Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Predictor

Scalping ES for a Living

Recommended Posts

  light65536 said:
@jackb And, I did that to avoid all the people trying to tell me how to trade, how to read a book and go do it.. all the things I'm getting here! It didn't work.

 

I will tell you something, I am the most OPEN trader of anyone around. I guarantee you that most traders whether it is was with SIMULATOR or real money can not produce my returns!! Not for 6 months or a year.. I know this because my systems are top ranked out of all the thousands people have tried to make. And they try very hard, too. So, yes I am a successful trader by QUANTITATIVE measures. Against anything I can measure it too. Am I successful compared to people anonymous people on a board or compared to vendors who let you dream up the returns? Who cares. It can't be measured.

 

Why do you think everyone is so upset that I'm so frank about things? That I'm so honest.. because everyone is running around losing money and not wanting to admit it. Everyone is running around and afraid to realize the Emperor has no clothes!

 

Sure, maybe you did great on a simulator. Did you ever reset it? Start over? I can't do that with my record! Try to do what I did for # months I've did.. lets see how easy it is!! Maybe you did with real money but gave it all back.. Whatever i do is on my record.. good or bad and for anyone to see. No resetting. No lies. No "I don't predict the market.. I just scalp". This was another trick that Senters used, the "I don't predict market.. I just scalp". My thought was, "okay if true then why bother with the worthless analysis?"

 

Anyway, I'm about ready to say this is settled. We've not heard from a single person stating they do these returns or vouching that they took every trade in the room and did these returns. We had a few first time posters telling me to go sign up with them. The reports from people who had tried their service were terrible.

 

I'll leave it open. Maybe we will hear from some scalpers eventually or for from more people who took every trade with real money in the Larry Levines scalping room. Please speak up!

 

Any full time scalpers in crude or 6e here? Looking forward to hearing what type of returns you've experience and what size account you did it with.

 

You've only been trading with real money since April and you don't have enough equity to be a sponsor. That makes you a nobody. If you can't understand that simple bit of logic, then you have way more problems to deal with than figuring out how to become a successful trader. And your obstinate tendencies are a trait the market loves to feed on. You undoubtedly don't understand that now, but you will...and I suspect in a big way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to give an update. I've spoke with a few people privately who I've no reason to doubt who are making good money scalping. It seems I'm hearing from a few sources: they are trading CL and 6E.

 

However, I haven't been given any evidence to believe this vendor's claims. I've one good report about the market profile room and several negative reports about the scalping room. I'm glad people replied who had real experience with this vendor.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  light65536 said:
@jdevron

If you are to imply that just because I have superior ability that it infers I would easily get a job. This is not realistic. I knew a lot of brilliant programmers growing up and many didn't have a job. They did open source. I was in the top 20% of programmers for years before I was able to get a job and when I finally got into the field, I was surprised I was among the best. Getting a job is more about meeting the requirements, . . .

 

Businesses and people do NOT recognize or value exceptional people. In fact, exceptional people are basically overlooked and probably even discounted. The business model is to hire monkeys who can be trained, and will try to do what you tell them to do.

 

Sorry if I'm off the subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Predictor said:
I see the previous thread here. First, let me start by stating that I'm a *very* successful trader. I am already more successful by measurable means then most. I have 2 of the top ranked futures systems at C2 greater then 6 months old (one discretionary and one quantitative). I've been over there at that other trading forum. However, I'm thinking of moving here because there doesn't seem to be a lot of quality posting going on over there.

 

I have 2 questions. Please read them carefully.

 

1. Has anyone taken every trade in Larry Levines trading room with eral money and do the results match the hypothetical results they send out? I seen what happened to the other thread about his program. Please do not share your experience unless you have taken every trade with real money for at least 1 month (or as close as possible).

 

2. They claim they do around 5k NET per month with only 5k in the account trading 1-3 ES contracts with a max stop of 2 points. They actually average around 7-8k month net. I do not believe that is possible. They claimed over 100k profits last year trading 1-3 contracts. They sent me an Excel file but no real money track record. If anyone here can do that with 5k account and produce real money track results for at least 1 year then I'd be willing to do 2 things: A. Pay you and B. Pay you for mentoring. Again, let me be frank I do not believe that it is possible. I, also, offering mentoring and trade the ES nearly exclusively on hypothetical account. I take proxy trades with rea money at NADEX since April -- for every trade I place. I have very strong returns but nothing like that. The average trade profit is around $20 per trade they claim. This is very low.

