Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

They were just waiting for a gap fill ... and once the ES filled the NQ took off. I was walking the dog at the time trying to avoid taking a trade in advance of the FOMC ... But I could see a substantial rally out of this hole. ES 1416.75 would be reasonable target. You have to think that large money players would be staying out before the FOMC ... but on the other hand, if they think it's all old news, why not get in a better prices now?

 

It's turned because there are no more sellers, not because buyers have dried up. I think like you said, they come out to play on FOMC with a real test below 6.25 to see if it is solid.

 

Famous last words....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey I read the first page of this thread. Chances are that im not going to read 700 or however many pages there are already. Are you still posting stuff on the ES in the same fashion as the first page? BTW I saw some of the charts posted and want to post some of my own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey I read the first page of this thread. Chances are that im not going to read 700 or however many pages there are already. Are you still posting stuff on the ES in the same fashion as the first page? BTW I saw some of the charts posted and want to post some of my own.

 

Post away. The only thing I ask is that if you really must post a trade, you explain why you took it so that others might (or might not ;)) benefit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very balanced 2 days just gone and we could break either side. My view is that we could remain in the same balance if either 1417.75 or 1396.50 contain the range. I think both sides of the range could be tested again (not necessarily both today).

 

Here's a chart:-

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32371&stc=1&d=1351169563

2012-10-25_2.thumb.jpg.62260a22a1faab8df6f232eee245257d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They were just waiting for a gap fill ... and once the ES filled the NQ took off. I was walking the dog at the time trying to avoid taking a trade in advance of the FOMC ... But I could see a substantial rally out of this hole. ES 1416.75 would be reasonable target. You have to think that large money players would be staying out before the FOMC ... but on the other hand, if they think it's all old news, why not get in a better prices now?

 

1416.75 was a pretty obvious place for the market to test. It has been on my chart for a while now, as I said in this prior post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1416.75 was a pretty obvious place for the market to test. It has been on my chart for a while now, as I said in this prior post.

 

It was obvious to the world and his wife given it was the low of the recent range, I agree.

 

What threw me was the Open-Drive off the level. For some reason I expected a bit more of a test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the suggestion of explaining the trades..no offense but I just don't think the web needs more people posting without giving the reasons for trades....so thanks to those who are taking the extra effort...great thread..been lurking here a long time !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Got long 1 more time in the NQ right now... at 2656.50.

 

10 point stop, 10 point target

 

You should have still been in your first NQ trade. Common for me too to get out early and reenter only to give the short profit back with out any benefit for the effort.. when just staying in the First Attempt Would have produced CA decent profit. I hate doing That

 

And isn't it nice to have me around to remind you of that;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like the suggestion of explaining the trades..no offense but I just don't think the web needs more people posting without giving the reasons for trades....so thanks to those who are taking the extra effort...great thread..been lurking here a long time !!

 

Ya, I would normally do more explaining john, but I don't post in this thread more than a few days out of the month, and the main reason I posted anything was because I let the world know that I made money trading index futures today, and also to give an example to new visitors that it is in fact possible to make a trading decision (or 3) from your home computer, finish with 2 wins, 1 loss, and a profit of over $200 per contract after comissions.

 

I like posting more information, because teaching is fun for me, as is sharing, and discussing subjects I enjoy with others who enjoy them.... buuuut.... had I taken the time to write up an explanation, the timestamp would have been totally skewed, and therefore less "authentic".

 

I know, I sound pretty self centered and narcissistic eh! I'm not really, just honest, and I was feeling in a competitive mood and saw a chance to score a goal for team forextraderx.

 

but, if I have enough time between seeing the opportunity and actually needing to take it, I WILL write up a more detailed analysis of why I took that trade, and what I saw that I liked, etc.

 

To address the first ES trade though... I have been waiting for the 1400 level for a week now, because it is a major psych level, and it has been significant S/R in the past. Also, it was just a few ticks under the lows from yesterday, which tells me that liquidity will be found in the form of sell stops (anyone long from yesterday will most frequently put their stop at or just below the low of the day)... and when I saw price violate yesterdays low, but then rebound and start a very tight consolidation for more than 10 minutes, complete with above average volume appearing under bullish candles (green ones with long bodies) on a 1 min chart tells me that not only are the buy stops being absorbed by a market participant (or several informed participants...whatever) who has an even larger buy order at or very near that price... thus, in a sense, it showed me "big money" tipping it's hand as to what it's intentions were. So I bought.

