Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Xiao si

The First Day of My New Trading Business

Recommended Posts

A brief update on my progress:

 

We have focused on systematic trading, suits my personality better and i enjoy the creative side to it.

 

We now have one system we are testing on AUTO in the RT prices but still on the simulator.

 

I have leased two systems to provide some income to cover expenses during the time my systems are in development.

 

Using Apadtrade's Builder, i have several systems that i am testing on historical data.

 

Still focusing on two markets for my systems, we should have another two systems ready for Live testing by Monday.

 

Hopefully if they test well over the coming months we should be able to go live on a real account in September.

 

I have a long list of lesson's learned that i will present once i deem myself successful, in hopes that other new traders won't make the same mistakes.

 

Cheers,

 

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, the other thread about 'see my beautiful new trading system' or whatever, got me thinking...and after the last 6- 8 months or whatever its been now, i know why so many 'traders' sell their systems....because its way easier to sell or lease systems, courses, trade rooms etc., than it is to make money on the markets consistently. Its EASY money because there are fools like me who want that holy grail and thought that it was possible.

 

Even with systems that you can test on OOS data and deem trade-able your self, you still need to stick with them through draw-downs. Can you do that? I bet many people that lease systems eventually stop leasing once the draw-downs kick in and reach their pain threshold. I would imagine the vendors count on this, and i would love to see the stats on how many customers stay for the long haul.

 

I could register a domain name,spend 5-10 grand on an eCommerce website and do the same thing quite easily. Maybe someday i will. To do that before i become a successful trader would only be kidding myself. It would be an admission that i wasn't good enough to make my money out of the market and i had to make it on the fringe, from 'wanna be's' just like me. Nope...Not yet...

 

Back to work...perseverance, determination, good research and a little luck...you never know maybe i will be trading one of my system's live on a real account and making money from it one day.

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have developed a profitable system,

would you sell it?

would you lease it?

 

why would you?

why would you not?

 

 

if your system is profitable,

with the high leverage of futures,

you can make money yourself.

Why go through all the trouble of marketing, customer service, support, etc.?

 

even if your system can only make US$100 per day,

if the draw down is manageable,

if the profit is consistent,

you can easily scale it up and make more money.

 

If your system cannot make consistent US$100 per day,

there is no point in continuing.

so people put the system up for lease. ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you have developed a profitable system,

would you sell it?

would you lease it?

 

why would you?

why would you not?

 

 

if your system is profitable,

with the high leverage of futures,

you can make money yourself.

Why go through all the trouble of marketing, customer service, support, etc.?

 

even if your system can only make US$100 per day,

if the draw down is manageable,

if the profit is consistent,

you can easily scale it up and make more money.

 

If your system cannot make consistent US$100 per day,

there is no point in continuing.

so people put the system up for lease. ;-)

 

If my system makes what the tests say it should, and it trades as it tests and i trade the max contracts that i am comfortable with, why would i lease it for 50 bucks month? Even if i limited the leases to say...20. That's another 1000 bucks a month, hardly worth the hassles of dealing with customers in pain, so yeah i agree.

 

The other thing that strikes me when browsing systems for sale or lease is the lack of commissions and slippage on the BT reports...why would you exclude this when you wouldn't do it yourself...there can be only one reason...to make the results look better than they actually are.

 

Its a mean old world out there!

 

XS

 

Some 'free' code for the SPI....use on a SPI 15 min chart. Enjoy!

 

{Easy Language__

 

Max bars back: 97

 

Created by: Xiao Si

Created: March/2012

 

Compatible with TradeStation 6 or newer

 

Data File: F:\Data - Historical ASCII\SPI\SPI 15 min.txt

Build Dates: 1/07/2010 to 18/04/2011

 

Project File: SPI001_15 min

}

 

{ Strategy inputs }

Inputs: NL1 (53),

NL2 (35),

NL3 (3),

NL4 (46),

NL5 (15),

NL6 (42),

NS1 (22),

NS2 (82),

NS3 (3),

NATREnL (33),

EntFrL (2.2916),

MMStopSz (450.00),

NBarExL (55),

NATREnS (57),

EntFrS (0.6837),

TimeExS (1405),

NTargS1 (3),

NTargS2 (98),

TargFrS (1.2183),

NBarExS (12);

 

{ Variables for average true range for entry and exit orders }

Var: ATREnL (0),

ATREnS (0);

 

{ Variables for entry and exit prices }

Var: EntPrL (0),

EntPrS (0),

TargPrS (0);

 

{ Variables for entry and exit conditions }

Var: EntCondL (false),

EntCondS (false),

EndofSess (false);

 

{ Average true range }

ATREnL = AvgTrueRange(NATREnL);

ATREnS = AvgTrueRange(NATREnS);

 

