Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

  roztom said:
Hope you are all alive & well.. /I think mkt has unfinished bussiness at the 88.75 level and that we could test 92.25 - 75 area... Of course we could launch from there but If that becomes the extreme then this could be the top of a pennant on a bear flag... Could be...

 

Good hunting & good trading,

 

 

Was thinking the same about you buddy, hope all is well, we miss you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Tom! Where you bin?

 

Anyway, my spidey sense is tingling and it's saying low will be taken for weak hands and either gap closed or weekly open tested before break back into ib. dunno though that could just be total bs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
If 76s give way here, not sure I would want to buy until the next logical support-- overnight 72s.

 

EDIT: will say this though-- looking at yesterday's profile, 74.50 makes a good case for potential support, given how well 80 provided resistance this morning.. check out yesterday's profile.

 

Accompanying picture........

Looking to possibly short here for a point or two on the way down to that support.

5aa710ef73bf2_4-20-20123-05-33PM.thumb.png.9bf5e006420f648bc4c393a0301ec516.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking in terms of current market status, we have already broke the uptrend at roughly 10am central time, so at about 10am all of you should have gotten a signal to sell I'm sure. That being said if you look closely we just broke the downtrend so anytime know we should be climbing back up. I'm long here

 

Nikko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
Accompanying picture........

Looking to possibly short here for a point or two on the way down to that support.

 

My guesstimate: 74.50 - 72.50 it but ACH :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Matter fact if you all look back near the end of 2007 through beginning of 2008 charts I have a good feeling that here in the near future we will see some correlating activity. That being said I don't feel that now is the time to bank on big drops in the market as opposed to the rises. Being a bear is risky at this moment, the time will come soon but I think an overall bullish view is the way to go until further notice.

 

 

Good luck,

 

Nikko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To add to what I have said it is as simple as backtracking and seeing in which direction MORE OFTEN THEN NOT big swings in the market happen and you will see that having a bullish view in today's current market would be a better position for the majority of momentum type trading. Once again it is as simple as more often then not as that has a lot to do with structuring a profitable trading program for yourself. Mine won't work with your emotions, vise versa. Here soon I will post my strategy the best way I can explain it.

 

Nikko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know I just like going long even if I had to wait until 73 ( not 72.50 ) for a long and a couple ticks. I do not see how you are getting sell signals?

 

Nikko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Nikko said:
Oh wow your close, how did you come up with your execution?

 

Nikko

 

How did I come up with it? After the one tick break and failure to go lower immediately I put my limit in at 73.75 which was the prior low. I don't know if that's what you're asking or not.

 

So, you holding this over the weekend? I would assume so, since there's no reason to buy here otherwise, given the time of day and the very low possibility of going higher after 3:30 or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a shitty time on the links today in the wind but was probably more fun than what this session produced. Looking for 65's or a bit lower. Retest the 90-94 then sell baby sell and hold for 100 biog ones.

See you all on Monday I hope and have a great weekend.

 

slick60

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah well, that final one from the 73.75 did work but just didn't have the legs to close back inside the IB. We left a pretty poor low there @1373.50 too.

 

Hope everyone did well today, have a great weekend and hope to see you all next week!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No overnights for me, very very rarely do I go overnight. Anyway on the last 15 min of the day I could have ended up with a 7-8 tick profit but was hoping for a EOD buyers rally so by the time all the last min action happen I ended up flat on my last trade other then that it was a good day today. Like I said overnights are not part of what I do, maybe a couple 2-3 times a month maybe...

 

Nikko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gosu, you posted this on another thread:

 

 

  gosu said:
I just go into every RTH session "knowing" that the market will make one extreme in the AM and, once made, the market will move away from that extreme in the other direction expanding the range until congestion (usually midday). If congestion begins or arrives during the AM, I know the first extreme will likely be tested later usually in BO/FBO modus.

 

You also mentioned that you don't consider a fixed 60 minute window (like the MP "IB"), for example, but that rather you have three general periods of varying length, depending on the day: morning, midday, and afternoon.

 

First perspective on this: If we generalize this concept, a case could be made that the day session in and of itself should not be treated as a specific time frame (405 minutes), but that the market is simply continuous and only has one 15 minute break during the session close at 4:15pm ET, and again the half hour maintenance downtime at 5:30pm. For example, in the attached charts, is there an obvious, clear delineation from the overnight session to the RTH session? I've discussed this ad nauseum in other threads here so no need to go too far down this path.

