Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tradewinds

Owner of a Thread / Their "rights"

Recommended Posts

I have visited at least one thread where the originator of the thread stated that he would delete posts that did not meet a certain criteria.

 

So, is there a way for some members to be able to control their thread to the extent that they can delete other people's posts? I guess if a person was a moderator, maybe they could do that.

 

It often happens that threads get cluttered up with garbage, get off track, and people's behavior can degrade. I wish there was some way of structuring a thread to deal with this problem.

 

Actually, I think it would be good if the owner of a blog had the right to delete other users comments. That way, the forum would remain the same, but the member would have total control over their blog. And structure the blog posts like the forum posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the thin wedge of big brother :)

 

I know what "big brother" is, but I'm not sure what you mean by "the thin wedge". I'm assuming that it means that a very small change, can be leverage open by a wedge, creating something bad later. I agree with that concept. Small, seemingly innocent changes can mean big problems down the road. If you are flying across the ocean, and the plane is only off by 1 degree, you going to be way off target when the fuel runs out. Big brother is when the few people who rule have oppressive control over everyone else. That's one extreme. There is also "Little brother". Little brother can throw a childish fit, and cry and scream and make life unpleasant for everyone else. Either way, the minority is inflicting something bad on everyone else.

 

I don't want big brother or little brother.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It often happens that threads get cluttered up with garbage, get off track, and people's behavior can degrade. I wish there was some way of structuring a thread to deal with this problem.

 

Actually, I think it would be good if the owner of a blog had the right to delete other users comments. .

 

Yes, I agree. I had a thread where someone made unwanted comments and politely asked them to delete the post. They refused. No problem , I quit posting, problem solved. :)

There is a place for blogs however and one can allow/disallow comments. You could use that function here at TL.

 

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TL has over 100,000 registered users. My personal opinion is that the 100,000 registered users is a bit misleading. How many members and visitors visit the site in a weeks period? How long do they stay logged in?

 

If advertising is the goal, then TL should want people to visit often, and stay for a while. What is going to influence people to do that?

 

I want information quickly. I don't want to read garbage. There may be some people who visit TL for personal drama and conflict, but I'm guessing that most aren't interested in that. But TL could have the best of both worlds, keep the forum the same where people can engage in whatever debate they want to. But allow the owner of a blog to have control over their blog, even delete other members comments.

 

It's not "Big Brother" because each individual only has control over their blog. Big Brother would be if TL just went around deleting people's post for no good reason. There is a big difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i apologise tradewinds - I thought you wanted to be able to delete posts from a thread you started as per the heading.....I think the thread is for open discussion, the blog possibly should have other rights which I can understand the blogger can choose to ignore, delete rubbish. But ultimately when it comes to the threads, ignore works, and as its a public form you have to put up with the public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i apologise tradewinds - I thought you wanted to be able to delete posts from a thread you started as per the heading.....I think the thread is for open discussion, the blog possibly should have other rights which I can understand the blogger can choose to ignore, delete rubbish. But ultimately when it comes to the threads, ignore works, and as its a public form you have to put up with the public.

 

No problem. There was some overlap there as I was sort of working out the ideas. And the title of the thread isn't accurate. I guess I gave the thread a title before I'd worked out all the implications of the issue. Yes, I agree, it can't be called an open and public forum unless people have the freedom to post what they wish to a forum thread, . . . within the rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I guess the owner of a blog can delete comments. duh! I guess I should have looked at the situation more closely. A lot of the focus is on the threads, and even though I have made blog posts, I didn't really pay much attention to what was available. Then after seeing this:

 

Making High Probability Trades - Traders Laboratory Forums

 

a couple of times, I started wondering if DbPhoenix had some special "rights" to create what he did. But I guess anyone can structure a blog the way he did. The Blog options allow comments to be moderated before displaying.

 

Okay, I learned something new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

I've looked into this request here are the findings:

 

First of all, vBulletin, as great as it is for forums is very hard to work with! :doh: So please bear with us while we work out you user requests.

 

Second, the blog area is having some issues (permission, people can't see them, etc) so please refrain using that area. Instead, if you want to post an article, please use the Article area (in main Nav bar)

 

Third, I've looked into giving people ability to delete comments in articles but as this is a vBulletin limitation, it is not (as far as I know) possible. However, please feel free to report ANY post\comment you don't want and I will diligently follow-up

 

Fourth, and this goes for the forums as well ... please report posts\issues as we are diligently monitoring the site and can help moving\trimming\cleaning up threads.

 

thanks!

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure giving the thread starter the power to delete posts is a goof idea (actually I am sure it is not). Blogs (when they work correctly) are the mechanism for someone to post 'in peace'. Threads are for discussion and giving the thread starter the power of censorship is a recipe for disaster. Common sense posting with firm but fair moderation is all that is required.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.