{ Entry prices }

EntPrL = CloseD(1) - EntFrL * ATREnL;

EntPrS = C + EntFrS * ATREnS;

 

{ Entry and exit conditions }

EntCondL = TriAverage(StandardDev(C, NL1, 1), NL2) >= XAverage(WAverage(Highest(Momentum(H, NL3), NL4), NL5), NL6);

EntCondS = L[NS1] >= WAverage(Average(L, NS2), NS3);

EndofSess = false;

If DataCompression >= 1 and DataCompression <= 4 then

EndofSess = time = SessionEndTime(0, 1);

 

{ Entry orders }

If (MarketPosition = 0 or EndofSess) and (EntriesToday(Date) < 4 or EndofSess) and EntCondL then begin

Buy next bar at EntPrL limit;

end;

 

If (MarketPosition = 0 or EndofSess) and (EntriesToday(Date) < 4 or EndofSess) and EntCondS then begin

Sell short next bar at EntPrS limit;

end;

 

{ Exit orders, long trades }

If MarketPosition > 0 and EndofSess = false then begin

 

If BarsSinceEntry >= NBarExL then

Sell next bar at market;

end;

 

{ Exit orders, short trades }

If MarketPosition < 0 and EndofSess = false then begin

 

If time >= TimeExS then

Buy to cover next bar at market;

 

If BarsSinceEntry >= NBarExS then

Buy to cover next bar at market;

 

TargPrS = EntryPrice - TargFrS * AbsValue(XAverage(O, NTargS1) - Highest(L, NTargS2));

Buy to cover next bar at TargPrS limit;

end;

 

SetStopLoss(MMStopSz);

 

SetExitOnClose;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If my system makes what the tests say it should, and it trades as it tests and i trade the max contracts that i am comfortable with, why would i lease it for 50 bucks month? Even if i limited the leases to say...20. That's another 1000 bucks a month, hardly worth the hassles of dealing with customers in pain, so yeah i agree.

 

The other thing that strikes me when browsing systems for sale or lease is the lack of commissions and slippage on the BT reports...why would you exclude this when you wouldn't do it yourself...there can be only one reason...to make the results look better than they actually are.

 

Its a mean old world out there!

 

XS

 

Some 'free' code for the SPI....use on a SPI 15 min chart. Enjoy!

...

 

 

 

 

It is a naive world out there

 

 

 

 

 

 

ps. please use code tag when posting codes. That's the code.gif icon at the top of the message window frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is a naive world out there

 

 

 

 

 

 

ps. please use code tag when posting codes. That's the code.gif icon at the top of the message window frame.

 

ok cool

 

{ Strategy inputs }
Inputs: NL1 (2),
       NS1 (1110),
       FirstTradeTm (950),
       LastTradeTm (1528),
       NBarExL (62),
       MMStopSzL (675.00),
       MMStopSzS (350.00),
       NBarExS (41);

{ Variables for entry and exit prices }
Var:    EntPrL   (0),
       LStop    (0),
       SStop    (0);

{ Variables for entry and exit conditions }
Var:    EntCondL  (false),
       EntCondS  (false),
       EndofSess (false),
       TimeOK    (false);

{ Entry prices }
EntPrL = HighD(0);

{ Entry and exit conditions }
EntCondL = XAverage(O, NL1) > LowD(0);
EntCondS = Time < NS1;
TimeOK = time >= FirstTradeTm and time < LastTradeTm;
EndofSess = false;
If DataCompression >= 1 and DataCompression <= 4 then
  EndofSess = time = SessionEndTime(0, 1);

{ Entry orders }
If (MarketPosition = 0 or EndofSess) and (EntriesToday(Date) < 3 or EndofSess) and EntCondL and TimeOK then begin
  Buy next bar at EntPrL stop;
end;

If (MarketPosition = 0 or EndofSess) and (EntriesToday(Date) < 3 or EndofSess) and EntCondS and TimeOK then begin
  Sell short next bar at market;
end;

{ Exit orders, long trades }
If MarketPosition > 0 and EndofSess = false then begin

  If BarsSinceEntry = 0 then begin
     LStop = EntryPrice - MMStopSzL/(BigPointValue * CurrentShares);
  end;

  If BarsSinceEntry >= NBarExL then
     Sell next bar at market;

  Sell next bar at LStop stop;

  If TimeOK = false then
     Sell next bar at market;
end;

{ Exit orders, short trades }
If MarketPosition < 0 and EndofSess = false then begin

  If BarsSinceEntry = 0 then begin
     SStop = EntryPrice + MMStopSzS/(BigPointValue * CurrentShares);
  end;

  If BarsSinceEntry >= NBarExS then
     Buy to cover next bar at market;

  Buy to cover next bar at SStop stop;

  If TimeOK = false then
     Buy to cover next bar at market;
end;

SetExitOnClose;

Try this one...