 

Second perspective: From a practical standpoint, logically the day session from 9:30 to 4:15 ET is a different animal. Days are a logical structure humans use, and due to the traditional nature of the pit session, the RTH session time is certainly "separate."

 

My point is this: if you do not consider a 60 minute time frame significant, but have flexibility as to the logical structural three phases of the day session, what about further flexibility and simply seeing the entire 1440 minutes as a logical unit, or even the 5 days of the week as a logical weekly unit (we could go on here, but you get my point)?

 

I suppose from a practical perspective (number two above) that it makes a lot of sense to divide it the way you do. But I thought about this idea this morning; the market was simply building on what it did in the pre-RTH session; it traded to points of reference established overnight. See third attached chart. So, why do we consider this as a new logical unit, and not merely an extension of what happened a few hours prior? I would actually like to hear you expound a bit more on your logical day structure, if you would be kind enough to do so. Specifically, the formation of one extreme, an expanding in the other direction, and so on. In other words, what does a day "look like" to you? Or, how does the market "work" in your paradigm of things?

range.thumb.png.184d8127e5a53e1f51a2fdd98af24e8f.png

vol.thumb.png.bd5a5479d19384f7d32855a10117a8d7.png

today.png.0c1c8e9063eaf050e62562941a79cdff.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi joshdance, I parsed your post below.

 

  joshdance said:
gosu, you posted this on another thread:

 

  gosu said:
I just go into every RTH session "knowing" that the market will make one extreme in the AM and, once made, the market will move away from that extreme in the other direction expanding the range until congestion (usually midday). If congestion begins or arrives during the AM, I know the first extreme will likely be tested later usually in BO/FBO modus.

 

You also mentioned that you don't consider a fixed 60 minute window (like the MP "IB"), for example, but that rather you have three general periods of varying length, depending on the day: morning, midday, and afternoon.

 

This needs correcting slightly. I did not state that I don't consider 60m fixed durations; I do monitor 60m bars. I stated that I do not use a strict 60m test like Dalton in testing for the formation of an extreme after the open. In other words, I don't consider the first 60 minutes of the RTH session any more significant than the first 65, 73, 82, 94 minutes, etc.

 

I do divide the RTH session into 3 parts, as you correctly state. The most important of the three for me is the AM, the end of which is a window between 8:40 and 9:00 pacific time, or 8:50 for convenience.

 

  joshdance said:
First perspective on this: If we generalize this concept, a case could be made that the day session in and of itself should not be treated as a specific time frame (405 minutes), but that the market is simply continuous and only has one 15 minute break during the session close at 4:15pm ET, and again the half hour maintenance downtime at 5:30pm. For example, in the attached charts, is there an obvious, clear delineation from the overnight session to the RTH session? I've discussed this ad nauseum in other threads here so no need to go too far down this path.

 

I follow what you are saying and it would indeed be very tidy if the market were a continuous function from one day to the next. Going to the AS (all sessions) perspective is one way to do that. Unfortunately, the drop off in participation cannot be disregarded in practice. We know the market just does not trade the same outside of RTH. The Hershey group is on the other end of the spectrum and disregards the AS entirely, connecting the prior RTH close with the current RTH open via removing any and all gaps. They have even succeeded in convincing a software vendor to include an option for automatic gap removals.

 

I've found neither approach completely satisfactory. My "solution," if I can call it that, is to monitor on both AS and RTH charts (without gap adjustment) and to be aware of the market's position on both.

 

  joshdance said:
Second perspective: From a practical standpoint, logically the day session from 9:30 to 4:15 ET is a different animal. Days are a logical structure humans use, and due to the traditional nature of the pit session, the RTH session time is certainly "separate."

 

Don't forget the most important difference of all: the cash market being in session. The stock index futures market is the mere handmaiden of the cash market.

 

  joshdance said:
My point is this: if you do not consider a 60 minute time frame significant, but have flexibility as to the logical structural three phases of the day session, what about further flexibility and simply seeing the entire 1440 minutes as a logical unit, or even the 5 days of the week as a logical weekly unit (we could go on here, but you get my point)?

