Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody

Would anyone can explain me whats the best indicator/s to predict next candle(intraday)?

Candlestick patterns, Bollinger and RSI are those i found them usefull.

Has anyone any experiment on this?:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mistake said:
Hello everybody

Would anyone can explain me whats the best indicator/s to predict next candle(intraday)?

Candlestick patterns, Bollinger and RSI are those i found them usefull.

Has anyone any experiment on this?:confused:

 

the best "predictor" indicator is volume.

 

11927d1246813024-price-volume-relationship-b2b.jpg

 

 

see more discussions here:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/price-volume-relationship-6320.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams, does Spydertraders /Jack Hershey's method work for you? I've read through it a couple of times and my doubts lie in its use of time based price bars, the removal of the ETH from it's study parameters and the daily "U" shaped volume pattern that occurs in the RTH of the ES everyday no matter what and as such doesn't that diminish the value of the volume gaussian?

Please let us know if it has predictive power as a complete study. Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
Tams, does Spydertraders /Jack Hershey's method work for you? I've read through it a couple of times and my doubts lie in its use of time based price bars, the removal of the ETH from it's study parameters and the daily "U" shaped volume pattern that occurs in the RTH of the ES everyday no matter what and as such doesn't that diminish the value of the volume gaussian?

Please let us know if it has predictive power as a complete study. Thank you

 

a method that creates doubts in your mind will never work for you, even if it is beneficial to others.

 

there are more than one way to skin a cat.

it is more productive to seek a method or style of trading that brings comfort and assurance to your mind.

 

 

p.s. regarding the daily "U" shape, I don't think you have got the story correct. Look up "pace" in the thread.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all due respect Tams, you are pointing this newb in the direction of a methodology that prides itself in "iterative learning". It doesn't tell him to question, but to repeat the learning process if things aren't working out. So with that in mind it seems to me that your non answer concerning my simple question of whether the predictive method works or not is, "no."

You are having to twist the methodology in order to make it somewhat reliable or predictive. Skinning this cat any other way is not an option to it's practitioners and can lead a newb on a bad bunny trail. Just my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps i had choose bad way to ask my question as my weak English or something made you these thoughts guys.

when we talk about prediction(that we have it often & usually deny it) , some routin sentences come out, for ex. : imposible to predict 100% ....

We know all of them and recognize Probability rules. ( i swear :))

but, notice that we can find or PERSONALIZE or Combain some Indicators to have a better view on market future style.

Think about Bollinger+RSI , these are work better than CCI+Bollinger on this issue obviously.

So this thread presents to share these beholds.

Help to discover better ideas through it.

(and it's necessary to say that i work in Forex only ,no shares)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
With all due respect Tams, you are pointing this newb in the direction of a methodology that prides itself in "iterative learning". It doesn't tell him to question, but to repeat the learning process if things aren't working out. So with that in mind it seems to me that your non answer concerning my simple question of whether the predictive method works or not is, "no."

You are having to twist the methodology in order to make it somewhat reliable or predictive. Skinning this cat any other way is not an option to it's practitioners and can lead a newb on a bad bunny trail. Just my opinion.

 

many people felt your pain too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
many people felt your pain too.

 

Say it ain't so Tams!!

After all you've posted on TL, you're going to hang your hat on this method? Come on are you serious?

With that being said I don't wish to be rude. If this structures the market into a tradeable form for you then it's good. The creation of a tradeable structure is the essence of successful trading as far as I'm concerned, if you find it in this method then great!

Actually we're all kind of catching the coattails of truth and making a few bucks without really understanding why it works anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
... it seems to me that your non answer concerning my simple question of whether the predictive method works or not is, "no."

....

 

it seems to me that you already have the answer before you even asked the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
With all due respect... So with that in mind it seems to me that your non answer concerning my simple question of ....

 

Let's be very clear, that was neither a simple question, nor an intelligent one.

 

what if I say "yes"?

 

what if I say "no"?

 

where does that lead you?

 

when you have a preconceived answer before you even asked the question, why ask?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
Let's be very clear, that was neither a simple question, nor an intelligent one.

 

what if I say "yes"?

 

what if I say "no"?

 

where does that lead you?

 

when you have a preconceived answer before you even asked the question, why ask?

