Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

torero

week 5

Recommended Posts

Hi Torero,

 

Very dull day today, lets see if the US brings us some action.

Cable just pushed through the asian low but this is one of those cases where it is at a key support level on the 240 chart so, as you mentioned, this could be a turning point here, it doesn't look like price is going to follow through at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cable just pushed through the asian low but this is one of those cases where it is at a key support level on the 240 chart

 

More importantly, it's the long range weekly support area too. The 240m chart highlights the 'confluence' area with that 61.8 line from the recent higher low leg up on Cable.

 

A good buy area with corresponding lower frame triggers - if only to check the resolve back to short term (hourly) range resistance!

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=580&stc=1&d=1170084087

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=581&stc=1&d=1170084094

gbp70.gif.52cd7abc747c82bb2057144ead118edc.gif

gbp71.gif.9a0730776fa3af8f11723f02d9e8bac3.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it fails to prop here, there's a bit of Daily support lower down @ c9450 which is the 78.6% zone on that 240m graph + a weekly S1 pivot camp.

 

It's slowly & lazily displaying lower tops on the hourly off last weeks highs, so this weekly support zone is a pretty decent flag for Bull-Bear (near term) strength.

 

Can always flip to a stop & reverse stance if the lower frames signal a stall & shunt to the short side - we'll see huh!

 

ps: Still experiencing hangs & delay's here on posting etc. You guy's finding things a little better of late?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, tex, it's gotten better and faster, but there are days, it'll act up. Soul harasses programmers constantly to get the site to hum like a ferrari, but once in a while it hums like a FIAT LOL!

 

I see the major resistance here, but it's trying to finish off the rest of the bull stops before going higher?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm peeking at the hourly for the near term resistance stalls torero.

 

As a coincidence? Buk has todays Pivot lines marrying up with a couple of the markers I'm spying. The 9688 zone is also the main Weekly Pivot area, so alongside the natural s&r lines, we have some likely upper side turbulance to navigate should price manage a push North.

 

The demand area below at that Weekly support + last weeks lows was sufficient (in my book) to trigger a long, & the lower graph with the 15m bars displayed a probable lower risk upside trigger.

 

Like I said, the follow thru needs to kick it up with supporting deals, otherwise it's suspect to weakness & the $ Bulls will merely soak up the activity & drive it back thru the confluence supports back towards the lower Daily lines.

 

I sure won't hesistate to book some profits up here if it begins to stall & blow out.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=582&stc=1&d=1170088064

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=583&stc=1&d=1170088071

gbp72.gif.7aeca62386dd60e4c70efac7e0acae93.gif

gbp73.gif.b07291c24aba272af174da3a0ea70aa4.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course, if hokshila's done his math this morning ;) he'll no doubt have calc'd the S1/S2 % supports (based on the 9591 NY close of Friday) @ c9557-9543.

 

A good enough secondary reason to fade it back into the range, even for a lazy intraday strike!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Decided to take a chance after seeing a higher low and on the first small breakout action. Let's see if it can take it higher, I'm giving this baby a bit of room to maneuver so placing my stop below a major support area. See how it goes.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=584&stc=1&d=1170090408

FOREXPLANE-GBPUSD-15MIN-HIGHER-HIGH-AT-MAJOR-SUPPORT.gif.26866d0b80e435d1d3cbe05b1dada382.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tex, math? what math? Don't know what you're talking about...;)

 

I love those babies. Work like a charm.

 

I've been most of the day out of my office, but I saw a couple of spots good for

scalps. However, I'm trying to follow your advice and go just for A Grade

trades.

 

Basically I'm watching the same levels as you. I corrected my fibs to match

yours and watching the action around PW low level.

 

I'll patiently wait and see what tomorrow brings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If i got my workings right on your calcs Anna, price rebounded right off R1 this morning during the asian session at 9641?

Now waiting for a continuation signal to see if this move back up will continue. I am currently waiting to see if we get some support down at the 9600 level and will look for a signal there. We may find some support off yesterdays high now acting as support and also this 9615 area is a fib confluence zone as well.