 

As stated previously, I do monitor 60m bars. I also monitor the AS dailies, which are equivalent to 1440 minute bars. On the weekend, I chart the weeklies (5 days) and monthlies for the cash market to get a broader perspective. Thus I do get your point and am already doing as you suggest.

 

  joshdance said:
I suppose from a practical perspective (number two above) that it makes a lot of sense to divide it the way you do. But I thought about this idea this morning; the market was simply building on what it did in the pre-RTH session; it traded to points of reference established overnight. See third attached chart. So, why do we consider this as a new logical unit, and not merely an extension of what happened a few hours prior?

 

To me it is both: a separate unit because of the step-up in participation with the opening of the cash market and an extension of the AS activity leading up to the cash open.

 

  joshdance said:
I would actually like to hear you expound a bit more on your logical day structure, if you would be kind enough to do so. Specifically, the formation of one extreme, an expanding in the other direction, and so on. In other words, what does a day "look like" to you? Or, how does the market "work" in your paradigm of things?

 

This sounds like a request for me to do work. LOL..

 

Unfortunately, I wouldn't know where to begin to try to expound on anything because I have not organized my thoughts in any formal manner (i.e., by writing). My comments regarding how a day begins that you reference happened to be a spur of the moment post triggered by someone's reference to a 65% chance of the day's high having been made while I saw an AM p3 of the long upcoming with a resumption to follow. My dubiousness led to a request of the source of his percentage and when I got the details I recognized the truth behind the concept sans the arbitrary 60m parameter.

 

It would please me a good deal to be able to meet your request but I am aware of my personal limitations and that of the medium we're communicating through. Also add the fact that I'm here to relax and just shoot the shit. I post things rather indiscriminately and if anyone finds something useful in what I post it is purely accidental.

 

 

I've had a few beers and so I will end with a hodgepodge of things concerning the AS/RTH delineation that pop into my head.

 

Going into the cash (RTH) open, I'm unambitious and do not seek to know how the DAY will go but just the AM. I follow the AS activity leading up to the cash open and I have the greatest number of KNOWNS on my side than at any other point in the trading session.

 

I know the overnight sentiment and whether it is continuation/change from yesterday's RTH session.

 

I know the relative extent of the gap before the cash open.

 

I know at cash open there will be a surge in volume and volatility relative to the AS activity leading up to the open.

 

I know the RTH session will have a high and a low and one of them (and on rare days both of them) will be made in the AM (with a single caveat).

 

I know every trading day has a volatility that is correlated with volume and the day's place within the ST trend.

 

I know within the day the AM volume is the most consistent in its high amplitude relative to the other parts of the day.

 

I know therefore the default AM condition is range expansion.

 

I know the midday volume is the most consistent in its low amplitude.

 

I know therefore the default midday condition is congestion.

 

I know "default" means that it is the condition unless it is visibly clear that it is an exceptional day - AM congestion or midday BO w/ increasing volume.

 

I know this is not a complete list, so add your own, or even better, put one together yourself.

 

Cheers. :beer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  gosu said:

 

I've had a few beers and so I will end with a hodgepodge of things concerning the AS/RTH delineation that pop into my head.

 

 

Cheers. :beer:

 

I know that when I have a few beers, thoughts of the market get crowded out and are replaced with the desire to see more of the rose and thorns tattoo on the lower back of someone half my age.

 

I give you credit for remaining focused on the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  gosu said:
Going into the cash (RTH) open, I'm unambitious and do not seek to know how the DAY will go but just the AM. I follow the AS activity leading up to the cash open and I have the greatest number of KNOWNS on my side than at any other point in the trading session.

 

This is very astute observation, and since you say it this way, it puts a bit of a more objective take on my own experience: I have thought, though maybe not posted, before, how much more clear (if I may use that word) the morning part of the session is, compared with the rest of the day, generally speaking. There are always exceptions, but generally the market seems to have a goal, or a purpose, in the morning. Sometimes it's more of a continuation of the European session, which ends at 11:30am ET, or it seems to take a new direction, perhaps based on yesterday's day session. But usually, the business seems to be taken care of in the morning, and then in the afternoon, the market's more prone to less predictable behavior. This is purely anecdotal, but is also practical and also mirrors the opinions of many traders.

 

  gosu said:
I know the relative extent of the gap before the cash open.

