Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wsam29

Equities vs. Derivatives

Recommended Posts

Now my brief stink as proprietary day trader in NSADAQ stocks lasted a whole 1 month if I recall.

 

I did not share the same market trading methology as the manager of the firm but I did have a great learning experiance from it. He wanted his traders to scalp for pennies risking 1:1 and trade all day long. Proprietary trading firms which are part of the ECN network get what are called "credits" if they provide liquidity to any ECN they place their order through.

 

Example about providing liquidity, trader A bids 35.98 for 1000 shares of ABCD stock, his order gets filled, he gets a credit by XYZ ECN of 0.002 cents per share. Trader B sold 1000 shares @ 35.98 of ABCD stock on XYZ ECN, he pays XYZ ECN 0.003 cents per share. Trader B took liquidity out of the market so therefore needs to pay up.

 

That was off topic but the manager wanted us to follow the ES for market direction as a reason to enter a long position or even confirmation that our trade will work out. (He could not trade for a net profit day if his life depended on it)

 

So what I'm trying to get at is everyone is looking at everyone for confirmation in a trade to work out or at least put the probabilities in it working out in our favour.

 

When Louis Borsellino used to trade mainly from the SP pit, new traders were told to watch what he did and just follow in his footsteps. Who's to say that his trade will work out?

 

Collectively we should focus on the net order flow to get a sense of direction and confirmation to our trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very interesting, I've always been curious about prop firms and their policies. Any experience you can share will be greatly appreciated. I assume your experience with this firm, there was no freedom to trade your style or methodology?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you asked.

 

The deal with that specific prop. firm was start small trading real money, 100 shares or 1 lot after a 2 day "theory of trading" training session by the manager who has no clue how to trade.

 

Show you can make a profit of $100 per day either by credits or scalping. That is a lot of trading for the course of 1 trading session. What was hand tying was their risk management policy, limit trading loss per trade to 0.02, the ideal loss was 0.01 per share.

 

Once you proved you were a profitable hyper scalper, you were given more capital to trade more size. Your account would always start with what you are given as trading capital. If you hit your loss target, your account would lock up. They had a central system that showed everyone P&L for the day.

 

Now here's the interesting part. At the time I was there, they had this one trader who was either +/-$1000 on any given day and he'd either hit either target within the first 30 minutes of trading. Either way he would stop trading for the day and hang around the office, he pretty much kept to himself. his style of trading...he would find a thinly traded stock and manipulate the price, it would either work or it would not. You need to be very proficient in your hot key order entry since there are many ECN's for you to place your order. Some guys would trade 1 block (10,000 shares) of a highly liquid stock and scalp it for 0.01

 

Some were credit traders, placing a bid or offer to get filled of a sideways moving stock under $5.00, they would be shaving to get in front of the level 2.

 

Either way it was a room full of traders just like us, but some of them looked like they were trading without the slightest clue about market direction, shorting a strong up trending day and getting steamrolled. It was a video game to them, short 10,000 of ORCL just like that and they would do it over and over again because the cost of trading was fractions of a penny.

 

That is where all the volume comes from those NASDAQ stocks, trading firms like that.

 

There I was trying to practice patience and the way they traded was the complete opposite. I did not respect the manager because here this guy was, teaching others how to trade when he could barely do it himself. I was watching him one day trade. Sitting there, left hand, right hand on the keyboard, placing trade after trade after trade, like a robot without emotion. He'd be losing and he'd still continue.

 

The plus side was I did meet this one trader who said to me "Change your way of thinking." I had no idea what he meant at the time, but now I do.

 

In case you are wondering which prop. firm this is...it's Swift Trade.

 

Don't get me wrong some of their traders make nice money, but you need capital to trade 20,000 shares of anything, even on margin. They do how ever retain their traders because of that.

 

One firm I know does futures, ES, NQ and they lose traders after they realize they can trade with as little as $5000 and keep all the net profits.

 

The way they compensate was in tiers.

 

70/30

60/40

50/50

 

The more you make, the more you get to keep. If you were making $1000 every two weeks, you'd get like 30% of net profits. It was not much in the lower bracket so your goal was to be trading size to reap the benefits of the 50/50 spilt.

 

 

In some ways they were tape reading, but have you seen the speed at which some NASDAQ stocks print???

 

It was a good experiance none the less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The criteria is make money within 2 months, if you are doing that, they keep you, if not they let you go.

 

Don't ask how some get it in 2 months because if that were the case, I'd be a millionaire by now.

 

Either way, it was not the way I wanted to play the game like bingo, long here, short here, all for what, a 1 tick scalp?

 

Then again, not all prop. trading firms opperate that way, so I can't bad mouth them all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard about this place...they are in richmond hill right? An aquaintance I knew said he wanted to get into the stock market. And at the time, I remember I heard about this company...swift trade, so I referred him to the website.

 

It was nuts, within 1 week he said he was already trading, they literally take people off the street. He ended up in some dark room near china town or something..with a bunch of computers and people eating food at their stations.

 

Anyways, it sounded bizarre. I should call this guy up to see if he's still there. I'm curious if he was able to stay on the 2 months.

 

I remember he told me in the training session, they simply told the applicants that, if you can play video games really well, you can do this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To wsam28 not all swifts trading offices are like that anymore, well not to the degree you mention at the office I'm at anyhow. They hire you as an indepentent contractor (no trading experience necessary). After 2 days of theory and a short test, you get moved to the computer doing simulation for 2-3 more days before you get to trade live.

 

The office I'm at didn't mention anything about credit trading and no one I know of does it there, I think thats because its too risky nowadays. And from everyone else I've talked with no one is scalping at 10,000 shares (yet its still a fairly new office though). The highest are a few guys at a 1000. They still start you trading at a 100 and allow for a 3 cent trading loss now. Although it's really frowned upon if it happens, especially if you hit anything over this. The office I'm at also doesn't churn you to make hundreds of trades. I average around 40-50 aday because I'm still a beginner and you make mistakes and should learn from them. The number of trades should be decreased over time as you get better reading the markets and with your entry points. I think its about quality over quantity.

 

You also have up to 5 months to make $2000 dollars if you want to advance from student to trader (they call it graduating) before you start getting paid. But I think if you're not cutting it after 3 months, you get let go. The commisions are similar to the scale you mention but it also depends on where your office is located as I know they have offices in China, Phillipines, Malaysia etc.

 

Anyway I've been with Swift for almost a month and so far the experience I've gained as a trader has been quite valuable. It's allowed me to learn the basics of day trading and learning from my mistakes without having to invest any of my own money. Although you can look at the oppurtunity cost of not getting paid for 5-6 months over having a full-time job elsewhere. But I don't have any major expenses to woory about at the moment so the opportunity to learn how to day trade is perfect for me. I supplement my living by having a part time job tutoring so it helps with the minor bills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very enlightening to hear tradingman. I checked out the website. I assume they are looking for college-age recruits only right since most do not currently have high expenses required to have a full time job.

 

Do they trade stocks only? Do they trade futures too? I assume the drop out rate is quite high, considering the 3 cent stop loss is extremely small unless it's the purpose to teach hitting stops every time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.