Forgot commissions and slippage...hehe:roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xiao Si, would you call trying to buy other people's trading systems running a trading business?

 

 

Well its not my perfect idea of a trading business, but it wouldn't be much different than using your own systems in the tax mans view IMO. I am leasing two algo's now to try and earn some extra income and gain some experience while i develop my own, so they're part of my business now, yeah.

 

Ideally i would develop my own strats and only use them myself.

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well holy cow, check out my system! No, its not for SALE!

 

This is what hard work, perseverance, and determination can yield!

 

XS

 

 

 

I guess with those kinds of returns you should be able to lease a bloomberg terminal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The scatter graph shows a 1k stop loss. I am not aware of the precise details of the problems with the built-in stop loss and target keywords because I stopped using them when I found out they had problems. There are people using those things correctly, but the risk of error is not worth the time saved verses the time it takes to write something specific that implements their logic without their inherent defects.

 

Examining these stats further ... shows you've optimized the stop loss separately for longs at 980 and 755 for shorts. If you're doing this using the built-in keywords .. good luck transfering their logic into real life trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The scatter graph shows a 1k stop loss. I am not aware of the precise details of the problems with the built-in stop loss and target keywords because I stopped using them when I found out they had problems. There are people using those things correctly, but the risk of error is not worth the time saved verses the time it takes to write something specific that implements their logic without their inherent defects.

 

Examining these stats further ... shows you've optimized the stop loss separately for longs at 980 and 755 for shorts. If you're doing this using the built-in keywords .. good luck transfering their logic into real life trading.

 

there is no problem with the built-in stop loss and target keywords,

most people make the mistake of putting them inside conditional loops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most people are not aware of the need to enable look inside bar backtesting. That reduces but does not eliminate the problems. It is still possible to write strategies that take advantage of the defects inherent within the stop and target logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most people are not aware of the need to enable look inside bar backtesting. That reduces but does not eliminate the problems. It is still possible to write strategies that take advantage of the defects inherent within the stop and target logic.

 

I do understand this...but I've not yet backtested any strategy using look inside bar.

 

Should i do this? How critical is this on lower timeframes?

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do understand this...but I've not yet backtested any strategy using look inside bar.

 

Should i do this? How critical is this on lower timeframes?

 

XS

 

if he takes the trouble to bring it to your attention,

do you think it can be important?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if he takes the trouble to bring it to your attention,

do you think it can be important?

 

Of course it must be important Tams:roll eyes:, but in reference to the lower time frames how important is it? It seems to me that the higher the time frame the more important it would be, but if you are trading 1 minute bars then maybe not as much of an issue, depending on volitility etc...

 

XS

 

Using the bar magnifier settings, set to 1 minute, there is no difference in the test results....have i missed something?

 

XS

Edited by Xiao si

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my latest problem....my system places an order but doesnt get a fill on the IB sim.....:angry:

 

Err, sorry..creates an order but does not send it to the sim.

5aa710e74fe93_DAX15minsystem-nofilltoIB.thumb.GIF.d8b65dbd0d9eac332bcee0b94bc7fa06.GIF

Edited by Xiao si

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in reference to the lower time frames how important is it? It seems to me that the higher the time frame the more important it would be, but if you are trading 1 minute bars then maybe not as much of an issue, depending on volitility etc...

 

It's probably more important in lower timeframes. Say that your strategy has a profit of factor of 1.8 in both daily and 1 minute timeframes. What does that mean in real dollar terms? In the daily timeframe it means that you can afford a point or two (or a few dollars) of error in your calculations (although I would still recommend that you try and avoid this). In the 1 minute timeframe the profit factor of 1.8 might translate to an average trade profit of just a few dollars - if you have miscalculated in this scenario by not using look-inside-bar resolutions (or any of a host of other potential pitfalls) then that few dollars lost will equal your entire profit margin and then some.

 

If you're unclear on what I mean by this then let me know and I will provide code for an EL strategy that works great without look-inside-bar . . . And then falls apart as soon as you test at a higher resolution.

 

Finally, if you are looking at one minute bars then your resolution definitely needs to be single-tick, and you'd better make damned sure that there are no bad ticks in that data - a fund trading intraday will employ staff whose sole responsibility is the development and implementation of algorithms to control the quality of the tick data that their systems are exposed to.

 

Hope that helps

 

Bluehorseshoe

Edited by BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's probably more important in lower timeframes. Say that your strategy has a profit of factor of 1.8 in both daily and 1 minute timeframes. What does that mean in real dollar terms? In the daily timeframe it means that you can afford a point or two (or a few dollars) of error in your calculations (although I would still recommend that you try and avoid this). In the 1 minute timeframe the profit factor of 1.8 might translate to an average trade profit of just a few dollars - if you have miscalculated in this scenario by not using look-inside-bar resolutions (or any of a host of other potential pitfalls) then that few dollars lost will equal your entire profit margin and then some.

