Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Tape Read (Time & Sales) Strategies

Recommended Posts

I'm hoping that someone like dVL will provide some strategies. All I need is a strategy and then I can go away and program it in Excel.

 

The best strategy is market understanding and the ability to put price in context of the current trading bracket, both long term and short term, along with reading the order flow.

 

The ability to think in probabilities and possible scenarios is something that is completely unnatural - especially for technical people like us. So learning that is a gradual process.

 

I am a discretionary trader first and foremost. But I can't stop myself from creating a mechanical system that builds on my discretionary tools because I am still a programmer at heart. I do have some free stuff for Sierra Chart users that I posted in the SC message board under (Warrior Trader).

 

Regards,

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The best strategy is market understanding and the ability to put price in context of the current trading bracket, both long term and short term, along with reading the order flow.

 

 

dVL

 

I'm working on that mate....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosu, that I would agree is a problem. One way to overcome that problem is write an excel formula to alert me to the frequency of bids/asks. I understand that when large institutions start to accumulate they do so in small lots. So, I will write a program that will watch for that kind of action. Other than that I have don't know how to deal with that issue.

 

I should add if you have any suggestions as to what I should watch out for I would love to hear them. At the moment I'm just studying the Tape with a simple setup. Once I see a pattern I will write a program for it. I'm just looking for patterns right now.

 

I'm hoping that someone like dVL will provide some strategies. All I need is a strategy and then I can go away and program it in Excel.

 

I have no suggestions as to how to overcome the problem of hidden volumes on the bid and ask. GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts. That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.

 

Another thing to consider regarding the usefulness of the bid/ask volume as a trade signal is that at any given time there are potential market orders that can overwhelm the inside market without first being bid or offered. In my view, potential volume from "invisible" market orders far exceeds that of the limit orders visible on the inside market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no suggestions as to how to overcome the problem of hidden volumes on the bid and ask. GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts. That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.

 

I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

Another thing to consider regarding the usefulness of the bid/ask volume as a trade signal is that at any given time there are potential market orders that can overwhelm the inside market without first being bid or offered. In my view, potential volume from "invisible" market orders far exceeds that of the limit orders visible on the inside market.

 

Ditto the above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosu, that I would agree is a problem. One way to overcome that problem is write an excel formula to alert me to the frequency of bids/asks. I understand that when large institutions start to accumulate they do so in small lots. So, I will write a program that will watch for that kind of action. Other than that I have don't know how to deal with that issue.

 

I'm not trying to discourage you, but big institutions hire very smart, highly educated people and pay them well to write complex algorithms that are designed solely for the purpose of hiding their intentions. It's not as simple as "a bunch of 1 lots means someone's buying big." Now, we may see large volume come into the market and base a trade decision on that information--I do this a lot. However, it is pretty safe to say that it's impossible for you to write a program that will discern the intention of a large buyer or seller, whether it be accumulation or whatever you want to call it. Some algos operate on a sub-second time frame; others on a minute, or hourly basis. There are simply too many variables, and the orders far too complex, for you to "figure out" what's going on. And this has nothing to do with reading the tape by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

 

 

Ditto the above.

 

Josh, is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Josh, is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

 

Cheers

 

Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

clts.thumb.PNG.03a33a291d8d09fe0d081324bbbb0679.PNG

tsprops.PNG.5dbbb7ace085d835ce397a993c7936ac.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

 

Thanks Josh,

 

I use Esignals advanced a charting software.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

 

Josh, I think I've been bit of a numpty (British term for what Americans call a Putz).

 

Do you remember when Gosu said 'That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.'

 

What is exactly what I was doing, when it actual fact I thought I was doint what you thought I was doing when you said I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

It's still possible to write a formula for that, just going to require a little more thought....

 

Thanks mate....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I did not watch all of this video, or the subsequent ones, but this explanation on the first part of the video where the software vendor offers "proof" is laughable. Sure, one example where heavy selling leads to price moving down--hardly a proof. If it were this simple, you sell when you see lots of red, and you will always win, right?

