Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

List of ETFs for Sector Rotation

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Sector rotation is one of the easiest and top performing trading strategy. It is easy because you have to track markets only on daily time frame and hence requires little dedicated time. It performs well because other strategies in similar time frame (holding period > 6 months) tend to get whipsawed in current economic mess.

 

cyclicalpic.jpg

 

The strategy is so much in demand that ETFs have been launched entirely to mirror a sector rotation portfolio. The Guggenheim/Zacks Sector Rotation ETF (Ticker: XRO) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the performance of an equity index called the Zacks Sector Rotation Index. However, it is illiquid, and past performance data does not covers a full market cycle.

 

Take past 6 months sector performance for example. The defensive sectors of Consumer Staples, Health Care, and Utilities (XLP,XLV,XLU) are performing much better than the leading sectors of Financials, Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials (XLF,XLK,XLY, XLI). This means money is flowing to the defensive sectors; i.e., the overall market is bearish. The regional banks topped out much earlier than DOW as a sign of warning (also mentioned here). I have also attached the sector scenario for market bottom in 2009, which looks just the reverse of current situation.

attachment.php?attachmentid=25707&stc=1&d=1313173909

attachment.php?attachmentid=25706&stc=1&d=1313173791

 

 

To use the list of ETFs, please keep the following points in mind:

  1. Illiquid ETFs may be used as indicators for market trend but do not use them for actual trading because they have tendency to deviate erratically from benchmark returns.
  2. The Equal weighted Rydex ETFs (first ticker letter R) tends to mirror the broad markets.
  3. The Is and Xs are market-cap weighted, meaning that larger companies have greater representation in the index. So far they have been the best indicators for identifying business cycles.
  4. Small Caps tend to outperform in the last leg of a bull market.
  5. There are also ETFs managed by rule based quantitative analysis by First Trust and Powershares. However, comprehensive information on the selection criteria is not available.
  6. The inverse ETFs or Short ETFs do not actually reverse the returns of their benchmark. You are better off shorting a relevant ETF than buying it’s inverse.

 

SECTOR-WISE LIST

 

XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR

RCD Consumer Discretionary

IYC iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Sector Index Fund

PSCD S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio

AXDI MSCI ACWI ex US Consumer Discretionary Sector Index Fund

 

XLP Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR 10.84%

RHS Consumer Staples

IYK iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Sector Index Fund

PSCC S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples Portfolio

AXSL MSCI ACWI ex US Consumer Staples Sector Index Fund

 

XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR

RYE Energy

IYE iShares Dow Jones U.S. Energy Sector Index Fund

PSCE S&P SmallCap Energy Portfolio

AXEN MSCI ACWI ex US Energy Sector Index Fund

 

XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR

RYF Financials

IYF iShares Dow Jones U.S. Financial Sector Index Fund

PSCF S&P SmallCap Financials Portfolio

AXFN MSCI ACWI ex US Financials Sector Index Fund

 

XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR

RYH Health Care

PSCH S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio

AXHE MSCI ACWI ex US Health Care Sector Index Fund

 

XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR

RGI Industrials

IYJ iShares Dow Jones U.S. Industrial Sector Index Fund

PSCI S&P SmallCap Industrials Portfolio

AXID MSCI ACWI ex US Industrials Sector Index Fund 7.89%

 

XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR

RTM Materials

IYM iShares Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Sector Index Fund

PSCM S&P SmallCap Materials Portfolio

AXMT MSCI ACWI ex US Materials Sector Index Fund

 

XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR

RYT Technology

IYW iShares Dow Jones U.S. Technology Sector Index Fund

PSCT S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

AXIT MSCI ACWI ex US Information Technology Sector Index Fund

 

XLU Utilities Select Sector SPDR

RYU Utilities

IDU iShares Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Sector Index Fund

PSCU S&P SmallCap Utilities Portfolio

AXUT MSCI ACWI ex US Utilities Sector Index Fund

 

 

Posting a comment will only take you 2 minutes, but it will be the strongest motivation for me to share something better.

bottom.thumb.png.e8387fa9eb02457eba2b874808e6b0eb.png

Top.thumb.png.722a394b8df2dd3a41ae277b14aad6c3.png

Edited by Do Or Die
formatting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

Of the EFTs you noted relative to illiquid, which for trading does not workout well as to pricing, can you some how de-note within your groupings which you believe to be the more illiquid?

Jay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, Do or die. Great strategy, where do you get your research from? I know there is alot of info out there.How often do you rebalance your portfolio? Thanks

 

Hi,

 

My research comes from my trading experience. I do not use this strategy. I have better cards (see here, here and here).

 

Sector rotation is a significant improvement over any strategy that you are using for broad market. For example, If you buy the SPY on 200 MA crossovers; switching to sector rotation whenever it crosses the MA will make a significant difference. At the most basic level, it will improve returns over buy and hold.

 

I will post a backtested strategy example when get time.

