Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Nick1984

Asia/Pacific traders...How do you cope with the time difference?

Recommended Posts

First post on these forums! Long time reader first time poster hehe.

 

Anyhow, it seems like most ppl on these forums trade the US markets.

For those of you who live in the Asia/Pacific region (Australia included) how do you guys cope with the time difference?

 

Why not trade the Asian markets instead?

 

 

 

 

P.S: On a little brown nosing note, great site, heaps of usefull info, and great community here. Glad to be a part of it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At one point in my trading career I was trading the Nikkei listed on SGX, Nick Leeson got my inspired to trade the market that brought down Barings Bank after seeing a movie made about it "Rouge Trader"

 

Not to mention I was scared of the US markets because of some huge losses I took, but that is a different discussion all together.

 

For one thing, the US market is the only market that I am aware of that has market internals to show the health of the stock market. I also believe the Korea Stock Exchange has market internals as well, but I do not know of any data vendor that supplies that data.

 

There is more liquidity in the US markets compared to other financial markets in the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea its the depth that you can find in the US markets that makes them so attractive.

 

If the SFE had the depth that the US markets had, i'd have no trouble or doubts trading it. By when you get over 100K + contracts per day on the CBE E-mini's you can't really compare.

 

I feel like I understand our All Ordinaries index very well but unti we can get the depth in the Aussie markets, it still feels to prohibitive :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I feel like I understand our All Ordinaries index very well but unti we can get the depth in the Aussie markets, it still feels to prohibitive :(

 

 

What I suggest you understand in trader psychology and market psychology, it applies to all markets in the world.

 

I just took a look at an SPI200 chart, its got some nice flow to it on a 5 minute chart, whats the spread like for that contract?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What I suggest you understand in trader psychology and market psychology, it applies to all markets in the world.

 

heheh sorry should of expressed that a bit better. I mean't that as in I feel comfortable with the All Ords here in Aus. Its true that the psychology of the markets is universal, but i think that most people would feel comfortable in their own domestic markets if they weren't limited by lack of depth/liquidity.

 

I think certain wool futures contracts only have a cpl hundred contracts traded a day!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first encounter with trading was during my time in Boston. I studied the US markets initially and focused strictly on it. By the time I came back to Tokyo, I was completely absorbed with the US markets.

 

Trading the US markets is a complete turn around for me.. I trade from 11:30pm night time and finish around 6:00am. A complete night trader. At first I felt extremely unhealthy... but after a few years Im pretty used to it now. I would move to the US if I could in a heartbeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest graeme
Yea its the depth that you can find in the US markets that makes them so attractive.

 

If the SFE had the depth that the US markets had, i'd have no trouble or doubts trading it. By when you get over 100K + contracts per day on the CBE E-mini's you can't really compare.

 

I feel like I understand our All Ordinaries index very well but unti we can get the depth in the Aussie markets, it still feels to prohibitive :(

 

If you want to do some serious size, there is always the nikkei or kospi. You can still daytrade the SPI, but if you want to dump 20-30 lots on the market in 1 hit, you are obviously going to have some problems with slippage. Otherwise it's been a great contract to trade.

 

Obviously it's going to be a case of personal preference for each person, but there are more than enough opportunities for the retail trader in Asia to do quite well without having to be awake at 3am. Personally, I like my sleep too much!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey, soul i would love to switch place with you. i feel more energy and focus at night. and i have to snap my faces in order to wake up 630 in the morning. :p

PS: couldn't trade since last week due to the borke internet cable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi nsitt, do you trade forex? it's about as even as anywhere else I believe. You see what everyone else sees

 

nah not forex. I don't know why but something about it scares me :o

At the moment I do stocks and am looking to move into futures. That leverage effect is calling to me hehe.

 

Given the responses to this thread as well as reading several others, seems that lifestyle plays a HUGE part in most ppl's trading. Kudos to Soul for keeping up that gruelling schedule!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.