Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheNegotiator

A Brief Comparison of Various Charting/trading Platforms.

Recommended Posts

As this is perhaps one of those things which is a real pain for traders to research and then switch if necessary, I thought it'd be good to share with you some of my experiences with various charting and trading platforms.

 

The various different considerations have to be:-

 

Functionality

Reliability

Speed

Cost

Computing resource requirements

Data feed compatibility

Ability to trade from it(I know this is a function)

 

Firstly I'll just tell you which programs I have used in the past to various degrees. These are:-

 

CQG Integrated Client

CQG Trader

ESignal

Linnsoft Investor/RT

Multicharts

Market Delta

Ninjatrader

Trading Technologies X-Trader Pro

 

Next I'll tell you what I believe I need and what the ideal setup is:-

 

Dedicated trading PC

Charting/Internet PC

Charting Programmability

Depth-of-Market Ladder - DOM

Good Market Profile, Volume Profile and Volume Data Type Indicators

 

The first thing you have to note is that using two PC's means having two data feeds. This costs money. If you use a single PC but want a different charting package to your execution platform, you'll need two data feeds. This costs money.

 

So here's a quick rundown of a few pros and cons of each of the platforms I have mentioned.

 

CQG Integrated Client

 

Excellent platform which I have used extensively in the past. You can do most things with CQG and if you can't do something, there is usually some solution. It's solid, you can trade from it and the data is reliable and on tap. Feed is included. Very good. Very expensive. Last time I checked, it was £400/$800pcm. Really, it offers way more than most traders require.

 

CQG Trader

 

Usually free or built into the brokerage costs. Robust and good data as with CQG IC. Good DOM which can be altered to some extent for how a user wishes to use it. Can open multiple side by side DOMs. No charting as far as I am aware, so you must have an additional data feed to chart as well as use CQG Trader. No SIM unless you do the free trial. So there's no messing about if you are a first time user. You make a mistake, you lose.

 

ESignal

 

Not used this in a long time. At the time it had a lot going for it. Lots of features, lots of symbols. Feed included. Reliability had been an issue for me in the past so I just have avoided it. Not that cheap but I think they have different options now.

 

Linnsoft Investor/RT

 

Does a lot very well at a very reasonable price. Excellent for the charting features which I require. Makes you work hard to do things. Symbols really annoy me. Should be flexible as it is, but be much more straight forward when trying to load charts with common symbols. You have to pay for an additional data feed and they generally aren't cheap. However, if you do most of your analysis out of hours, DTN Market Access is perfect as it's only $15 pcm and gives you(I believe) access to all the symbols which DTN covers. It has a trading ticket I think but no DOM. Programmable for advanced indicators (I don't program but I often use indicators others have written). Lots of indicators on offer. No free trial offered.

 

Multicharts

 

I'm not too familiar with Multicharts. I believe they have just done a major release. I have looked at the free version and honestly, there is nothing I can see that differentiates it from something like Ninjatrader. So unless I see or hear of something that changes my mind, I wouldn't chose to look at it further. I know plenty of people are out there who use it, so it must have something to offer.

 

Market Delta

 

Market Delta is driven by the same engine as Linnsoft Investor/RT. Linnsoft I believe license it out to Market Delta. It has the same basic functionality as IRT and anything you do is done in pretty much the same way. It needs a data feed which you must pay for. It does however go further than IRT with the amount of volume type indicators you can set up out-of-box so to speak. The biggest benefit to me is that you can chart a "delta footprint" and a chart displaying volume traded at price per bid and ask. It's expensive imo. It costs $129 right up to $249 pcm. They do offer a 1 month free trial.

 

Ninjatrader

 

Really useful for beginners. Usually 'free' with costs built into brokerage commissions. You don't get the ability to use automated strategies or use the chart trader function(unless you were grandfathered in with chart trader). To use automated strategies and certain types of orders, you'll need the full version which I beleive you can lease ($50pcm I think) or buy for $1000 one off fee. Very flexible and can do pretty much anything. Not enough indicators which are useful to me. The more custom indicators you install and use, the more the system resources are put under pressure. DOM is very poor. No way of customising it. The way the volume data is displayed makes it very difficult to 'read the tape'. There's no scrolling back on a time & sales window either. Good that charting and trading are in one package though.

 

Trading Technologies X-Trader Pro

 

TT still have imo the benchmark platform when it comes to DOM (or MD as they term it) trading. They originally designed and patented it and in the past there have been issues with different software vendors because of this. It is the fastest, slickest, most robust and useable DOM platform I have used. It now comes with a degree of charting too I believe although I don't actually use it anymore. It is very expensive. Needlessly so imo. It used to be something like £800 per month for Pro. I needed it at the time, but I think there was a standard version which offered the ability to have fewer different contracts up at the time and no advance features for about half the price. I think this is probably the version which brokers offer for 'free' but built into commission structure. I haven't checked but maybe will at some point in the future. The autospreader was very good too. T&S excellent and very useful position window. They also have something called "Orders and Fills Window" which "Combines Order Book, Fill Window, Trade Book and Fill Recapper functionality into one new window. An order toolbar provides one-click order actions along with the ability to uptick, downtick and repeat orders." apparently! Very good product. The platform of choice in arcades.

 

I'd just like to finish off by saying that these are the products I have used and for the features I need, these are my opinions. There are loads of other products out there, good and bad, so feel free to add your comments on what I have written or on your thoughts of other platforms. One thing I may do is take another look at TT at some point and perhaps take a free trial of Sierra Charts. I'll report back when/if I do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
...I thought it'd be good to share with you some of my experiences with various charting and trading platforms.

 

ESignal

 

Not used this in a long time. At the time it had a lot going for it. Lots of features, lots of symbols. Feed included. Reliability had been an issue for me in the past so I just have avoided it. Not that cheap but I think they have different options

 

eSignal update...eSig user for 14 yrs. eSig's data feed has excellent reliability... one of the most reliable available. cost averages < $100 mo. the cost is a business expense.

question: if the trading profits cannot cover the cost of the platform, would switching to a cheaper platform solve the problem?

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  peterjerome said:
eSignal update...eSig user for 14 yrs. eSig's data feed has excellent reliability... one of the most reliable available. cost averages < $100 mo. the cost is a business expense.

question: if the trading profits cannot cover the cost of the platform, would switching to a cheaper platform solve the problem?

peter.

 

Peter,

 

Thanks for sharing your experiences of esignal. I had a different experience and generally I prefer other platforms over it. Value clearly has more to do with what is offered to you and whether it facilitates trading profits when compared to the competition. Trading/charting platforms are a business expense indeed and therefore must be evaluated in terms of value. So a $100p/m platform might be expensive and a $1,000p/m platform might be cheap. Regardless of profitability. Of course if you are a rookie trader who is learning the ropes, paying $1000+ per year is pretty pointless unless it offers you something you can't get for less somewhere else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.