Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Collaboration to design a new indicator?

Recommended Posts

I am interested in building an indicator based off a time of sales and tick chart. The basic concept is this: I want an easier way to read the tape and to watch for supply vs demand.

 

What I want is an indicator that plots a histogram of the difference between the number of contracts at the ask vs the number of contracts at the bid. I want this difference taken from a tick chart of choice.

 

For example: If the tick chart settings were set to 233 tick chart, the histogram will plot the difference between the number of contracts at the ask minus the number of contracts at the bid off one 233 tick bar.

 

The parameters for the tick chart settings can be changed to whatever.

 

If anyone can help me with this it would be appreciated. I have no knowledge of EL or coding. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soul I know it is possible and I even have one, i will post it when I find it, but it will work only on real time data, it doesnt look on historical data... on the other side I believe it calculates on up/dn ticks and not real bid ask volume on TS... Linnsoft its about the only soft that has reliable performance on this type of data until now... and has the abilty to recalculate historical data and plot it... maybe the most near competitor its topgunsoftware thought their aproach is quite diferent... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, you could try it realtime with

 

inputs: 
UpColor(green), 
DownColor(red); 

variables: 

MyVol(0), 
Color(yellow), 
intrabarpersist MyCurrentBar(0), 
intrabarpersist VolumeAtBid(0), 
intrabarpersist VolumeAtAsk(0), 
intrabarpersist BAVolDiff(0), 
intrabarpersist VolTmp(0); 

if LastBarOnChart then begin 
  	MyVol = Iff(BarType < 2, Ticks, Volume); 
if CurrentBar > MyCurrentBar then begin 
	VolumeAtBid = 0; 
	VolumeAtAsk = 0; 
	BAVolDiff= 0; 
	VolTmp = 0; 
	MyCurrentBar = CurrentBar; 
end; 
if InsideBid < InsideAsk then begin 
	if Close <= InsideBid then 
		VolumeAtBid = VolumeAtBid + MyVol - VolTmp 
	else if Close >= InsideAsk then 
		VolumeAtAsk = VolumeAtAsk + MyVol - VolTmp ;  
	end; 
if VolumeAtBid > 0 and VolumeAtAsk > 0 then	BAVolDiff= VolumeAtAsk-VolumeAtBid ; 
VolTmp = MyVol ; 
end ; 
if BAVolDiff<= 0 then color = DownColor else color = UpColor; 

plot1(BAVolDiff, "BAVolDiff", color); 
Plot2( 0, "ZeroLine" ) ; 

 

Make sure that you use Trade Volume on Format Symbol.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a radarscreen one called "Tug of war". It shows who is in control, buyers or sellers. It does multi time intervals as well.

 

[LegacyColorValue = true]; 

{_SMAA_TugOfWar  }

{***************************************

Written by: Hondo

Description: For Intra Day Use Only

****************************************}


{Modifying Programmer:  Avery T. Horton, Jr.  aka TheRumpledOne, 
gifts and donation accepted, PO Box 43575, Tucson, AZ 85733 }

{ © Copyright 2006 Avery T. Horton, Jr.}



Inputs: 

iDecimals(2); 

VARIABLES: 

Last_Close ( 0 ) ;

variables: 

xTug(0),   

xPeriods(60),
xInterval(0),

sFirstPass(true),

xMRO( 0 ),
xIndMin( 0 ),
xIndAvg( 0 ),
xInd(0),
tInd(""),


FG1(white),
BG1(black),

fg2(white),
bg2(black),

fg3(white),
bg3(black),

fg4(white),
bg4(black),

vdummy("");


{commentary variables}
variables: 
xcomm(0),
oComm1( "" ), 	
oComm2( "" ), 	
oComm3( "" ), 	
oComm4( "" ), 	
oComm5( "" ),
oComm6( "" ),
oComm7( "" ),
oComm8( "" ),
oComm9( "" ), 	
oComm10( "" ); 



{first time through}

if sFirstPass
then begin

sFirstPass = false;

{bar test}

If bartype = 4
then xInterval = 94
else
If bartype = 3
then xInterval = 93
else
If bartype = 2
then xInterval = 92
else
If bartype = 1
then begin
xInterval = BarInterval;
end; { If bartype = 1  }

end; {if sFirstPass}


{ INITIALIZE }

tInd = "";

FG1 = WHITE;
BG1 = BLACK;

fg2 = WHITE;
bg2 = BLACK;

fg3 = WHITE;
bg3 = BLACK;

fg4 = WHITE;
bg4 = BLACK;


{ PROCESSING }


{ calculations }

if bartype  <> 1
then tInd = "error - intraday interval only" ;


if Last_Close <> Close or 
BarStatus(1) = 2 
then begin 
// Calcs, Plots, Buy/Sells go here 

{Tug of War}

Value1 =((HighD(1)-LowD(1))+(HighD(2)-LowD(2))+(HighD(3)-LowD(3))+(HighD(4)-LowD(4))+(HighD(5)-LowD(5)))/5;
Value2 =(HighD(0) - Value1);
Value3 =(LowD(0) + Value1);

value5 = Value3 - Value2 ;

if value5 <> 0 
then xTug = ( Close - Value2 ) / value5
else xTug = xTug[1] ; 

end ; // update only on price change of last tick of bar 

Last_Close = Close ; 

