Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

Moment of Truth for Stock Investors

Recommended Posts

The signs right now are that the motor of the European economy is starting to slow down significantly. That was confirmed with the release of second-quarter figures that showed gross domestic product growth of a mere 0.1% at a quarterly rate in the second quarter of the year, significantly lower than the 0.5% most economists had been predicting.

 

Germany will lead the global downturn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

c'mon peeps , challenge the media paradigms just a little bit !!!

 

For example, how could Germany "lead" the global downturn when the global downturn started years ago and Germany has actually held up quite well ? ... up til now, at least... ;)

Germany ain't leading the "downturn". They are following it. Jeez luise, Japan has been leading them into the downturn for some 20 + years now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, I just glanced that article. But I think they were talking something like troubles have been around for decades but Germany just signaled the crash. The US Equity markets affects everyone globally and it was rising happily all this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned in first post, I'm out of almost all of my investment stocks (avg holding 18 months) and currently most trading is short-term.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25802&stc=1&d=1313840891

 

Buyers are stepping in and the market on both Thursday and Friday was relatively stronger than Low of August 8th. On Thursday, the the day began with a large drop, but prices in afternoon reached a balance area supported by buyers; there was also a short-lived test at 3pm while yesterday the market closed near lows which may signify exhaustion. More importantly, buyers were willing to participate at prices generally higher than last Monday’s and Wednesday’s (August 8-10) low closes.

 

The bottom line is that market in last two days has been trading relatively stronger than prior week. As expected RSI has shown a considerable improvement as marked in the chart. Prices have certainly been taken to levels that are normally viewed as very attractive.

 

This was about internal relative strength of the broad market itself. I will look forward to buy stocks on Monday which have been trading relatively stronger than the market.

 

Ticker	Date/Time	Change Since 8/10	
^GSPC	8/19/2011	0.3636	
XLB	8/19/2011	0.5973	
XLE	8/19/2011	1.5414	
XLF	8/19/2011	-0.2467	
XLG	8/19/2011	0.0614	
XLI	8/19/2011	-1.3211	
XLK	8/19/2011	-1.9164	
XLP	8/19/2011	2.6755	
XLU	8/19/2011	7.2517	
XLV	8/19/2011	2.8164	
XLY	8/19/2011	-0.0294

 

The leading sectors of Financials, Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials (XLF,XLK,XLY, XLI) continue to trade relatively weaker than market.

 

Hence my current strategy is to buy stocks for gains in 3-5 days while carry shorts initiated on 3rd August. I will take long trades on Monday only IF the market shows strength. What can be the reward for such anticipatory trading? (acting at the first sign of a double bottom). The move up can be dramatic – and fast. The risk is that selling once again overwhelms buying, driving would-be buyers back to the waiting room once again.

 

Some strong stocks which have been trading relatively stronger than the broad market in last 2 weeks and belong to the defensive group are:

Ticker	Date/Time	Change Since 8/10	
ADM	8/19/2011	5.7648	
AES	8/19/2011	5.1653	
CAG	8/19/2011	2.4648	
CCE	8/19/2011	4.7158	
D	8/19/2011	3.5160	
DTE	8/19/2011	5.1804	
ED	8/19/2011	5.5739	
EXC	8/19/2011	4.8731	
FE	8/19/2011	5.1902	
GIS	8/19/2011	2.4607	
KMB	8/19/2011	4.4430	
KO	8/19/2011	4.9093	
MAT	8/19/2011	2.7778	
MO	8/19/2011	5.5419	
PCG	8/19/2011	5.0497	
PEP	8/19/2011	2.9012	
PG	8/19/2011	4.1873	
SO	8/19/2011	5.1012	
TE	8/19/2011	5.6034

snp.png.89901fc754c307a5c4164cf9ddefae22.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is market state for same day - 19th August. ETFs representing Consumer Staples, Health Care, and Utilities (XLP,XLV,XLU) and Financials, Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials (XLF,XLK,XLY, XLI) are mentioned.

 

  • Trend Strength refers to mid-term trend (similar to 50 day moving average)
  • RS Internal refers to immediate expected movement
  • RS (S&P) refers to how well the sector is performing relative to overall market
  • -100 means extremely bearish and +100 means extremely bullish

 

It can be seen from chart that RS internal turned positive for all sectors.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25900&stc=1&d=1314297211

1.jpg.0efe6ef41a6c0407206a96904fd707d7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Updated chart:

attachment.php?attachmentid=25923&stc=1&d=1314453904

 

See the performance of sectors last week- the defensive sectors underperformed the market (or the leading sectors out performed). This indicates value buying at lows.

Ticker	Change in past week
XLB	6.03
XLF	5.28
XLI	6.18
XLK	5.68
XLP	2.1
XLU	1.88
XLV	3.9
XLY	6.08

 

The chart for mid-term trading indicates indecision- there is no clear direction.

 

There has been support established as I anticipated in previous post. Also the price of Gold dropped very sharply, and will be curtailed now because of margin requirements; and gold has negative correlation with stocks.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25924&stc=1&d=1314453904

SnP.png.6ab22f618ce8593808c5f87337c0d311.png

1.thumb.png.d88bb27925fbf5abd800758547020850.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Utilities are still strong- XLU trading close to 40 day moving average, and the average is slightly sloping upwards. The Financials are the best bet for directional trading, because it is leading the overall market.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=26089&stc=1&d=1315644011

1.thumb.png.ddc8313a50045979082836a3ac5e72cb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Europe, Hange Seng, Indian Nifty have been badly hammered.

 

I remember vividly the scene in Rogue Trader where Nick Leeson tries to support the falling market with his buying. Obama government seems to be in Leeson's shoes, but they of course have much larger power to influence the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

S&P trading below 1140 is very bad.

 

The best weekly gains for this year was in last week of June which marked the end of bull market as well as was shadowed by monster sell-off in mid-July (see first post).

 

We've just seen the second best week of the year (past week) and it may be 'engulfed' today- one hell of a engulfing bear pattern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Do Or Die said:
Europe, Hange Seng, Indian Nifty have been badly hammered.

 

I remember vividly the scene in Rogue Trader where Nick Leeson tries to support the falling market with his buying. Obama government seems to be in Leeson's shoes, but they of course have much larger power to influence the market.

 

the market is brutal... just don't argue with it.

 

an example of artificial government support, and the result:

Black Wednesday

Black Wednesday - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.