Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Phantom,

 

Unless you are using a custom macd, the standard macd in ninjatrader does not have the selection for the moving average types so the fast, slow, and smooth, would all be EMAs.

 

I do understand all of the other moving average you use are SMA.

 

J.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phantom,

 

Unless you are using a custom macd, the standard macd in ninjatrader does not have the selection for the moving average types so the fast, slow, and smooth, would all be EMAs.

 

I do understand all of the other moving average you use are SMA.

 

J.

 

Alright, you show-off (lol).

 

Just goes to show that even someone who pays very little attention to the details (I'm speaking of me here) can make money in these markets.

 

You are absolutely right on this point; they are EMAs.

 

Now go and show me that you, too can make some money using this stuff.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Phantom here is a chart of the Fri PM action with the macd 5,13,13 sma now. I have expanded the macd so one cud see the histo well. I have a variable called spread and that control the height of the histo bars. I have reduced the size of these histo bars now [from 5 to 2].

 

Attached chart now shows only 1 L and 1 S setup as per your criteria.

 

Thank you for your comments and encouragement.

 

 

Regards

 

 

Pat

LA626245-09.thumb.png.ad99fb765462dd34e9c04a77b3d36862.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phantom here is a chart of the Fri PM action with the macd 5,13,13 sma now. I have expanded the macd so one cud see the histo well. I have a variable called spread and that control the height of the histo bars. I have reduced the size of these histo bars now [from 5 to 2].

 

Attached chart now shows only 1 L and 1 S setup as per your criteria.

 

 

Now try EMAs on those settings and I think we'll be close?!

Your sell signal is ballpark but the buy signal is off-kilter.

 

Redraw with the new settings and let's have a look.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

phantom here is the CL chart with ema's settings ..and possible S and L setup. You are right data feed etc may also cause some variation in the charts. My datafeed is Zenfire.

 

Thank you for the comments.

 

 

Regards

 

 

pat

LA626245-10.thumb.png.78e36064632725d97c9115d9335634a0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
phantom here is the CL chart with ema's settings ..and possible S and L setup. You are right data feed etc may also cause some variation in the charts. My datafeed is Zenfire.

 

The buy signal is void in my book because the fast and slow lines are below the zero line.

 

Otherwise, looks good.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes phantom took a little liberty with the L signal but strictly per criteria it is void. I can see you are pretty strict on the setup criteria and dont stray away from it? Will keep an eye open for the setups on CL ... and see how good I do in seeing the setups in real time.

 

Thank you for your comments and help. I wud hope others wud join in and have any comments or post the charts to see. We cud trade this setup and see what else cud be added or look for to make the trades a bit easier for the struggling traders.

 

 

Regards

 

 

Pat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Phantom .. I have only recently discovered this forum & been spending hours on your invaluable thread.

I have studied your comments on the MACD & tried out the various combinations.

Why is it that I can only ever get one signal-line?

the MAC on this chart is the Linda Raschke, if I understand correctly.

did you say that the lines should cross above/ below the zero line for buy/ sell respectively? that's if one can get the lines!

Thanks for a tiring but very absorbing evening.

system_3.gif.065ddd52aff6c47e83dee7077ea7fe62.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it that I can only ever get one signal-line?

the MACD on this chart is the Linda Raschke, if I understand correctly.

did you say that the lines should cross above/ below the zero line for buy/ sell respectively?

 

Linda's was a stochastic...

 

I use a 5-13-13 MACD.

 

Don't know what to say about your inability to get the fast, slow and signal numbers to produce a fast line and a slow line.

 

Maybe call your chart broker for help?

 

Zero crossing is NOT the signal for this trade.

 

The signal is a "failed test" of the fast line versus the slow line with the zero line being a filter for buys and sells.

 

Anyway, thanks for joining the thread.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to be dwelling on the MACD which I take it is not of primary importance, but this is what I get when calling up Properties for it:

 

Parameters: Fast EMA, Slow EMA & MACD SMA .. so far so good.

