Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

Data Visualization

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Technical Analysis can help only if you can identify patterns which are non-random. So the important part is identifying profitable patterns- either through graphs or through machine learning. Lets talk about discovering patterns through data visualization (using graphs).

 

To clarify: I'm using the word 'pattern' in a broad sense and not just the classic chart patterns. Trend itself is a pattern- the way you define a trend should suggest that prices has a high probability to continue in the direction of the trend; if they don't then trend does not exists. Similarly how a trend first starts, establishes and gets exhausted is all about patterns in price behavior.

 

So let's revise pros and cons of some available charts. Please help building a proper list by mentioning why you use a particular plot style. I will mention some not-so-popular plot styles tomorrow.

 

Line Chart

Pros: Filters out daily/minute ranges by plotting only close value. Some people find this helpful.

Cons: People who seek more details would go for O/H/L/C charts

Bar Chart

Pros: Plots the O/H/L/C values for each day, as well as the price ranges over a quarter or year depending on the number of bars you plot.

Cons: Single color; color are more catchy to eyes than just data points

Candle Stick Chart

Pros: The most popular- plots daily ranges in a way that it is easy to identify each bar pattern, also uses different colors for easier visualization

Cons: None really, depends on how comfortable a trader is with this plot style

 

Range Bar Chart

Pros: Plots each bar according to a preset range and hence filters out time details

Cons: Absence of relevant information- internals retracements within the bar range are chalked out.

Rules for plotting:

  1. Each bar is the same height because the range is constant.
  2. The close of a bar is always at the high or low of the bar.
  3. The open of a bar is always one tick below or above the close of the preceding bar.
  4. The time period covered by each bar varies.
  5. All gaps are filled with inserted 'phantom' bars.

 

Equivolume Bar Chart

Pros: Plots the bar size in proportion to volumes- hence more information in the same plot

Cons: None really, depends on how comfortable a trader is with this plot style

Heikin-Ashi Chart

These are not really price charts but may come under the category of price derived indicator. Each bar is calculated with formula (below) to emphasize existence of trends

  • Open = (open of previous bar+close of previous bar)/2
  • Close = (open+high+low+close)/4
  • High = maximum of high, open, or close (whichever is highest)
  • Low = minimum of low, open, or close (whichever is lowest)

 

Renko Charts

These have predetermined range bars (bricks) similar to range bar charts.

Pros: does not have intra-bar hi/lo like range bar charts

Cons: internals retracements within the brick range are chalked out.

 

Kagi Charts

These are another form of time-independent charts. The thickness of the Kagi line changes depending on price action. The Kagi line is plotted up (or down) until prices reverse by a specified amount. These are not just price plots- can be categorized under derivatives.

Point and Figure Charts

Another price derived chart which follows the following rules:

  • Use the high when another X can be drawn and then ignore the low.
  • Use the low when another X cannot be drawn and the low triggers a 3-box reversal.
  • Ignore both when the high does not warrant another X and the low does not trigger a 3-box reversal.
  • Use the low when another O can be drawn and then ignore the high.
  • Use the high when another O cannot be drawn and the high triggers a 3-box reversal.
  • Ignore both when the low does not warrant another O and the high does not trigger a 3-box reversal.

Edited by Do Or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technical Analysis can help only if you can identify patterns which are non-random.

 

Yes, this is the ultimate goal. Starting out, I focused on price patterns only. I now compare the price pattern to other non-price indicators. I think it's important to compare price to some other non-price pattern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please give your reasons why you prefer certain type of graphs.

 

Market Profile Charts:

These supposedly give better visuals for PV analysis by plotting volume along with price levels.

 

Each of attached charts are different, click to enlarge.

5aa7109eb08c0_1vp.thumb.jpg.77720f5bddf612f24ec02cebb34c312f.jpg

5aa7109eb863f_2vp.gif.70ce429eab137131617446e8da5db7cb.gif

5aa7109ebee26_3vp.jpg.921f1ca36c5054a5d59a3887520b3468.jpg

5aa7109ec79ef_4vp.thumb.jpg.5d0384292583ac71213f486c189d7418.jpg

5aa7109ecc439_5vp.gif.0ddf445c7dfa73fcf595b53b0d376b34.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Market Overview Charts:

 

These can be very helpful for stock traders.

 

Heatmaps are the simplest and can be drawn easily in Excel 2007.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25952&stc=1&d=1314719695

Treemaps are a improved version of heatmaps where components are weighted as per their importance.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25954&stc=1&d=1314719695

Relative Performance charts are my favorite.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25953&stc=1&d=1314719695

Even more customization can be used for technical information.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25955&stc=1&d=1314719695

attachment.php?attachmentid=25956&stc=1&d=1314719877

5aa7109ee4099_1hm.png.d5bfa5a041bfae74b735f3bfec2ce5b5.png

5aa7109eea871_1rs.png.21752df82b774ef94bf8a014696fdcf0.png

1.png.7099361ecdf2ea024a199593ed7f7430.png

sauplo3_11.thumb.png.56c6a9ac8721a2cd4cf1ce9672c0dd39.png

12.png.3116423b610653a336fb41fe988bba57.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Similar to time independent charts like Range Bars, Kagi, Renko and PnF charts; Wilder (the author of RSI indicator) developed Accumulation Swing Index (ASI). People may find it a slight improvement over line charts. The methodology for ASI:

 

SI(i) = 50*(CLOSE(i-1) - CLOSE(i) + 0.5*(CLOSE(i-1) - OPEN(i-1)) + 0.25*(CLOSE(i) - OPEN(i)) / R)*(K / T)

 

ASI(i) = SI(i-1) + SI(i)

 

Where:

SI (i) — current value of Swing Index technical indicator;

SI (i - 1) — stands for the value of Swing Index on the previous bar;

CLOSE (i) — current close price;

CLOSE (i - 1) — previous close price;

OPEN (i) — current open price;

OPEN (i - 1) — previous open price;

R — the parameter we get from a complicated formula based on the ratio between current close price and previous maximum and minimum;

K — the greatest of two values: (HIGH (i - 1) - CLOSE (i)) and (LOW (i - 1) - CLOSE (i));

T — the maximum price changing during trade session;

ASI (i) — the current value of Accumulation Swing Index.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=26017&stc=1&d=1315143227

ASI.thumb.png.f9f339ad390914ce6adb4d24ba5d90b7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.