Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

zdo

At Your 'mean'

Recommended Posts

Alright... I make trades at the extremes from the mean (as defined by the market price)... or, I trade breakouts of the extremes. What is throwing me, is the term "at your mean". Price defines the mean, and I'm responding to price action as it corresponds to the mean. The market defines the mean price level... I have no say in the matter. There are strategies in use of the Andrews pitchfork which involve buying or selling the extremes, and scaling in or out of positions at the mean. Even this is defined by the market price and trend though (I don't use this method... it's just my understanding of one method that involves the mean).

 

Not getting it... but, it wouldn't be the first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... I've been sidetracked by my own density. After reading back through the thread (carefully) I understand what you are describing as "your mean". I do have a "mean" that is expressed by price extremes. This would be more of a band or area above and below a trend line of a price pattern. Price movement into this range, would trigger the possibility of a trade, but not initiate one. What I'm looking for is the market to indicate a reversal. once I've seen that, my entry is on the pullback from that reversal move. Sorry dude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jpennybags, et al,

 

re: “What is throwing me, is the term "at your mean"”.

 

I emphasized ‘at your mean’ to keep the question an open question. Had I limited it to a certain moving average or another ‘mean’, I suspected that those who didn’t use that particular ‘mean’ would be less inclined to contribute… so far turns out it didn’t matter much

 

and re “Price defines the mean, and I'm responding to price action as it corresponds to the mean.”

Yes price does create ‘mean’ but it doesn’t define ‘the mean’. At each price there is a whole spectrum of available ‘means’, not just one ‘the mean’ .

Most ‘means’ are ultimately 'mean'ingless :doh: ;) – those considered AND those not included in considerations…

 

re “There are strategies in use of the Andrews pitchfork which involve buying or selling the extremes, and scaling in or out of positions at the mean…” Great observation ! Also makes it a perfect one off example of why I didn’t specify a particular ‘mean’ – few would consider / remember / whatever that the Andrews Median Line is yet another way of ‘mean’ projection.

…and basically, the OP question is the same as Andrews conundrum – what to do at ‘your mean’?

 

  Quote
Andrews observed certain price behavior as price approached the line - and especially that price tended to change trend at or near the line.

Andrews determined there was a high probability price returned to this line after the third pivot

Those familiar with Andrews’ work know that he determined prices tended to change trend when they reach the Median Line. Many expect prices to reverse at this line every time without fail, and quickly dismiss the method when they find out it does not. Andrews determined the line could indeed be used to signal a change in trend, BUT according to his course, “under specified conditions”. So, apparently there is more to it than that.

Is the method worth further study?

 

Andrews' Pitchfork - an Explanation

 

Attached is EURUSD 144 minute sort of real time example

MedianLineAsMean.thumb.jpg.a75f821109bb625e1513d5e37236610b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At each price there is a whole spectrum of available ‘means’, not just one ‘the mean’ .

 

 

I realize this not where you intended to take this thread, but as we are already here:

 

I would agree with this statement if you had said "in each price pattern" instead of "at each price"... please explain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jpennybags said:
At each price there is a whole spectrum of available ‘means’, not just one ‘the mean’ .

 

 

I realize this not where you intended to take this thread, but as we are already here:

 

I would agree with this statement if you had said "in each price pattern" instead of "at each price"... please explain.

 

How about “At each moment in time, there is a whole spectrum…” ?

That and “in each price pattern” and “at each price” all seem functionally interchangeable to me at this point…

but please note I’m probably getting downright slappy at this point… am on a trading marathon. The trading is fun and easy at this time - but I’m really starting to feel the net 17 hour + days spread all over any 24 hour period…

and I may be at it all week... more turns in last 4 trading days than previous (vacation shortened) month combined... yammering post count per day also way up., too..

hmm :missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jpennybags said:
... In the end, talking about / concerning yourself with "mean" price is somewhat superfluous... to that I would agree.

Does that mean ;) making trading entries at (your) "mean" price is also somewhat superfluous?

 

  Quote
Boys, Oh Boys, Oh Boys! It's makes you wonder! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can draw a trend line anywhere... is it right, will it be right... don't know, don't care. I'm looking for the market to show me something that I'm looking for at that point in time. For me, and the way I trade..."my mean" is superfluous. If I were to spend a great deal of time considering it, what good would it do me in any practical sense... I'm looking for something that is "kinda right" based on price patterns.

 

Consider someone who is a strictly a system trader who takes every signal... especially automated systems. Their "mean" should probably carry more weight (for them) than "my mean" does for me.

 

By the way... what do you do at your mean? You haven't said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jpennybags said:
By the way... what do you do at your mean? You haven't said.

 

Yes I have. From Post 19 “Generally (and somewhat in terms of trends), I am repeatedly assessing the probabilities of whether the current move back to my ‘mean’ is a correction and the mean ‘value’ will hold and the current trend resume or price will cross mean and a new ‘trend’ form with my ‘mean’ / ‘value’ now moving in the other direction from the direction it was moving at the most recent extreme before the reversion.”

I have a ‘mean’ that (is only used / “carries any weight” in certain MarketTypes and in those Types) gets visited / tapped by the high or low extreme of a bar quite frequently. Was just asking what others do (if anything) at their ‘mean’. Two ideas so far…

 

 

  jpennybags said:
For me, and the way I trade..."my mean" is superfluous.

 

from the OP (Post #1)

“… if you don’t use a ‘mean’ or make trading decisions or executions at your ‘mean’ as described above, then please ignore question..."

ie the question was for those who do routinely make trades at their ‘means’

 

Besides the fact that all but a few of us are "looking for something that is "kinda right" based on price patterns", why am I even talking with you? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.