Anna, i know you mentioned that in times of medium term trends you will take on setups before the London open, but this is not one of those times. In instances lke this morning, if you got a good signal would you take it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re-thinking that one, i suppose as your trades are momentum based off major s+r areas, i am thinking that you would probably wait for the london open, when there would be plenty of players around and the necessary momentum to see price move?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

 

Yeah, I prefer to have some company on board if I'm looking to execute an intraday position away from a perceived busy level.

 

Trouble with executing during the ghost shift (between NY & London), is the liquidity. Prices have a tendancy to fade off if a mini trend is absent.

 

You can get a move which occurs as Tokyo opens & it can be good for maybe 30-40 pips, then a sharp pullback or fade into the London Open?

 

They're ok to transact as a quick play on the Tokyo price activity, but you need to be mindful that it's only a range play.

 

If I leg in during London or NY (as was the case y'day), I'll maybe book a little profit if the level suggests so, then keep stops tucked away at the relevant technical zone.

 

That way I can allow Tokyo to take up the slack & assess the picture as London comes to the table.

 

This morning prices have nudged back slightly off my R1/2 % zone (9656-9642) & the R1 pivot zone @ 9632. It's not threatening the Round Number @ 1.96 as yet & looks to be attracting some support for a pop thru one of my resistance markers from y'day - so, all's well at the mo.

 

Until a swing or trend becomes established then every trade execution is merely a short end momentum (or range) position. As with the vast majority of our entries, they'll be subject to a partial pare out & trail. No-one knows where or when they'll fully break out into a potential 100+ pip move. But we want to be positioned (with trailers) wherever possible should the occasion unfold.

 

If prices merely bounce off a resistance zone up here around 9650 & shoot back, we'll be able to scale out a little more profit & our remaining stakes will get snatched for a b/e. If not, we'll trail up & look to compound back.

 

Either way, we got our value entry back down below at the prev weeks low/confluence zone & are sitting on a dime a dollar trade!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Re-thinking that one, i suppose as your trades are momentum based off major s+r areas, i am thinking that you would probably wait for the london open, when there would be plenty of players around and the necessary momentum to see price move?

 

Good question Steve, I was about to ask the same, because price is sitting above the 50% fib level too, however, if I'm correct, it would be wise to wait and see how price reacts around the 30&50% R levels after London opens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a 'test the waters' technique, and that was a nice entry yesterday Anna.

Did you pare out some last night after the inverted hammer spike on the 15, off 9610, or did you manage to hang on to the full position? Just curious, how much would you be looking at paring off in that situation? 50% and then move the stop to break even or the remaining 50%?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started doing that last Friday and it was great because I was paring out,

let's say 80% of my position, letting the rest flow and was ready to increase it

in case some sort of trend developed.

 

And I have to say that it was great. Much better than selling all my positions

at one price and waiting to enter again fully loaded at some other level.

 

So, that's something I forgot to mention, that it's having a great impact on my

performance, specially on the psychological side. Things tend not to be so black

and white then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hokshila,

 

Yes, you could describe it as such.

 

Thing is, I play these positions primarily with the assumption that price is going to attack an upside resistance zone & make it's decision. It's gonna do 1 of 2 things:

 

1) Attract sufficient support to bust the level & continue to next stage s&r.

 

2) Hit supply at the upper resistance zone & get batted back to lower demand level where it will look to garner support from the prev buyers for a further punt to the upside.

 

So, essentially we're seeking intent? Who has the field. Who controls the near term strength?

 

London is the majority volume player, therefore nothing will be determined until they hit their buttons. In the interim, price will bob around & look to fake or fade the key levels.

 

It can be a dangerous time slot to engage. The flows are thin & suspect to false pops.

 

One major advantage to this current long off y'days lower confluence zone, is the fact I have the option to short prices back to my entry if the smaller frames begin to display exhaustion or meet decent supply up here at current levels?

 

The (1.96) Round Number will be the key to that particular play however. At the moment I need do nothing. Simply wait until London decides to kick it up or bat it back.

