Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

JBahn

Who has a good paper trading simulator

Recommended Posts

I have been reading and studying about as much as I can take it. It is now time to get a paper trading account.

 

Any recommendations on what works well with simulated e-mini trading? I dont mind paying a small access fee as long as it isnt anything outrageous.

 

Thanks for any advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you go to the CBOT`s website you will see a heading " Education" click on it, look to the left of your screen and you will see "simulators" click on it, there is a list to pick from.

 

Regards,

Emile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

Another one is some outfit called "Open E Cry". Small broker out of Ohio, with an owner who runs his own private futures hedge fund.

 

But try Infinnity's software too. Compare and contrast and see what's easier for you to use. Just be wary about what broker you are assigned to over there.

 

You'll find that if you spend more time managing your live trades, than planning and executing your trades, it can overwhelm you.

 

Remember, though, because it's "simulated" you'll get filled much sooner than in real-life (in essence, no slippage). So you might want to take that into account when devising and implementing your approach to futures trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember, though, because it's "simulated" you'll get filled much sooner than in real-life (in essence, no slippage). So you might want to take that into account when devising and implementing your approach to futures trading.

 

Regarding this statement and Infinity's sim...thats not true. There are plenty of times that I won't get filled at a price when someone I trade with will be trading live and get filled at that exact price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have been reading and studying about as much as I can take it. It is now time to get a paper trading account.

 

Any recommendations on what works well with simulated e-mini trading? I dont mind paying a small access fee as long as it isnt anything outrageous.

 

Thanks for any advice

 

Do's or Don'ts of Simulator Trading:

 

* If you have not selected a broker...only use the simulator from a few brokers your considering opening a trading account with.

 

* If you have selected a broker...only use their simulator.

 

* Simulator should only be used to learn the broker execution platform and not for testing a new method unless your testing a built-in strategy code that is an option in the simulator itself.

 

Thus, use a backtesting software or manually test your strategies and then move into real money trading with a small position size but only when you feel comfortable in using your broker trade execution platform.

 

Most traders takes about a month to fully learn their broker execution platform while simulating trading.

 

Then it usually takes an additional 1 - 2 months to feel comfortable using the platform with real money on the line.

 

* No trading plan, no well defined strategy regardless if its profitable or not...

 

Don't use a simulator until your ready to simulate your method and your ready to learn how to use your broker execution platform.

 

There's also another use for the simulator.

 

Lets pretend your one of those traders that consistently makes profits in the morning a.m. trading session but yu tend to lose those profits in the afternoon p.m. trading session...

 

Only use a simulator in the afternoon p.m. trading session until you can determine (resolve) your trading problems for that trading session.

 

However, the best solution in that particular situation is to not trade (no real money nor simulator) in the afternoon p.m. trading session.

 

In addition, when you do use a simulator, only use the exact same position size that equals what you will be using in real money trading when you first plan to go live with real money trading.

 

For example, lets say you will eventually trade 10 ES contracts (you have the account size for such) but you want to take it easy in the beginning and only trade 1-2 contracts.

 

Thus, when you simulate trade...only do it with 1-2 contracts and not 10 contracts.

 

Summary: It's only time to use a simulator when you're satisfied with your method's backtesting results, you have a well defined trading plan and your now ready to learn your broker trade execution platform.

 

Too many traders make the classic mistake of using a simulator while they don't have a trading plan nor a proven method via backtesting.

 

This mistake will cause trading problems when you do go to real money trading.

 

Mark

(a.k.a. NihabaAshi) Japanese Candlestick term

 

"Volatility Analysis is a doorway to consistent profits."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
There are plenty of times that I won't get filled at a price when someone I trade with will be trading live and get filled at that exact price.

Good for you. How do you find the simulator helps your trading? Are you saying that you think that it is realistic?

 

For example, here's a training video on scalping the S&P futures (ES) using the Infinnity AT platform on a LIVE account (not demo).

 

Live Scalp Trade on Emini S&P Futures

 

I think the best use of the simulator is to familiarize yourself with the bells and whistles of the platform before trading live.

 

The feature set that is demonstrated seems to lessen the learning curve of setting and adjusting stops and profit targets manually, something that can trip up a newbie real easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JC is wrong when said that stuff about the demo account. Notice on his first 10 lot he got taken out without the bid being above his offer? That would not happen in the simulator. The sim makes it so that the bid must touch your offer.

 

I did sim for a few days last week to help me figure out if I lacked confidence in my setups or if something else was wrong emotionally. My setups are on fire, so now I feel much better. The AT platform kicks butt!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Open E Cry's sim is pretty sharp...and I hear Ninja Trader has an algorithm to mimic slippage, etc....you can actually adjust settings if I am not mistaken...

 

I've used OEC and Ninja on paper. Neither just fill your order when touched, they put you in line like a real trade it seems. I've gotten paper slippage on orders. That's my biggest fear of going live, not emotions but expecting fills that aren't realistic. From what I'm told and can tell this won't be an issue with how these simulators handle orders though.

No internals on either yet which sucks. I can't wait to go live and just get Tradestation setup.

 

Ninja has a sweet reporting tool and simple bracket order options.

OEC has a much better OCO order setup and better chart trading.

 

To be honest if OEC had internals I'd probably use them over Tradestation due to the no minimum trades for the platform to be free and the more attractive daytrade margins on YM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried Interactive brokers simulater and was not satisfied with it for daytrading eminis. I also tried Ninja Trade briefly but it did not appeal to me. I'm interested in Infinity, but I think they intend it as a demo rather than a simulator, so not sure if they will allow a long term use of it. Currently I'm using Open E Cry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can tell their staff via chartroom...feedback on the OEC trader platform to improve it

 

hopefully they will do something about it on their next software upgrade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interactive Brokers has a good trading simulator. They also give you daily, weekly, monthly statements on the simulated tading account. Simulated comissions are also included.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i find the ninja trader order system to be pretty nifty where it allows the user to trade straight off the chart. however there are other aspects which need improvement

 

Does anyone know of a similar progam that allows the ability to trade off the chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i find the ninja trader order system to be pretty nifty where it allows the user to trade straight off the chart. however there are other aspects which need improvement

 

Does anyone know of a similar progam that allows the ability to trade off the chart?

 

Open E Cry has the best chart ordering bar none IMO.

Ninja is not bad on chart ordering but not on the level of OEC. In fact if I wasn't hellbent on using Tradestation when I go live I'd just use OEC as my broker. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As MC said, the trade from the chart feature is nice with OEC. I don't use it much myself, but it is a nice feature.

 

I love the oco order entry on the chart.

I look for support and resistance and slam in the order quick and easy.

You hold shift and right click at the target and stop price and you're done.

:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am surprised no one has really come up with a hardcore stand alone simulator program...of course there is NT, etc.....and I see the practicality in that since it's also a real platform, as is OEC...

 

But still, it just surprises me that in the world of marketing everything to do with trading...that no one has really made a dedicated simulator program (that I am aware of at least).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am surprised no one has really come up with a hardcore stand alone simulator program...of course there is NT, etc.....and I see the practicality in that since it's also a real platform, as is OEC...

 

But still, it just surprises me that in the world of marketing everything to do with trading...that no one has really made a dedicated simulator program (that I am aware of at least).

 

It's a good point Reav and one that could easily be done by these existing vendors. There seems to always be some shortcoming in simulator trading.

 

I guess the answer is that most probably would rather learn on the software they are going to use in real-time vs. some simulator software and then switch over to something else.

 

So it's really a matter of why have some vendors done so little to their simulators?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.