Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I think we're going considerably lower. I'd like to see 1392 get tested and if we get thru the support in that zone we've got 1378.75 zone for later in the day.

 

I am still keeping in mind the historical observation that the market often puts in a low on the Thurs or Friday before OEX week, then rallies into it.

 

So you think this is the calm before the storm then? ;)

 

Summer Doldrums or Calm Before the Storm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mr Negotiator,

 

Can you tell me when you decide to change your Composite charts - order under what conditions. The last set of CLVN's and CHVN's are starting to make me keep track of them again. My own work generating these profiles using my own developed indicator had mixed results but the values on your recent charts have been very indicative of inflection points that actually work.

 

I understand that you use IRT to generate these babies. Does the program do so automatically?

 

(As an aside I once did a demo of IRT but didn't like the user interface - I may have to revisit it.)

 

I actually prefer to steer away from long term levels when they are well into the low volume zones on the far extremes. I look at the areas but give the lines less weighting -they are auto generated by irt. I could do them myself and perhaps I should as some might not see them in the same way as I do. The other question is whether or not to change the start date of the chart to improve definition. That depends for me on whether or not I have reasonable other levels already to look for and how far back the additional data goes. The data needed here is back from '07 and so I'm less keen on it although will extend it I think if we close today above 1400.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So you think this is the calm before the storm then?

 

I think that the volatility is about as low as it gets. And the $ticks 20 day average of Highs and Lows show that extreme $ticks are now at +969 and -889

 

That is very low.

 

As well, there has been a lot of accumulated trades occur this past week at these highs - so a pullback "might" be in store. And the targets I spoke about are not very large in scope.

 

My trading won't really change except to the extent that if and when I get in a short I"ll be trying to hold it longer and if and when I get long I'll be having a tighter target.

Edited by bakrob99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to criticise too much so i'll only point out one thing. Your target is 2 ticks below yesterday's rth low and 1 tick below the overnight vpoc. Frequently, we see this of pattern where s/r breaks, price reverses back through, then same s/r holds on the retest (kind of h/s pattern although I don't like naming things as such).

 

====

 

yes, but 1-2 ticks violation doesnt count, plus I am in the same mood as bakrob99 - we should be going down some 40-50 points (1 point = 4 ticks) so may be staying longer would have paid better, but patience is a problem.. That's why my second favorite instrument CL..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regard to the chart posted yesterday afternoon, note that price dropped thru support at 2300, tried and failed to rally back above at 0400, tested support (now resistance) at 0900, making 95 a nice entry for a short.

 

Db

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=30463&stc=1&d=1344608411

 

 

4f5N80y3kBXI5AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

0809c.jpg.63587c5705b269a81c4fb9303ec67136.jpg

Edited by DbPhoenix
Wrong time zone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1392 gently tested for bakrob :)

 

Long from PVP 1393.50 after Delta turned positive .. out 1/2 at 1397.75 and hanging in for possible gap.. The 1392 test fond no sellers at all and this market is rangebound which means to me .. trade responsively (and responsibly).

 

Update 10:33 EDT Stop now at 1395.75. Rallying to target possibly.

 

Update: 10:45 EDT Tightened stop to 97.25 Either up or out.

Edited by bakrob99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Long from PVP 1393.50 after Delta turned positive .. out 1/2 at 1397.75 and hanging in for possible gap.. The 1392 test fond no sellers at all and this market is rangebound which means to me .. trade responsively (and responsibly).

 

Even though we're hardly trading a massive range, the actual way it's trading is okay so long as you're sticking to a solid plan. Like you said Rob, no sellers into 92's (and the retest delta was a little clue there) followed by a building up for the reversal. Was personally looking for a test of the balance vpoc @99.25 and it's as good as done that for me so I'm out. If we can maintain above 95.50, probably a decent chance of a gap close (if not this time around). Could also be a one/two move type day with the rest of the morning and early afternoon dead until possibly a move into close. You never know though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Long from PVP 1393.50 after Delta turned positive .. out 1/2 at 1397.75 and hanging in for possible gap.. The 1392 test fond no sellers at all and this market is rangebound which means to me .. trade responsively (and responsibly).

