Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sign in to follow this  
Tradewinds

Trendline Vs Plots

Recommended Posts

I've read that Plots can be converted to Trendlines in EasyLanguage. What is the difference between a Plot and a Trendline? How is the code different? I'd like to see an example of each. A Plot has the syntax of:

 

PlotN(Expression[,"<PlotName>"[,ForeColor[,Default[,Width]]]]);

 

Expression is the price value to be plotted, PlotName and ForeColor are self explanatory. Width is how thick you want the plot to be.

 

Text and Trend Lines are created using the Text_XXXXX and TL_XXXXX Reserved Words. The "TL_New" reserved word adds a trendline.

 

TL_New (Reserved Word)

 

This reserved word adds a trendline with the specified starting and ending points to a price chart. It returns a numeric expression corresponding to the ID number of the trendline added to the chart.

 

I want to start a trendline, and have it continue until the next signal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is the:

 

TL_SetEnd (Reserved Word)

 

This sets the end of the trendline.

 

 

This reserved word changes the end point of the specified trendline; the end point has a later date and time.

 

The trendlines seem like a lot more work, and more difficult to program. I'm also curious as to whether they take more computing power.

 

I'm trying to avoid having connecting lines between trend lines that are at different price levels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've read that Plots can be converted to Trendlines in EasyLanguage. What is the difference between a Plot and a Trendline? How is the code different? I'd like to see an example of each. A Plot has the syntax of:

 

PlotN(Expression[,"<PlotName>"[,ForeColor[,Default[,Width]]]]);

 

Expression is the price value to be plotted, PlotName and ForeColor are self explanatory. Width is how thick you want the plot to be.

 

Text and Trend Lines are created using the Text_XXXXX and TL_XXXXX Reserved Words. The "TL_New" reserved word adds a trendline.

 

TL_New (Reserved Word)

 

This reserved word adds a trendline with the specified starting and ending points to a price chart. It returns a numeric expression corresponding to the ID number of the trendline added to the chart.

 

I want to start a trendline, and have it continue until the next signal.

 

PLOT is used to paint a price bar, a dot, a dash, a cross, or a line on a chart.

you plot one bar at a time...

when plotting a line, as in a moving average, you get a continuous curving line.

when plotting a line based on a pivot value... you get a straight line.

 

 

Trendline (TL_NEW) is a drawing object.

you define the coordinates -- the starting point and the ending point, in terms of date, time and price, and you get a trendline.

 

a trendline is always straight; it can be a vertical line, horizontal line, or a line that spans diagonally across the chart.

 

a trendline can be made to extend beyond the starting and/or ending point.

 

a trendline can be moved, deleted, attributes modified...

 

well... trendlines can be fun, or headache... depends on which side of the fence you are on.

 

 

more discussions here:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/coding-forum/5840-trendline-easylanguage.html

 

59.45

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A trendline can be made to extend beyond the starting and/or ending point.

 

I want a straight line for price level to keep going until the next price level signal fires. I looked at your code in the other thread, and here is what I have so far:

 

var: Peak(False),NoPriorPk(False);
var: ClsDwn(False),ClsUp(False);
var: ht(H);

ClsDwn=c<o;
ClsUp=c>o;

Peak=ClsUp[1] and ClsDwn;
NoPriorPk=Peak[1] = false;

if Peak and NoPriorPk then ht= H[1];


{-- restarts the trendline if a new peak signal fired ---}
var: HiTrget(-1);
if Peak then 
Begin
	HiTrget = tl_new(d, t, H, d, t, H);
end;

{--- extends the trendline from PEAK to current bar ---}
tl_setend(HiTrget, d, t, h);

// To test for a PEAK signal.  Set format to POINTS.
{If Peak and NoPriorPk then 
plot30(l,"Test",Black,5) 
else NoPlot(30);}

 

