Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Pony

Which Indicators Do You Use?

Recommended Posts

I first started short-term trading with about $4000 about a year ago. I had good days and bad, ultimately loosing about two hundred fifty dollars. I only used candlestick indicators to determine when to enter and exit the market. My account eventually was suspended (thankfully) for becoming a pattern day trader without the minimal $25,000 in the account.

 

Anyway, I've recently become re-interested, and have been looking at bollinger bands along side candlesticks, which seems like it will be a lot more reliable than just the candlesticks alone.

 

My question being: Which indicator/indicators do you use to make trades, and what made you evolve into using them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also use candlestick patterns and some of my most profitable trades start with a simple candlestick pattern.

 

I also use RSI because I have found divergence on RSI to be one of the most accurate tools to make money off of trends losing steam.

 

I used to use MACD because divergence on it is also highly accurate but I think using MACD is just too slow.

 

I also use EMAs to make sure I stay with the trend (short/long on bounces off the EMA in favor of the trend.

 

Elliott Wave counts are also very important to my trading along with traditional technical patterns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much. That's exactly the kind of information I'm looking for. However, when you say MACD is too slow, I'm afraid I'm too knew to know what you mean. How would it be slower than the others? I'll definitely read up on how to follow those different types if indicators.

 

Anyone else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MACD signals you to enter the trade long after the optimal entry therefore you make less money on the trade and take more risk because your stop would have to be farther away. It has the same problem on signals to exit the trade.

 

The biggest way to be successful (in my opinion anyway) is just basically keep trading and study charts and you will begin to be able to recognize patterns that are highly probable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can use the VIX to understand risk in the market. The VIX can be viewed as the "investor fear gauge" index. It measures the volatility and fear in the market by tracking the implied volatility of at-the-money put and call options for a 30-day period in the S&P 500. When stocks go down, option volatility (VIX) increases as more options traders buy puts to either protect their stock portfolio, as an alternative to shorting, or to speculate.

 

Typically, a VIX below 20 means the market is complacent and investors are not concerned about the current outlook of the market. A VIX reading greater than 30 generally means that investors have become more fearful about the current state of the market and the increase in volatility is a result of the increase in investor uncertainty.

 

The further the VIX increases, the more panic there is in the market. The further the VIX decreases, the more complacency there is in the market. As a measure of complacency and panic, the VIX is often used a contrarian indicator.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
as a short or long term trend indicator?

 

Umm...I dont really use it to show the trend direction. I guess you could. I would rather look at the slope of the vwap. I guess the 15min would be a good short term.

 

Put a 200sma on either a 15min or 60min chart and you will see some respect. 5min not so much...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Umm...I dont really use it to show the trend direction. I guess you could. I would rather look at the slope of the vwap. I guess the 15min would be a good short term.

 

Put a 200sma on either a 15min or 60min chart and you will see some respect. 5min not so much...

 

so a 200sma on a price chart? what are you looking for with this indicator? crossing over\under? delta by a certain %?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so a 200sma on a price chart? what are you looking for with this indicator? crossing over\under? delta by a certain %?

 

Hey are you by any chance SoulTrader? What happened to him...

 

Yeah price chart. You might also see sometimes 200sma converge with a daily pivot. Higher probabaliity. I just watch the tape.But Its nice to know were the 200sma.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey are you by any chance SoulTrader? What happened to him...

 

Yeah price chart. You might also see sometimes 200sma converge with a daily pivot. Higher probabaliity. I just watch the tape.But Its nice to know were the 200sma.

 

No I'm not Soultrader - looks like he hasn't been around for awhile. I'll have to play around with the sma200 and daily pivots and try and figure out what you are looking for. Thanks for the tip.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Umm...I dont really use it to show the trend direction. I guess you could. I would rather look at the slope of the vwap.

 

according to the MIDAS system, the vmap subsequent to a reversal in trend is a major indicator of major change in market (trader) sentiment. this is one of their key chart predictors - mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
according to the MIDAS system, the vmap subsequent to a reversal in trend is a major indicator of major change in market (trader) sentiment. this is one of their key chart predictors - mslk

 

VMAP? Is that a typo for VWAP?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea is to know understand the difference between leading indicators and lagging indicators.

 

IE for trade entry - do you want to use a LAGGING indicator?

for Trade Management do you want to use a LEADING indicator?

 

Ask your-self those questions, and then identify what indicators are leading, and what are lagging....

 

As you will no doubt find/know already the leading indicators help you to GET into the trade.. the lagging indicators help you to manage the trade, and LET YOUR PROFITS RUN, as the saying goes....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good idea is to know understand the difference between leading indicators and lagging indicators.

 

IE for trade entry - do you want to use a LAGGING indicator?

for Trade Management do you want to use a LEADING indicator?

 

Ask your-self those questions, and then identify what indicators are leading, and what are lagging....

 

As you will no doubt find/know already the leading indicators help you to GET into the trade.. the lagging indicators help you to manage the trade, and LET YOUR PROFITS RUN, as the saying goes....