Edited by Do Or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HI,

Of the EFTs you noted relative to illiquid, which for trading does not workout well as to pricing, can you some how de-note within your groupings which you believe to be the more illiquid?

Jay

 

The X's and I's are the most liquid in the list (ticker symbol starting with X or I). The others are mentioned as indicators only.

 

As a general rule keep away from ETFs where avg daily volume is less than 10,000 shares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I did test two very basic tests of sector rotation on SPDRs (XLB, XLY, XLP, XLE, XLF, XLV, XLI, XLK, XLU). I do not enjoy programming and hopefully some one will improve these tests.

 

Trading Rules:

 

Keep a log of month-to-month performance of the sector ETFs. At the beginning of each month, buy the strongest of 3 sectors based on their past month returns. Alternatively to test a market neutral strategy, at each month buy the strongest and short the weakest of sector ETFs, maintaining 3 positions at all times. There are NO stop losses.

Summary:

A long-only always-in-market strategy shows returns similar to SnP 500.

A market neutral strategy made 63.86% (CAR of 7.23%) comparative to 200 day MA crossover strategy returns on SnP 50029.6% in the same period

These tests are only to show the edge or the advantage sector rotation can give you against a broad market index trading strategy. This is not a trading system.

 

Market-Neutral Performance

No. of Trades 141 Winners 58.16% Losers 41.84%  

attachment.php?attachmentid=25727&stc=1&d=1313412001

attachment.php?attachmentid=25728&stc=1&d=1313412001

Amibroker Code

SetBacktestMode(backtestRotational);
SetOption("UsePrevBarEquityForPosSizing", True);
SetOption("MinShares", 1);
SetOption("AllowPositionShrinking",True);
SetOption("AccountMargin",100);
Totalpositions = 3;
SetOption("WorstRankHeld", Totalpositions + 1);
SetOption("MaxOpenPositions", Totalpositions );
SetOption("SeparateLongShortRank", True ); 
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 3);
SetOption("MaxOpenLong", 3);
//Monthly Rotation
perf= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -1 );
perf1= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -2 );
score= 100*((perf- perf1)/perf1);
PositionSize = -100/Totalpositions;
PositionScore = score;
m = Month();
newMonth = m != Ref( m, -1);
PositionScore = IIf(newMonth, PositionScore, scoreNoRotate);

 

Long-Only Performance

No. of Trades 177 Winners 63.84% Losers 36.16%  

attachment.php?attachmentid=25725&stc=1&d=1313412001

attachment.php?attachmentid=25726&stc=1&d=1313412001

Amibroker Code

SetBacktestMode(backtestRotational);
SetOption("UsePrevBarEquityForPosSizing", True);
SetOption("MinShares", 1);
SetOption("AllowPositionShrinking",True);
SetOption("AccountMargin",100);
Totalpositions = 3;
SetOption("WorstRankHeld", Totalpositions + 1);
SetOption("MaxOpenPositions", Totalpositions );
//Monthly Rotation
perf= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -1 );
perf1= TimeFrameGetPrice( "C", inMonthly, -2 );
score= 100*((perf- perf1)/perf1) + 100;
PositionSize = -100/Totalpositions;
PositionScore = score;
m = Month();
newMonth = m != Ref( m, -1);
PositionScore = IIf(newMonth, PositionScore, scoreNoRotate);

5aa7109829f12_11_PortfolioEquity.png.1bb87ef76c76d049645accc81cc8df63.png

5aa710982ee79_13_ProfitTable.png.f7aa62f8e6d6a25014784d268e7f0e9c.png

5aa7109832b0e_1_PortfolioEquity.png.3e6108a2ba184f6847e70ca7c4ca831f.png

5aa7109836a28_3_ProfitTable.png.58de0dcccef13730c63e672e2b75d4d3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no experience with amibroker / portfolio backtesting.

 

 

Would you be able to test: select the best 3 performing etfs for last 6 months (trailing), sell only when the top 3 drop out of the top 50% of performers. Perform this monthly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be able to test: select the best 3 performing etfs for last 6 months (trailing), sell only when the top 3 drop out of the top 50% of performers. Perform this monthly.

 

Please put things in rules when you're asking anyone to program. Assuming we're using the 9 SPDRs to test, do you mean?

 

  1. At each month, buy top 3 based on last six months performance
  2. At each month, sell if any spdr falls below the rank of 4 'past six month performers'

 

Both rules will contradict each other, because if we're buying top 3 performers we need to sell if their performance drops below top 3 (not top 4).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article Do Or Die,

I have recently deployed this application in an attempt to validate the theory.

Free stock market forecast. Buy sell emails. Neural network, indexes, technical analysis predictions

The principle is as follow :

- you select a set of reference ETFs (although I set up a predefined one)

- you choose one share to be analysed

The software will first calculate the past inter dependencies between the historical data of the ETF and the historical data of your share.

It will then infer the trend of your share based on the latest data of the set of ETF.

Any thoughts?

Regards,

G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.