Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mslk

Manual or Automated Trading?

Recommended Posts

as i have been reading thru the numerous threads about people techniques (phantom, maelstrom, optiontimer, etc), a question always pops in my mind - "is any of this automated?"

 

if not, is it possible? or does successful trading require more than just programming models into a system? do you need to develop some gut-instinct as well?

 

- mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
as i have been reading thru the numerous threads about people techniques (phantom, maelstrom, optiontimer, etc), a question always pops in my mind - "is any of this automated?"

 

if not, is it possible? or does successful trading require more than just programming models into a system? do you need to develop some gut-instinct as well?

 

- mslk

 

if you can articulate your logic in plain English,

you can program it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you can articulate your logic in plain English,

you can program it.

 

Sorry Tams, but as a professional programmer with 35 years experience, I can unequivocally say that your statement just is not true.

Of course many systems can be automated. But the problem lies with systems where the signals are not generated by "when X is 2 cents below Y." There are traders I have worked with who can tell me exactly what they are doing and I can program an approximation, but the backtesting blows up because I can *never* find a Z% away from W that adequately captures their "artistic" entries.

I like programming systems but I have never got one to work that adequately approximates how *I* trade. Now that's frustrating! :crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The mindset of being an automated systems developer is quite a bit different from the mindset of being a discretionary / rule based systems trader. The best system developers I know would consider manual trading to be a complete waste of time. They find a niche edge and become masters of testing and accurately reading performance reports and real time tweaking instead of masters live ‘screen time’ trading.

 

After a while at it, I finally realized I had to spend months as one, then months as the other to get desired results – but maybe that’s just me. After almost 25 years of trading full time, I still look at some methods and fantasize about automating it but realize how extremely arduous it would actually be to even try – all the while without any guarantees of acceptable results. Been there done that – more than once. :) Also have been blessed to develop some automation that is still standing the test of tme...

 

Also, finding a programmer to get into a shared vision with you / really understand what you are trying to accomplish, and make the wholehearted commitment required has odds about like playing the ‘big game’ lotteries. The huge majority of programmers, including most 'do it yourself'ers, can’t even begin to think and code into the uncertainty and fuzziness of varying multiple weights / influence of parameters that is required.

 

It takes a great deal of work to fully automate most methods – largely because it’s very arduous to correctly program all the parameter fuzzinesses that individual's grayware handles quite a bit more routinely. Basically, the practiced eye can discern and unconsciously use information, but not be able to quantify it in code well enough where it works the same way automated as it does manually for close to the same percentage of signals. Generally most beginners find that code can generally handle setups ok, but anything but the simplest of context conditions can quickly become a very 'disencouraging' activity…

 

In the ‘distribution’ of methods, the great middle of systems ie analysis methods most traders use are the ones most difficult to automate. Very generally speaking, the systems that can be ‘easy’ to automate are in the tails. Both are ‘simple’ types of systems. They are either in or near the lower win rate tail (think long term trend, etc.) or they are in or near the high win rate tail (think HFT, etc.). The real challenge programmatically for both of these types of ‘easy’ automation is proper risk management. Without automated sizing too, the whole development effort can be a waste, etc etc. … am not jaded and I still love automation. Just trying to be real here

:missy:

hth

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry Tams, but as a professional programmer with 35 years experience, I can unequivocally say that your statement just is not true.

Of course many systems can be automated. But the problem lies with systems where the signals are not generated by "when X is 2 cents below Y." There are traders I have worked with who can tell me exactly what they are doing and I can program an approximation, but the backtesting blows up because I can *never* find a Z% away from W that adequately captures their "artistic" entries.

I like programming systems but I have never got one to work that adequately approximates how *I* trade. Now that's frustrating! :crap:

 

then you are talking non-logic... it cannot be coded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the first step is getting your thoughts in clarity

 

human mind works in fuzzy logic

 

computers/languages we have access to works in sequential logic

 

before you can code anything,

you have to reduce your fuzzy feelings into cold hard facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said, zdo.

 

My experience working with my brother, who is a high level programmer, attests to your insights. We've tried, but we just couldn't do it.

 

I'm not saying that it is not possible.

 

I am saying that our results were not reliable.

 

Huge difference.

 

 

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you can articulate your logic in plain English,

you can program it.

