Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Price Remains Stagnant for 35 Seconds

Recommended Posts

Hello Traders,

 

Last week, while trading the mini-dow, I noticed there were occassions when the price remained fixed (didn't go up or down) for over 35 seconds. Is this normal behaviour and what can be read from a price that doesn't move for such long time?

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Traders,

 

Last week, while trading the mini-dow, I noticed there were occassions when the price remained fixed (didn't go up or down) for over 35 seconds. Is this normal behaviour and what can be read from a price that doesn't move for such long time?

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

 

what time did this happen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean your DOM was literally not moving? Were the bids/asks on the ladder at least changing? Or was everything static, including all bids/asks?

 

If your DOM was not moving at all - current price and bids/asks, I would check with your broker. Try to record it so you can send them a video of it.

 

If it was just current price not moving, that can happen, esp on the YM where there can be a 1-2 tick spread at times. You'll also see this happen around news announcements. As long as something is moving on the dom - mainly the bids/asks - then you should be connected. Also check if your broker has a way to check your connection, maybe your internet had a hiccup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Friday. 10:27 - 11:13am EST (YM)

 

The market was centering at the beginning of the period in question but I didn't see what you describe. You might want to check your data connection for that period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Browns fan,

 

Thanks for responding.

 

In answer to your question, the bid/ask was moving and it so happens that I did record it.

 

I really dont believe it was my Internet connection.

 

I recorded the trading using Camtasia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have it recorded and was monitoring the YM closely at the time of centering. I don't see what you describe during that time, but I didn't go back through the entire period you questioned. If you want to get more specific in your time period, I can check my recording to confirm. 10:27 to 11:13 is a rather large window of time to review.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Browns fan,

 

Thanks for responding.

 

In answer to your question, the bid/ask was moving and it so happens that I did record it.

 

I really dont believe it was my Internet connection.

 

I recorded the trading using Camtasia

 

If you got it recorded, then get that to your broker's support ASAP to see if there was an issue or just normal DOM activity. If the bid/ask was moving, then I would think everything was fine and you were just watching a time where there was a spread. Does your DOM have a way to show when there is a spread? If so, turn that on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I too have it recorded and was monitoring the YM closely at the time of centering. I don't see what you describe during that time, but I didn't go back through the entire period you questioned. If you want to get more specific in your time period, I can check my recording to confirm. 10:27 to 11:13 is a rather large window of time to review.

 

Gosu thanks for responding I will look again at my recording and if I can somehow figure out how to take a clip from the avi I will post it.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Gosu/Traders,

 

First of all I would like to apologise as I got the times of the stagnant price wrong.

 

Just to give more detail

 

The price of YM remained at 11229 on 09/01/11 from 15:24:29 until 15:25:12.

 

I have attached a snapshot of Interactive Brokers TWS that I was using to trade with.

 

Let me have your thoughts.

 

 

Cheers

Doc1.doc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Gosu/Traders,

 

First of all I would like to apologise as I got the times of the stagnant price wrong.

 

Just to give more detail

 

The price of YM remained at 11229 on 09/01/11 from 15:24:29 until 15:25:12.

 

I have attached a snapshot of Interactive Brokers TWS that I was using to trade with.

 

Let me have your thoughts.

 

 

Cheers

 

 

Would love to see the prints for the period...that would tell if it was a period where no prints were made, unlikely, or prints went through in between the bid and offer, in which case it would be a hold.

 

Cheers,

 

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would love to see the prints for the period...that would tell if it was a period where no prints were made, unlikely, or prints went through in between the bid and offer, in which case it would be a hold.

 

Cheers,

 

 

XS

 

Hi XS, thanks for responding.

 

The main reason for the post was to get opinions on approaches when these situations occur. So putting this trade to one side for a moment, I would like to hear thoughts on what may be occuring when I price holds steady for say 5 seconds? Are the big players buying at that price? Something must be occuring while a price remains stagnant for 3 to 5 seconds. What are traders typically doing during this period of stagnation

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi XS, thanks for responding.

 

The main reason for the post was to get opinions on approaches when these situations occur. So putting this trade to one side for a moment, I would like to hear thoughts on what may be occuring when I price holds steady for say 5 seconds? Are the big players buying at that price? Something must be occuring while a price remains stagnant for 3 to 5 seconds. What are traders typically doing during this period of stagnation

 

Cheers

 

I would think time & sales would help here.

 

1) find price not moving

2) reference your t&s window to see who is buying and selling at that price level

 

The difficult part of this is back testing as you'll need a data stream since charts will be of no help here.

 

You may just find out that there really is no one interested at that price at that moment in time for whatever reason(s). This does not surprise me on the YM at all. Try the same exercise on the ES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Gosu/Traders,

 

First of all I would like to apologise as I got the times of the stagnant price wrong.

 

Just to give more detail

 

The price of YM remained at 11229 on 09/01/11 from 15:24:29 until 15:25:12.

 

I have attached a snapshot of Interactive Brokers TWS that I was using to trade with.

 

Let me have your thoughts.

 

 

Cheers

 

There is nothing unusual about that period. The market was in dry up, pennant. The 29s were printing while the bid/ask were changing. There were 2 periods within that duration of about 15s each where there were no prints. Not unusual at all when you consider it was the tail end of an extended midday period on a Friday before a long weekend.

 

I've attached the YM 2m showing the formation. Notice the PRV < 76 for the bar in question.

5aa710a1c0caf_20110902fYM2m1226bar.png.86758b0dd4dfe597f8f1284bccaaf724.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would love to see the prints for the period...that would tell if it was a period where no prints were made, unlikely, or prints went through in between the bid and offer, in which case it would be a hold.

 

Cheers,

 

 

XS

 

perhaps, the more appropriate title would be....

 

ON MY OWN SCREEN--price remains stagnant for....

 

in addition to what others already mentioned.... numerous other reasons could have caused your screen to freeze or your particular product screen to NOT to move nor show the then current price structure during your cited time and period.

 

especially, your broker ib signal feed (sorry ib) is surely not the best nor the more reliable signal feed company standard to use for trading real money.

 

no, i am not remotely associated with any of the signal feed companies locally nor globally, but have in the past tested many different feeds.

 

it is not a good practice to say in public which three or four are my personal choices, but i would tell you in private which i prefer, k? and ib is far down the list, sorry again ib.

:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would think time & sales would help here.

 

1) find price not moving

2) reference your t&s window to see who is buying and selling at that price level

 

.

 

Would you happen to know of any threads from traders that effectively use T & S as part of their trading?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Traders,

 

Last week, while trading the mini-dow, I noticed there were occassions when the price remained fixed (didn't go up or down) for over 35 seconds. Is this normal behaviour and what can be read from a price that doesn't move for such long time?

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

 

Unfortunately it's too late to get the free data, but at this link:

 

E-mini Dow ($5)

 

You can see all transactions. Reference this next time (day after the trading) to verify the activity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.