This won't plot anything. I've tried everything I can think of, and I can not get a trendline to do anything right. I've tried hard coding the dates, times and price levels. I've tried the simplest example I can think of, and I can't get anything to work for a trendline. If anyone can tell me how to make this work, I'd appreciate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I want a straight line for price level to keep going until the next price level signal fires. I looked at your code in the other thread, and here is what I have so far:

 

var: Peak(False),NoPriorPk(False);
var: ClsDwn(False),ClsUp(False);
var: ht(H);

ClsDwn=c<o;
ClsUp=c>o;

Peak=ClsUp[1] and ClsDwn;
NoPriorPk=Peak[1] = false;

if Peak and NoPriorPk then ht= H[1];


{-- restarts the trendline if a new peak signal fired ---}
var: HiTrget(-1);
if Peak then 
Begin
	HiTrget = tl_new(d, t, H, d, t, H);
end;

{--- extends the trendline from PEAK to current bar ---}
tl_setend(HiTrget, d, t, h);

// To test for a PEAK signal.  Set format to POINTS.
{If Peak and NoPriorPk then 
plot30(l,"Test",Black,5) 
else NoPlot(30);}

 

This won't plot anything. I've tried everything I can think of, and I can not get a trendline to do anything right. I've tried hard coding the dates, times and price levels. I've tried the simplest example I can think of, and I can't get anything to work for a trendline. If anyone can tell me how to make this work, I'd appreciate it.

 

What is your chart resolution?

 

With Tradestation, you can only use minute chart or higher resolutions.

ie no tick chart or any non-time based charts.

 

With MultiCharts, you can draw on any chart format.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

note correction on Ht

 

var: Peak(False),NoPriorPk(False);
var: ClsDwn(False),ClsUp(False);
var: ht(H);

ClsDwn=c<o;
ClsUp=c>o;

Peak=ClsUp[1] and ClsDwn;
NoPriorPk=Peak[1] = false;

if Peak and NoPriorPk then ht= H[1];


{-- restarts the trendline if a new peak signal fired ---}
var: HiTrget(-1);
if Peak then 
Begin
	HiTrget = tl_new(d, t, Ht, d, t, Ht); // <--- note correction on Ht
end;

{--- extends the trendline from PEAK to current bar ---}
tl_setend(HiTrget, d, t, ht);  // <--- note correction on Ht

// To test for a PEAK signal.  Set format to POINTS.
{If Peak and NoPriorPk then 
plot30(l,"Test",Black,5) 
else NoPlot(30);}

 

chart from above code:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25123&stc=1&d=1309835106

5aa7108796dfa_hsitl.png.f57e6d94b18b7ce72e30113ef2ff2f34.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using a 1 minute chart of the @ESU11. I used that code with the change you made, and it still would not plot. I'm wondering if the issue is at least partly related to something other than the indicator. I'm constantly getting a msg that the Axis Scaling is being reset to "No Axis" when I add an indicator to the chart. Attached is a screen shot of the msg. I can get a POINT to plot from my signals, I can get regular plot lines to work, but when I try using a trendline, then it just doesn't work. I may need to post something on the TradeStation support forum.

5aa710879d89e_AxisScaling.thumb.JPG.c92bcd6ab40460dd39b37a43553ced3b.JPG

ES_Chart.thumb.JPG.257f36faef62c1bdbcff408aa118990a.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This code does part of what I want. It starts a trendline at one of my PEAK signals.

 

Variable: ID(-1);

If C[1]>O[1] AND Close<O Then Begin
 ID = TL_New(Date[1], Time[1], H[1], Date, Time, H[1]);
 Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(ID, True);
End; 

 

I want the LAST high to be the price level of the trend line if my peak signal fires. So I used "H[1]" for the start price. For the end price, I want the line to be perfectly level and horizontal, so the end price must be the same as the start price. So I used the last high for the end price also.

 

ID = TL_New(Date[1], Time[1], H[1], Date, Time, H[1]);

 

So this is a beginning. Now I need to be able to stop one trend line when the next one starts.