 

I think the issue here is: Can one articulate one's logic in plain English?

 

Talk is cheap, Tams.

 

How about you posting one of your trades where you coded the entry and exit and had the computer bring you a REAL profit?

 

Otherwise, we can assume you're only playing the Devil's Advocate...

 

 

Phantom

 

P.S. and if you reply with something lame, like, "you can assume whatever you want..." We'll have to "consider the source" from here on out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams is absolutely correct about “if … logic in plain English, then…” – Theoretically.

 

But practically ?? A quick, incomplete example - It is ‘logical’ for 1) a certain condition to fall within a certain range to be ‘true’, 2) for that ‘trueness’ range to vary in size and location (still under logical but suddenly overly complicated conditions) … practically, the 'coding' practicality falls off rapidly and precipitously...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking the diff’s btwn manual and automated several layers further - In much manual trading, even cognitive ‘work’ with “all the parameter fuzzinesses that our grayware handles…” isn’t logical.

 

‘Worse’ yet for attempts at coding, beyond that we also have the issue of subjective probability accessed not from the cognitive but from adaptive utilization of the ‘soft’ data of emotions. You can actually train yourself to consciously benefit from awareness of common cause and special cause and ambiguity aversion,etc. Knightian uncertainty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia etc etc

Let’s see you code that sht, bit! :rofl: ( …jerk gotta scoot so finished this up tersely instead of nicely )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Taking the diff’s btwn manual and automated several layers further - In much manual trading, even cognitive ‘work’ with “all the parameter fuzzinesses that our grayware handles…” isn’t logical.

 

‘Worse’ yet for attempts at coding, beyond that we also have the issue of subjective probability accessed not from the cognitive but from adaptive utilization of the ‘soft’ data of emotions. You can actually train yourself to consciously benefit from awareness of common cause and special cause and ambiguity aversion,etc. Knightian uncertainty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia etc etc

Let’s see you code that sht, bit! :rofl: ( …jerk gotta scoot so finished this up tersely instead of nicely )

 

WOW. Now THAT was a mouthful!

 

Think I'll stick to manually trading breakouts of ranges with evidence of price rejection...

 

I gotta go wipe my forehead off...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
then you are talking non-logic... it cannot be coded.

 

tams, is your trading 100% automatic? i am also a programmer by trade and thus automating is always my natural instinct. on one hand, i see your point - if your rules are logical and clear, in theory it should be programmable. in practice, i see some issues with sequential languages and maybe a rules-based language might be better. but back to the topic, how much of your trading is automated?

 

I think the issue here is: Can one articulate one's logic in plain English?

 

you hit the nail on the head phantom!

 

Talk is cheap, Tams.

How about you posting one of your trades where you coded the entry and exit and had the computer bring you a REAL profit?

 

lets not get into a 'prove' yourself flamewar .. tams i'll take your word on whatever your response is.

 

any other traders have any input? timracette, thenegotiator, mms, steve46, thalestrader, urmablume?

 

thanks

-mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tams, is your trading 100% automatic? i am also a programmer by trade and thus automating is always my natural instinct. on one hand, i see your point - if your rules are logical and clear, in theory it should be programmable. in practice, i see some issues with sequential languages and maybe a rules-based language might be better. but back to the topic, how much of your trading is automated?

 

...thanks

-mslk

 

my trading is not automated.

 

I have audio and visual alert on key events,

but the signals are not automated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a trader with an IB, I have two developers working with me developing "strategies" to assist my trading. At the end of the day human instinct/gut felling is where the real money is.

 

The markets are driven by emotions (fear/greed), no program can cover that. It is easy to fit a strategy to historical data. However, humans do irrational things at expected and unexpected times which could never be accounted for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My apologies.

Phantom

 

no worries, i've just seen other threads where this stuff kills the thread (e.g. most threads where steve46 is involved!)

 

anyhow, my motivation for this question is really around picking the right broker\platform. obviously, if success can be achieved via programming then i need to be more selective and my options are more limited. i've been playing with ninja but also looking at tradestation as its broker integration is nice. for any of the programmers out there, what are you using?

 

thanks

- mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
However, humans do irrational things at expected and unexpected times which could never be accounted for.

 

are you referring to other traders or yourself? if its other traders, is the idea for you to spot these and take advantage of?

