Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Maelstrom

Trading the Storm - Methods for the Struggling Trader

Recommended Posts

gotta breakout here and made another another 1.5 pts. on 1/2 of position... just hit fib extension and remainder is trailing....

 

possible longer extension target around 1335 for pattern (wedge/triangle) extension but I'm inclined to be a little more conservative and keep it inside the upper fork boundry around 1330 less a tick or two but will trail using micro swing lows.

 

that's all for today... gotta take my daughter to dr. appt...

 

2011-07-13_0916.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post mortem...

 

never made it to 100% extension target... final 1/4 of position got stopped out @ 1324.50 on the trail stop.

 

i guess another take on the pattern could've been the C&H or W... if one were to trade it as such then the measured move for the latter patterns was likely hit depending on how a trader would measure the pattern.... e.g. from the bottom of the handle or W to the b/o line... this chart has the extension re-drawn using the more conservative measurement of the handle or W.

 

also, on the flip side of things there was a potential short just after lunch when it reversed and broke below the fork mid-line... that swing was a perfect 50% retrace with a high probability of at least going back to the original b/o line... which it did and then some... but i was not able to catch any of that as i wasn't able to trade this afternoon.... even if i was, a lot of the time i opt to not trade in the afternoons or during lunch hour.

 

2011-07-13_1520.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the most important idea in the original method outlined in this thread is the idea of "market intent".

I realized as I was looking over these charts that it is what I have been slowing coming to realize in my trading, I had just figured a different way to define it using a moving average and just standard price action.

Weather we intend to use the exact method outlined here or not, the idea of seeing the "market intent" is as important a concept as one could have in trying to trade the markets. I know this has probably been said a million times in these forums, but I am just getting it now.:roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

My apologies to anyone who have been following the thread for my lack of posts. Unfortunately, had some personal issues that I had to deal with last week, so there was no trading for me. Glad to see that there have still been some great contributions to the thread.... if any out there are still interested in the continuation of the thread, let me know and we can pick up where we left off.

 

Thanks

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the most important idea in the original method outlined in this thread is the idea of "market intent".

I realized as I was looking over these charts that it is what I have been slowing coming to realize in my trading, I had just figured a different way to define it using a moving average and just standard price action.

Weather we intend to use the exact method outlined here or not, the idea of seeing the "market intent" is as important a concept as one could have in trying to trade the markets. I know this has probably been said a million times in these forums, but I am just getting it now.:roll eyes:

 

JEH,

 

You hit my intentions for this thread right on the head. Entry triggers, targets, stops, etc - these can, and do, all depend on the trader. But the universal key to success imho is asking and answering "what is the market trying to do right now". Lots of ways to determine that, this way is just one - but, if it has helped at least one person out there in some way, then I am very glad I started this thread.

 

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M,

 

I have been wondering how we should deal with periods of consolidation. The rules of method as it stands indicates that we follow a long opportunity (if we trade it or not) with searching for a short setup. A good long trade may be followed with a short setup (to be taken), a long setup (to not be taken), or consolidation. Coming out of the consolidation we don't have a clue as to where the market will go next. The next short setup may be a fake out that is followed by a great long trade.

 

Are we better served by... taking the short (this is the rule) and taking the "small" loss?

 

If we take the short trade (and the loss) do we assume we are still looking for a short or is the nest trade "up for grabs" and we take the next setup, long or short?

 

How do we re-synchronize ourselves with the market intent?

 

I have looked at this method for a while this is the only area I am confused with.

 

Thanks,

J.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
M,

 

I have been wondering how we should deal with periods of consolidation. The rules of method as it stands indicates that we follow a long opportunity (if we trade it or not) with searching for a short setup. A good long trade may be followed with a short setup (to be taken), a long setup (to not be taken), or consolidation. Coming out of the consolidation we don't have a clue as to where the market will go next. The next short setup may be a fake out that is followed by a great long trade.

 

Are we better served by... taking the short (this is the rule) and taking the "small" loss?

 

If we take the short trade (and the loss) do we assume we are still looking for a short or is the nest trade "up for grabs" and we take the next setup, long or short?

 

How do we re-synchronize ourselves with the market intent?

 

I have looked at this method for a while this is the only area I am confused with.

 

Thanks,

J.

 

Jon,

 

I believe I know what you are asking about, but if you can post a chart or two with examples of these areas, I will try to offer an explanation.

 

Thanks

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
M,

 

I have been wondering how we should deal with periods of consolidation.

 

How do we re-synchronize ourselves with the market intent?

 

Thanks,

J.