 

I honestly, think, it would be difficult to trade the ES for a living with even 100k. Most everything has told me one needs around 300k to trade for a living.

 

So you changed your handle from light65536 to Predictor !

 

That's snakey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the under-current to this thread not prove that paper-trading leads to overconfidence?

 

Predictor, look past the tone of the responses you have received and rather take on board the valuable insights that you have inadvertently garnered.

 

Every successful trader had to find out what worked for them. They paid their dues largely by overcoming themselves.

 

Most people arrive at the markets with some money, a method and no mind. They trade off the money to build up the other two, but most bet big initially and blow out.

 

Their egos get in the way of learning the craft. (Why do you think one of the respondents calls himself "No Ego" - he's learnt his lesson, like we all had to.

 

You could spend weeks with Tiger Woods learning to play golf, but you will never ever play as well as him. Spending time with the best trader will not make you the best trader. Stop focusing on the method alone, a trader's psychological makeup is unique to that trader - that deserves as much attention.

 

Good judgement comes from bad experiences. Go and get yourself some bad experiences, but try and keep them as cheap as possible.

 

Come back to this thread when you are ready to learn.

 

Peace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Good judgement comes from bad experiences. Go and get yourself >some bad experiences, but try and keep them as cheap as possible.

 

I would disagree to some extent. The trader who hasn't had a bad experience may trade better then the one who has. This holds true in Gymnastics where the younger gymnasts aren't afraid to do the moves whereas older gymnasts may have memories of painful accidents. The same is true of heart attack. If you've had one you are prone to another because you've weakened the muscle.

 

I'd say the same could be true for trading. I know it is because I've always won but have had losing streaks. My resilience is much higher then if I had lost to begin with. This also true in condition responses. Of course, this is the basis also behind problem gambling but would equally apply to successful trading. At any rate, I'd say that often bad experiences may be the result of bad behaviors and we all know that behaviors are hard to correct. I'd say a trader like Rob Hoffman has a much greater chance of blowing up again then a trader who controls risks and understands the market can do anything.

-----------

 

Enough of that, I wanted to update what TradingAdvantage and one of Larry's reps had to say to my question about if Dan's results were made with real money.

 

Does Dan take every trade with real money?

 

This is education.. blah blah blah

 

Can you show me the real money results from Dan's room?

 

No. that's illegal. They'd shut this place down in a heart beat. You will never get the real money results from us.

---

 

I've never heard that showing a real money equity curve is illegal if it is a real money equity curve. I'm absolutely done with these jokers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
So you changed your handle from light65536 to Predictor !

 

That's snakey.

 

Tams you are making me laugh again:haha: Careful not to drive this cat off the edge, he'll wear his fingers out with a respose to your one liner questions. Too funny!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Predictor,

$50k/yr is VERY possible trading no more than 2-3 contracts on each set up with a 2pt stop, so a $10k account can accomplish this on ES, though $5k may be bit slim with potential drawdowns... However, I've yet to see an automated sytem accomplish this and def no vendors looking to make $$ from you advertising this..

 

PM me as I trade with a small skype group and you will see this done live and for free.. I'd like to see you perform this live as well.. Generally, I'm not a scalper though that's how I traded in the past, but will often exit my trades early when I see something that warrants an early exit, which turns some trades into scalps.. BTW-what's the fixation with that vendor with big claims? Many vendors have similar claims..

TZ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question for Mr. Levine.

 

If you could make 7 to 8 thousand dollars per month on a $5,000 account, why would you sell your services? You could trade 10 contracts per trade and make 70 to 80 thousand dollars a month. Or, you could trade 100 contracts per signal and make 700 to 800 thousand dollars a month. The ES is so liquid that you could probably trade 500 or a 1,000 contracts at a clip without affecting the market. That would give you 50 to a 100 million dollars a year.

 

This same question goes to another burned out floor trader named Oscar that I see on You Tube.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  VaughanV said:
Good judgement comes from bad experiences. Go and get yourself some bad experiences, but try and keep them as cheap as possible.

