Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wsam29

Equities vs. Derivatives

Recommended Posts

Now my brief stink as proprietary day trader in NSADAQ stocks lasted a whole 1 month if I recall.

 

I did not share the same market trading methology as the manager of the firm but I did have a great learning experiance from it. He wanted his traders to scalp for pennies risking 1:1 and trade all day long. Proprietary trading firms which are part of the ECN network get what are called "credits" if they provide liquidity to any ECN they place their order through.

 

Example about providing liquidity, trader A bids 35.98 for 1000 shares of ABCD stock, his order gets filled, he gets a credit by XYZ ECN of 0.002 cents per share. Trader B sold 1000 shares @ 35.98 of ABCD stock on XYZ ECN, he pays XYZ ECN 0.003 cents per share. Trader B took liquidity out of the market so therefore needs to pay up.

 

That was off topic but the manager wanted us to follow the ES for market direction as a reason to enter a long position or even confirmation that our trade will work out. (He could not trade for a net profit day if his life depended on it)

 

So what I'm trying to get at is everyone is looking at everyone for confirmation in a trade to work out or at least put the probabilities in it working out in our favour.

 

When Louis Borsellino used to trade mainly from the SP pit, new traders were told to watch what he did and just follow in his footsteps. Who's to say that his trade will work out?

 

Collectively we should focus on the net order flow to get a sense of direction and confirmation to our trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very interesting, I've always been curious about prop firms and their policies. Any experience you can share will be greatly appreciated. I assume your experience with this firm, there was no freedom to trade your style or methodology?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you asked.

 

The deal with that specific prop. firm was start small trading real money, 100 shares or 1 lot after a 2 day "theory of trading" training session by the manager who has no clue how to trade.

 

Show you can make a profit of $100 per day either by credits or scalping. That is a lot of trading for the course of 1 trading session. What was hand tying was their risk management policy, limit trading loss per trade to 0.02, the ideal loss was 0.01 per share.

 

Once you proved you were a profitable hyper scalper, you were given more capital to trade more size. Your account would always start with what you are given as trading capital. If you hit your loss target, your account would lock up. They had a central system that showed everyone P&L for the day.

 

Now here's the interesting part. At the time I was there, they had this one trader who was either +/-$1000 on any given day and he'd either hit either target within the first 30 minutes of trading. Either way he would stop trading for the day and hang around the office, he pretty much kept to himself. his style of trading...he would find a thinly traded stock and manipulate the price, it would either work or it would not. You need to be very proficient in your hot key order entry since there are many ECN's for you to place your order. Some guys would trade 1 block (10,000 shares) of a highly liquid stock and scalp it for 0.01

 

Some were credit traders, placing a bid or offer to get filled of a sideways moving stock under $5.00, they would be shaving to get in front of the level 2.

 

Either way it was a room full of traders just like us, but some of them looked like they were trading without the slightest clue about market direction, shorting a strong up trending day and getting steamrolled. It was a video game to them, short 10,000 of ORCL just like that and they would do it over and over again because the cost of trading was fractions of a penny.

 

That is where all the volume comes from those NASDAQ stocks, trading firms like that.

 

There I was trying to practice patience and the way they traded was the complete opposite. I did not respect the manager because here this guy was, teaching others how to trade when he could barely do it himself. I was watching him one day trade. Sitting there, left hand, right hand on the keyboard, placing trade after trade after trade, like a robot without emotion. He'd be losing and he'd still continue.

 

The plus side was I did meet this one trader who said to me "Change your way of thinking." I had no idea what he meant at the time, but now I do.

 

In case you are wondering which prop. firm this is...it's Swift Trade.

 

Don't get me wrong some of their traders make nice money, but you need capital to trade 20,000 shares of anything, even on margin. They do how ever retain their traders because of that.

 

One firm I know does futures, ES, NQ and they lose traders after they realize they can trade with as little as $5000 and keep all the net profits.

 

The way they compensate was in tiers.

 

70/30

60/40

50/50

 

The more you make, the more you get to keep. If you were making $1000 every two weeks, you'd get like 30% of net profits. It was not much in the lower bracket so your goal was to be trading size to reap the benefits of the 50/50 spilt.

 

 

In some ways they were tape reading, but have you seen the speed at which some NASDAQ stocks print???

 

It was a good experiance none the less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The criteria is make money within 2 months, if you are doing that, they keep you, if not they let you go.

 

Don't ask how some get it in 2 months because if that were the case, I'd be a millionaire by now.

 

Either way, it was not the way I wanted to play the game like bingo, long here, short here, all for what, a 1 tick scalp?

 

Then again, not all prop. trading firms opperate that way, so I can't bad mouth them all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard about this place...they are in richmond hill right? An aquaintance I knew said he wanted to get into the stock market. And at the time, I remember I heard about this company...swift trade, so I referred him to the website.

 

It was nuts, within 1 week he said he was already trading, they literally take people off the street. He ended up in some dark room near china town or something..with a bunch of computers and people eating food at their stations.

 

Anyways, it sounded bizarre. I should call this guy up to see if he's still there. I'm curious if he was able to stay on the 2 months.

 

I remember he told me in the training session, they simply told the applicants that, if you can play video games really well, you can do this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To wsam28 not all swifts trading offices are like that anymore, well not to the degree you mention at the office I'm at anyhow. They hire you as an indepentent contractor (no trading experience necessary). After 2 days of theory and a short test, you get moved to the computer doing simulation for 2-3 more days before you get to trade live.

 

The office I'm at didn't mention anything about credit trading and no one I know of does it there, I think thats because its too risky nowadays. And from everyone else I've talked with no one is scalping at 10,000 shares (yet its still a fairly new office though). The highest are a few guys at a 1000. They still start you trading at a 100 and allow for a 3 cent trading loss now. Although it's really frowned upon if it happens, especially if you hit anything over this. The office I'm at also doesn't churn you to make hundreds of trades. I average around 40-50 aday because I'm still a beginner and you make mistakes and should learn from them. The number of trades should be decreased over time as you get better reading the markets and with your entry points. I think its about quality over quantity.

 

You also have up to 5 months to make $2000 dollars if you want to advance from student to trader (they call it graduating) before you start getting paid. But I think if you're not cutting it after 3 months, you get let go. The commisions are similar to the scale you mention but it also depends on where your office is located as I know they have offices in China, Phillipines, Malaysia etc.

 

Anyway I've been with Swift for almost a month and so far the experience I've gained as a trader has been quite valuable. It's allowed me to learn the basics of day trading and learning from my mistakes without having to invest any of my own money. Although you can look at the oppurtunity cost of not getting paid for 5-6 months over having a full-time job elsewhere. But I don't have any major expenses to woory about at the moment so the opportunity to learn how to day trade is perfect for me. I supplement my living by having a part time job tutoring so it helps with the minor bills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very enlightening to hear tradingman. I checked out the website. I assume they are looking for college-age recruits only right since most do not currently have high expenses required to have a full time job.

 

Do they trade stocks only? Do they trade futures too? I assume the drop out rate is quite high, considering the 3 cent stop loss is extremely small unless it's the purpose to teach hitting stops every time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.