 

In my mind, we should NOT deal with periods of consolidation, unless we already have substantial profits built into the trade.

 

Why not stand aside and let the market give clear indication of its intent, i.e. resumption of the trend?

 

If you need to trade, find another market to invest in that isn't consolidating and wait out the initial market's indecision.

 

No need to take unwarranted losses...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my mind, we should NOT deal with periods of consolidation, unless we already have substantial profits built into the trade.

 

Why not stand aside and let the market give clear indication of its intent, i.e. resumption of the trend?

 

If you need to trade, find another market to invest in that isn't consolidating and wait out the initial market's indecision.

 

No need to take unwarranted losses...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

Problem is you usually don't know your in consolidation right away. Yes, the way to deal with consolidation is to sit aside, but recognizing the consolidation early on is the issue here I think.

I believe there were some ways outlined in some earlier post to this thread that might help answer the question...

A legitimate question, none the less...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Problem is you usually don't know you're in consolidation right away. Yes, the way to deal with consolidation is to sit aside, but recognizing the consolidation early on is the issue here I think.

 

Yes, it's tough to enter the market without some kind of test (after your entry) which threatens your risk stop. And since the markets consolidate roughly 85% of the time, this only exacerbates the problem...

 

But if, say, for arguments sake, you are using a 20 period MA as your trend filter, the slope of that MA is rising or falling as adversed to going sideways, you are much more likely to be in trend mode than in consolidation mode, especially if each new bar is rising/falling outside the previous bar's range...

 

I fully understand the concept of hindsight is 20/20 but the market leaves its clues to the watchful eye.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Problem is you usually don't know your in consolidation right away. Yes, the way to deal with consolidation is to sit aside, but recognizing the consolidation early on is the issue here I think.

I believe there were some ways outlined in some earlier post to this thread that might help answer the question...

A legitimate question, none the less...

 

J,

 

It is a legitimate question. I will try to post an example of what I think you may be asking about here shortly. But briefly, I simply don't pay attention to consolidation periods, either between trades or during, as long as an exit point isn't breached, or a reversal occurs.

 

Often times, I get into a trade, and it immediately goes into consolidation - alternating up/down bars with no real direction. As long as it doesn't retrace enough to hit an exit point, this is fine an a normal part of a trend. For me a trend consists of bursts (or intention moves) in a given direction, then stalling/consolidation/minor pullbacks, then a move in the trend direction again, over and over in a good trend.

 

As for consolidation periods between trades, I will wait as long as needed for a signal opposite of the last to occur. You had asked earlier about a consolidation period, and whether to take the first trade right after that (a short I believe), and possibly take a long after that would have been a good trade. I would absolutely take that short IF the previous trade had been a long.

 

Look at it this way - losing trades are good with this method. Picture a up trend and a long entry, and lets say you took the trade, and got out with +100. Then, you have a short that doesn't work, so it a -21 or -22. Then, the market takes off north again, you get another long signal, and lets say you make another +100. You are now +178 for that day.

 

The point is, if I hadn't taken that short trade for the loss, I wouldn't have been able to take that second long and would have been sitting on only 100 pts for the day (of course, not a bad day at all) because I only take alternating trades.

 

Sometimes, this methodology doesn't let you get everything a day has to offer - today is an excellent example of that for me - but I got +160 today per 2 contracts with a new money management strategy I am using. Left a lot on the table, but no complaints here.

 

Back on point, there are several nuances I use that help keep me out of chop or whipsawing trades. If anyone out there is looking to actively trade this method, or something similar, I will be happy to post details - it would have certainly helped last week.

 

I didn't trade at all last week, but did go back and look through the trades available, and this is what I saw:

 

4 longs - 3 wins, 1 loss

4 shorts - 3 wins, 1 loss

 

So, 6 out 8 for about 295 pts/car. Tough week, not a lot of range at all, but would have held up just fine.

 

So far this week, 1 short and 1 long, +160 per contract.

 

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for an excellent thread. Having read through each post I think I am beginning to understand your message but would like to check that opinion. Attached is a screen capture of the YM beginning on Sunday, with my interpretation of your method applied to the chart. Please comment as to its’ accuracy or lack thereof. I also have some related questions as posted in this note. I apologize for the congestion.

 

Am also borrowing some of your descriptive format… the “formations of intent” are enclosed in colored rectangles (yellow = downward, cyan = upward). Each formation is labeled with a letter (A through R).

 

Beginning Sunday night, I think the first legitimate entry signal occurs in block G, when a close below 12,335 “validates” the downward intent in block F. Then a pullback followed by an entry short at the close (12,314 or as close to that as possible) of the next candle.

