Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thc

Recurring Order Flow Phases

Recommended Posts

I trade the ES intraday. As my method matures I am spending most of my research time trying to properly visualize order flow. After all, the developing structure is easy to see in the form of a price fractal, volume profile, and perhaps a channel or two. But visualizing order flow cycles is more subjective.

 

One topic I think would be of broad interest relates to the nature of the recurring order flow phase shifts (I call them liquidity phase shifts) that I see each day in the ES. I'll give a few examples to kick things off:

 

RTH 0 to 15 minutes - Overnight order initiative and response

 

RTH 15 to 30 minutes - First institutional initiative and response

 

Some people might trade this as a 15 minute OR breakout

 

RTH 30 to 60 minutes - Second II and response

 

AKA the 30 minute OR breakout

 

RTH 60 to 90 minutes - Third II and response

 

AKA IB extension

 

RTH 90 to 120 minutes - Fourth II and response

 

I believe this is driven by the close of RTH in London and the Dax.

 

 

I have a few more but first I would like to see if anyone has perspective to share on which market constituency is dominating the initiative in each of the phases above. As I mentioned, I believe the 4th II ( or call it what you wish) is driven by Europe initiative.

 

Does anyone disagree or have other perspectives on the topic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a way to account for scheduled news release times? There can be different mixtures of amounts and times of news releases, and their importance. How are you going to verify these cycle periods? If you can verify the cycle periods with data, then why not just use the data?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would call them "windows" rather than "periods". But typically within each window you will see initiative and response. These are just my observations after staring at the order flow for many months.

 

As another example, I think the 2:30 PM to 3:00 PM ET time window is dominated by the bond market close and related rebalancing in equities. So I shorted the day's high to the tick after the close of the bond market produced non extreme initiative followed by evidence of exhaustion. I held for the VWAP but as 3:45 PM ET approached I took my gains as I knew the last 15 minutes is a totally different type of initiative related to last call. Unfortunately the initiative that emerged was to my favor but I'm still comfortable with the decision given the recurring pattern and an acceptable gain.

 

My point being that if you understand the nature of the initiative then you can supplement the structure and order flow analysis with additional observations. In this case I observed bonds selling off into the bond close and given the time window in which that occurred I understood the initiative in equities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume he probably IS "just using the data"...thats what I am doing

 

The first time period IS in fact the time to process the overnight and MOC orders that originate primarily from retail (when retail folks are in the market)....there is also a component of MOC orders from longer time frame speculators and system traders, so it is not entirely homogeneous...As a result the 15 time frame is probably subject to revision

 

The second time frame is in my opinion the time frame in which most institutions come in to "shear the sheep" and that corresponds to the release of some (though not all) economic reports. Generally speaking you have "informed" participants pre-positioned for the report releases by this time...and the rest of the crowd is just reacting.... thats the way its always been.

 

Depending on the significance of a report, or pending news (earnings, or political news) the balance of the day can be summed up as programmed execution, and speculators calling the shots until such time as the longer time frame crowd sees either A.) an opportunity to buy below value (at wholesale prices) or B.) an opportunity to sell above value (at retail prices)...and of course you have the rest of the informed participants either tagging along or initiating trades if they see price at the border of either scenario...

 

Those of us using time-based pivots and supply demand analysis spend our time, watching the larger players move the market to places where we can lean on or front run specific numbers. Since most of us know what the numbers are, it has become a game of "tug of war" as each side tries to move the market while managing risk...

 

Its been a fun year...

 

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those of us using time-based pivots and supply demand analysis spend our time, watching the larger players move the market to places where we can lean on or front run specific numbers. Since most of us know what the numbers are, it has become a game of "tug of war" as each side tries to move the market while managing risk...

 

I assume that your reference to "time based pivots" is a reference to the concept I am exploring here. Can you elaborate?

 

Also just to keep the topic warm, once again on Friday the Bond Close brought an initiative/response sequence that produced another key structural inflection point right at 3 PM ET.

 

I am more puzzled by the patterns observed at the 30-60 minute and 60-90 minute mark. Perhaps there is no clean explanation for these windows, as you indicate.

 

In the case of the 30-60 minute window, I have read that many traders will not take a position until the 35 minute mark, regardless of the news schedule. If true then I assume this is because they want to see what I call the First Initiative between the 15 to 30 minute mark before deciding to step in. Does this sound familiar?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I talk about time-based pivots in my thread "An Institutional Look at the S&P Futures".

Basically, TBP form the profit goals that many if not most institutional traders use on a yearly basis. It has to do in part, with how bonus money is calculated.

 

Coincidentally we had a test of one of the most important time-based pivots on Friday. That being the yearly open at 1263.50

 

I have attached a chart so that you can see the test and strong counter reaction (a 10 point move for those ready to enter long)....

 

Time based pivots are one of the cornerstones of my method.

 

Good luck

Steve

5aa710800be32_FridaysScreen.thumb.PNG.9b524d0fd6d8693d79b482391f1e4312.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve, Is your worksheet pivots something you programmed? Or are they part of some software? What trading platform do you use for charting? I am evaluating all this now and I'm about 6 months into the study of Market Profile.

 

Do you have any experience with market profile trading rooms with a moderator?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steve, Is your worksheet pivots something you programmed? Or are they part of some software? What trading platform do you use for charting? I am evaluating all this now and I'm about 6 months into the study of Market Profile.

 

Do you have any experience with market profile trading rooms with a moderator?

 

 

I try to be "low tech" whenever possible. I prefer the hands on approach. My worksheet is something that I do manually every night on a sheet of paper. Works for me.

I use Esignal (the newest version)

and I don't use market profile other than the basic "value area high and low" (its not necessary in my system).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I missed one element of your question

 

I have some experience with "rooms" that use Market Profile. Frankly I might still be using Market Profile or Volume Profile, but for one lucky day when I ran into an old gentleman (now deceased) willing to show me a entirely different method of trading...I think a person can make money with market profile if they are willing to handle the drawdowns....One of the benefits of my method is that I can manage risk in more effiecient manner...and I am able to find favorable entry more often. simple as that...

 

Good luck

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.