 

If you're unclear on what I mean by this then let me know and I will provide code for an EL strategy that works great without look-inside-bar . . . And then falls apart as soon as you test at a higher resolution.

 

Finally, if you are looking at one minute bars then your resolution definitely needs to be single-tick, and you'd better make damned sure that there are no bad ticks in that data - a fund trading intraday will employ staff whose sole responsibility is the development and implementation of algorithms to control the quality of the tick data that their systems are exposed to.

 

Hope that helps

 

Bluehorseshoe

 

 

Thanks for that BH, very insightful.

 

So far my testing and development has shown me that system develop on anything lessthan 15 minute are less robust and hold up poorly over more oos testing and less so in WF.

 

When i have started looking inside bar from 15 minutes i have no difference at all in results...???

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is my latest problem....my system places an order but doesnt get a fill on the IB sim.....:angry:

 

Err, sorry..creates an order but does not send it to the sim.

 

I haven't tested yet because even the Hang Seng is closed for Easter, i think it was my mistake...i simply didn't have the IB chart loaded, only eSignal....I'm still thinking in NT (which i use as well) where you have the primary data source then the broker for orders...

 

Pretty sure this will be the issue.

 

Doh!

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • HLF Herbalife stock, watch for a bull flag breakout above 9.02 at https://stockconsultant.com/?HLF
    • Date: 1st April 2025.   Will Gold’s Rally Hold Strong as New Trade Tariffs Take Effect Tomorrow?   Gold continues to increase in value for a sixth consecutive day and is trading more than 17% higher in 2025. Amid fear of higher inflation, a recession and the tariffs war escalating investors continue to invest into Gold pushing demand higher. The trade policy from April 2nd onwards continues to be a key factor for the whole market. Can Gold maintain its upward trend? Trade Policy From Tomorrow Onwards Starting as soon as tomorrow, a 25% tariff will be imposed on all passenger cars imported into the United States. While this White House policy is anticipated to negatively affect European industrial performance, it will also lead to higher transportation and maintenance costs for everyday American taxpayers. The negative impact expected on both the EU and US is one of the reasons investors continue to buy Gold. Additionally, last month, President Donald Trump announced reciprocal sanctions against any trade partners that impose import restrictions on US goods. Furthermore, tariffs on products from Canada and the EU could increase even more if they attempt to coordinate a response. Overall, investors continue to worry that new trade barriers will prompt retaliatory measures, particularly from China, the Eurozone, and Japan. Any retaliation is likely to escalate the trade conflict and prompt another reaction from the US. Experts at Goldman Sachs and other investment banks warn that this will lead to rising inflation and unemployment. They also caution that it could effectively halt economic growth in the US.   XAUUSD 1-Hour Chart   The Weakness In The US Dollar Another factor which is allowing the price of XAUUSD to increase in value is the US Dollar which has been unable to maintain any bullish momentum. Despite last week’s Core PCE Price Index rising to its highest level since February 2024, the US Dollar has been unable to see any significant rise in value. Due to the US Dollar and Gold's inverse correlation, the price of Gold is benefiting from the Dollar weakness. Investors worry that new trade barriers will prompt retaliatory measures from China, the Eurozone, and Japan, potentially escalating the conflict. Experts at The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. believe that such actions by the US administration will drive rising inflation and unemployment while effectively halting economic growth in the country. Can Gold Maintain Momentum? When it comes to technical analysis, the price of Gold is not trading at a price where oscillators are indicating the instrument is overbought. The Relative Strength Index currently trades at 68.88, outside of the overbought area, since Gold’s price fell 0.65% during this morning’s session. However, even with this decline, the price still remains 0.40% higher than the day’s open price. In terms of fundamental analysis, there continues to be plenty of factors indicating the price could continue to rise. However, the price movement of the week will also partially depend on the employment data from the US. The US is due to release the JOLTS Job Vacancies for February this afternoon, the ADP Non-Farm Employment Change tomorrow, and the NFP Change and Unemployment Rate on Friday. If all data reads higher than expectations, investors may look to sell to lock in profits at the high price. Key Takeaway Points: Gold’s Rally Continues – Up 17% in 2025 as investors seek safety from inflation, recession fears, and trade tensions. Trade War Impact – New US tariffs and potential retaliation from China, the EU, and Japan drive uncertainty, boosting Gold demand. Weak US Dollar – The Dollar’s struggle supports Gold’s rise due to their inverse correlation. Gold’s Outlook – Uptrend may continue, but US jobs data could trigger profit-taking. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.