If that is correct, I wonder how you enter the trade… stop market, limit order, manually entered market order… etc?

 

Set risk - Initial stop at 1 point above this candle… at 12, 335 in this case. Trail to 12, 292 (block I) if not exited by that point.

 

Exit plan… either

( A ) 1:2 risk:reward target, or 42 points,

( B ) extension target from entry by the height of block F, or 53 points in this case,

( C ) trail the stop (initially to 12,292 in this case),

( D) get taken out upon reversal at block L

Do you have suggestions or guidance as to choice of exit?

 

If my interpretation is correct regarding long entry at 14:44 yesterday… if held overnight with trailed stops, the position would be looking at +12,498-12,298 or +200 pts as of this afternoon at close of the market. I think you said previously that you set alerts and trade 24 hours during the week. You also offered a warning of sorts regarding the overnight lack of liquidity. How do you handle the overnight alternative?

 

Again I thank you for your excellent descriptive posts and your willingness to share your experience.

 

Kind Regards,

F

 

PS… this is my first run at adding an attachment… we’ll see how that works out. First file is complete history... next two are a repeat of first, broken into 2 parts for better visibility?

RangeBarExample_YM_y110719.thumb.jpg.35f4ead6ce51cb4af400ed5617b4f2c8.jpg

RangeBars_YM_y110719-p1.jpg.1e3ceda3e752927244f2c3baf20efaf9.jpg

RangeBars_YM_y110719-p2.jpg.697690631974ac801134515dfc870cf5.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for an excellent thread. Having read through each post I think I am beginning to understand your message but would like to check that opinion. Attached is a screen capture of the YM beginning on Sunday, with my interpretation of your method applied to the chart. Please comment as to its’ accuracy or lack thereof. I also have some related questions as posted in this note.

 

Arndude,

 

Your charts and annotations are excellent - I should refer people to you to explain this method :) I will try to answer all your questions, but looks like you have a pretty good grasp of this.

 

First off, it appears that we have a data discrepancy. The beginning of the downtrend Sunday night, then your first formation of the uptrend - bars on my charts are different. Was trying to figure out why, and I noticed that your bars seem to open at exactly the same price the precious one closes. For example, on my charts, it a downbar closes at 12400, the open of the next bar is always one tick from the close, 12399 in this example. Not sure if I am seeing the opening bar prices on your charts correctly or not, but do verify that for me. Even if that is the case, your charts seem like they will work just fine.

 

Your recognition of the formations, breaks and entries are dead on. Now, for the short trade, and I will base everything on your charts since mine are different (will post mine shortly) and will go step by step as you did.

 

1. Formation A forms (down)

2. Formation B forms (up)

3. Formation C forms (down) and there has been no close below A - the upward Formation B is ignored since we are only looking for shorts.

4. There is a close below Formation C a few bars later, a two bar pullback, then the entry bar would be the first down bar of what becomes Formation D.

 

Something to note....a setup formation does not have to be below a previous formation in a downtrend, or above in an uptrend. But, for me, I take only the first signal in a new direction, so your entry off of Formation F would not be something I would take. It IS absolutely correct in the setup, formations, etc, and worked well in this instance, it is just not something I do because I have had too many trades mid-trend flail around and take out my stops.

 

Also, with the extension - the first extension in a trade should be from the most recent formation prior to the entry bar - in this case, the extension should be based on Formation G, and the extension should begin from the bottom of the formation (the green bar terminating the formation). Overall though, great trade!

 

Now, for the long....

 

Looks great - entry is dead on. Again, the first extension should be of Formation K, however, not J. Also, in regard to extensions, keep making those extensions off of each new formation that occurs in the trend.

 

Overall, looks pretty damn close to what I do - great job!

 

Now let me see if I can answer your other questions....

 

If that is correct, I wonder how you enter the trade… stop market, limit order, manually entered market order… etc?

 

Usually during RTH, stop market orders - on overnight, since it is usually so slow, I will use a limit order to try and eliminate slippage.

 

Do you have suggestions or guidance as to choice of exit?

 

Timely question. Just this week, I have decided simplicity is the way to go. I have wrestled with fixed vs fluid exits, and have sort of merged the two now. In brief, I still adhere to the trailing formation stops and extensions, but now exit half my position at 60 pts, the 2nd half at 100 if no other exits have been hit. Today, I left a lot of money on the table, BUT....300+ pt straight moves are fairly rare, where as 100 pt moves are much more common, and I saw myself losing too much on retraces, even with trailing stops. But this is where each person's market experience comes into play - if you could clearly see there is a lot more upside, hang on to that thing and ride it out :cool:

 

You also offered a warning of sorts regarding the overnight lack of liquidity. How do you handle the overnight alternative?

