Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
-
Welcome Guests
Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.
Day Trading the E-mini Futures
By
TheNegotiator, in E-mini Futures
-
Similar Content
-
By Quantower
The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
What is Power Trades?
Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
Here are a few examples of how it looks like
How it finds zones?
There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:
Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.
Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.
So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
-
By makuchaku
Hi everyone,
This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
- Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
- Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
What do you think?
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By Stocks4life · Posted
TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP -
Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to... -
By Stocks4life · Posted
TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP -
By fxeconomist · Posted
How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H? -
My wife Robin just wanted some groceries. Simple enough. She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side. Someone keyed her car. To be clear, this isn’t just any car. It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior. Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal. That's what happens when you stand out. Nobody keys a beige minivan. When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it. What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say. Ideas work the same way. Take tariffs, for example. Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.) That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs. And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing. Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?) But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something. We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why. Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better. We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.” AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table. Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda. Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar. The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation. They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse. But let me pop this myth: Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me). Here's the deal. Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less. Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to. Take the 1800s. For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year. The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today? Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs. Let me give you a simple example. Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation! Nope. If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers. If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business. Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge. Three quick scenarios: We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money. Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight. That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs. Back to tariffs today. Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic. Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded. Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing. Strategic win, no inflation. Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?). Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs. If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation. In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation. Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart. Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this. And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck. Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone. (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/
-