 

if its yourself, then isn't the point of automation to try and eliminate these (assuming its programmed correctly with the right fail-safes). thanks for the input.

 

anyone know what the big institutions\hedge-funds do?

 

thanks

- mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there are 3 types of autotrading

 

1. trend following

 

2. scalping, also known as buy low sell high. most of HFT are in this category.

 

3. spread/differential trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there are 3 types of manual trading

 

1. trend following

 

2. scalping, also known as buy low sell high. most of HFT are in this category.

 

3. spread/differential trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i've been playing with ninja but also looking at tradestation as its broker integration is nice. for any of the programmers out there, what are you using?

 

thanks

- mslk

 

I use IB and have done a little programming against its java API...not perfect, but could be worse. Let me warn you, don't use Tradestation Futures edition. It plain sucks. The regular Tradestation 8 for equities is OK. By the way, I use ninja for charting, it gets its data feed from IB with no problem except IB doesn't send tick data :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there are 3 types of manual trading

 

1. trend following

 

2. scalping, also known as buy low sell high. most of HFT are in this category.

 

3. spread/differential trading

 

tams - i don't know if your being sarcastic or not. instead of speaking in code, what do you mean by these 2 posts?

 

thanks

- mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tams - i don't know if your being sarcastic or not. instead of speaking in code, what do you mean by these 2 posts?

 

thanks

- mslk

 

autotrading is just a reflection of manual trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
are you referring to other traders or yourself? if its other traders, is the idea for you to spot these and take advantage of?

 

if its yourself, then isn't the point of automation to try and eliminate these (assuming its programmed correctly with the right fail-safes). thanks for the input.

 

anyone know what the big institutions\hedge-funds do?

 

thanks

- mslk

 

The hedge funds that trade through us use multiple strategies. Unfortunately we may only be seeing one side of the trade. Hedge funds tend to use multiple prime brokers to execute through.

 

Even your Quant funds use research reports, i.e. Fundamental analysis

 

What I was referring to if you could predict human behaviour making money in the markets would be easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

n!

permutations

factorial

 

Factorial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Let's assume you have 2 Moving averages on one chart, and 2 Moving averages on another time frame chart. Then you have identified 3 basic behaviors of each. Then you look at support and resistance, and have identified 3 basic behaviors of each. Then you have one lower study, and are looking for 4 basic behaviors from the lower study. So you have 12 conditions that you are trying to monitor.

 

  • 3 conditions from Chart One with two MA's
  • 3 possible conditions from Chart 2 with 2 MA's
  • Support and resistance with 3 possible conditions you are filtering for
  • 1 Lower study with four specific conditions you are looking for. E.g. Over 40, Under -40, Just went under zero, Just went over Zero. There could be many more.

 

There are 479,001,600 possible combinations of those 12 conditions. So you need to find a way to either exclude a lot of those possible conditions, or combinations of conditions, or you need to be able to evaluate over 479 million different possibilities.

 

So if you want to rely on pure computing power, and a complete analysis of every possible combination, it would seem that your system would need to somehow filter through hundreds of millions of possible conditions. And you would need to define what each of the millions of possible combinations means.

 

Or you need some way of figuring out why 99.999999% of those 479 million possible combinations are irrelevant, and define which combinations are the only relevant ones.

 

When you realize how many possible combinations of the conditions there can be, it's understandable how easy it is to miss what is really going on in the market. No one can possibly monitor hundreds of millions of possible combinations in real time.

 

Excellent trading knowledge might be able to easily discount the vast majority of those combinations as meaningless to a trading decision, but still, even if you are left with hundreds of possible combinations of your trading inputs, that's still not easy to quickly evaluate in real time.

 

We don't consciously understand how much data the brain is processing in real time. It's a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in practice, i see some issues with sequential languages and maybe a rules-based language might be better

 

-mslk

 

I think a combination of an artificial intelligence language like Prolog and a sequential language like C++/C# would provide a framework for a workable 'expert system'. This would be a long-term project of at least a few years.

 

From my experience a good programmer makes a terrible discretionary trader and a good discretionary trader makes a sub par programmer. In order to create an 'expert system' you also have to be an expert to begin with. :-) I wonder how many good traders know enough programming to put their subconscious rules into a set of programmable rules?

 

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.