Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sign in to follow this  
Predictor

Trading NADEX Spreads

Recommended Posts

Regards, I know a lot of people don't have the money to trade the ES futures. I have 2 of the top ranked > 6 months old strategies at C2 and I still didn't feel quite up to trading the full contracts. I wanted to share my experience trading at NADEX. I don't have any affiliation with them. But, I think not many people know about them and want make others aware of them! I only found them because I was looking for CFD's which aren't available to us US guys.

 

Anyway, NADEX offers bull spreads based on the futures and forex market (i.e ES, CL, YM, etc). These are limited risk/reward spreads and are small as $1 tick. The SP500 bull spread is based on the ES and has $10 to 1 ES point equivalent.

 

I wrote 2 writeups on them here:

 

http://themarketpredictor.com/Details/2011/2/26/Nadex,%20Emini%20Alternative

 

http://themarketpredictor.com/Details/2011/3/1/NADEX%20Binaries,%20Attractive%20Solution

-------------

 

Brief benefits:

* Great leverage and granularity of contracts

* Wide range of markets (Forex, Index, Commodities)

* No PDT rules

* Limited risk/reward

 

Detriments:

* Not as efficient as futures market (paying outside best bid/best ask)

* Time limited contracts. This is my biggest issue to date.

* Tick size to commissions is high

* Leverage can work both for and against you

 

 

 

I wanted to share also strategies I've found for successfully trading them. I've had my account since April and on a 3k model account (1k of capital) my net real money return at peak was $1500+, currently around $500.

 

General principles for trading the bull spreads

 

* It tends to pay to take on more risk then buy right at the floor/ceiling. I'm typically willing to make no more then 3 to 4 points of premium (market premium). General strategy is to first, look at the market price and see where it is trading. Look at the wide spread 800 points. Next, go to the narrow spreads and see find the spread that is priced most closely to market. Check the dollar risk/reward. Be sure to cap both point risk and dollar risk to avoid paying too much in premium. Capping point risk will help you avoid paying too much in premium if you make a mistake.

 

* Do not close the spread for a loss unless you know you are wrong. I've had spreads go to zero and then come back and break even or even make money. While stops are required in highly leveraged futures trading, when you don't use stops then you maximize your winning potential. I only close spread if I'm sure that I'm wrong and typically only at near break even.

 

* For the futures market, you typically have to execute outside the best bid/best ask. If you trade $30 per point then you are down $18 when entering and exiting a trade. If you hold until expiry then will not pay the spread (your expiry commissions however will not be capped at $7/turn). However, if the trade reverses you won't have time for it to recover either. I.e the spreads expire at end of day and this has proven my greatest challenge in trading them.

 

* Be sure to figure in your fees when trying to break even and choosing trading style. If you trade 3 contracts then you will be down around $18 in spread and $6 in fees when entering: you must make $24 to break even. In general, I do not recommend to "scalp" these because of that. They do work well for my style -- taking out trend moves. You can also take out a measured move with them, as well -- 3 to 4 points.

 

* Be sure to look at time expiry. In general, you want as much time as possible unless you have a specific reason not too.

 

* Prefer binaries when buying/selling extremes. The bull spreads will often not respond to the degree you'd hope for because the time premium is such a large part of price at extremes.

 

* Sometimes paying a slight bit in premium is not a bad idea. The premium will decay slowly over time and so even if you pay up then you won't lose that "instantly". Generally though, the market pays you to take more risk. Trying to find a risk/reward where you are only paying a slight bit in premium but have capped risk and can leverage to a greater extent.

 

* In general, do not buy spreads that out-of-the-money until/unless you are advanced and have strong reason.

 

Principles on binaries

 

* Prefer to buy binaries on price extremes

* Remember you give up a significant edge when trading binaries: the edge is around 8% with commission. Most technical based methods only have a 2% to 2.5% edge. Be sure you have a strong edge when trading the binary.

* Only sell a binary at a loss if you are sure the trade is dead and you are wrong. I've had binaries go to nearly worthless on me and then expire with full payout. However, if I'm wrong then I will close them out even if there is only $15 to save. When closing out a losing binary, try to pick a limit order that will get you best price and cost you least amount. I mean be willing to fight for it: you've probably lost most of the value by time you recognize you are wrong anyway.

* Prefer at-the-money or slightly out-of-the-money binaries.

---

 

Also, I don't trade the Forex markets yet but they claim their Forex markets are often as good as the spot FX, i.e your bid/ask. So, whether you will have to pay outside the best bid/best ask depends on the market. It is always the case with the ES but the spreads are fairly constant and so I just factor that in.

 

I'm not stating it is easy. But, if you are trading the ES on simulator successfully and if your strategy isn't just scalping then I highly recommend you to start getting some real money experience.

 

You can open account for as little as $100. I'm trading with only 1k in the account right now but I'm willing to put in a lot more in the account if needed.

 

My recommended lot sizes for a 3k account:

 

Small

2 Contracts = $20 point. Use for widest spreads.

 

Standard

3 Contracts = $30 point.

 

Heavy

4 Contracts = $40 point. Only when most confident.

 

Max account risk:

I feel one needs to be able to take 12 losses in a row. This would be a max risk of around $250 per trade or 8% of account. You need to take into account probability of loss and the max loss. In futures market, my REALIZED risk per trade is often lower then trading spreads but my MAXIMUM risk is higher. Do not confuse theoretical risk/reward with PROBABLE risk/reward. In general, if you need to risk $350 to $500 on a trade then be prepared to do that with a tiny account. Even risking up to 20% of the account may be justified if you have a strong edge.

 

Take advantage:

Take advantage of the small size. I am probably capitalized enough where I could trade the ES on some days but may not take every trade. I have traded ES for years though but I could not trade the mini crude -- for example because I only started trading it. However at NADEX, I can trade crude with just a few hundred at risk. So, it is a good way to learn new markets too. I am taking only 1 new market at a time though.

 

It is crude for now but based on what I read then the 6E? Euro? will be likely next.

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.