 

At this point, I have to be ready to trade overnight to catch those first signals of a new trend. AH trading demands A LOT of patience, and watch the spreads.... you can slip a couple of points easily with a market order. Trading with significant size could also be a problem, but I have not seen an issue on anything up to 10 contracts.

 

If one chooses to trade overnight, setting price level/bar formation alarms is a must, otherwise you will never sleep. But, several people have contacted me and changed up this method to make it their own..... smaller bar sizes, only trading RTH, etc, and had good success. Take what works and discard what doesn't, and make it your own.

 

Thank you for taking the time to understand my method and for the outstanding post - keep the posts, questions and comments coming!

 

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I'll take a stab at today's question.

 

My answer is B.

 

At Point A there was still no close below the intention move. The next bar after A closed below the intention move so you should short at B.

 

That my guess anyway :confused:

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After the 3 bar signal from the top, there is a green bar. I don't know if you call the three red bars the "formation" or if you include the green bar that bottomed out and closed higher.

If you go with the three red bars and look for a close below the low of that third bar, then the "A" bar is the entry.

If you are going with the 1st green bar as the tip of the signal move down, then you need a close below there. That 2nd green bars goes lower but closes even with the bottom of the 1st green bar so no break yet. You would have to wait for the "B" bar for the entry.

 

Those are the type of fine tuning questions that are going to come up. I'm glad you are bringing them up for us.

 

From what I understand about your process, the "B" bar is the entry bar, but i would not say that with 100 % certainty.

 

Thanks,

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi M

 

Great thread! Can this system be traded withn a 10 point range bar (instead of 20) and only trading the YM during the New York night session? (I live in Australia)

 

 

Thanks

 

Adam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A chart with some comments and questions. Just thinking out loud here...

Forget the time-frame and trading vehicle. this is just for discussion...

 

The question is, guess, recognizing congestion and what to do with it. I guess my rule is when you don't know what is going on, do nothing, but the trick is figuring out when that is...

SNAG-0006.thumb.jpg.5dc7467153e091392009e74387f8637b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A chart with some comments and questions. Just thinking out loud here...

Forget the time-frame and trading vehicle. this is just for discussion...

 

The question is, guess, recognizing congestion and what to do with it. I guess my rule is when you don't know what is going on, do nothing, but the trick is figuring out when that is...

 

JEH,

 

Yup, that chart looks like crap :rofl: but, it is a good one to show congestion - looks like a really fast chart though.

 

I am looking for a graphic editing program better than MS Paint to make some notes on your attachment, and will make some comments on it shortly.

 

Going to take a guess on the chart though..... NQ, something around a 10 tick range? Actually, don't answer that lol..... but if you would, double whatever range that is and repost a chart of the same area - I would like to see what that looks like.

 

In a trade at the moment, but will post my comments on your chart soon, as well as award the winner(s) in the "where is the entry" contest :)

 

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YMoca, JEH, and IamJon :applaud:

 

BUT.....I did not take that trade at B - I took it at C.

 

And then, a lot of conflicting signals, several possible trades and probable losses, but I did not take another trade until 9:00am CST this morning.

 

This is the point where anyone reading this thread is saying "WTF, you are full of shit!" Maybe so, but....let's extend the exercise. Any ideas why I took that short later? or why no other trades in that choppy mess until this morning?

 

Well, for the amazing price of $97, I will hand you the keys to the kingdom, and ALL the secrets of the holy grail. Act now, only a few packages left!

 

MODERATORS and everyone else - I AM JOKING!! :rofl: Don't ban me, I just couldn't resist.

 

But seriously, I would like any thoughts as to why I took the trades today where I did, and not the others. I will explain the reasons, but this may be helpful to you guys.

 

Last thing, I REALLY hope no one out there is trading this without full understanding of what they are doing and why. I would assume that is a given, but you never know, and I would feel like crap if someone traded this mess this morning, as there are at least 2, maybe 3 losses there just using the methods I have posted (though the long this morning would have more than made up for it). There are some additional things I look for in days like today, and a lot of last week, that I haven't gone over yet. It gets a little more complicated, and I want to make sure anyone looking at this is clear on the "basics" first.

 

M

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25408&stc=1&d=1311264974

5aa710901dcc9_YMcurrent.thumb.jpg.4efeb9b767c57eb2c4fe3ec28febbe7b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.