Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

secondmouse

ECN Vs Market Maker

Recommended Posts

I'm new to Forex and have a couple of quick questions. Would appreciate feedback.

 

I've heard that ECNs are preferable to work with, instead of market makers, because ECNs don't have dealing desks (and therefore no conflict of interest). But I've also been advised that you don't get good fills with ECNs. Any thoughts?

 

Also, does anyone have any experience with the newstrading system, StraddleTraderPro?

 

Lastly, anyone know about mirror trading and a platform called Tradency?

 

Thanks,

SM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm new to Forex and have a couple of quick questions. Would appreciate feedback.

 

I've heard that ECNs are preferable to work with, instead of market makers, because ECNs don't have dealing desks (and therefore no conflict of interest). But I've also been advised that you don't get good fills with ECNs. Any thoughts?

 

Also, does anyone have any experience with the newstrading system, StraddleTraderPro?

 

Lastly, anyone know about mirror trading and a platform called Tradency?

 

Thanks,

SM

 

 

When I was starting out, for the reason's you list, I opened an account with an ECN...

I found them to be no better or worse than the Market Makers I use now. ECNs do charge commission, which is why I stopped using them. I have never traded more than 5 standard lots at a time, so I never had a "Fill" problem with either.

You will experience "Re Quote" issues with just about any broker using MT4.

 

Sorry, no experience with Tradency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm new to Forex and have a couple of quick questions. Would appreciate feedback.

 

I've heard that ECNs are preferable to work with, instead of market makers, because ECNs don't have dealing desks (and therefore no conflict of interest). But I've also been advised that you don't get good fills with ECNs. Any thoughts?

 

Also, does anyone have any experience with the newstrading system, StraddleTraderPro?

 

Lastly, anyone know about mirror trading and a platform called Tradency?

 

Thanks,

SM

 

Forget news trading with market makers, the spread will widen and/or they will requote. You can new trade with ECNs, but just like any real market liquidity will dry up just before the event with the effect of a large spread, but it won't be as bad as the market makers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm new to Forex and have a couple of quick questions. Would appreciate feedback.

 

I've heard that ECNs are preferable to work with, instead of market makers, because ECNs don't have dealing desks (and therefore no conflict of interest). But I've also been advised that you don't get good fills with ECNs. Any thoughts?

 

Also, does anyone have any experience with the newstrading system, StraddleTraderPro?

 

Lastly, anyone know about mirror trading and a platform called Tradency?

 

Thanks,

SM

 

 

That is true, a real ECN broker does not have dealing desk and it sends the client's orders directly to the markets. This is a huge advantage comparing to market maker which sometimes trades against its own clients. I disagree with your second comment because with a real ECN you can enter the market any time (but not always in the price you ask- when spreads are widen) . Market maker on the other hand, is more often to send you requotes because it has fix prices and it cannot supply when the market is too volatile. As I said, there are many brokers that considered as ECNs but they are not really ECN brokers- just a gimmick. From my experience, I found out that, sunbird fx and Alpari are real ECN brokers, also I know that Sunbird has mirror trader, anyways, try a demo account first when you try any new broker. Good Luck..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
peterfx -

Thanks for the advice and recommendations.

 

Cheers

 

 

 

The litmus test for good fills is if they are a direct market access broker.

If they fill out of their own inventory then you will be getting jerked around some

of the time. I noticed that if placed an order with a broker that fills out of his own

inventory they tend to delay, hold, and fondle your order if you go in the direction

of what they consider the trend to be. If you place an order against what they consider

the trend to be then you get quick fills. It sucks to have your own broker trade

against you. If your fills aren't instant then your broker either isn't DMA or is jerking you around. When you order does eventuall fil you can always check the time and sales

tape to verify they are giving you the best inside market.

