Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Pony

Which Indicators Do You Use?

Recommended Posts

I could tell you ... but then I'd have to kill you! :rofl:

 

Seriously, Steve, if I told you, would you be the wiser?

Would you use it to your advantage, or just sample it for 10 minutes and discard it as a fail!

 

It is a part of a complete strategy, and it has different settings for different Time Frames.

 

I am a swing trader, aspiring to position-trading, so the indicator is suited to the longer TF. You can day-trade or even scalp with it.

 

But here is the hint - the success does not lie with the indicator ... rather, success is found using the multi-time-frame approach. The indicator is there just to confirm the TF are lining up ... and to show when thee is a pull-back.

 

You could use RSI - CCI - Stochastic - PSAR - MACD - or even a simple set of EMA's ... or the TDI. It doesn't matter. What matters is that you get things lined up for trend, and then identify a small pull-back, which is resuming its run with the other higher TF.

 

It's not difficult, and the higher the TF, the more forgiving it is of an error.

Further, the higher TF's rule, until there is a change in the trend, which will be identified in the smaller TF first.

 

It is not complicated ... but it is successful.

 

Do I need to expand on that? Hope it helps.

how many different time frames do you use for confirmation?

 

i just started trading stocks (made my first trade last week) and i use a couple of moving averages and MACD only. im also working on a system that uses bollinger bands, acceleration bands, and RSI right now, but im on limited capital and can only really be in one position at a time :embarassed:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
how many different time frames do you use for confirmation?

When trading swing/position TF you need to be aware of the "big picture."

 

The big picture is whatever the monthly TF is doing, and at the very least, what the

weekly is doing. I don't want to turn this into a thread about what one trader is doing, but in order to work out where price is going in the lower TF, it is a good idea to look at the trend in the higher TF.

 

I have 6 charts on my MT4 profile.

 

I look at the higher TF first. These are the slow-moving elephants, and when they

gather a bit of momentum, they are difficult to reverse. They are not like a speeding train - trains mostly run on a straight course. Elephants (I believe) can pick up a bit of pace, then slow ... turn ... pick up pace ... slow ... turn ... and so on.

 

The "slowing-and-turning" can be seen on the next lower TF, but mostly the elephant

decides it was right in its original course, and resumes its trotting along. Look at a

Monthly and then a weekly chart of the same instrument. Best if you can get them

side-by-side, or at least toggle them back and forth.

 

Pretty soon you get the picture, that while the weekly can deliver reversals, eventually

the monthly asserts its influence, and there is a very large move, as the instrument

moves back into alignment with the monthly direction.

 

If only it was a simple as that.

 

There are problems of course, with this approach.

 

If you look long enough at charts, you would realise that even monthly charts have

major turning points ... and these points have to begin somewhere. They begin with

ONE TICK on the lower TF, and morph into a new trend (eventually).

 

So our job as traders is two-fold ... trade with established trends ... and remain alert for

changes to that trend.

 

Using many indicators keeps traders enslaved to the cacophony of the noisy, lower TF.

I would say from my own point of view, that since I ditched about 5 of my most

treasured and "useful" indicators, and moved even higher up the scale to

weekly/monthly, my trading has been more satisfying.

 

I get fewer trades ... but larger moves ... and fewer failed trades.

 

Over the past 2 weeks, I haven't traded at all - I just have not seen the setups. But in

the last week of July/first week of August, there were some lovely trends, as the EURO

(in its death throes) drove useful trends for enduring periods.

 

Even the higher TF are subject to "noise" (chaos) ... but less frequently. Using a single

indicator can deliver far more clarity to what price is doing over several TF, and I found

that what I lacked above all else, was not an indicator to show me where to enter, but

clarity in what I was seeing.

 

I think there is more clarity in this approach. Swing Trading is worth more than a casual

look. It is not hard, though there is more to it than I have shown in this quick "Cook's Tour."

 

Good luck with your quest.

5aa711300a269_Screenexample.thumb.PNG.c00aceecd1d68775a2bd22a5744495ac.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a long reply, Baker - I hope not too much info there for the thread.

 

But of course you do NOT need 6 charts, and according to the screen real-estate available (I have 2 x 23" monitors) you could remove 2 of those charts.

 

Just don't complicate things that are meant to be simple. Trading is not a pursuit for the intellectual - I am proof of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...great info being passed on, thanks very much INGOT

 

I am sure some seminars pass on less good info than you have there...!!!

 

If you find yourself in Australia, I would love to meet up and show you around,,!!!

 

I would have to ask you one or two more questions though...!!

 

Cheers mate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...great info being passed on, thanks very much INGOT

 

I am sure some seminars pass on less good info than you have there...!!!

 

If you find yourself in Australia, I would love to meet up and show you around,,!!!

 

I would have to ask you one or two more questions though...!!

 

Cheers mate

:cool: I'm a Queenslander!

 

We like it up here.

 

Beautiful one day ... perfect the next!

 

Hervey Bay is the whale watching capital of the world ... Platypus Bay ... not far from here ... is where hundreds of humpbacks stop off to play on their annual breeding/calving run north the the Whitsunday Islands, before heading south for the summer. Right now the boats go out every day with tourists ... and scores of whales are seen every day.

 

Whale watching runs July/November annually.

 

Hervey Bay Whale Watching

 

Ok ... sorry about the off-topic ... as you were, men!