 

Then, the move up to the target point was easy...essentially the move down from 1407ish to 1403ish and was made in a single burst of momentum. This requires agressive active sellers who are dumping using "market" orders, and a relatively fewer number of contracts available to fill those sell orders as limit orders. This creates a zone of low density order fill (I like to call it low density commitment), and thus when price starts to push back up through this zone, the relative lack of traders who became committed to a position at that range of prices between 1403ish and 1407ish would imply that a disproportionally small amount of "losing traders" would feel compelled to cover (because there just weren't many trades execucted at the 1403-1407 zone, compared to immediately above and below, therefore, there are just not many losers....and this matters, because it's the losing trader that needs to cover their position more than any other trader)

 

so, low liquidity zone = less trades happened there = less losing traders = less orders to work through as price moves back up from 1403-1407 = price hitting 1407ish is basically a done deal = my target for is 1407ish.

 

FTX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You should have still been in your first NQ trade. Common for me too to get out early and reenter only to give the short profit back with out any benefit for the effort.. when just staying in the First Attempt Would have produced CA decent profit. I hate doing That

 

And isn't it nice to have me around to remind you of that;)

 

ehh... no, I'm actually completely satisfied with my stop management as well as the entry and exit I took in the first NQ trade.

 

Really, it was second trade that just never should have happened. The first attempt DID produce a profit for me, albeit small, it was controlled, and minimzed risk the entire time.

 

The 2nd trade was just because I got a wild hair up my ass to click a button and see my bank account fluuctuate by a few dollars, with the hope of it ending in the positive more than the negative.

 

Yeaaaa.... 2nd trade = total impulse mistake.

 

 

FTX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was obvious to the world and his wife given it was the low of the recent range, I agree.

 

What threw me was the Open-Drive off the level. For some reason I expected a bit more of a test.

 

OD's can turn into OA's or ORR's if they fail to follow through. At that point you have to decide whether you are willing to stand or wait for a pullback if it does reverse. I think you could have probably done either in this case given the context although if you're unsure then there's nothing wrong with holding fire. The second retest of 1414.00 for me would have been a pretty reasonable location and clearly with what did happen, timing.

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting session yesterday and overnight. Yesterday tested and extended both sides of the balance but couldn't get to the 1396.50's and the high was at 16.75 10/22 rth low, on the low end of the area up to the balance low vol 17.75. Possibly AMZN/AAPL tipped the balance after close as seen in NQ. The 96.50's were then tested and the momentum took it through a couple of points to 94.50 before clearly holding well on the retest. Q3 GDP came in higher and now, we've swung back up to test the aapl scene of crime (SOC) and all of this before the rth open. Don't forget we have michigan @09:55. It looks as though we'll open somewhere in the middle of the balance now. I'm taking that o/n test of 96.50 as done for now and that means a test higher potentially on the cards. Possibly to 11.25 then 17.75. Does that mean we're going to be out of balance and break out? I don't know. I think there will be some decent movement though so pick your spots and work with the market context. Good luck!!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32410&stc=1&d=1351257242

2012-10-26.thumb.jpg.4e7b000f3f197e093ab3360b93bb24f4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like the suggestion of explaining the trades..no offense but I just don't think the web needs more people posting without giving the reasons for trades....so thanks to those who are taking the extra effort...great thread..been lurking here a long time !!

 

Glad you like the thread John! You should get yourself involved and post a few ideas ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My latest trick... After successfully live trading forex for years, switch to trading futures in the U.S. Chicago Mercantile Exchanges. Futures spreads are generally 1 or 2 ticks with no swaps, and data fees and commission fees are fixed. As a caveat, leverage changes throughout every day based on international sessions, so this is not for small accounts. 
    • @analyst75, I am just dying for you to write a sequel... Why Some Young People Prefer to Live Alone.😂
    • I have to guess that a single person living alone, with no pets, with a light appetite, and in a small home stands the best chance. Less expenses = more time to get profitable. Maybe... an emotionless psychopath?😂
    • IMHO, demo contests with a cash prize tend to cause new traders to take unrealistic risks because they're literally risking nothing to win something. I wouldn't get into the habit of that.😬
    • I posit that traders should code auto-trading bots, or use a platform interface that supports building bots without coding, and then backtest everything in demo before trading at all. @aimhi, I believe that you have already posted this in another thread.🤓
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.