Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

VTK

Sam Seiden-Understanding The Exact Process Behind The Movement In Price

Recommended Posts

  VTK said:
he always told us to call things as they are-supply and demand.Sup/res can mean fib.ret. MA,pivot point or whatever.

 

I've never heard anybody call a fib retracement, MA, or pivot point "support" or "resistance." A moving average is a measure of value--it's the mean price over the last X bars, whether that be closing price, typical price, or whatever. A pivot point, if you mean a pivot calculated using something like (H+L+C)/3 or any other formula, is again a measure of value. Nowhere is there implied that there's some type of support or resistance associated with either of those.

 

We're really just parsing words--"support" means buyers bought and "supported" price. There was enough demand at that level to cause prices to rise from there. It's just terminology, and Sam does a very good job at making "supply and demand" sound unique, but it's all different terms for the same thing. I actually like the terms supply and demand better, but to say that they are fundamentally different from support and resistance is a mistake, IMO. If you disagree I'd like to know exactly how they are different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
I've never heard anybody call a fib retracement, MA, or pivot point "support" or "resistance." A moving average is a measure of value--it's the mean price over the last X bars, whether that be closing price, typical price, or whatever. A pivot point, if you mean a pivot calculated using something like (H+L+C)/3 or any other formula, is again a measure of value. Nowhere is there implied that there's some type of support or resistance associated with either of those.

 

We're really just parsing words--"support" means buyers bought and "supported" price. There was enough demand at that level to cause prices to rise from there. It's just terminology, and Sam does a very good job at making "supply and demand" sound unique, but it's all different terms for the same thing. I actually like the terms supply and demand better, but to say that they are fundamentally different from support and resistance is a mistake, IMO. If you disagree I'd like to know exactly how they are different.

 

Hey Josh...

A fib. trader would pick something like 61.8% retracement,wrap some rules around it and trade it as he/she would assume that price found sup/res.I have heard many times people saying price found sup/res at MA.

If you look at the chart you will see that MA alone gave sup/res only once, but it failed miserably most of the time.But when it was in confluence with S/D level it worked fine.Note that in this example it's same with 61.8.

Both fib and MA could be understood as sup/res but more often than not they work fine when they are in confluence with S/D levels.

So for me one is illusion other is reality.If you look just at terminology it's same thing i agree with you but technically it could be understood differently so i like to call those levels for what they are representing-supply and demand imbalances.:2c:

Best,

VTK

 

P.S.

Sorry for messy chart!:)

 

94151557.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
Though I agree with most of what you said VTK, I disagree slightly here. Orders are filled of course, but new orders can be placed. Potential buyers may in fact see a level holding and become more convinced that it will continue to hold, and put more orders in, so that the price level becomes more solid. More visits to a price area really only objectively indicate one thing--interest in that area. The future probability of an area to either hold or break could be statistically measured, and I would give some weight to this, but conceptually, it's a toss-up.

 

All levels will eventually be broken, yes, but the argument that a level which is touched once, which is not as important, is more likely to hold than a level that has proven multiple times to be important, is not a sound argument, unless it is backed up with some data. Visually on my chart I see many "peaks" which are simply ignored the next time they are visited. Yet, I see many bases, or proven areas, which continue to provide that support. Visual testing as this is pretty useless, but I would like to see some actual statistical data that would give weight to the concept.

 

Based on the videos I've seen, Sam approaches this issue from the perspective of having worked on the pits handling order flow.

 

As an example:

When there is a large, possibly institutional order to buy at a certain price level, prices will eventually rally up from this level due to orders imbalance, provided they overwhelm opposing orders. When prices subsequently retrace back to the level where the large order is sitting, the remaining number of unfilled orders will be less than before. On a subsequent cycle, even fewer.

 

Of course, this doesn't account for the "then and now" evolving circumstances as you noted. My take on this is that we can't possibly account for every price move, but we can specialize in a few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Peterthemonkey said:

Of course, this doesn't account for the "then and now" evolving circumstances as you noted. My take on this is that we can't possibly account for every price move, but we can specialize in a few.

 

That is very true! No system can account for everything. But zones theory can account for 90% + from my personal experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  VTK said:
A fib. trader would pick something like 61.8% retracement,wrap some rules around it and trade it as he/she would assume that price found sup/res.I have heard many times people saying price found sup/res at MA.