 

Colors: Main & Signal .. with no reference to the parameters.

 

as if to say: Colors is what you asked for, colors is what you get!

forget about Parameters .. although they do work, becoz the display does change in accordance with the input .. with one line missing.

 

it is very strange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

amory,

 

Your macd is showing the signal (fast) as a histogram and the smoothed (slow) as the line. Phantom's macd is showing the signal (fast) as a line, the smoothed (slow) as a line, and the difference between the signal and the smoothed as a histogram. The diff line is not important for this trading method.

 

There are other MT4 macds available that will look more like Phantoms. I can point you to them if you would like.

 

J.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank IamJon .. well that clears that up.

 

Seeing that it's the only additional window on Phantom's charts, it must be of some importance in the general scheme of things.

 

I wonder if I am in close enough touch with the methodology, using mostly the One-hour timeframe?

 

<< Zero crossing is NOT the signal for this trade.

The signal is a "failed test" of the fast line versus the slow line with the zero line being a filter for buys and sells. >>

 

that alone will require a fair bit of comparison & study!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"The signal is a "failed test" of the fast line versus the slow line with the zero line being a filter for buys and sells."

 

phantom not sure I understand this statement correctly especially "failed test". Do you mean the same thing that you use in your setup which is not related to CL?

 

here is the 2 locations of CL setup S and L as I understand the CL setup based on Macd. Any comments wud be appreciated..

 

Regards

 

 

Pat

LA626245-11.thumb.png.854ff57c6dc7dda357c4d44bac269419.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"The signal is a "failed test" of the fast line versus the slow line with the zero line being a filter for buys and sells."

 

phantom not sure I understand this statement correctly especially "failed test". Do you mean the same thing that you use in your setup which is not related to CL?

 

here is the 2 locations of CL setup S and L as I understand the CL setup based on Macd. Any comments wud be appreciated..

 

 

Failed test means the fast line tested the slow line, then turned away.

 

You nailed these signals. Great job.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Linda's was a stochastic...

 

I use a 5-13-13 MACD.

 

Don't know what to say about your inability to get the fast, slow and signal numbers to produce a fast line and a slow line.

 

Maybe call your chart broker for help?

 

Zero crossing is NOT the signal for this trade.

 

The signal is a "failed test" of the fast line versus the slow line with the zero line being a filter for buys and sells.

 

Anyway, thanks for joining the thread.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

/

 

The correct time frame for the signals is what works, of course. But, I believe the best, and the one Rashke uses, is a 3/10 with a 16 smoothing. That's based on the old SMR approach that Chick Goslin uses. It's phenomenal what that does. Unfortunately, I still don't trust it enough to avoid second guessing. My person hang-up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
/ I believe the best, and the one Rashke uses, is a 3/10 with a 16 smoothing.

 

Darvasfan, you are a bit misleading in your comment...

 

(P.69 STREET SMARTS: "I tinkered with the %K and %D to try and duplicate the 3-10 oscillator. I found that by using the 7%K and a 10%D the "Anti" pattern worked even better than it did with my own tools.")

 

This is, of course, a stochastic.

 

I've found that my macd indicator works even better for me than the stoch.

 

It has stood the test of time.

 

BTW, Mr.Goslin was a self-proclaimed loser in the long run; that's beside the point.

 

I'm just saying...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about Chick being a self proclaimed loser in the long run. Here's what he says on his bio: "Professional trader since 1979 (trading his own account), during which time he has made well over 10,000 trades, over $100,000 profit in one day, over $200,000 profit in one week and well over $1,000,000 profit in one year; one time turning $100,000 into $1,500,000 in eighteen months. (Note: an accountant's letter verifying this result is available on this Web site.)"