 

What is the "relative extent"?

 

  gosu said:
I know the RTH session will have a high and a low and one of them (and on rare days both of them) will be made in the AM (with a single caveat).

 

This seemed a bit curious, but I assumed you meant that "most of the time one of them will be made in the AM," though I'm not sure what the single caveat is.

 

So, I did some stats.

 

If we divide the 405 minute day session into three parts equally, we get 9:30 to 11:45, 11:45 to 2:00, and 2:00 to 4:15, each period being 135 minutes in length. Seeing as how the 15 minutes after cash close at 4pm can have some very interesting movement, I considered this time as well, not choosing to close the day session at 4pm for these statistics.

 

We'll call these AM (morning), MD (midday), and PM (afternoon).

 

AM: HOD made 47% of the time, LOD made 56%, both made 12%, and neither made 9%

MD: HOD made 12% of the time, LOD made 13%, both made 0.25%, and neither made 71%

PM: HOD made 44% of the time, LOD made 32%, both made 3%, and neither made 23%

 

If we dig a little deeper down to 30 minute intervals, the first half hour of the day has been the high 25% of the time, and the low 29% of the time. For the first hour, it is high 34% of the time, and low 41%.

 

I used the last 1000 trading days for these stats. Changing it to the last year (250 days) does not significantly (+/- 3%) change the stats in any way, though the opening half hour is likely to be the HOD 21% over the last year, compared with 25% over the last 4 years.

 

Consistent across all periods from 30 minutes, 60, and 135 is that the high is only slightly more likely to be put in during the first period than the last (max difference of about 7% more likely considering 30 and 60 minute periods, about 1% more likely considering the three period day); yet, the low is much more likely to be made earlier than later (68% more likely for the three period day, and 98% more likely in the first hour than the last 45 minutes).

 

We can thus draw the reasonable conclusion that the market has had a tendency to search for value lower in the morning, and rally later in the day.

 

We can also conclude that a trade initiated during the MD period generally will not be at an extreme of the day, and thus more subject to either a smaller profit, or an early exit as the PM session is more likely to make a new extreme.

 

Nothing earth shattering, but the stats certainly agree with gosu's generalizations and probably other useful conclusions can be drawn from this information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:

 

...

 

Consistent across all periods from 30 minutes, 60, and 135 is that the high is only slightly more likely to be put in during the first period than the last (max difference of about 7% more likely considering 30 and 60 minute periods, about 1% more likely considering the three period day); yet, the low is much more likely to be made earlier than later (68% more likely for the three period day, and 98% more likely in the first hour than the last 45 minutes).

 

...

 

 

 

Hi Josh,

 

Nice post! Great job!

 

However, I did not understand the above paragraph really, just its conclusion.

 

Could you please explain in other words what you did analyze here exactly? I've re-read it now several times but I don't understand... :crap:

 

You mention the 30 min, 60 min, 135 min and even a 45 min period. How does these relate to the aforementioned AM, MD, PM sessions you did analyze?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

karo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
* * *

 

What is the "relative extent"?

 

I mean that I know the "size" (or the extent) of the gap compared to recent gaps and where the gap will put the open relative to containers, horizontals and sloped lines carried over from the prior session on RTH charts.

 

  joshdance said:
This seemed a bit curious, but I assumed you meant that "most of the time one of them will be made in the AM," though I'm not sure what the single caveat is.

 

Your interpretation of what I said is a reasonable one and I could have easily stated it in that natural way. Instead, I chose to state it in an apparently convoluted way not because I was inebriated but because I wanted to be precise and not just good enough for conversation.

 

I did not use the qualifier "most of the time" for a reason. Since I trade on knowledge and not probabilities, "most of the time," even if that means 91% in a backtest involving 1000 days, is not good enough for me to rely on. I need to know that what I am monitoring either IS or IS NOT. It is perfectly fine to answer "I really don't know" or "I don't know yet."

 

The base of my statement without parentheticals is, I know the RTH session will have a high and a low and one of them will be made in the AM. I go into every open knowing this is how the market "works." Call it a market truth that I rely on without any qualification. However, I do add a warning to the operator's manual, the "single caveat" in the second parenthetical of my statement. The single caveat is, "Be on the lookout for an exceptional day."

 

You wrote a good post.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.