 

The SEC allows a broker up to 3 minutes to fill a market order. 3 minutes can be a

lifetime in a fast moving market and can be plenty of time to jerk you around for a

nickel or dime per share in a slow moving market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mirror trading: The mirror trading method allows traders in financial markets to select a trading strategy and to automatically “mirror” the trades executed by the selected strategies in the trader's brokerage account. Traders can select strategies that match their personal trading preferences, such as risk tolerance and past profits. Once a strategy has been selected, all the signals sent by the strategy will be automatically applied to the client’s brokerage account. No intervention is required by the client as all the account activity is controlled by the platform. Clients may trade one or more strategies concurrently. This flexibility enables the trader to diversify their risk while maintaining complete trading control of their account at all times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm new to Forex and have a couple of quick questions. Would appreciate feedback.

 

I've heard that ECNs are preferable to work with, instead of market makers, because ECNs don't have dealing desks (and therefore no conflict of interest). But I've also been advised that you don't get good fills with ECNs. Any thoughts?

 

Thanks,

SM

 

I trade with MB Trading's non-MetaTrader Forex in EUR/USD exclusively, using HyperScalper. MB Trading is a pure ECN with the following characteristics:

1) Interbank pricing

2) No penalty for small lot size

3) Pay for Limits which gives you a Credit when you add liquidity, which

4) Result in No Commission, when you place order carefully.

 

They pay a credit equal to 1.95 base currency per $100k forex lot, or any proportional lot size down to the micro lot. For example, in current EURO price, that is 1.95 times 1.3, which is about $2.53 per Forex standard lot ($100,000) PER SIDE.

 

So, a Forex standard lot, purchased wholesale, buy BID and sell ASK has a Gross profit of $10 for 1 tick, Plus the credit of $2.53 per side, so that's NET approx $15 profit, and the market didn't move at all... (theoretically, if you wait with resting limits to get your fills).

 

If you use a marketable order, and you "hit" a counterparty, then you pay only 2.95 in base currency per side fully proportional commission. The counterparty gets the liquidity credit in that case, so you want to use Limit orders carefully on their ECN.

 

Their fees and credits are here:

MB Trading - Pricing

 

No dealing desk, no restrictions on scalping, and no FIFO restrictions on hedging.

 

Fill times roughly 0.5 seconds round trip.

 

Anyway, this is Modern Transparent ECN Forex, and it's a great trading environment.

 

Just FYI... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, as long as the broker gets you in and out of your trades, you will not notice a significant difference between either models, other than spreads which are already fairly competitive these days. And a reputable broker will fill you as the market allows.

 

Don't get "spooked" solely on the strict terms ECN and Market Maker :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I

 

 

 

No dealing desk, no restrictions on scalping, and no FIFO restrictions on hedging.

 

 

 

Just FYI... :)

 

 

Your statement on hedging is incorrect. this is copied directly from their site. I couldn't find any information that would lead me to believe one could circumvent FIFO either

( first in first out ).

 

 

MB Trading - Stocks Options Futures Forex Online Discount Trading

mb.thumb.jpg.6796f4114311fc7099fc1adb77d363aa.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your statement on hedging is incorrect. this is copied directly from their site. I couldn't find any information that would lead me to believe one could circumvent FIFO either

( first in first out ).

 

 

MB Trading - Stocks Options Futures Forex Online Discount Trading

 

Thanks for pointing that out. I really don't know about Hedging, and I should not have been making that statement, so I apologize.

 

However, the "FIFO" issue is an accounting issue, and is handled at their back office.

 

This is not an issue easily explained, but basically, using their MetaTrader (which I don't use), you are able to do LIFO trading "last in, first out". Normally, FIFO restrictions would force you to close the First In, as the First Out.

 

But all of this evaporates, because not only do they take care of that in the back office, when you are not talking about "deals" in MetaTrader, which are no longer "deals" because they are an ECN. You can buy or sell, at least within a single Forex symbol in any amount and in any order you wish.