 

Good one,VaughanV!:)

 

As mine favorite trader once wrote;

".....Instead of being afraid to fail, I now understood that

success is IMPOSSIBLE without some failure.Most people are afraid of failure in any part of life, especially trading. You have to understand that failure does not happen TO YOU, it happens FOR YOU. It is an opportunity to grow. When you shift your mind and think this way, you will smile with each failure, knowing

that you have just identified a flaw that needs to be corrected or removed. Adversity is scary in the moment, but it is always when we

grow the most. How wonderful adversity and failure really are." :D

 

Sorry for offtopicking!(is this even a word!? :D )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were basically all looking at the same math in some form or another. Pick a system and stick to it and create your own edge....

 

It wont work all the time even the perfect one will fail. But its random so you just have to know when to get out and be ready to jump back in even though your mind is saying dont.

Based on your stats you should in this instance be profitable overtime....It should work based on your stats 7 out of 10 times etc....

 

 

Remember consistency come from within...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Predictor said:
>Good judgement comes from bad experiences. Go and get yourself >some bad experiences, but try and keep them as cheap as possible.

 

I would disagree to some extent. The trader who hasn't had a bad experience may trade better then the one who has. This holds true in Gymnastics where the younger gymnasts aren't afraid to do the moves whereas older gymnasts may have memories of painful accidents. The same is true of heart attack. If you've had one you are prone to another because you've weakened the muscle.

 

I'd say the same could be true for trading. I know it is because I've always won but have had losing streaks. My resilience is much higher then if I had lost to begin with. This also true in condition responses. Of course, this is the basis also behind problem gambling but would equally apply to successful trading. At any rate, I'd say that often bad experiences may be the result of bad behaviors and we all know that behaviors are hard to correct. I'd say a trader like Rob Hoffman has a much greater chance of blowing up again then a trader who controls risks and understands the market can do anything.

-----------

 

Enough of that, I wanted to update what TradingAdvantage and one of Larry's reps had to say to my question about if Dan's results were made with real money.

 

Does Dan take every trade with real money?

 

This is education.. blah blah blah

 

Can you show me the real money results from Dan's room?

 

No. that's illegal. They'd shut this place down in a heart beat. You will never get the real money results from us.

---

 

I've never heard that showing a real money equity curve is illegal if it is a real money equity curve. I'm absolutely done with these jokers.

 

Agree, I asked the same question to one of the Larry Levine's reps and he never answer it.

What is amazing is the CNBC brief appearances were Larry Levine never made a significant valuable comment about the markets ! only some vague useless bullshit.

 

I was interested in taking his training last year to improve upon my method from 75% win ratio scalping the ES using one point stop loss and 2 points target, but decided not to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TRADEZILLA said:
Predictor,

$50k/yr is VERY possible trading no more than 2-3 contracts on each set up with a 2pt stop, so a $10k account can accomplish this on ES, though $5k may be bit slim with potential drawdowns... However, I've yet to see an automated sytem accomplish this and def no vendors looking to make $$ from you advertising this..

 

PM me as I trade with a small skype group and you will see this done live and for free.. I'd like to see you perform this live as well.. Generally, I'm not a scalper though that's how I traded in the past, but will often exit my trades early when I see something that warrants an early exit, which turns some trades into scalps.. BTW-what's the fixation with that vendor with big claims? Many vendors have similar claims..

TZ

 

Pardon me for injecting a little reality into the thread, but to make 50k a year trading 2-3 contracts with a 2 point stop, and risking 2 pts to make 2 points, you'd need to be right 60% of the time and would have to take 22-33 trades a day. One to one trades at a 60% win rate gives you a net of about $3 a trade. If you can find that many profitable opportunities in es, then $50k a year becomes possible trading 2-3 contracts; otherwise, it is fantasy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Pardon me for injecting a little reality into the thread, but to make 50k a year trading 2-3 contracts with a 2 point stop, and risking 2 pts to make 2 points, you'd need to be right 60% of the time and would have to take 22-33 trades a day. One to one trades at a 60% win rate gives you a net of about $3 a trade. If you can find that many profitable opportunities in es, then $50k a year becomes possible trading 2-3 contracts; otherwise, it is fantasy.

 

MM,

 

Sorry, just to look at those figures you quote again.

 

Assume you hit +2 points 60% of the time and -2 points 40% of the time.

 

Trading 1 single lot in ES 10 times a day you would get 6 winners and 4 losers so net 2 winners and +4 points. 4 points per day at 20 days per month 12 months per year = 960 points per year. 1 ES point = $50. $50 x 960 = $48,000 per year. Of course then you have to deduct comms which could knock up to a quarter off that total if you are on a high retail $5/RT rate- $5 per trade x 10 trades per day x 20 days per month x 12 months per year = $12,000.

