Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Most Influential Stocks of Dow & Nasdaq

Recommended Posts

Hello Traders,

 

I have style of trading that monitors the components of the DJIA to trade YM and the components of Nasdaq 100 to trade NQ.

 

I was advised the best approach would be to monitor a select few stocks of each index rather than the whole set of components. It was suggested that a select few will dictate which direction the whole index takes.

 

I was wondering if someone could advise on the best approach to selecting the most influential stocks of each index?

 

I believe one approach is to monitor the stocks with highest weighting for each index, but I would love to hear your opinions.

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically yeah. If they're big they'll more likely bias the index they're in. Also though it does vary. If this is your approach you really should be noting sector strength and weakness too. You could even spread the two off against each other if say techs are outperforming industrials or vice versa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:

I have style of trading that monitors the components of the DJIA to trade YM...

 

I was wondering if someone could advise on the best approach to selecting the most influential stocks of each index?...

 

Which components are you currently using? the precise choice of stocks will depend on your current methodology. Also, how exactly do you monitor it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Do Or Die said:
Which components are you currently using? the precise choice of stocks will depend on your current methodology. Also, how exactly do you monitor it?

 

I use all the components of the nasdaq 100.

 

I use an Excel formula to monitor the components realtime. Why do you ask?

 

I was interested to know if someone could tell me the best approach in selecting those components that will move the index?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
I use all the components of the nasdaq 100.

 

I use an Excel formula to monitor the components realtime. Why do you ask?

 

I was interested to know if someone could tell me the best approach in selecting those components that will move the index?

 

Cheers

 

I was asking about your methodology. Instead of watching the DOW itself, you watch ALL individual components, right? If you're using comparative relative strength as suggested by poster before me, your choice of components should depend upon those related to your method rather than which have more weighting in DOW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DorD,

 

Thanks for responding.

 

Yes I do watch ALL individual components.

 

I don't think the last poster mentioned anything about comparative relative strength. However, I would be very grateful if you would elaborate.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comparative Relative Strength is when you compare the performance of one ticker against another. It is the general term for sector strength comparison: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/10189-relative-strength-2.html#post126645

 

For example if you see BAC gapping up 10% and make a conclusion that it will drag the financials upwards with it. OR if you see financials showing extremely weakness you make an estimate that they will drag the entire market down.

 

What makes you track ALL DOW components instead of the DOW itself?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Do Or Die said:

 

What makes you track ALL DOW components instead of the DOW itself?

 

Thanks for the explanation.

 

I find that tracking the Dow components allows me to assess the eventual direction of the YM.

 

I have Interactive Brokers feed 100 components into my Excel program and assess the strength or weakness of any move with the help of my formula.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
Thanks for the explanation.

 

I find that tracking the Dow components allows me to assess the eventual direction of the YM.

 

...assess the strength or weakness of any move with the help of my formula.

 

If your formula puts more weight on certain components, pick the top 7-10.

 

If the formula always factors the movement of all components equally try picking the top 15 which have most weight in Dow; using less than 10 components may not work.

 

This is just my wild guess because I have no clue about what information the formula is extracting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Do Or Die said:

This is just my wild guess because I have no clue about what information the formula is extracting.

 

Before I answer reply to quote, just wanna say I've been reading some of your posts and they provided plenty of food for thought. Thanks.

 

I think you have made a really good suggestion on possible ways to pick top components to monitor.

 

In answer to the quote, at present the formula applies the Trade Value Index to all 100 components in realtime. I'm not sure if you're familiar with TVI, however when each individula component are inline with the index there is a message of either strength or weakness with the YM (if looking at the 30 components of the DJIA). Alternatively, if I'm monitoring each individual component of the nasdaq 100 then there is a message in the NQ.

 

I hope that makes sense :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the question may be: wich one moves the other

 

index traders will look at stocks, stocks traders will look at futures. I'm personnally not that sure that stocks will decide since derivatives became so important in modern trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

icon10.gif I've heard about trade value index with reference to NBA only. I did a google search and could not find the maths formula representing it.

 

  carltonp said:
... however when each individula component are inline with the index there is a message of either strength or weakness with the YM.

 

Anyways seems to me you are using the concept similar to market breadth. That is, if all components are showing strength then there is momentum in YM until it peaks out. Instead of dropping components I will suggest to use a heatmap for ALL 30 components (S&P 500 Map Heatmap ) or a similar map 'trend strength' which I posted in the link mentioned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Do Or Die said:
I did a google search and could not find the maths formula representing it.

 

The formula for Vb.Net is

 

' Get the volume of the symbol, indexed by bar index.

Define volume() As Number = BarVolume(_symbolIndex, barIndex, length + 1)

' Get the closing prices of the symbol, indexed by bar index.

Define close() As Number = BarClose(_symbolIndex, barIndex, length + 1)

' Use for the latest trade volume index.

Define TVI As Number = IndicatorIndexValue()

' Use for the calculated indicator script values, indexed by bar index.

Define results(length - 1) As Number

' Calculate the indicator script values for the specified bar range.

For i As Integer = length - 1 To 0 Step -1

' Calculate the indicator script value for the current bar.

If (close(i) - close(i+1) > _MTV) Then

TVI = TVI + volume(i)

Else

TVI = TVI - volume(i)

End If

results(i) = TVI

Next

Return results

 

The formula I have programmed into Excel is:

 

=IF(E15-E14>1,H14+F15,H14-F15)

 

I reviewed the Heatmap, however I think I prefer 'trend strength.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great formula! it tracks performance of components and also weights recent volumes. I would suggest do not drop any components... just design a custom map for components which uses similar measures using bar range and volume. use the map as well as TVI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Do Or Die said:
This is a great formula! it tracks performance of components and also weights recent volumes. I would suggest do not drop any components....

 

Brilliant, that's exactly what five other traders said at Trade2Win and few others at ET(don't know if its frowned upon to mention other forums) :crap:

 

However, I do like the idea of picking 7 - 10 components and putting them at the top of list.. uhmmmmmm ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome on the questions.

 

The 'awesomeness' of the formula is in the fact that it dynamically weights each component based on recent volumes. Consider a case: suppose you kick out the 5 stocks with least weight. Now suppose heavy volume comes in that discarded stock- because of 52 week high, earnings or whatever. In this case it will drag Dow along with it up or down, but you will miss on this significant information.

 

Many pro traders use maps for visualization- go ahead and design you own. Should be easy since you are alreadt acquainted with macros and there are lot of resources on net.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
Hello Traders,

 

I was advised the best approach would be to monitor a select few stocks of each index rather than the whole set of components. It was suggested that a select few will dictate which direction the whole index takes.

 

Carlton

 

The person that advised the approach didn't help you ???

 

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.