Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheNegotiator

Entries & Exits. Which Are More Important?

Recommended Posts

An interesting and fairly common discussion we come across in trading is the importance of entry and exit strategies and their impact on risk. Lots of traders it is true, look for entry systems with high success rates in picking great turning points or likely trend continuation points where you aren't likely to endure much heat. More and more though, people are suggesting that entries have little to do with their success or failure and it is the exit strategy which makes all the difference for them.

 

I'd like to hear from people their view on either or both entries and exits.

 

My idea is that anyone who says one is more important than the other is underestimating the impact of both. I believe that they must work in a system in conjunction and are just as important as each other. For example, what do you think would be the average success rate of a short(ultra short say fx on a 1min intraday) term trend system where you have 99% of days with a range of 100 prices or fewer and you buy after a rally of 100 prices? Or if you have a system with a fixed number of prices to exit at which is not adjusted for volatility or near price structure which could alter the expected move size?

 

What do you guys think about this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it can really depend on what you're trading and in what timeframe. Some days you really just need to catch a good entry point early on then let the market do the work for you. But clearly you have to be able to identify when you have one of those days. Day traders are also artificially contained in a time bracket also where as markets work until supply/demand dynamic changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always believed that "trade management" is most important. A good entry can become a loser, just as a bad entry can become a winner. It all depends on how stop loses and profit stops are managed.

 

Sorry for the grey answer. If I had to vote I'd go with exits since they represent both loss and profit stops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is true that both are important. I wanted to think more deeply about this as I think that it is true that all too often, people have little effective planning for exits. Mostly to do with targets rather than stop losses. How many times do traders finally have a trade get onside and they get a great feeling when it gets to their target and fills them, only for the market to storm past and show them what they missed out on?

 

But also I would reiterate that unless you find a good entry point, you are potentially risking more. The market does not care what your account balance or risk tolerance is. It cares what its past and current activity is. So to be 'wrong' in a trade is about where the market is likely to turn from or continue to price-wise. If you get your entry wrong, you will have to have a wider stop for the market to show you where you are wrong.

 

I think that both are important and both need to have attention paid to them. It has frustrated me to see a trend in people saying that entry points are just not that important. Well they are. Maybe exits are more important, who knows for sure. But BOTH are essential IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that Entries are 80% percent of trading, and exits are 20% percent. A good entry is very quickly profitable, and that makes life a whole lot easier. It's a lot more fun to manage how right you are and how rich you are going to be, than to manage how bad a mistake you made, and how screwed you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good entries are one of the key elements of successful trading. Exits are more the matter of managing the trades and fine tuning your strategy.

 

But entries, which provide you an edge in the markets are more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no amount of risk management skill can make a bad trade good.

 

100% of bad trades begin with a bad entry.

 

100% of good trades that went bad begin with a bad exit.

 

100% of bad exits begin with bad risk management.

 

 

YMMV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no amount of risk management skill can make a bad trade good.

 

100% of bad trades begin with a bad entry.

 

100% of good trades that went bad begin with a bad exit.

 

100% of bad exits begin with bad risk management.

 

 

YMMV

 

not to be confused with a random trade :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, it shouldn't matter if Entries are more important or if Exits are more important until someone is having a specific problem with one or the other. Regardless, both are needed and dependent upon each other for success along with other variables.

 

Yet, the reality is that most traders spend most of their time working on their entry strategies in comparison to their exit strategies. Further, usually a trader will spend quality time on exit strategies after allowing profitable trades turn into losing trades, allowing big profits vaporize into a small profit or after seeing too many of their trades results as early exits to then see it continue without them into a big price movement.

 

Therefore, it's possible for exits to be more important to some traders due to current problems in their trading after entry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you consider markets to be random in nature (which I don't think they are so hold your horses) it can be demonstrated using Monte Carlo simulations that a trading system that takes random entries is indeed profitable if (and only if) it "lets profits run and cuts losers short". The "letting profits run and cut losers short" part is your exit strategy so we could conclude that, indeed, exits are more important than entries.

 

BUT

 

I don't think that a comparison between the quality of entry setups vs. exits makes a lot of sense. Both are integral parts of a trading strategy and one should not be considered without the other. If your entries suck you can have the best exits in the world yet you'll end up broke, and superbly timed entries will still tank your account if your exits are not working. What's important for consistent success is a system with a good expectancy over time coupled with decent risk management. Entries and exits are a part of both so again, I don't think it's feasible to discuss them without consideration to the other components of a trading system. If one wanted to be a wise ass one could say that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear a lot of votes for the "entry" being more important, so I will offer the opposing argument in favor of the "exit" being more important.

 

The main problem that occurs with a "bad" entry, as multiple people point out, is your risk tolerance. I feel it is based solely on the individual trader as to what a "bad" entry is.

