Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

List of ETFs for Sector Rotation

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Sector rotation is one of the easiest and top performing trading strategy. It is easy because you have to track markets only on daily time frame and hence requires little dedicated time. It performs well because other strategies in similar time frame (holding period > 6 months) tend to get whipsawed in current economic mess.

 

cyclicalpic.jpg

 

The strategy is so much in demand that ETFs have been launched entirely to mirror a sector rotation portfolio. The Guggenheim/Zacks Sector Rotation ETF (Ticker: XRO) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the performance of an equity index called the Zacks Sector Rotation Index. However, it is illiquid, and past performance data does not covers a full market cycle.

 

Take past 6 months sector performance for example. The defensive sectors of Consumer Staples, Health Care, and Utilities (XLP,XLV,XLU) are performing much better than the leading sectors of Financials, Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials (XLF,XLK,XLY, XLI). This means money is flowing to the defensive sectors; i.e., the overall market is bearish. The regional banks topped out much earlier than DOW as a sign of warning (also mentioned here). I have also attached the sector scenario for market bottom in 2009, which looks just the reverse of current situation.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25707&stc=1&d=1313173909

attachment.php?attachmentid=25706&stc=1&d=1313173791

 

 

To use the list of ETFs, please keep the following points in mind:

  1. Illiquid ETFs may be used as indicators for market trend but do not use them for actual trading because they have tendency to deviate erratically from benchmark returns.
  2. The Equal weighted Rydex ETFs (first ticker letter R) tends to mirror the broad markets.
  3. The Is and Xs are market-cap weighted, meaning that larger companies have greater representation in the index. So far they have been the best indicators for identifying business cycles.
  4. Small Caps tend to outperform in the last leg of a bull market.
  5. There are also ETFs managed by rule based quantitative analysis by First Trust and Powershares. However, comprehensive information on the selection criteria is not available.
  6. The inverse ETFs or Short ETFs do not actually reverse the returns of their benchmark. You are better off shorting a relevant ETF than buying it’s inverse.

 

SECTOR-WISE LIST

 

XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR

RCD Consumer Discretionary

IYC iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Sector Index Fund

PSCD S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio

AXDI MSCI ACWI ex US Consumer Discretionary Sector Index Fund

 

XLP Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR 10.84%

RHS Consumer Staples

IYK iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Sector Index Fund

PSCC S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples Portfolio

AXSL MSCI ACWI ex US Consumer Staples Sector Index Fund

 

XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR

RYE Energy

IYE iShares Dow Jones U.S. Energy Sector Index Fund

PSCE S&P SmallCap Energy Portfolio

AXEN MSCI ACWI ex US Energy Sector Index Fund

 

XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR

RYF Financials

IYF iShares Dow Jones U.S. Financial Sector Index Fund

PSCF S&P SmallCap Financials Portfolio

AXFN MSCI ACWI ex US Financials Sector Index Fund

 

XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR

RYH Health Care

PSCH S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio

AXHE MSCI ACWI ex US Health Care Sector Index Fund

 

XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR

RGI Industrials

IYJ iShares Dow Jones U.S. Industrial Sector Index Fund

PSCI S&P SmallCap Industrials Portfolio

AXID MSCI ACWI ex US Industrials Sector Index Fund 7.89%

 

XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR

RTM Materials

IYM iShares Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Sector Index Fund

PSCM S&P SmallCap Materials Portfolio

AXMT MSCI ACWI ex US Materials Sector Index Fund

 

XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR

RYT Technology

IYW iShares Dow Jones U.S. Technology Sector Index Fund

PSCT S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

AXIT MSCI ACWI ex US Information Technology Sector Index Fund

 

XLU Utilities Select Sector SPDR

RYU Utilities

IDU iShares Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Sector Index Fund

PSCU S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio

AXUT MSCI ACWI ex US Utilities Sector Index Fund

 

 

Posting a comment will only take you 2 minutes, but it will be the strongest motivation for me to share something better.

bottom.thumb.png.e8387fa9eb02457eba2b874808e6b0eb.png

Top.thumb.png.722a394b8df2dd3a41ae277b14aad6c3.png

Edited by Do Or Die
formatting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

Of the EFTs you noted relative to illiquid, which for trading does not workout well as to pricing, can you some how de-note within your groupings which you believe to be the more illiquid?

Jay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  barostni said:
Hi, Do or die. Great strategy, where do you get your research from? I know there is alot of info out there.How often do you rebalance your portfolio? Thanks

 

Hi,

 

My research comes from my trading experience. I do not use this strategy. I have better cards (see here, here and here).

 

Sector rotation is a significant improvement over any strategy that you are using for broad market. For example, If you buy the SPY on 200 MA crossovers; switching to sector rotation whenever it crosses the MA will make a significant difference. At the most basic level, it will improve returns over buy and hold.

 

I will post a backtested strategy example when get time.