 

I don't use the MetaTrader concept of "deals" but simply Buy and Sell EUR/USD Forex lots. By doing this, I am able to pull my Price Break Even point, or Cost Basis in my favor, and "Nibble" away at the market by taking Partial profits, so that when any "entry" comes into profit, I can close it out. This, incidentally would be considered "LIFO" last in, first out, from the perspective of "deals".

 

My trading style is strictly LIFO, so I do know that FIFO restrictions, at least within a single Forex pair, are eliminated at MB Trading. Basically, using their ECN (aka EXN) it's just like trading on a "real" exchange, like Globex. You just buy and sell, in an unrestricted fashion.

 

So, ultimately, trading is just Average Buy price vs Average Sell price minus commission, and even commission can be mitigated at MB Trading, or eliminated, by their "Pay for Limits" program.

 

Hope this helps !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your statement on hedging is incorrect. this is copied directly from their site.

 

As regards Hedging, I'm not an expert here, but having a long and short position in the same account makes no sense to me anyway. And that practice has been banned, I believe by NFA.

 

However, as a matter of fact, with 2 accounts, you could certainly have a long position in one, and a short position in another, on the same Forex pair symbol. I know of a guy who specifically had 2 accounts at MB Trading for just this purpose. I guess that would accomplish the purpose of hedging... ?

 

But when we trade Forex on a modern ECN, we are really getting outside of the whole "Dealing Desk" concept, so the "order" of the deals, in the sense of MetaTrader positions, becomes irrelevant. Anyway, my comments and experience with the "MetaTrader world" are limited. I've used MB Trading's MetaTrader briefly (but performance was terrible) and so I know that LIFO execution sequences are unrestricted. The last "deal" can be closed "first".

 

But "modern" trading on an ECN doesn't have the concept of "deals" anymore, and so Forex has finally come into the modern era with ECN's such as MB Trading's offering. My trading is called "Nibbling" and consists of hundreds of small transactions, mostly on a "LIFO" basis using Cost Basis Averaging over a wide price range in Euro.

 

HyperScalper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As regards Hedging, I'm not an expert here, but having a long and short position in the same account makes no sense to me anyway. And that practice has been banned, I believe by NFA.

 

However, as a matter of fact, with 2 accounts, you could certainly have a long position in one, and a short position in another, on the same Forex pair symbol. I know of a guy who specifically had 2 accounts at MB Trading for just this purpose. I guess that would accomplish the purpose of hedging... ?

 

But when we trade Forex on a modern ECN, we are really getting outside of the whole "Dealing Desk" concept, so the "order" of the deals, in the sense of MetaTrader positions, becomes irrelevant. Anyway, my comments and experience with the "MetaTrader world" are limited. I've used MB Trading's MetaTrader briefly (but performance was terrible) and so I know that LIFO execution sequences are unrestricted. The last "deal" can be closed "first".

 

But "modern" trading on an ECN doesn't have the concept of "deals" anymore, and so Forex has finally come into the modern era with ECN's such as MB Trading's offering. My trading is called "Nibbling" and consists of hundreds of small transactions, mostly on a "LIFO" basis using Cost Basis Averaging over a wide price range in Euro.

 

HyperScalper

 

I am not knocking MB, they have a solid reputation. Just didn't want mis information out there. Yes, one could "hedge" by having 2 accts at any broker. Like you, I have never been big on hedging.

 

I used to consider myself a decent mid term trader. By mid term I mean 3 days to 2 weeks. While the trade was open I would scalp ( in the direction of my analysis ) .

Now, with FIFO, I just scalp. I'll take another look at MB and see if they offer a demo.

See if the cost averaging would work to better advantage for me.

 

When the Rules change, we change. We adapt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not knocking MB, they have a solid reputation. Just didn't want mis information out there. Yes, one could "hedge" by having 2 accts at any broker. Like you, I have never been big on hedging.

 

I used to consider myself a decent mid term trader. By mid term I mean 3 days to 2 weeks. While the trade was open I would scalp ( in the direction of my analysis ) .

Now, with FIFO, I just scalp. I'll take another look at MB and see if they offer a demo.