 

So how did you get 22-33 trades per day? Did you use the round turn figure instead of the number of trades?

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
MM,

 

Sorry, just to look at those figures you quote again.

 

Assume you hit +2 points 60% of the time and -2 points 40% of the time.

 

Trading 1 single lot in ES 10 times a day you would get 6 winners and 4 losers so net 2 winners and +4 points. 4 points per day at 20 days per month 12 months per year = 960 points per year. 1 ES point = $50. $50 x 960 = $48,000 per year. Of course then you have to deduct comms which could knock up to a quarter off that total if you are on a high retail $5/RT rate- $5 per trade x 10 trades per day x 20 days per month x 12 months per year = $12,000.

 

So how did you get 22-33 trades per day? Did you use the round turn figure instead of the number of trades?

 

When I trade, I pay the spread and commissions. If scalping you will definitely pay the spread. 22-33 depending on if you trade 2 or 3 contracts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
When I trade, I pay the spread and commissions. If scalping you will definitely pay the spread. 22-33 depending on if you trade 2 or 3 contracts.

 

If you mean you are trading at market by "the spread", that doesn't matter. The example was you make 2 points or you lose 2 points. Not the market is printing x ticks higher or lower and so you would make or lose a different amount based on best market price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
If you mean you are trading at market by "the spread", that doesn't matter. The example was you make 2 points or you lose 2 points. Not the market is printing x ticks higher or lower and so you would make or lose a different amount based on best market price.

 

If you are getting out in a 8 tick move plus or minus then you make 3 bucks a trade. You can only get 7 ticks if the market moves 8 ticks. Unless you have the ability to sell at the ask or buy at the bid to exit with 100% fills. I am not talking theory.

 

If you are getting out when it moves 9 ticks in your favor or 8 ticks against you that is a different story. That is not a 1 to 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies MM, I must be mistaken. My assumption when someone says a system makes 2 points or loses 2 points is that this is the performance on execution. If we're taking about how far a market moves favourably before an exit is taken, that's a completely different analysis to what I understood the exercise to be about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
Apologies MM, I must be mistaken. My assumption when someone says a system makes 2 points or loses 2 points is that this is the performance on execution. If we're taking about how far a market moves favourably before an exit is taken, that's a completely different analysis to what I understood the exercise to be about.

 

TN, if a market moves in your favor 8 ticks, you can't get out at will. We can even say the same about entering, but we can always avoid the trade, if we do not get filled. I know you know this, but I see that others don't consider it.

 

You will get taken out if the market hits your 8 tick stop. You can only guarantee yourself 7 ticks if the market moves 8 ticks from when you get in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I'd add some color since last touching this topic. I have some of the top ranked public ES systems, and I also monitor the best ES traders that I can find. What I've found is that excellent ES day traders/systems will average around $30 per contract after costs. Anywhere from $10 to $40 per contract is typical. The more one trades then the lower this number tends to go. I have some day trading systems that trade infrequently that can do much more.

 

It is easy to extrapolate and estimate the number of contracts required that one must trade to do the claims they make. At 5k per month (and they had some months showing more then that), then you need to trade roughly 250 contracts/month or about 12 contracts per day.

 

Also, I've monitored trading competitions where we know the traders are both professional and taking more risk then one would in a normal account and returns over 4x-6x are excellent and top of field. They were showing returns of 24x!!

 

Realistically, this means that an excellent trader in a best case scenario might do 30k on a 5k account over a year. This is an excellent return but a far cry from the 24x returns they claim. More over, such a return could easily be strong enough to win a trading competition. Think also, even at "only" 100% return over about 5-8 years it is possible to take a 10k account to over a million dollars!

 

I believe that it is possible to make a lot in futures market if one is very skilled and perhaps doesn't get too unlucky. It is certainly possible to make a whole lot over an intermediate time frame.

 

But 24x in one year, I have not seen anyone do this. The only way possible would be to trade 24/7 but again with 5k then the overnight session wouldn't be an option. I admit it seems like it shouldn't be that difficult but all the data suggest otherwise. Even risking 15% to 20% of the account per day, I think it would be difficult to hit those numbers.

 

I'll grant it is conceivably possible but great claims require great proof. I certainly don't believe they are doing that.

 

---

Curtis

themarketpredictor.com

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.