Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

Basic Sector Rotation Using ETFs

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This follows from: List of ETFs for Sector Rotation. Testing is done on SPDRs (XLB, XLY, XLP, XLE, XLF, XLV, XLI, XLK, XLU).

 

Rules:

  1. Track the monthly changes and past 10 day changes
  2. Trades are made only once each month
  3. Using past month data, buy the ETF with largest gain and short the ETF with largest loss
  4. Do not buy an ETF if it is overextended on the upside- has been advancing for each of the past 6 months
  5. Do not buy/short an ETF if it is over extended in short-term- past 10 days change is more than 10% (refer here for mean reversion)
  6. You maintain a market neutral portfolio- keep a long and short position

 

Performance:

Profit= 123.96%, CAR= 12.96%, Winners= 56.14%, Losers= 43.86%

 

I'm posting the code here so that people can test or improve it. Immediate improvement could be avoiding long positions when market is extremely bearish and avoiding short positions when it is extremely bullish. Also, a stop-loss should be maintained for each position.

 

For comparison, see here the Fidelity Sector Rotation strategy.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25736&stc=1&d=1313496546

attachment.php?attachmentid=25737&stc=1&d=1313496546

 

Posting a comment will only take you 2 minutes, but it will be the strongest motivation for me to share something better.

 

Statistics:

Statistics 
 All trades Long trades Short trades 
Initial capital 10000.00 10000.00 10000.00 
Ending capital 22395.72 16685.38 15710.34 
Net Profit 12395.72 6685.38 5710.34 
Net Profit % 123.96 % 66.85 % 57.10 % 
Exposure % 98.92 % 58.59 % 40.33 % 
Net Risk Adjusted Return % 125.31 % 114.11 % 141.57 % 
Annual Return % 12.96 % 8.04 % 7.07 % 
Risk Adjusted Return % 13.10 % 13.73 % 17.52 % 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All trades 114 66 (57.89 %) 48 (42.11 %) 
Avg. Profit/Loss 108.73 101.29 118.97 
Avg. Profit/Loss % 1.62 % 1.24 % 2.13 % 
Avg. Bars Held 30.04 30.70 29.13 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Winners 64 (56.14 %) 43 (37.72 %) 21 (18.42 %) 
Total Profit 27585.36 14455.14 13130.22 
Avg. Profit 431.02 336.17 625.25 
Avg. Profit % 6.28 % 4.66 % 9.59 % 
Avg. Bars Held 35.28 35.30 35.24 
Max. Consecutive 7 9 3 
Largest win 2358.63 1855.25 2358.63 
# bars in largest win 64 64 64 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Losers 50 (43.86 %) 23 (20.18 %) 27 (23.68 %) 
Total Loss -15189.64 -7769.76 -7419.88 
Avg. Loss -303.79 -337.82 -274.81 
Avg. Loss % -4.35 % -5.14 % -3.67 % 
Avg. Bars Held 23.32 22.09 24.37 
Max. Consecutive 6 4 5 
Largest loss -1177.85 -1089.78 -1177.85 
# bars in largest loss 23 23 23 

 

Amibroker Code:

SetBacktestMode(backtestRotational);
SetTradeDelays(1,1,1,1); 
// everything delayed 1 day
SetOption("UsePrevBarEquityForPosSizing", True);
SetOption("MinShares", 1);
SetOption("AllowPositionShrinking",True);
SetOption("AccountMargin",100);
Totalpositions = 2;
SetOption("WorstRankHeld", Totalpositions + 1);
SetOption("MaxOpenPositions", Totalpositions );
SetOption("SeparateLongShortRank", True ); 
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 2);
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 2);
perf= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -1 );
perf1= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -2 );
score= 100*((perf- perf1)/perf1);
score= IIf(TimeFrameGetPrice("C",inMonthly,-1)>TimeFrameGetPrice("O",inMonthly,-2)AND
TimeFrameGetPrice("C",inMonthly,-2)>TimeFrameGetPrice("O",inMonthly,-3)AND
TimeFrameGetPrice("C",inMonthly,-3)>TimeFrameGetPrice("O",inMonthly,-4)AND
TimeFrameGetPrice("C",inMonthly,-4)>TimeFrameGetPrice("O",inMonthly,-5)AND
TimeFrameGetPrice("C",inMonthly,-5)>TimeFrameGetPrice("O",inMonthly,-6), 0, score);
score= IIf(abs(100*(C-Ref(O,-10))/Ref(C,-10))>10,0,score);
PositionScore = score;
PositionSize = -100/Totalpositions;
m = Month();
newMonth = m != Ref( m, -1);
PositionScore = IIf(newMonth, PositionScore, scoreNoRotate);

5aa71098cad9c_1_PortfolioEquity.png.e1697e8afcfc7e1fa17a5626950e89a8.png

5aa71098cef41_3_ProfitTable.png.cd5e5aeccf09ce363795b7a27df50c4b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks very interesting, although I did not understand in details the idea.

Perhaps you could express your idea in other words and give an example of winning and another of losing .Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.