See if the cost averaging would work to better advantage for me.

 

When the Rules change, we change. We adapt.

 

Yes, I know a lot about MB Trading Forex, PM me and we can discuss. My own work is focused upon High Frequency "Nibbling" with continuous LIFO profit-taking and continuous cost averaging over a wide range of pricing. So, no stop outs (almost never). I make Net Credits most of the time, so mostly don't have to pay any net commish. But precision Order Entry is the key to that. Absolutely we learn something new every day, Good Trading ! HyperScalper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not knocking MB, they have a solid reputation. Just didn't want mis information out there. Yes, one could "hedge" by having 2 accts at any broker. Like you, I have never been big on hedging.

 

I used to consider myself a decent mid term trader. By mid term I mean 3 days to 2 weeks. While the trade was open I would scalp ( in the direction of my analysis ) .

Now, with FIFO, I just scalp. I'll take another look at MB and see if they offer a demo.

See if the cost averaging would work to better advantage for me.

 

When the Rules change, we change. We adapt.

 

Yes, I know a lot about MB Trading Forex, PM me and we can discuss. My own work is focused upon High Frequency "Nibbling" with continuous LIFO profit-taking and continuous cost averaging over a wide range of pricing. So, no stop outs (almost never). I make Net Credits most of the time, so mostly don't have to pay any net commish. But precision Order Entry is the key to that. Absolutely we learn something new every day, Good Trading ! HyperScalper

 

If you trade in terms of net positions, it really doesn't matter mathematically whether it is LIFO, FIFO, or [whatever]IFO

 

Except hedging. If you hedge a position of the same currency pair, you essentially remove all the risk from the broker, and pay two commissions, two spreads, and possibly two swaps with no additional monetary benefit to the trader. When you offset an existing position, you are completely out of the market. I think the whole point of FIFO was to guarantee that the person could not hedge the same pair in the same account. But the NFA did several other things that made forex trading from a USA broker undesirable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! first post,

I traded live with both ECN's and Market makers for a few years, with ECN's you have privileges to more transparent trading but you pay a price in the form of commission, what people seem to not be aware of or fail to mention is that ECN's are much more expensive than MM's , atleast the ECN's I tried have been, of the Market makers there is both good and rotten apples, they are not all trading against you, look for STP brokers, they will only charge you the spread. I think better for small acounts, ECN's only for trading big lots.

thats my experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi! first post,

I traded live with both ECN's and Market makers for a few years, with ECN's you have privileges to more transparent trading but you pay a price in the form of commission, what people seem to not be aware of or fail to mention is that ECN's are much more expensive than MM's , atleast the ECN's I tried have been, of the Market makers there is both good and rotten apples, they are not all trading against you, look for STP brokers, they will only charge you the spread. I think better for small acounts, ECN's only for trading big lots.

thats my experience

 

I have no particular relation to MB Trading, but this is what makes them unique:

 

1) Very low funding requirements $400 U.S.

2) No penalty for small lots whatsoever, down to micro lots.

3) All Credits, and commissions are proportionally calculated.

4) Marketable orders incur a routing fee (commission) which is reasonable.

5) Traders with advanced order precision earn Credit for placing limits on their ECN, which add liquidity. (Must be resting on the ECN, taken by a counterparty)

 

My trading style is Nibbling using HyperScalper and many hundreds of small lot trades can be done per day, with Credits (provided orders are placed precisely on their ECN). I trade only EUR/USD Forex.

 

Because there is no penalty for small lot sizes, positions can be built up and profits taken incrementally, which is why I call it Nibbling.

 

I am able to get credit for 90% of transactions, which means no commission, and a Net Credit but this requires software which is able to place limit orders with precision.

 

This is an ideal environment for Nibbling or scalping, provided you have software tools which enable you to trade precisely. This is a fair and transparent ECN. Your trades appear on the Depth of Market, along with all other market participants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MNST Monster Beverage stock, top of range breakout above 60.45, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?MNST
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.