 

It's worth remembering that most 'indicators' that purport to lead price only do so (allegedly) based on assumptions that are pretty much false. Having said that things like trend lines or channels can project potential future turning points. (or even plain old S/R). Some might even argue that volume leads price (debatable, arguably a price will or will not attract volume).

 

I'd be interested to know what you consider 'leading'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I've recently learned that lagging indicators are not at all popular on here. But when I'm looking at an intraday chart, I have been looking at the macd, and essentially, I just wait for the lines to cross, whenever they do, I either short sell, or buy long. I should also mention that I look at the day trend as a whole, whether it should be going up or down that day, and put the two together for the best results. Is this a terrible strategy?

 

I should also mention that I have only traded stocks. I don't even have a clue how to get into futures, which were recommended as "stocks on steroids," plus you pay less tax on futures? I don't understand that, I would assume they would both fall under capital gains tax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I make all my trading decisions based upon a special proprietary indicator which I call 'XTradeCompass'. The code is a carefully guarded secret and I don't share the indicator with anyone. I use it as part of the following setups:

 

The Cash Cow

Six-Bar Dollar Catcher

Theta Breakout Scalping Strategy

The Sniper

 

I get hundreds of requests from traders wanting to buy this indicator but it's secret and proprietary as its our in house indicator and I only share it with those I know have the potential to suceed in this game. This indicator will NEVER be released to the public. You can see a video of me trading with this indicator on my website - a thousand micropips on options in single stock gold futures yesterday - SWEET! Please do not contact me asking to buy this indicator.

 

Hope that helps!

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

ps For more information about this indicator please contact me at bluehorseshoe@tradersgoldfutures.com

 

pps Please ignore anything you read about me on the SEC website - it's all lies and they're just jealous because they're not making the kind of RETURNS that I am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MACD signals you to enter the trade long after the optimal entry therefore you make less money on the trade and take more risk because your stop would have to be farther away. It has the same problem on signals to exit the trade.

 

The biggest way to be successful (in my opinion anyway) is just basically keep trading and study charts and you will begin to be able to recognize patterns that are highly probable.

:helloooo:

hello Guys

I will share a simple strategy that I get from a friend and I hope more profit for you .

 

 

*strategy depends on 2 indicators :

 

1- KG Support and Resistance indicator

 

2- iMACD indicator with two lines

 

* we will use our strategy on 4 hours frame only .

 

*signal of buy:

 

1 - the green line intersects with the red line and the intersection under zero in iMACD indicator .

 

2 - after intersection happened look at KG Support and Resistance indicator , the price must be near the red support line which is a daily support and we will wait untill we see blue support line or 4 hours support then enter the market and sometimes we will see red and blue lines at the same price.

 

3- we have to co-operation together here to know target and stop

 

 

* of course signal of sell is the opposite of buy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Price, price, price... why make it more complex than that?? there's no need! really!
You might be right forexlady101, but I have never been able to get "price" to work any better than any other indicator - leading or lagging - and I have about 10,000 hours of screen time between my ears.

 

There have been whole forums dedicated to price. And whole forums dedicated to the discussion of trading ... every member looking to participate in dialogue ... or lurking ... in a quest for an improved edge.

 

I only use one indicator - one lagging indicator ... and I am just as successful as ever :cool:

 

It is intriguing to see some traders' charts with many indicators ... sometimes even the same indicator repeated in a different window on the chart, using different settings.

 

I guess that must be working for them.

 

I won't nominate any particular indicator, because they all have something to show ... but generally, one must understand the indicator, and what it does.

 

Then one must M-A-S-T-E-R one strategy based on what that single indicator is revealing. Labeling indicators as "lagging or leading" just muddies the water for me - but I acknowledge good and successful traders (I am led to believe) use these to advantage.

 

It might be fairly safe to say that there may be many ways to skim the markets ... all the trader has to do is to become successful at ONE of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HI INGOT...GREAT THAT YOU ARE HAVING SUCCESS WITH ONE INDICATOR,

 

WHICH ONE...?????

 

I am sure we would be grateful for an insight to your style, how about another post with a bit more info.

 

Cheers mate, Steve

I could tell you ... but then I'd have to kill you! :rofl:

 

Seriously, Steve, if I told you, would you be the wiser?

Would you use it to your advantage, or just sample it for 10 minutes and discard it as a fail!

 

It is a part of a complete strategy, and it has different settings for different Time Frames.

 

I am a swing trader, aspiring to position-trading, so the indicator is suited to the longer TF. You can day-trade or even scalp with it.

 

But here is the hint - the success does not lie with the indicator ... rather, success is found using the multi-time-frame approach. The indicator is there just to confirm the TF are lining up ... and to show when thee is a pull-back.

 

You could use RSI - CCI - Stochastic - PSAR - MACD - or even a simple set of EMA's ... or the TDI. It doesn't matter. What matters is that you get things lined up for trend, and then identify a small pull-back, which is resuming its run with the other higher TF.

 

It's not difficult, and the higher the TF, the more forgiving it is of an error.

Further, the higher TF's rule, until there is a change in the trend, which will be identified in the smaller TF first.

 

It is not complicated ... but it is successful.

 

Do I need to expand on that? Hope it helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.