 

By the way VTK, I enjoy having this discussion, please don't think I'm being argumentative or picking an argument here ;-)

 

What you seem to be missing is this--while demand being greater than supply is the underlying reason for prices rising, WHY was demand higher? In other words, why did buyers want to buy there? Was it because of a news report? Was it because enough buyers saw the same fib retracement level, or had the same MA on their chart? Was it because of a previous price level that had held before? Was it because enough big traders got together in a secret room and decided to move the market? Did an algo go nuts and buy more than it was supposed to? We have no idea, and never will, WHY demand was greater.

 

All we know is that the resulting movement in price indicates that demand was greater. But saying that "price rose because demand was greater" does not describe WHY traders bought at that level. Perhaps some bought because they looked left and saw prior support, but perhaps many who bought do not even use charts to trade, and are trading off of a news item. Or perhaps enough traders liked the 200MA and used it. Neither you nor I can say that an EMA, or that a fib level, or any other measure where traders place value, was or was not the CAUSE for the demand. Keep in mind that you're identifying PRIOR supply and demand, and this may or may not affect current supply or demand, at that same price.

 

Support and resistance levels (or call them supply and demand levels) only "work" for one reason--traders pay attention to them. Prior supply and demand at a price is only significant if enough traders TODAY put significance on that price and want to buy or sell it. Simple as that. S/R, or S/D, is not magic, and is no different than a pivot, EMA, phase of the moon, or news item--it only works because people pay attention to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tradewinds said:
:( But I want to create my own program. Now I'm so sad.

 

My day job is software development so I understand the inclination to want to program all things and be challenged etc. However, I must say that when it comes to pattern recognition and identifying "zones" in the market -- is something us humans are very good at and can do with very little effort as opposed to programming all the steps for a computer program to do it. (time is money)

 

I think your time would be better spent studying the market in general than programming something like this. You can identify these zones and draw them out on a chart in as little as 2 minutes, whereas programming something similar might take you weeks/months...

 

Is it really worth your time? I also wouldn't pay a dime to someone who programmed something like this when I can spot the patterns myself for free and while doing so might learn something about the chart I'm looking at... :missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Nvesta81 said:

Is it really worth your time? I also wouldn't pay a dime to someone who programmed something like this when I can spot the patterns myself for free and while doing so might learn something about the chart I'm looking at... :missy:

 

Great attitude mate!

Also i would add that it's quite easy to spot those S/D levels just by looking for strong rallies or drops.

 

  joshdance said:
By the way VTK, I enjoy having this discussion, please don't think I'm being argumentative or picking an argument here ;-)

 

No worries mate.I can sense hostility.That's why i was so direct with Gabe..

 

 

  joshdance said:
We have no idea, and never will, WHY demand was greater.

 

I agree with you and to tell you the truth i don't care for exact reason as long as i can find S/D patterns on chart.

 

  joshdance said:

Support and resistance levels (or call them supply and demand levels) only "work" for one reason--traders pay attention to them. Prior supply and demand at a price is only significant if enough traders TODAY put significance on that price and want to buy or sell it.

 

I am taught to think in terms of order flow.So how it usually looked on CME for Sam-is transfered into mine way of thinking about S/D.He worked on a desk where he was getting orders by phone from big institutions.And for example he had really big stack of orders to buy Yen between 81.15 and 81

Let's say that price was falling for some time and it was at 81.50.As it was getting closer to 81.15 phones would start to ring and people were excited and wanted to sell after drop in price.Those were generally retail/novice traders.As soon as price came to 81.15-81 area of demand buy orders were filled and when last sell order was filled price would go higher usually leaving unfilled buy orders at area of demand.So when price came next time to same area of demand it met unfilled buy orders and if there were enough of them it rose again from the level.

I am not countering you here or anything.Just wanna show you way i see whole stuff.Basically i told and explained my self in previous posts and there is not much more to say.I'm fine with different views of others as mine edge is in thinking differently than majority.

Just to put picture to words here is long on USDCAD that hit limit last night.

Best,cheers!

 

58863406.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

This is my first post on this forum. I watched sam's webinars and decided that it might well be a method I'd like to employ, so I did a little googling to find more info and ended up here.

I'm in the demo trading phase of my trading career, hoping to get to a stage where I'm able to make a little profit instead of dragging my virtual account a further into the mud with every trade I make.

