty (British term for what Americans call a Putz).

 

Do you remember when Gosu said 'That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.'

 

What is exactly what I was doing, when it actual fact I thought I was doint what you thought I was doing when you said I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

It's still possible to write a formula for that, just going to require a little more thought....

 

Thanks mate....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I did not watch all of this video, or the subsequent ones, but this explanation on the first part of the video where the software vendor offers "proof" is laughable. Sure, one example where heavy selling leads to price moving down--hardly a proof. If it were this simple, you sell when you see lots of red, and you will always win, right?

 

The quote should be altered to, "volume always leads price, you just don't know which direction price will go." Sure, volume is required to move price. A transaction must occur for the last traded price to update. But it's not that simple. This is basic stuff here, but in the first attached chart you will see first an example of heavy selling (that's the delta on the volume at the bottom) led to an immediate move up, and second where heavy buying led to an immediate move down. In fact, these were great trade opportunities. The other chart shows just one example in many that occur every day where selling is heavier over a period of time (in this case 1 minute), yet price was higher at the end of that period than at the beginning of that period.

 

If someone reading this wants really good and logical volume information, see Wyckoff. He was the man, and still is.

cl1.thumb.PNG.c6914645702b401492ea46c1893a223f.PNG

cl2.PNG.78d71c6b86d1180cc6b2852a2a2cfee9.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

I'm a little late to this thread, but I thought I would chime in. I am pretty much where carltonp is, that I am attempting to use automation to read and act on order flow. I was a professional programmer before becoming a full time trader. I am well aware, as joshdance points out, that I am competing with the smartest and best-financed traders in the world at their game. I also have many years' trading experience.

 

Thanks to gosu for pointing out that "GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts.". I knew that was common in stocks, but I had not heard that about GLOBEX.

 

I have heard that GLOBEX is now aggregating trades. I'm not sure if ECBOT is doing that too, but I would not be surprised if they are or will be soon. The problem is bandwidth and transaction volumes.

 

That's also something I wonder if carltonp is aware of. While IB's data is aggregated, it has less lag, especially during busy times, than more complete data feeds. You can have completeness or you can have timeliness ... take your pick. I use IB's data. There are some things about IB's data that don't seem to be widely known. For example, we can now get live volume together with price in the same update, along with a timestamp. Pair that with DOM, and we have a pretty complete and timely picture of what is happening at a rate of well over 100 updates per second.

 

By way of clarification, we need two things to be able to trade off order flow: the limit order book (which shows bid/ask but not trades) and the tape (which shows trades, not bid/ask). This thread got to be pretty confusing about that.

 

Regarding carltonp's question above, it comes down to identifying whether a trade removed size from the bid or ask. I believe you can guess, and you will be right most of the time. But what I really wonder is: How useful is that information?

 

[rwk]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Josh, I think I've been bit of a numpty (British term for what Americans call a Putz).

 

Do you remember when Gosu said 'That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.'

 

What is exactly what I was doing, when it actual fact I thought I was doint what you thought I was doing when you said I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

It's still possible to write a formula for that, just going to require a little more thought....

 

Thanks mate....

 

It seems to me that you are looking to design some type of a poor man's HFT algorithm to trade a retail account. My experience is that the "micro" level of the market is not the optimum place for a retail trader to operate. There is so much gamesmanship at that level that you really need to secure your bearings as to the right side of the market from less transitory elements and then zoom in when an action is required.

 

Indeed, once you know the right side, you will find that the best action points are fading the "fake outs" on the micro level and not reaching for prices after the move is underway. By "best" action point I mean an entry that can be "washed" easily if the need arises and an exit that extracts the bulk of the move--after the "swoosh," if you will.

 

You will be operating on another level when you no longer wait for "confirmation" but hit the transmit button to fade the micro spike on the stall because you KNOW that is the right side. Capturing the spread is just icing on the cake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The T/S and DOM is a crazy place that is for sure. To be able to see Iceberg and other institutional orders is a big help with any trading method.

 

I have created Software that works with Ninja Trader and plots these orders on a chart in real time. I have been a trader for 11 years and have always looked at the order flow on the DOM and T/S but a lot of orders have become way to fast for the human eye or are hidden in tiny lots. I have examples and screen shots to help explain. This will help anyone that is trying to understand the market by tape reading.

 

My website is Tradewithvolume

 

Have a great day!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

I find this topic quite interesting and I should say I am one of the programmers who use Excel to automate trading decisions.

 

My excel macro simply tries to do things described here, and from this thread I got an idea as to what an always-winning (or mostly-winning) algrorithm should be.

 

Is this thread dead already before sharing my observations and experince with you guys?

 

I also wonder what developments have happended over the past 10 months.

 

I will update my excel function to create a signal after 20 seconds of recording HOD and LOD and crossing any one of them with enough volume increase within the next 10 seconds and will share the results shortly. This is what I come up with after all reading the discussion here.

 

Does it sound a good algorithm for you professional traders?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carltonp,

 

Where are you at the moment, I mean your progress on the matter, that is developing an Excel function using Tape Reading technique?

 

I don't see my posts listed here, but it might be a matter of time...

 

I will be checking for any response...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @MightyMouse,

 

It does not look good for the infamous always-winning strategy then. Does it? Perhaps there is nothing such a thing...

 

What Carltonp has done is exactly what I should do, in fact. At least my mom thinks so. I got stucked with all this algorithm stuff and set apart my social, personal and professional life for over the past 1.5 years. And yet not so much success in stock markets. I feel like I am on the wrong course.

 

In this respect, well done Carltonp!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.