 

Tams, the question was very simple. " Does the method work for you?" Granted that you don't have to answer it, but the question was still a simple one. As to it's intelligence, it was just simple curiousity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
Tams, the question was very simple. " Does the method work for you?" Granted that you don't have to answer it, but the question was still a simple one. As to it's intelligence, it was just simple curiousity.

 

It is either you are naive, or you think that I am naive.

 

tell me, what would an answer lead you? (either a yes or no answer)

 

 

why are you twisting and evading and manipulating and avoiding my question ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
It is either you are naive, or you think that I am naive.

 

tell me, what would an answer lead you? (either a yes or no answer)

 

 

why are you twisting and evading and manipulating and avoiding my question ???

 

As to where your opinion on the predictive abitities of Hersheys structuring of the markets would have lead myself or others:

 

A) If your answer was a yes, that you believed in it's predictive abilities, you could have helped others to see why in your opinion it was valid in the face of opposing ideas for reasons that others don't yet recognize.

 

B) If your answer was a no, showing that you didn't believe in it's predictive abilities than those of us who thought the same way would realize there was no further discussion necessary to discover if our opinions might not be right.

 

Tams,calm down! Don't take these forums too seriously. To degrade others as being "naive.....not intelligent....manipulative.....evasive" just because we either don't agree or don't see eye to eye has no place in a "laboratory" and that's what TL is right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
...

Tams,calm down! Don't take these forums too seriously. To degrade others as being "naive.....not intelligent....manipulative.....evasive" just because we either don't agree or don't see eye to eye has no place in a "laboratory" and that's what TL is right?

 

you were being evasive... LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
As to where your opinion on the predictive abitities of Hersheys structuring of the markets would have lead myself or others:

 

A) If your answer was a yes, that you believed in it's predictive abilities, you could have helped others to see why in your opinion it was valid in the face of opposing ideas for reasons that others don't yet recognize.

 

getting me to say a yes answer has no correlation to you getting to the salvation.

You still have the same doubts you have, even if the heaven opens up to you.

all the explanations are in the thread. You can get it from the horse' mouth.

if you have specific questions, post the specific question in the thread. Don't beat around the bush.

 

  clmacdougall said:
B) If your answer was a no, showing that you didn't believe in it's predictive abilities than those of us who thought the same way would realize there was no further discussion necessary to discover if our opinions might not be right.

 

that's a very imaginative manipulation.

if you for a moment think that is even a remote possibility, why bother to ask the question at all? It leads to nowhere.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams, I asked the question to you because from the outset of Spydertraders thread they've either ignored or made no room for discussion with those who oppose its "ïterative" methodology.

I thought you might be able to explain why the concerns of others were misguided concerning this price/volume "Gaussian" understanding of market structure.

The" horses mouth" isn't saying much and since you seem like you've run around the track a few times you're the closest thing to a horse I've got to talk to about this method you're obviously aware of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
Tams, I asked the question to you because from the outset of Spydertraders thread they've either ignored or made no room for discussion with those who oppose its "ïterative" methodology.

I thought you might be able to explain why the concerns of others were misguided concerning this price/volume "Gaussian" understanding of market structure.

The" horses mouth" isn't saying much and since you seem like you've run around the track a few times you're the closest thing to a horse I've got to talk to about this method you're obviously aware of.

 

I don't think the culture was ever to ignore or made no room for discussion.

 

The PV thread is an instructional thread, not a gloves-off debate thread. I can see why disruptions are not encouraged. But you are free to start a new thread to expound on your theory (or anti-theory). SpyderTrader proposed his theory with explanations and charts and diagrams. If you found it to be a fraud, you should post a few screen shots to dispute the theory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mistake said:
Hello everybody

Would anyone can explain me whats the best indicator/s to predict next candle(intraday)?

Candlestick patterns, Bollinger and RSI are those i found them usefull.

Has anyone any experiment on this?:confused:

 

How about looking at the context, volume trends, and what the price bars themselves are telling you about where the market wants to go, based on what it has done recently? Anything can change at any moment so prediction is not possible, but use this information, combine it with the current market "mood" (is volume increasing right now, after it moves is there follow through, is the market indecisive, whipping back and forth, or has it established a clear direction..?). This is not easy, and I am still struggling with being able to have confidence in my read on the market, though it is right more often than not. I believe it takes time, experience, a decent working model of how the market moves, and even then it is still a challenge at times I'm sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you use any kind of support and resistance analysis? Also, do you notice places where the price is "consolidating"?