 

I've read through this thread and taken a look at the charts posted by Gabe. One of them in particular raised some questions with me. Gabe was wondering why the areas marked as 'not demand' are not used to take trades. Purely using what I have on the chart and lacking higher timeframe supply or demand levels, I've drawn in the areas where I could see myself entering a trade:

 

chartqa.jpg

 

Areas in red are levels where I would've entered a trade and lost, and green is good, naturally! So we're looking at one really good trade and two fairly small losses.

I'm aware that there is no way to eliminate losing trades, but I'm still curious if those two losses are badly placed trades.

As such, my question to anyone familiar with sam's method, would you have avoided those two losing two demand levels? If so, why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Derutrade said:
Hi guys,

 

 

As such, my question to anyone familiar with sam's method, would you have avoided those two losing two demand levels? If so, why?

Hey Derutrade,

 

The way that I see and trade it is to always look for timeframes of confluence. the 5 min timeframe alone is not enough to hold price. but when we have a 30,15, 5min time frame in confluence and maybe a 377 tick zone or something small to really give you a nice tight stop. That's how you can really "bring home the bacon!" When you have so many time frames in confluence it's what I consider a trend reversal trade. So you are really excepting for price to bounce and give you a good trade! Many zone traders tend to start out as reversal traders which is good and bad. Smaller stops, good RR, but everything seems like a reversal at the beginning.

 

The other way to approach it is to use the zones for trend following. This is where I use the 5min as my highest timeframe with my 377tick and perhaps another small time frames to get me in a trend move. On the ES, watch these trades closely and move your stop up to BE +1 after 10 ticks or so. You want to lock in and at least pay for your trade so that way it's a "free trade" so that no matter what happens you make money and your brain stops stressing out!

 

Another suggestion: Please consider watching the Euro(6E,EC) and the NQ or YM. The ES is the choppiest. Unless you really know what's going on you will get chopped out. Looking at the 5min chart on the ES causes me to see zones everywhere and can really lead to overtrading the zones quickly.

 

Hope this helps to get you profitable from the get go. You can also join a group of zone traders on skype. Let me know if you want in.

 

Here's a little simple video that will hopefully help you a little bit. Yes, trading is completely a probability game! You have to take every setup that matches your rules. Trading will always be hard though. Simple rules help.

 

http://apazones.com/wp-content/uploads/TLQA.mp4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  doubletop11 said:
Hey Derutrade,

 

The way that I see and trade it is to always look for timeframes of confluence. the 5 min timeframe alone is not enough to hold price. but when we have a 30,15, 5min time frame in confluence and maybe a 377 tick zone or something small to really give you a nice tight stop. That's how you can really "bring home the bacon!" When you have so many time frames in confluence it's what I consider a trend reversal trade. So you are really excepting for price to bounce and give you a good trade! Many zone traders tend to start out as reversal traders which is good and bad. Smaller stops, good RR, but everything seems like a reversal at the beginning.

 

The other way to approach it is to use the zones for trend following. This is where I use the 5min as my highest timeframe with my 377tick and perhaps another small time frames to get me in a trend move. On the ES, watch these trades closely and move your stop up to BE +1 after 10 ticks or so. You want to lock in and at least pay for your trade so that way it's a "free trade" so that no matter what happens you make money and your brain stops stressing out!

 

Another suggestion: Please consider watching the Euro(6E,EC) and the NQ or YM. The ES is the choppiest. Unless you really know what's going on you will get chopped out. Looking at the 5min chart on the ES causes me to see zones everywhere and can really lead to overtrading the zones quickly.

 

Hope this helps to get you profitable from the get go. You can also join a group of zone traders on skype. Let me know if you want in.

 

Here's a little simple video that will hopefully help you a little bit. Yes, trading is completely a probability game! You have to take every setup that matches your rules. Trading will always be hard though. Simple rules help.

 

http://apazones.com/wp-content/uploads/TLQA.mp4

 

Thanks for the explanation, the video definitely helped. Every so often I find myself running into tips or advice I've already known about for some time but magically forget whenever I'm looking through the charts. Multi timeframe analysis is one of those things, but your video might have been the last push I needed to actually start using it.

 

I think I'd be interested in the skype group as well, although I'm a skype noob and not entirely sure what to expect there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  doubletop11 said:
The way that I see and trade it is to always look for timeframes of confluence.

 

Derutrader,douletop is right.Sam picked lowest level as it was drop-base-rally on higher timeframe like 60 or 30.