Edited by Do Or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  JaySNJ said:
HI,

Of the EFTs you noted relative to illiquid, which for trading does not workout well as to pricing, can you some how de-note within your groupings which you believe to be the more illiquid?

Jay

 

The X's and I's are the most liquid in the list (ticker symbol starting with X or I). The others are mentioned as indicators only.

 

As a general rule keep away from ETFs where avg daily volume is less than 10,000 shares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I did test two very basic tests of sector rotation on SPDRs (XLB, XLY, XLP, XLE, XLF, XLV, XLI, XLK, XLU). I do not enjoy programming and hopefully some one will improve these tests.

 

Trading Rules:

 

Keep a log of month-to-month performance of the sector ETFs. At the beginning of each month, buy the strongest of 3 sectors based on their past month returns. Alternatively to test a market neutral strategy, at each month buy the strongest and short the weakest of sector ETFs, maintaining 3 positions at all times. There are NO stop losses.

Summary:

A long-only always-in-market strategy shows returns similar to SnP 500.

A market neutral strategy made 63.86% (CAR of 7.23%) comparative to 200 day MA crossover strategy returns on SnP 50029.6% in the same period

These tests are only to show the edge or the advantage sector rotation can give you against a broad market index trading strategy. This is not a trading system.

 

Market-Neutral Performance

No. of Trades 141 Winners 58.16% Losers 41.84%  

attachment.php?attachmentid=25727&stc=1&d=1313412001

attachment.php?attachmentid=25728&stc=1&d=1313412001

Amibroker Code

SetBacktestMode(backtestRotational);
SetOption("UsePrevBarEquityForPosSizing", True);
SetOption("MinShares", 1);
SetOption("AllowPositionShrinking",True);
SetOption("AccountMargin",100);
Totalpositions = 3;
SetOption("WorstRankHeld", Totalpositions + 1);
SetOption("MaxOpenPositions", Totalpositions );
SetOption("SeparateLongShortRank", True ); 
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 3);
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 3);
//Monthly Rotation
perf= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -1 );
perf1= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -2 );
score= 100*((perf- perf1)/perf1);
PositionSize = -100/Totalpositions;
PositionScore = score;
m = Month();
newMonth = m != Ref( m, -1);
PositionScore = IIf(newMonth, PositionScore, scoreNoRotate);

 

Long-Only Performance

No. of Trades 177 Winners 63.84% Losers 36.16%  

attachment.php?attachmentid=25725&stc=1&d=1313412001

attachment.php?attachmentid=25726&stc=1&d=1313412001

Amibroker Code

SetBacktestMode(backtestRotational);
SetOption("UsePrevBarEquityForPosSizing", True);
SetOption("MinShares", 1);
SetOption("AllowPositionShrinking",True);
SetOption("AccountMargin",100);
Totalpositions = 3;
SetOption("WorstRankHeld", Totalpositions + 1);
SetOption("MaxOpenPositions", Totalpositions );
//Monthly Rotation
perf= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -1 );
perf1= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -2 );
score= 100*((perf- perf1)/perf1) + 100;
PositionSize = -100/Totalpositions;
PositionScore = score;
m = Month();
newMonth = m != Ref( m, -1);
PositionScore = IIf(newMonth, PositionScore, scoreNoRotate);

5aa7109829f12_11_PortfolioEquity.png.1bb87ef76c76d049645accc81cc8df63.png

5aa710982ee79_13_ProfitTable.png.f7aa62f8e6d6a25014784d268e7f0e9c.png

5aa7109832b0e_1_PortfolioEquity.png.3e6108a2ba184f6847e70ca7c4ca831f.png

5aa7109836a28_3_ProfitTable.png.58de0dcccef13730c63e672e2b75d4d3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no experience with amibroker / portfolio backtesting.

 

 

Would you be able to test: select the best 3 performing etfs for last 6 months (trailing), sell only when the top 3 drop out of the top 50% of performers. Perform this monthly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  kidpwrtrader said:

Would you be able to test: select the best 3 performing etfs for last 6 months (trailing), sell only when the top 3 drop out of the top 50% of performers. Perform this monthly.

 

Please put things in rules when you're asking anyone to program. Assuming we're using the 9 SPDRs to test, do you mean?

 

  1. At each month, buy top 3 based on last six months performance
  2. At each month, sell if any spdr falls below the rank of 4 'past six month performers'

 

Both rules will contradict each other, because if we're buying top 3 performers we need to sell if their performance drops below top 3 (not top 4).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article Do Or Die,

I have recently deployed this application in an attempt to validate the theory.

Free stock market forecast. Buy sell emails. Neural network, indexes, technical analysis predictions

The principle is as follow :

- you select a set of reference ETFs (although I set up a predefined one)

- you choose one share to be analysed

The software will first calculate the past inter dependencies between the historical data of the ETF and the historical data of your share.

It will then infer the trend of your share based on the latest data of the set of ETF.

Any thoughts?

Regards,

G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.