 

Take for example, two traders who enter at the exact same spot. One may be scaling into a position over a 10 point range, the other has a 6T stop. If the trade goes 5T against the entry, one trader is sweating, the other isn't blinking. Was it a bad entry? The market doesn't care about your entry. Only the trader cares about the entry.

 

As for the exit. That's where you make money. There is no opinion, as it is pretty cut and dry on whether a trade was a winner or loser.

 

Unless you can grab the extreme low tick and exit on the extreme high tick, you can never grab an entire move. There will ALWAYS be money left on the table, almost by definition. You're only trying to grab a piece.

 

We all know this, at least subconsciously, but we still burden ourselves with "I should've stayed in longer!" If you exit with a profit (consistently, with a higher reward to your risk), then the exit is all that matters.

 

My 2 cents...

 

Daniel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with most of the responses here. I've written about this elsewhere. I see it this way. You have three independent attributes to trading: entries, exits, and money management.

  • Your trade entry determines your initial risk. Entries don't determine winners or losers.
  • The exit determines your profit or loss on a trade.
  • Money management (position sizing) determines your overall return and drawdown.

Of course, your entry and exit rules must result in something with a positive expectancy. You need all three to maximize your return.

 

Most traders are ruled by fear whether they admit it or not -- that's why they focus on entries so much. It's a psychological need to avoid being wrong. A trader knows (perhaps subconsciously) that a good entry means less risk, and less risk means less chance the trader has to face the uncomfortable fact that he made a wrong decision.

 

-A

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A point which is possibly worth making is what is more important to a unprofitable vs. profitable trader and why.

 

I would suggest that most profitable traders are more concerned with exits and unprofitable traders, with their entries. But is that because profitable traders are focussing on the right thing or is it because they have already nailed their entries? I think for many, we use different parts of the brain to enter and exit. Many of the best traders also suggest having a proper plan in place before the trade as when you enter and emotions are involved, all can go to shit.

 

So perhaps it's easier to plan in a logical way for entries before emotions get in the way and much tougher to deal with exits. it'd be interesting to do a study on the parts of traders' brains which are most active at entry and exit of their trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO something that has been written in other threads and here and sums it up perfectly.....

 

it depends on the strategy

 

If you are short term looking for high frequency profitable patterns whereby you are taking quick profit targets, then its likely to be entries that are more important.

 

If you are longer term looking to capture bigger moves, then the exits have more influence.

 

everything is a trade off and if you mix and match poorly the strategies and the exits and entries then you end up baking a chocolate cake that tastes like play dough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience, entries are of course important and I personally choose market direction based on fundamental drivers. eg if Eurusd is bearish, then I will be looking to short the rallies and only trade in one direction. This analysis requires an understanding of global economic issues and a lot of reading. In this case I find entries to be the easy part.

The exit is not so clear or well defined. For example, you may set a PT of 2:1 with a SL of 50 pips so you are aiming for a profit of 100 pips. The market doesn't know what you want but your retail broker does (that's another issue to overcome), you watch the trade reach 95 pips in profit only to see it turn and hit your SL of 50 pips. Your account has just experienced a nett loss of 145 pips. You have just relinquished a 95 pip profit and turned it into a 50 pip loss. That hurts!

This happens a lot and then causes doubt and fear and you then start to trade emotionally by cutting the trade short of the PT, only then to see the trade exceed the PT by 200 pips.

Now you are feeling that you have lost potential profits and maybe you should let the trade run. This emotion based trading is gut wrenching and trading suicide.

 

I think the plan for exits should be clearly defined in your trading plan and then stick to it.

If you plan to take a set PT of say 50 pips, then the market moves 150 pips, so what, you have your 50 pips profit and you should be happy. Do not lament about lost profit because you will never know when the market will turn.

 

Anyone can backtest a plan, it all looks so simple in hindsight with the completed chart in front of you, but it all falls apart when trading in real time. The pivot point isn't clearly defined until 2 candles later, the technical indicators are lagging, short time frames are too random to be useful or consistent in the long term.

 

I think that whatever exit strategy you use, it must be based on taking consistent, smaller profits, more often and not be sucked into the greed and fear cycles that trading brings out in all of us. You can make a living on 20 pips per day. It just depends on whether you can consistently make 20 pips every day on average and then how much per pip you are trading with. $100/pip x 20 pips = $2000/day. My point is you don't need thousands of pips to be profitable but you must be able to cut losses quickly and bank profits often.

Therefore you need to be decisive, business like, unemotional.

Think of trading as profits and expenses just like any other business. Wins and losses sounds a lot like gambling. In trading, losses are an integral part of doing business just like buying stock in the hope you are going to sell it. You may get stuck with it, but that's the cost of doing business and your profits must outweigh the costs.

Many novice traders beat themselves up when they have a loss but this is the wrong frame of mind to be in. Losses are trading expenses and nothing more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say that Entries are 80% percent of trading, and exits are 20% percent. A good entry is very quickly profitable, and that makes life a whole lot easier. It's a lot more fun to manage how right you are and how rich you are going to be, than to manage how bad a mistake you made, and how screwed you are.