{ Alert criteria }

xInd = xTug ;

If xInd > xInd[1]
then begin
Fg1 = green;
Bg1 = BLACK;
end
else
If xInd < xInd[1]
then begin
Fg1 = red;
Bg1 = BLACK;
end
else
begin
Fg1 = white;
Bg1 = BLACK;
end;


If xInd > .50
then begin
tInd = "Buyers Winning" ;
Fg2 = green;
Bg2 = BLACK;
end
else
If xInd < .50
then begin
tInd = "Sellers Winning" ;
Fg2 = red;
Bg2 = BLACK;
end
else begin	
tInd = "Draw" ;
Fg2 = white;
Bg2 = BLACK;
end;

Plot1( xTug , "Tug of War", fg1 ) ;
SetPlotBGColor( 1, bg1);


Plot2(tInd, "Message", fg2 ) ;
SetPlotBGColor( 2, bg2);




{

Plot3( oSlowK, "oSlowK", fg3 ) ;
SetPlotBGColor( 3, bg3);


Plot4( oSlowD, "oSlowD", fg4 ) ;
SetPlotBGColor( 4, bg4);
} 


xComm = _fCommentary(oComm1, oComm2, oComm3, oComm4, oComm5, oComm6, oComm7, oComm8, oComm9, oComm10);

CommentaryCl(oComm1 );

CommentaryCl(oComm2 );
CommentaryCl(oComm3 );
CommentaryCl(oComm4 );
CommentaryCl(oComm5 );
CommentaryCl(oComm6 );
CommentaryCl(oComm7 );
CommentaryCl(oComm8 );
CommentaryCl(oComm9 );
CommentaryCl(oComm10 );


CommentaryCl( " Tug Of War ", NumToStr(xInd, iDecimals) );

tug.gif.bf1f8de29861ff232907aeafe01d3c60.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok heres the indicator... thanks for the chart Tin. Apparently its called the volume breakdown indicator. Does anyone know if this exits for TS? Thanks

 

 

I have something like that, I'll post a screen shot of it in action and you tell me if that is what you are looking for.

 

it even plots an average of volume but you can take it out if yuo don't like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure I would like to take a look. Insideday made an indicator posted on page 1 of this thread which is pretty much what I wanted. I'll post a snapshot of that tomorrow after the close since it only works in real time. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure I would like to take a look. Insideday made an indicator posted on page 1 of this thread which is pretty much what I wanted. I'll post a snapshot of that tomorrow after the close since it only works in real time. Thanks

 

 

Are you saying there is an Easy Language programmer here???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is TRO's version (automatic floor pivots) with a radar trade indicator. The radar indicator should be set on 15 min time interval. It's a football analogy to trading. On the radar screen, Trade tells you when the alert hits, Possession is who has the ball (who is in control), TOP is the time of possession and Ball On is where the price is on a 100 yard field. Both are included in the eld.

gridiron.thumb.gif.4666f0e1aa80036682f1258efba1b2df.gif

gridiron1.thumb.gif.c0a4512688bef0ddff0a617107b72873.gif

gridirontrade.gif.01584fd31a3b730d06802ba2af76a732.gif

GRIDIRONANDTRADEINDICATOR.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soul, I couldnt find the indicator I promissed, its just about the same posted at beggining.... sorry for that.

 

I still dont know if the delta that ts creates really can be trusted... I understand that ts data uses for bid and ask values the up/ dn ticks... soul you should double check this factor because if this is true the delta that this indicator creates its not that much reliable... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure I would like to take a look. Insideday made an indicator posted on page 1 of this thread which is pretty much what I wanted. I'll post a snapshot of that tomorrow after the close since it only works in real time. Thanks

 

 

I have no clue where to find the actual ELD file to upload and I have no clue how to do that either.

5aa70dc37fb15_tickvol.thumb.jpg.7e9b3e74e9f6150ff1aadf33b43dfdc7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wsam29,

 

If you are sure that it is not an indicator that you paid for, do this:

 

1. Open TradeStation

2. Select the File | Import/Export EasyLanguage ... menu

3. Select Export EasyLanguage Documents file (ELD). Click Next.

4. In the Export Wizard Select All Techniques

5. Then select the TTM Tick Volume Indicator. Click on the > button.

6. Click Next.

7. Type in C:\TTM-Bid-Ask-Bars as the File Name

8. Click Finish

 

You will now have the TTM-Bid-Ask-Bars.eld file in C:\

 

Upload it.

1.PNG.bc3de687fc942609cd898b2f5b3191d2.PNG

2.PNG.c4a7f5d5e96ee4b520941d091b9a0b9f.PNG

3.PNG.e0aa4661bb2119d018761fb355efdd30.PNG

4.PNG.95ff89b4ad2be4384d95b703e4b20c99.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeap, ttm tick volume, its free to public, its been given freely by tradethemarkets.com to their members , but originally was developed by waynechem from tradestation forum, the original name of the indicator is WAV_VOL_3 you can see here his thread and the indicator link https://www.tradestation.com/discussions/Topic.aspx?Result=1&Topic_ID=42531 the indicator looks very good, and does work on historical data... it is based on up/dn ticks... so it would be a Delta from ticks... I attach the indicator, Enjoy cheers, Walter.

20050830200518WAV_VOL_3.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.