 

The quote should be altered to, "volume always leads price, you just don't know which direction price will go." Sure, volume is required to move price. A transaction must occur for the last traded price to update. But it's not that simple. This is basic stuff here, but in the first attached chart you will see first an example of heavy selling (that's the delta on the volume at the bottom) led to an immediate move up, and second where heavy buying led to an immediate move down. In fact, these were great trade opportunities. The other chart shows just one example in many that occur every day where selling is heavier over a period of time (in this case 1 minute), yet price was higher at the end of that period than at the beginning of that period.

 

If someone reading this wants really good and logical volume information, see Wyckoff. He was the man, and still is.

cl1.thumb.PNG.c6914645702b401492ea46c1893a223f.PNG

cl2.PNG.78d71c6b86d1180cc6b2852a2a2cfee9.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

I'm a little late to this thread, but I thought I would chime in. I am pretty much where carltonp is, that I am attempting to use automation to read and act on order flow. I was a professional programmer before becoming a full time trader. I am well aware, as joshdance points out, that I am competing with the smartest and best-financed traders in the world at their game. I also have many years' trading experience.

 

Thanks to gosu for pointing out that "GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts.". I knew that was common in stocks, but I had not heard that about GLOBEX.

 

I have heard that GLOBEX is now aggregating trades. I'm not sure if ECBOT is doing that too, but I would not be surprised if they are or will be soon. The problem is bandwidth and transaction volumes.

 

That's also something I wonder if carltonp is aware of. While IB's data is aggregated, it has less lag, especially during busy times, than more complete data feeds. You can have completeness or you can have timeliness ... take your pick. I use IB's data. There are some things about IB's data that don't seem to be widely known. For example, we can now get live volume together with price in the same update, along with a timestamp. Pair that with DOM, and we have a pretty complete and timely picture of what is happening at a rate of well over 100 updates per second.

 

By way of clarification, we need two things to be able to trade off order flow: the limit order book (which shows bid/ask but not trades) and the tape (which shows trades, not bid/ask). This thread got to be pretty confusing about that.

 

Regarding carltonp's question above, it comes down to identifying whether a trade removed size from the bid or ask. I believe you can guess, and you will be right most of the time. But what I really wonder is: How useful is that information?

 

[rwk]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Josh, I think I've been bit of a numpty (British term for what Americans call a Putz).

 

Do you remember when Gosu said 'That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.'

 

What is exactly what I was doing, when it actual fact I thought I was doint what you thought I was doing when you said I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

It's still possible to write a formula for that, just going to require a little more thought....

 

Thanks mate....

 

It seems to me that you are looking to design some type of a poor man's HFT algorithm to trade a retail account. My experience is that the "micro" level of the market is not the optimum place for a retail trader to operate. There is so much gamesmanship at that level that you really need to secure your bearings as to the right side of the market from less transitory elements and then zoom in when an action is required.

 

Indeed, once you know the right side, you will find that the best action points are fading the "fake outs" on the micro level and not reaching for prices after the move is underway. By "best" action point I mean an entry that can be "washed" easily if the need arises and an exit that extracts the bulk of the move--after the "swoosh," if you will.

 

You will be operating on another level when you no longer wait for "confirmation" but hit the transmit button to fade the micro spike on the stall because you KNOW that is the right side. Capturing the spread is just icing on the cake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The T/S and DOM is a crazy place that is for sure. To be able to see Iceberg and other institutional orders is a big help with any trading method.

 

I have created Software that works with Ninja Trader and plots these orders on a chart in real time. I have been a trader for 11 years and have always looked at the order flow on the DOM and T/S but a lot of orders have become way to fast for the human eye or are hidden in tiny lots. I have examples and screen shots to help explain. This will help anyone that is trying to understand the market by tape reading.

 

My website is Tradewithvolume

 

Have a great day!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

I find this topic quite interesting and I should say I am one of the programmers who use Excel to automate trading decisions.