 

The tourism board should have me as an ambassador - a few free shots there for our locality.

 

Acknowledgement for the image from Owen Wilson Photography:

 

Whale watching Platypus Bay | Owen Wilson Photography

5aa711311ee43_QFC0047WhalewatchingPlatypusBaybetweenfraserIslandandtheMainlandAustraliadsc_0061.thumb.jpg.13e694eaea7309920b42bcde4c30f6de.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i like to use previous highs and lows - 1st retest of those are more likely than other places to produce a small (or larger) reversal in the opposite direction.

 

candlestick patterns are good. check out bulkowski's site (think it's called thepatternsite.com, or somethig like that. bulkowski. google him) he has conducted some pretty exhaustive reasearch on market patterns including candlestick patterns. this alone can provide an edge to build around.

 

support and resistance - tops of ranges, bottoms of ranges (see previous highs and lows)

 

market profile and VSA are both very sound concepts, I use em, they make money.

 

printed flow data for spot forex trading.... goood to provide confirmation, or help pick a good entry point if you have other compelling reasons to believe in one particular direcational bias in a market.

 

information on options, of a particular interest are barrier options. can develop some really really neat-o trading concepts around barrier options. google: darkstar, trading.

he's developed some good models around various aspects of options and how they influence the spot forex market.

 

sam seiden and supply and demand zones. a good basic primer for starting to see how markets work, and has some very good, high probability trading strategies.

 

I also like trendlines. best indicator in the world to determine if a market is trending, reversing, consolidating, breakign out, etc... a simple diagonal line on a chart. nobrainertrades.com has some great work published on how to use S/R and trendlines for some good intraday profits, and Steve (the guy who runs the site) is the real deal. institutional experience, retail trader, one of the most complete understandings of how the markets work of anyone I know of. Uses trendlines like a trendline fiend.

 

on a very very rare occassion, fibonnaci... and also, on a very rare occassion, a moving average to filter out one specific setup I have.

 

i once heard a guy say if it makes any sort of squiggle on his screen, it can't make any money. I tend to agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When trading swing/position TF you need to be aware of the "big picture."

 

The big picture is whatever the monthly TF is doing, and at the very least, what the

weekly is doing. I don't want to turn this into a thread about what one trader is doing, but in order to work out where price is going in the lower TF, it is a good idea to look at the trend in the higher TF.

 

I have 6 charts on my MT4 profile.

 

I look at the higher TF first. These are the slow-moving elephants, and when they

gather a bit of momentum, they are difficult to reverse. They are not like a speeding train - trains mostly run on a straight course. Elephants (I believe) can pick up a bit of pace, then slow ... turn ... pick up pace ... slow ... turn ... and so on.

 

The "slowing-and-turning" can be seen on the next lower TF, but mostly the elephant

decides it was right in its original course, and resumes its trotting along. Look at a

Monthly and then a weekly chart of the same instrument. Best if you can get them

side-by-side, or at least toggle them back and forth.

 

Pretty soon you get the picture, that while the weekly can deliver reversals, eventually

the monthly asserts its influence, and there is a very large move, as the instrument

moves back into alignment with the monthly direction.

 

If only it was a simple as that.

 

There are problems of course, with this approach.

 

If you look long enough at charts, you would realise that even monthly charts have

major turning points ... and these points have to begin somewhere. They begin with

ONE TICK on the lower TF, and morph into a new trend (eventually).

 

So our job as traders is two-fold ... trade with established trends ... and remain alert for

changes to that trend.

 

Using many indicators keeps traders enslaved to the cacophony of the noisy, lower TF.

I would say from my own point of view, that since I ditched about 5 of my most

treasured and "useful" indicators, and moved even higher up the scale to

weekly/monthly, my trading has been more satisfying.

 

I get fewer trades ... but larger moves ... and fewer failed trades.

 

Over the past 2 weeks, I haven't traded at all - I just have not seen the setups. But in

the last week of July/first week of August, there were some lovely trends, as the EURO

(in its death throes) drove useful trends for enduring periods.

 

Even the higher TF are subject to "noise" (chaos) ... but less frequently. Using a single

indicator can deliver far more clarity to what price is doing over several TF, and I found

that what I lacked above all else, was not an indicator to show me where to enter, but

clarity in what I was seeing.

 

I think there is more clarity in this approach. Swing Trading is worth more than a casual

look. It is not hard, though there is more to it than I have shown in this quick "Cook's Tour."

 

Good luck with your quest.

 

One of the great things about referencing these higher timeframes as a swing trader is that they're inherently less noisy. A weekly or monthly chart still tends to have the "cleanliness" that daily charts used to have back in the days when trend following funds were raking it in. Trading from these higher timeframes is impossible unless you have shed loads of capital, but incorporating clear trend signals from them into lower timeframe systems as Ingot suggests is a great idea.

 

If you want to "prove" this to yourself, you could make the following comparissons between monthly/weekly/daily data:

 

1) Calculate the relative frequency (across a large data set) with which 'swings' occur (a low with a higher low on either side, or a high with a lower high on either side). In "cleaner" data you would expect fewer of these.

 

2) Calculate the percentage of each bar that occurs outside the range of the prior bar, averaged across the entire data set. In data that is "cleaner" and exhibits less mean reversion you would expect this figure to be lower, as price trends into new territory with greater frequency.

 

Hope that's of some use to someone.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.