 

Update 10:33 EDT Stop now at 1395.75. Rallying to target possibly.

 

============

 

Am I right that you basically expected a reversal from 1392ish judging by the fact that price simply didnt go further down? Sorry for asking, trying to figure out how could I have noticed that for myself, as your prediction nicely materialised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Could also be a one/two move type day with the rest of the morning and early afternoon dead until possibly a move into close. You never know though.

 

 

I won't be trading late today on a summer Friday afternoon. A scalp short off the open and a nice long confirmed off the bottom and I have more than made my daily goal. Most of this week it's been good early on and then chop... so just take the few good trades before 1030 and get on with your day.

 

Thanks for you posts and charts. I find them useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An update for those who are interested. As previously posted, price tested 96 from above and below, making 95 a good short at 0900 (the supply/demand lines are left as they were yesterday evening).

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=30464&stc=1&d=1344609596

 

At that point, price tests the next lower levels of support at 94 and 92, finding buyers at 93 and 92, but more devoted buyers at 92.

 

The midpoint of all this is 99-1400.

 

Db

0809d.jpg.c8a7e8f85a2bad7a724110d10975ebe7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 5 min chart just shoewed nice 37550 contracts red bar touching 1394.25.. My VPOC is 94.50, nice 4 point ride

:crap:

 

someone among big guys is playing by the narrow market rule today

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
============

 

Am I right that you basically expected a reversal from 1392ish judging by the fact that price simply didnt go further down? Sorry for asking, trying to figure out how could I have noticed that for myself, as your prediction nicely materialised.

 

 

Trading respoinsively involves evaluating the market at its extremes and determining the likelihood of it reverting back to prices which have been determined by the market to be fair. The 1392 was a prior low and I expected a reaction. My target was a gap fill up above and when the 1392 bounced I was waiting for a shift towards the buyers to get long.

 

AT 11:10 there was a similar shift to upside momentum.

 

I exited before my target because I had a SHORT signal at 1398.25 which I didn't take because I was still long - I should have just reversed but that is not something I do often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, for those who are interested...

 

These are the shorts and longs mentioned earlier. using the same supply/demand lines and S&R lines. Entries are made inside the retracements.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=30466&stc=1&d=1344615292

 

As for now, we've made a lower high at R (the midpoint) again and broken the current demand line. Therefore, another short bet 97 and 98 is appropriate. If price doesn't break its current supply line, the trade should be good down to 95-94.

 

Db

0809e.jpg.249d0216a8fdd57ab1e9ece28286363b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit late... noticed the LP's pulled out just before another buy program. I've detected what they may be detecting now but not interested to share it just yet.. need to see if they use to init new shorts or if encourages buying... bias is still to downside but need to remain flexible.. some signs that some inst. are buying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Again, for those who are interested...

 

These are the shorts and longs mentioned earlier. using the same supply/demand lines and S&R lines. Entries are made inside the retracements.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=30466&stc=1&d=1344615292

 

As for now, we've made a lower high at R (the midpoint) again and broken the current demand line. Therefore, another short bet 97 and 98 is appropriate. If price doesn't break its current supply line, the trade should be good down to 95-94.

 

Db

 

Thanks Db for the analysis. I got all your charts and links for more reading later on.

 

I been out of market action today due to some errand to tend to. Today, I see was a good day for learning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I been out of market action today due to some errand to tend to. Today, I see was a good day for learning.

 

Particularly that having a bias toward one side or another for whatever reason isn't nearly as important as knowing how to trade what's in front of you. And, of course, doing it.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
====

 

yes, but 1-2 ticks violation doesnt count, plus I am in the same mood as bakrob99 - we should be going down some 40-50 points (1 point = 4 ticks) so may be staying longer would have paid better, but patience is a problem.. That's why my second favorite instrument CL..

 

40-50 handles down?? Sure it could happen, but no objective reason for this certainly. Quite a few others thought this as well, hence the trap at the open to help add a little fuel to the fire. Shorts did not have a good day this week, so it's logical to assume that they are due and given the overnight market activity, many were easily fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.