 

This code uses the same logic, but just adds a little bit of detail:

 

var: Peak1(False);

Peak1 = C[1]>O[1] AND Close<O;

Variable: ID(-1);

If Peak1 Then Begin
 ID = TL_New(Date[1], Time[1], H[1], Date, Time, H[1]);
 Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(ID, True);
End; 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

So this is a beginning. Now I need to be able to stop one trend line when the next one starts.

 

...

 

 

note: // <-- add this line

 

 

var: Peak1(False);

Peak1 = C[1]>O[1] AND Close<O;

Variable: ID(-1);

If Peak1 Then 
Begin

   TL_SetExtRight( ID[1] , FALSE);  // <-- add this line

   ID = TL_New(Date[1], Time[1], H[1], Date, Time, H[1]);
   Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(ID, True);
End;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This code will delete all the old trend lines. So there is only one trend line at a time. As soon as the new trend line is created, the old trend line is deleted. Note the addition of "OldKeyID"

 

Variable: OldKeyID(-1), ID(-1);

 

So the OldKeyID AND the ID are both being initialized at a value of -1. I'm guessing what happens, is that each new trend line is assigned a successive number. This still doesn't do what I want, I want all the old trend lines to remain on the chart. Maybe I can use the OldKeyID to end the last line instead of delete it.

 

 

 

var: Peak1(False);

Peak1 = C[1]>O[1] AND Close<O;

Variable: OldKeyID(-1), ID(-1);

If Peak1 Then Begin
 OldKeyID = ID;
 ID = TL_New(Date[1], Time[1], H[1], Date, Time, H[1]);
 Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(ID, True);

 If OldKeyID <> -1 Then
 Value1 = TL_Delete(OldKeyID);
End;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a change, and it didn't give me what I want, but it does give me some more information. Instead of deleting the OldKeyID trend line, I set the Right Extension to "False". What that did, is it left the old trend line in place, but the old trend line is now only 1 bar in length. So the old trend line is still there, but it's not extended to the start of the new trend line. So it looks like I may need to use the "OldKeyID", but instead of deleting it or setting the right extension to False, I need to somehow define where the new end is going to be.

 

 

var: Peak1(False);
Variable: OldKeyID(-1), ID(-1);

Peak1 = C[1]>O[1] AND Close<O;

If Peak1 Then Begin
 OldKeyID = ID;
 ID = TL_New(Date[1], Time[1], H[1], Date, Time, H[1]);
 Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(ID, True);

 If OldKeyID <> -1 Then
 Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(OldKeyID, False);
End;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aah Hah, Hah, Hah Haaaaah!

I think I've done it!!!

I will now take over the world !!!

 

 

The code retrieves the new Start Time from the new trendline, and uses that as the End time for the old trend line. Then the code retrieves the Begin Value from the Old trend line and uses it as the end value for the old trend line. So the old trendline begins and ends at the same price - Horizontal line. But before the End is set for the old trendline, the extension to the right is shut down for the old trend line, but ONLY the Old trend line. So only the current trend line is being extended to the right. This causes the current trend line to be extended in "real time" as the chart is updating. As soon as a new Peak signal fires, the Extension to the Right shuts down and the ending point is defined for the last trendline.

 

var: Peak1(False);
Variable: OldKeyID(-1), ID(-1);
var: NewStartTime(t),OldStartPrice(h);

Peak1 = C[1]>O[1] AND Close<O;

If Peak1 Then Begin
 OldKeyID = ID;
 ID = TL_New(Date[1], Time[1], H[1], Date, Time, H[1]);
 Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(ID, True);

 If OldKeyID <> -1 Then
 Begin
   NewStartTime = TL_GetBeginTime(ID);
   OldStartPrice = TL_GetBeginVal(OldKeyID);
   Value1 = TL_SetExtRight(OldKeyID, False);
   Value2 = TL_SetEnd(OldKeyID, Date, NewStartTime, OldStartPrice);
 End;
End;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.