 

My excel macro simply tries to do things described here, and from this thread I got an idea as to what an always-winning (or mostly-winning) algrorithm should be.

 

Is this thread dead already before sharing my observations and experince with you guys?

 

I also wonder what developments have happended over the past 10 months.

 

I will update my excel function to create a signal after 20 seconds of recording HOD and LOD and crossing any one of them with enough volume increase within the next 10 seconds and will share the results shortly. This is what I come up with after all reading the discussion here.

 

Does it sound a good algorithm for you professional traders?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carltonp,

 

Where are you at the moment, I mean your progress on the matter, that is developing an Excel function using Tape Reading technique?

 

I don't see my posts listed here, but it might be a matter of time...

 

I will be checking for any response...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @MightyMouse,

 

It does not look good for the infamous always-winning strategy then. Does it? Perhaps there is nothing such a thing...

 

What Carltonp has done is exactly what I should do, in fact. At least my mom thinks so. I got stucked with all this algorithm stuff and set apart my social, personal and professional life for over the past 1.5 years. And yet not so much success in stock markets. I feel like I am on the wrong course.

 

In this respect, well done Carltonp!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Depressions aren't real either... ??
    • Dear B4 #42, I heard you can't get out of bed and decided you were going celibate and shaved your head and “reconsidered” having children.  If it took Trump getting elected to get you to stop fkn every Dum, Harry, and Dick you meet, we’ll take it.  thx Sincerely just sayin’ zdo PS To all the other girls I loved B4 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVq0ONrSH-Q 😚
    • MDB MongoDB stock watch for a range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MDB
    • Date: 12th November 2024. Market Buzz: Trump Trade Impact! “Trump trade” has boosted the US Dollar and US stocks, but Trump’s policies may have less favorable effects on global assets. Trump’s plan to raise tariffs is expected to negatively impact economies worldwide, especially exporters like China. Asia & European Sessions:   Bitcoin Surge! Bitcoin broke $90K, driven by Trump trade once again. Bitcoin is up roughly 110% in 2024, helped by robust demand for dedicated US ETFs, interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve and Trump’s cryptofriendly agenda. Crypto market capitalization has exceeded its pandemic-era peak, reaching $3.1 trillion. Traders are betting on Bitcoin reaching $100,000 by year-end, according to data from the Deribit exchange. Open interest — or outstanding contracts — for CME Group Inc. futures for Bitcoin and second-ranked Ether (ETHUSD) scaled records on Monday, a sign of growing engagement by US institutional investors. Asian shares dropped, alongside European and US equity futures, as traders evaluated the implications of President-elect Donald Trump’s policy agenda and potential cabinet choices. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell for a third consecutive day, driven by rising Treasury yields amid concerns that Trump’s proposed tax cuts could increase inflation. There are also reports that Trump is considering two individuals for prominent roles in his administration with track records of criticizing China. DAX and FTSE100 are down -1.1% and -0.5% respectively, after a pickup in German HICP inflation and higher than expected UK wage growth dampened easing expectations. Investors await the US CPI report for insights into the Fed’s easing path, as Trump’s inflationary policies may lead to fewer rate cuts. Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex continues to rise and is currently at 105.75. It hit a 1-year high. EURUSD drifts to 1.0620 and GBPUSD is in a sell off, currently at 1.2800. Oil prices fell after their biggest 2-week decline, amid a weak demand outlook from China, a stronger US Dollar, and concerns over a potential oversupply. Crude oil has traded within a narrow range since mid-last month, influenced by Middle East tensions, the US election, and OPEC+ output decisions. Gold remains under pressure and is currently at just $2604.36 per ounce. It hit a one-month low, down 5% since Trump’s election victory, as a strong dollar and US equity rotation pressured the metal. Gold’s decline was also technical, breaking below the 50-day moving average, causing funds to cover long positions. Despite recent drops, gold remains up 25% for the year, supported by central bank purchases and geopolitical risks. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.