Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

Investment Themes for Emerging Market ETFs (Part 2)

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

As mentioned this crisis in stocks is different in the sense that the sell-off has been triggered by global events. More specifically the risk has been transferred from corporates to the sovereigns. In past investors used to rotate money from leading industry groups to defensive industry groups. However, this time a lot of investments are being rotated from the developed markets to the emerging markets.

 

Before deciding to invest/diversify in emerging markets at all it is worth to look at some other significant factors. Historically emerging markets tend to pose more risk during recession. One way of measuring investors’ perceptions of the riskiness of a country’s stock market is to look at how risky the country’s debt is. This can be quantitatively indicated by sovereign credit default swap (CDS) spreads. CDS spreads measure the cost of insuring against the possibility that a country will default on its debt, i.e. they are a measure of the extent to which a country has sovereign debt problems. The wider a country’s CDS spreads, the more likely the investors think that country will go bankrupt, and the more nervous the market is about that country.

 

Let’s look at the current situation. From January 2010 to July 2011 (bull market), the average five-year CDS spread for developed markets in the MSCI ACWI index increased 206% to 263 basis points (bps); as a comparison the average spread for emerging markets actually decreased by 9% to 132 bps. At the end of January 2008 (bear market), in contrast, the ten developed world countries for which such data was then available had CDS spreads of less than 45 bps and were all among the 11 countries perceived to the be the least risky.

 

Core eurozone economies such as Germany and the Netherlands still have relatively narrow CDS spreads.

MSCI Germany (EWG)

Market Vectors Germany Small Cap(GERG)

iShares MSCI Netherlands Index (EWN)

 

The other factor could be London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), levels which can spook the US/UK markets. LIBOR has been trending higher in recent weeks with a change of +17% compared to previous month. A similar sudden rise in April 2010 triggered the largest price drop in last year.

 

So now coming back to investing in emerging markets, the strongest theme could be:

Domestic-demand Driven Economies

These are China, India, Indonesia, Singapore and Japan. These economies are driven mostly by domestic demand and are thus isolated from some of the slowing global growth trends. Relevant ETFS are:

  • iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index Fund (FXI)
  • iShares MSCI Hong Kong Index Fund (EWH)
  • iPath MSCI India ETN (NYSEArca: INP)
  • WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (NYSEArca: EPI)
  • iShares S&P India Nifty 50 (NASDAQ: INDY)
  • CurrencyShares Japanese Yen Trust (FXY)
  • Indonesia Index ETF (IDX)
  • MSCI Indonesia Investable Market (EIDO)
  • iShares MSCI Singapore Index Fund (EWS)
  • First Trust ISE Chindia Index Fund (FNI)

 

EGShares Emerging Markets High Income Low Beta ETF (HILO) is worthy of notice. The index consists of 30 stocks drawn from a 2500-company and 21-country universe. The top five are Malaysia with 18.0%, South Africa 17.3%, Brazil 13.4%, China 12.7%, and Thailand 8.9%. Sector-wise, HILO is heavy on telecommunications, infrastructure and utility stocks – much like dividend ETFs from developed markets.

 

Infrastructure needs of BRIC:

The four countries are similar only in their need for increased infrastructure spending. Using World Bank data, India appears to be the least developed, and most hard-pressed to develop infrastructure (China has the best). There is no Russia specific infrastructure ETF.

EGShares INDXX Brazil Infrastructure Fund (BRXX)

EGShares INDXX India Infrastructure Fund (INXX)

EGShares INDXX China Infrastructure Fund (CHXX)

 

The PowerShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure Portfolio (PXR) has market cap of $168.2 and holds equities in a diverse selection of countries including: China (13.3%), South Africa (11.3%), Taiwan (10.2%), Brazil (9.2%), Hong Kong (7.1%), Indonesia (6.7%), Malaysia (6.6%), Russia (5.3%), Chile (4.5%), and the United States (4.3%).

 

iShares S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure (NASDAQ: EMIF) contains exposure to China, Brazil, South Korea, Czech Republic, Mexico, Russia and Chile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.