Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

OldGrantonian

When is Margin Not Margin?

Recommended Posts

I've been buying Dow stocks for about 2 years now, and doing OK considering the economic climate.

 

With the markets so low, I want to try trading with a margin account, using only Dow stocks for safety (initially).

 

I live in the UK. As preparation, I have set up a separate bank account in the UK to ensure that I can meet margin calls even if the prices of all my stocks drop to $zero.

 

I would be grateful if someone could answer the following question.

 

Scenario 1:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $2,500 cash. I believe that this gives a "margin buying power" of $5,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock.

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) According to all the web articles on margin, I make a profit of 4 times the initial cash outlay. Because I receive $10,000, but I only paid $2,500 in cash.

 

Scenario 2:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $5,000 cash (double the amount of Scenario 1). This now gives a "margin buying power" of $10,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock (as before).

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) As before, I receive $10,000.

 

So, my question is. Do I still make a profit of 4 times? Or is it only a profit of 2 times, because there was enough available cash initially to buy the stock?

 

In other words, does the broker take the entire $5,000 in cash out of my account? Or does he only take $2,500 cash and lends me the other $2,500?

 

I'm sorry if I've used a lot of words to ask one question, but I want to be absolutely sure.

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  OldGrantonian said:

Scenario 1:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $2,500 cash. I believe that this gives a "margin buying power" of $5,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock.

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) According to all the web articles on margin, I make a profit of 4 times the initial cash outlay. Because I receive $10,000, but I only paid $2,500 in cash.

 

Scenario 2:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $5,000 cash (double the amount of Scenario 1). This now gives a "margin buying power" of $10,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock (as before).

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) As before, I receive $10,000.

 

So, my question is. Do I still make a profit of 4 times? Or is it only a profit of 2 times, because there was enough available cash initially to buy the stock?

 

In other words, does the broker take the entire $5,000 in cash out of my account? Or does he only take $2,500 cash and lends me the other $2,500?

 

I'm sorry if I've used a lot of words to ask one question, but I want to be absolutely sure.

.

 

you have switched what you are comparing in the two scenarios.

1....you are using the base of the margin requirement to calculate your PL multiple

2....you are using the amt deposited with the broker to calculate your PL multiple.

 

which leads to your next question.....

the answer here is it depends on the broker, and the type of account.

I would say that generally if you are buying on margin then yes the broker will wish to lend it to you (this maximises their profit in general), whereas with a cash funded account there is no lending.

Think of it this way - you can borrow from the broker, with in the account, OR you can borrow from a third party before depositing with the broker.

 

there are many ways to do this and you need to understand which your broker does as it can greatly affect the costs over the long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  OldGrantonian said:
I've been buying Dow stocks for about 2 years now, and doing OK considering the economic climate.

 

With the markets so low, I want to try trading with a margin account, using only Dow stocks for safety (initially).

 

I live in the UK. As preparation, I have set up a separate bank account in the UK to ensure that I can meet margin calls even if the prices of all my stocks drop to $zero.

 

I would be grateful if someone could answer the following question.

 

Scenario 1:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $2,500 cash. I believe that this gives a "margin buying power" of $5,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock.

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) According to all the web articles on margin, I make a profit of 4 times the initial cash outlay. Because I receive $10,000, but I only paid $2,500 in cash.

 

Scenario 2:

 

1) Assume that I open a margin account with $5,000 cash (double the amount of Scenario 1). This now gives a "margin buying power" of $10,000.

 

2) I then buy $5,000 of stock (as before).

 

3) Assume the stock doubles in value, and I sell all the stock.

 

4) As before, I receive $10,000.

 

So, my question is. Do I still make a profit of 4 times? Or is it only a profit of 2 times, because there was enough available cash initially to buy the stock?

 

In other words, does the broker take the entire $5,000 in cash out of my account? Or does he only take $2,500 cash and lends me the other $2,500?

 

.

if you buy on margin, the broker takes $2,500 from your account and lends you $2,500. The rest of the cash in your account is on standby... for you to purchase MORE stocks, so that the broker can lend you MORE money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to SIUYA and Tams for their helpful responses :)

 

It seems to me that both are saying the same thing.

 

SIUYA says:

 

  SIUYA said:
which leads to your next question.....

the answer here is it depends on the broker, and the type of account.

I would say that generally if you are buying on margin then yes the broker will wish to lend it to you

 

Tams says:

 

  Tams said:
if you buy on margin, the broker takes $2,500 from your account and lends you $2,500.

 

I think both are saying that if I have a MARGIN account with $1,000,000 in cash, then my "margin cash available" is $1,000,000, and my "buying power" is $2,000,000.

 

If I now buy $10 of stock, the broker takes $5 in cash and lends me the other $5. (I'm deliberately using ridiculously high and low values.)

 

This is the way that I would want my MARGIN account to operate. Because I think the market is low, I want to use margin for upside leverage, not because I need to borrow money. (As I said in my original post, I'll make damned sure in advance that I can meet any margin calls right down to zero.)

 

However, I was waiting quite a long time for a reply on this forum, so I made an identical post to:

 

When is margin not margin? - Trade2Win Forums

 

The reply was from John Forman, who wrote "The Essentials of Trading".

 

He says that if there's enough cash to buy the required stock WITHOUT margin, then the broker takes out the cash, and lends you nothing. And that's exactly what I DON'T want.

 

So, with the greatest respect, it seems to me that SIUYA and Tams are agreeing with each other, but disagreeing with John Forman.

 

Maybe I'll experiment by opening a margin account with a tiny amount, say $500, then buy $100 of stock to see what happens. (My broker says I can open a margin account any time.)

 

Thanks for all the help :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as mentioned before - it all depends on the broker and type of account you are dealing with.

If its a swap account (spread bet/margin account), i would bet the broker is generally trying to lend you the money and charge you for it.

If its a cash account with margin - when and if required, then they may only take out margin when you then need it.

The broker should be able to give you worked examples.

....and personally I would always wish to use my own cash first rather than a brokers - they will pay you 3% on your cash balances and lend to you at 5% - so why not maximise your broker balance first before borrowing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.