Also when going for extremes,one side will be exhausted and profit margin will be much nicer.Think of it as you are stretching rubber band.More you stretch it more it will snap back eventually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. English is not my native language, so sorry if something is hardly to understand or written incorrectly. I started trading about 4-5 monts ago and I've seen Seiden's webinar for the first time about 2 months ago, really liked his understanding of market. When I tried to trade with his strategy, it went really well. The profit was about 100% in two weeks, but then something has gone wrong. In the last week of September (when it was huge down-trending market), I began to lose and since then had NO profitable week. I tried to understand where were my mistakes,but couldn't. I'd be pleasant if someone could answer some questions from me on Seiden's strategy. May be your answers will be pleasant for somebody else.

 

First of all, is the trend really important for trading with S\D zones? Or it doesn't matter, market will return on the correctly defined S\D zones?

If you've got a stop-loss, you'll take the trade in the opposite side or will be waitng for the next zone to trade the same way?

P.S. Could someone post an order of analysing a probable trade? (ex.: 1.Look for the Daily S\D zones. 2. Swith to 1H and search for smaller S\D zones... )It'll be very good for newbies like me. Thank you very much!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Romant said:

First of all, is the trend really important for trading with S\D zones? Or it doesn't matter, market will return on the correctly defined S\D zones?

If you've got a stop-loss, you'll take the trade in the opposite side or will be waitng for the next zone to trade the same way?

P.S. Could someone post an order of analysing a probable trade? (ex.: 1.Look for the Daily S\D zones. 2. Swith to 1H and search for smaller S\D zones... )It'll be very good for newbies like me. Thank you very much!

 

I will post some videos for you and you are more then welcome to come hang out with all of us Zone traders in the APA Zones community!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  doubletop11 said:
I will post some videos for you and you are more then welcome to come hang out with all of us Zone traders in the APA Zones community!

 

Oh, it will be really great! Thank you very much.

 

P.S. As we know, Sam in his webinars and articles explaines much, but not everithing, so it will be very helpful for me(and not for me only, I'm sure) if you could explain the details.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think there are many things traders aren't focusing on IMHO. I think rally, base drops should be at swing highs and lows and not in the middle of the moves. So one might have to drop down to a smaller time frame to see it. Also probabilities at greater the first time back to these zone. Also incorporate the Odd enchancers into the scenario into the picture....Remember the win/loss ratio isn't a high percentage for S&D as told to me......but the important part is that it defines and minimizes your stop/loss.

 

I use S&D in conjuction w/ other stuff....the more of the other stuff I can get to align I feel the greater of the probability of the trade going in my favor. It's all a calculated risk.

 

Methodology is just one part....don't forget management and mind set. (3M's)

 

Once in a trade I’m an observer of my rules. I try not to judge them. I let them work for me and have confidence in them. A stop is part of my plan along w/ management and profits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  edmccall1 said:
i think there are many things traders aren't focusing on IMHO. I think rally, base drops should be at swing highs and lows and not in the middle of the moves. So one might have to drop down to a smaller time frame to see it.

 

You know, the strategy, we are talking about could be understood in different ways. For ex., Sam Seiden in his webinars sometimes marks the S\D zones in the middle of the moves.But I fully agree with you and consider, that the real "turn-around" zones are at highs and lows. In the middle of the moves price pulls back very rarely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  edmccall1 said:
I think rally, base drops should be at swing highs and lows and not in the middle of the moves.

 

Yup,it's like rubber band.More stretched price is greater the odds that it will turn around.Usually i don't do anything when price is "in the middle",right between two key areas of S/D.

 

 

  edmccall1 said:
Remember the win/loss ratio isn't a high percentage for S&D as told to me......

 

Wouldn't agree at all!

It's quite individual meaning that personal experience,understanding,approach...will determine ones W/L ratio.And after all W/L figure is not important.Profit factor is important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the basic idea that I use when looking at trends, as well as if I'm going to do a trend reversal trade or a trend following trade.

Knowing which one to use is extremely important. I know a lot of zone traders tend to be just reversal traders. So hopefully these videos help with that a little.

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2cAXvUB4p0]APA Zones Basic Zone Assessment - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhvXzMGbuwU]APA Zones Assessment 2 - YouTube[/ame]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  VTK said:
Here is something that i find most interesting.It's like price is anticipating an event.

Have noticed same thing when US got downgraded,S&P was at big picture supply,trading lower for couple of days and than the news came out.

 

http://www.sierrachart.com/userimages/upload_2/1320229393226.png

 

Next time you should post the supply level in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.