I base my decisions on what I would call momentum. I'm looking for momentum to slow down at peaks and bottoms. But then there needs to be confirmation of the reversal. If that doesn't happen, I assume another cycle of the same direction is going to happen. But it gets more complicated than that.

There are trends within trends, and so sometimes you get "faked out". Why does a trend seem like it's going to end, and then keep going? I believe that the market has a tendency to exhaust the current cycle before it turns. But here is the problem, is the market exhausting a short, medium, or long term cycle? That's what catches people "off guard".

What I find interesting, is that the theme of "Trends within Trends" seems to be common among different trading strategies. I see these trends within trends as overlapping market cycles.

I don't know of any indicator that can Identify "Trends within Trends". That's why people watch different time frame charts, or identify small, medium and large trends on the same time frame chart. People trading all kinds of different indicators have that in common.

So if you have found a few indicators that you like, and work for you, but you feel like you need something more, stop searching for the ultimate indicator, and start looking at other pieces to the puzzle.

If you look at the thread that Tams suggested, you see that it breaks things down into:

  • Fastest
  • Medium Fast - Traverse
  • Slowest - Channel

 

Other people will talk about:

 

  • Daily - support and resistance levels
  • Weekly - support and resistance levels
  • Monthly - support and resistance levels

 

Other people will talk about:

 

  • 50 period MA
  • 80 period MA
  • 120 period MA

 

Other people will talk about:

 

  • 15 Minute Chart
  • 4 hour chart
  • Daily Chart

 

It's all the same basic concept. You can search for the perfect indicator forever, but until you have a method for understanding market behavior, chances are you won't get any better at trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tradewinds said:
Here is a blog post that I find very interesting:

 

For Daytraders Only: the TICKQ - Traders Laboratory Forums

 

In what way tradewinds? I know some traders who swear by tick and tickq and other breadth indicators, but if simple tick divergence was really "predictive" by any stretch, it wouldn't really be an edge at all would it? I don't trade the indices much, but I would suppose that if I did I would want to use tick as another source of input to give some confirmation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
In what way tradewinds? I know some traders who swear by tick and tickq and other breadth indicators, but if simple tick divergence was really "predictive" by any stretch, it wouldn't really be an edge at all would it? I don't trade the indices much, but I would suppose that if I did I would want to use tick as another source of input to give some confirmation.

 

I rely on the NYSE TICK, NYSE Advancers/Decliners and NYSE Up Volume/Down Volume as the foundation to my strategy. Those 3 are 99% of my decision making. Without the information from those inputs, I probably would just give up on trading.

 

I apologize for not giving an explanation for how I use those inputs, but I'm paranoid about sharing the details of my "hard earned" knowledge. I'm just seeing how "close to the edge" I can get without actually divulging my "secrets". :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tradewinds said:
I rely on the NYSE TICK, NYSE Advancers/Decliners and NYSE Up Volume/Down Volume as the foundation to my strategy. Those 3 are 99% of my decision making. Without the information from those inputs, I probably would just give up on trading.

 

I apologize for not giving an explanation for how I use those inputs, but I'm paranoid about sharing the details of my "hard earned" knowledge. I'm just seeing how "close to the edge" I can get without actually divulging my "secrets". :rofl:

 

Understood and not really asking anyway, as I don't trade these. I can see how they are very valuable pieces of information. I simply meant that just trading a tick divergence alone is bound to fail, but then again so is anything else I suppose taken on its own without context or other supporting data to make a good decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just finished the new and revised course in a school ( I don't know if I can say ) The theme that they teach is price/ price/ price and it is king. I am able to see the turning points and am learning to predict the profit points and have bought this book called "reading price charts bar by bar". I plan to improve the quality of the trades that I make. It probably not hurt you as you are having problems already.

 

I started trading before I really knew what I was doing and lost alot of money. It really scares me I can predict where and when the price turns and how long it will stay in the trend. There will be times that it will do something different so as he said," put in a tight stop but not too tight." I have not gotten the book yet but I do belive it can help you with that. It would be interesteing if when you do read it to find out if it did help..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.