 

30min & hourly bars are looking ok thus far, so a case of waiting to spot any fall-out on the sub 30min bars to decide what stance to take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, that's something I forgot to mention, that it's having a great impact on my performance, specially on the psychological side. Things tend not to be so black and white then.

 

Cool. If you can work a playable strategy around that kind of execution & it fits your profile then great!

 

Sure, you'll get stopped on a fair % of trailers as price chops around inside a range zone, but then as long as you pare off & book a little profit along the way, you're constantly seeking to allow price to tell you what it's intent is?

 

None of us really know when the big moves are about to break out, yeah?

 

As long as we plan for that probable eventuality & can cobble together a safe, positive risk option to take advantage of these occurances, then we're doing all we can to cover the bases.

 

That particular method of execution won't suit all tastes, but as long as you can make it work & everything is in line with your equity/management/risk & psychology then for you, it works!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's purely dependant on the level & the current area of price Steve.

 

Usually within a defined range zone it equates to a 70/30 split. 70% booked at 1st level & 30% trailed.

 

At potential key levels, such as y'days weekly support or a typical level which we consider merits a decent kick back towards the dominant larger trend direction, we'll book sufficient profits to allow price to prove us wrong. Therefore the scale out will be reduced: ie, 20-30% booked, remainder trailed.

 

It affords us a b/e trade at worst scenario, with the option to chase it back if it dies quickly.

 

It really has to be adjudged on it's merits. You can't stick to a regimented percentage, otherwise you reduce & dilute potential profits when price breaks out or reverses back into the dominant direction?

 

This is where each trader needs to define their primary objective? Are you essentially an intraday player, seeking only to take advantage of the pops between your designated levels - or are you looking to trade the larger swings, where your intent is to capture a decent % of the potential move?

 

Only you can determine that stance. Which is why it's crucial to adapt any ancilliary advice or someone else's take on the technical map to fit your comfort zones?

 

It's fine to add a little of this & a bit of that to your own strategy etc, but the hard work then commences by seeing if the different ingredients blend with your template.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the positives about Forums such as this is the fact different views, information & perspectives can be shared & exhanged between traders & players. If something catches the eye or sparks an interest, then it can sometimes improve or enhance your already competant outlook?

 

It can also have a negative impact. Too much time & effort can be wasted trying to integrate someone else's views on particular scenario's?

 

You then get distracted & lose control/focus.

 

I guess the compromize is to explore something which rouses interest & test it seperately on a sim or demo to check it validates your own personal comfort zone & can actually fit your style.

 

Anything from the way you look at basic technical positioning/entries/profit targets to trade management/size & risk matrix etc require very careful & precise consideration. If you're applying a method which currently suits your outlook & it's returning sufficient profits & bottom line positives, then I'd be very cautious about integrating something which you haven't thoroughly tested & explored first.

 

It's great to share individual perspectives etc, but you need to remember that what suits one, won't necessarily suit another - no matter how good the reasonings or application appears!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with you Anna-Maria.

 

I only pay attention/try to fit stuff that feels natural to my trading

personality.

 

Many traders jump from one strategy to another before knowing themselves as

traders (or, for the case, not even their own personality core). In my opinion,

a failing approach right from the start.

 

I read this in a trading article somewhere:

 

"Trading is the most deceptive profession in the world. A person cannot walk

into an airport, jump into a 747, and take off down the runway without any prior

training. Yet people routinely will open an account and start trading without

any guidance whatsoever."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chipping out a bit more on the low of this neutral bar just underneath the R3 pivot zone. It's also the 38.2% level of the earlier larger Fib calc chart. 5min chart also showing exhaustive behaviour up here, see how it reacts to Asian/post London levels.

 

We have Consumer Confidence numbers printing at 10.00am EST ahead of a tranche of important data this week. Traders will be jostling for position ahead of the more 'observed data', which could cause jittery balances around these lower hourly range s&r levels.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=596&stc=1&d=1170147442

gbp74.gif.39a07b4e6c71334d6bc61431054e65cf.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.