 

Yes...A good entry/start is like scoring 3 runs in the top of the first inning. The sooner you're ahead, the better. Good entry, and I'll cross the exit bridge when I get to it.

The above 80/20 equation sounds pretty accurate to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An interesting and fairly common discussion we come across in trading is the importance of entry and exit strategies and their impact on risk. Lots of traders it is true, look for entry systems with high success rates in picking great turning points or likely trend continuation points where you aren't likely to endure much heat. More and more though, people are suggesting that entries have little to do with their success or failure and it is the exit strategy which makes all the difference for them.

 

I'd like to hear from people their view on either or both entries and exits.

 

My idea is that anyone who says one is more important than the other is underestimating the impact of both. I believe that they must work in a system in conjunction and are just as important as each other. For example, what do you think would be the average success rate of a short(ultra short say fx on a 1min intraday) term trend system where you have 99% of days with a range of 100 prices or fewer and you buy after a rally of 100 prices? Or if you have a system with a fixed number of prices to exit at which is not adjusted for volatility or near price structure which could alter the expected move size?

 

What do you guys think about this?

 

any trader using what you described is doomed from the very beginning....

 

trading is synonymous with flexibility and adjustability. anyone using a fixed price, fixed chart or fixed whatever.... is also fixed to drawdown, inevitably.

 

it appears as you are already a successful trader, why asking a philosophical question on entry and exit.... or perhaps you have already worked out the answer for.... chick or egg first....?

 

any trader without a properly preconceived and predetermined entry and exit point is really just playing and trading for fun and just gambling his capital away.... imho :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no amount of risk management skill can make a bad trade good.

 

100% of bad trades begin with a bad entry.

 

100% of good trades that went bad begin with a bad exit.

 

100% of bad exits begin with bad risk management.

 

 

YMMV

finally, u r openning up....

 

there is hope around here.... lol

 

i like your trading philosophy.... too....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

any trader without a properly preconceived and predetermined entry and exit point is really just playing and trading for fun and just gambling his capital away.... imho :2c:

 

Sorry nakachalet, but your statement couldn't be farther from the truth.

 

Ever heard of a floor trader?

 

Some of us professional traders react to price action on a daily basis.

 

In my trading, and I know many other pros who do the same, I wait for consolidations and then trade the breakouts. I let the ongoing price action determine my entries and exits, as I trade from consolidation zone to consolidation zone, adding contracts at some points, subtracting contracts at others.

 

Its akin to surfing the market waves.

 

Granted, I am much more experienced at this technique than many other traders, but I would rather react to price action than go in blindly at some price level and hope I reach some other price level to achieve my financial goals.

 

Traders that are "doomed" are the traders who do not have the ability to take what the market gives...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nakachalet,

 

What I am trying to illustrate is that many guys who don't know better, are told they should focus on this or focus on that. In actual fact, you need to focus on everything. Because if you don't, a professional who is better prepared than you will take your money.

 

Planning should be done pre-trading as to what you are looking for from the day. Before entering a trade you must assess whether you believe the potential move would make the trade worthwhile given your tolerance level(whilst the market couldn't care less what this is, you have to. fact.). Then when you have identified a favourable entry it's important to judge the market around the area you're looking at. Up to this point, you should have spent more time on your entry. You have prepared for entry, identified risk and are preparing to pull the trigger. If you haven't done any of the above you are asking for a hiding imo. So right now entry is more important. If you haven't paid attention to your entry, you'll probably often see your trade go well under water before you exit and it turns. More than likely you'll get out at the turn or within a price or two. Then the market will rampage in the direction you'd decided was most likely.

 

Once you are in the market though, clearly exits should be the imperative for you. You have to judge how the market is moving, adjust your exit points, trail your stop or whatever you do. If you don't, you'll end up taking smaller winners than your identified potential and thereby skew your risk. Plus you'll probably have trades which get either really well on side or maybe to within a price or two of your target(please notice at this point I have not mentioned fixed targets or anything of the sort, but each to their own), only to see the trade turn around and not only not make you money but lose you money.

 

When you get all of these minor but critical things wrong, it is going then to be a psychological struggle. You think that you're right, so right yet why can you never make money?! Damn the market. It's designed to tease and torment you isn't it! No. Of course not. But people who do fully prepare all parts of their trading are the ones who will likely profit consistently over an extended period of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wait for consolidations and then trade the breakouts. I let the ongoing price action determine my entries and exits, as I trade from consolidation zone to consolidation zone,

 

The consolidation zones are not predetermined by a price level, but you have predetermined that you will wait for those as a condition. Isn't that predetermined? Mentally predetermined? You haven't predetermined a price target, buy you have predetermined a condition.

 

nakachalet was probably talking about set price levels? Which is quite different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.