 

As to Rashke, I have an old lecture she gave to the telerate seminars with a workbook. She stated: "The concepts introduced in this workshop are patterns I have been using since 1981 when I originally subscribed to a charting service called Security Market Research. The service plotted a 3-10 simple moving average oscillator with a 16 period moving average of the oscillator." She goes on in the lecture to say that she uses now the MACD with a 3-10/16 which replicates the SMR oscillator. I don't have Street Smarts, so don't know what she says there. But, I think my original statement was very accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't have Street Smarts, so don't know what she says there. But, I think my original statement was very accurate.

 

Folks, we have another "live one" here...

 

My readers who own the book know I'm telling the truth...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Folks, we have another "live one" here...

 

My readers who own the book know I'm telling the truth...

 

No need to get your panties in a wad, phantom. I didn't say you weren't telling the truth. I was simply trying to help out based on information I have from Linda R, which is quite accurate. I don't have any axe to grind here. I'm a nobody. I'm not a profitable trader. I'm simply a guy struggling to get it. It's odd that you feel the need to immediately be defensive about a simple, truthful piece of info. I offered. Quite odd, indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No need to get your panties in a wad, phantom. I didn't say you weren't telling the truth. I was simply trying to help out based on information I have from Linda R, which is quite accurate. I don't have any axe to grind here. I'm a nobody. I'm not a profitable trader. I'm simply a guy struggling to get it. It's odd that you feel the need to immediately be defensive about a simple, truthful piece of info. I offered. Quite odd, indeed.

 

I'm sorry.

 

I sometimes let my emotions get the best of me.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No worries. It's cool. Apology accepted, and thanks for taking the time to offer your help.

 

Speaking of offering help, I'm curious...

 

Since I've never taken the time to study Nicolas Darvas, would it be asking too much for you to provide a summary of his methodology for my readers?

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll do my best on summarizing Darvas.

 

He wrote a great book back in 1960: How I Made $2,000,000 in the Stock Market. He made that money during the late 50s bull market. But, he also went on to use his method successfully until he died sometime in the late 70s. He made several hundred thousand trading National Semiconductor when the bear market of the early 70s was over. He was a true renaissance man.

 

As far as I can tell, Darvas only went long stocks. He never went short. So, when the market was a bear market, he simply stayed out.

 

He was basically a breakout trader. He did not use charts, only stock quotes that he received either from the newspaper, or maybe Barron's. Since he was a professional dancer, he actually made most of his money while he was touring in Europe. However, even though he did not use charts, his method applies very easily, if not more so, to charts.

 

Bill O'Neal, I believe, borrowed heavily from Darvas, who in turn borrowed from his predecessors. Darvas would look for young, explosive growth stocks that were involved in some new or different facet of society. He didn't care for blue chips. This would equate to the N in CANSLIM. For example, he made a huge amount of money in Lorillard, which was the company that came up with the first filtered cigarette.

 

Darvas would then look for substantial volume coming into the stock while, at the same time, the stock was moving up in price. He would then look to buy the stock on a breakout to a new high. Fundamentally, other than the "new" element, he would focus primarily on stocks that had really strong earnings. That is about the only real fundamental he cared about.

 

His technical system involved "boxes". Once a stock broke into a new high, he would buy the breakout. When the move stopped, and price fell from the high for 3 days (or more), he would mark the high as the top of the box. After the pull back, when the stock made a low and then rallied for 3 days (or more), that pivot low would be the bottom of the box. He would move his stop loss a small percentage below the low of the box. Then, it was just a matter of following the stock, and then watching it move up, make new boxes, while trailing the stop below the low of the box.

 

He generally followed that method, but he was not a mechanical trader. There were occasions when the stock was "not acting right" where he actually exited before his stop was hit. It think he was picking up some Wyckoff there but he did not give any credit for that "feel".

 

His method is still sound. Check out Apple and you can see that at certain points applying the Darvas method, one could have made 150 points or more at any one stage of the move. Darvas' method is simple; but, it is not easy.

 

Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Darvasfan,

Thats a very good synopsis of Darvas

And like Wykoff and Livermore and the rest, they relied on Volume.

Today its called Tape Reading.

The tape read like this...

100 UST @ 158.20

200 UST @ 158.20

1000 UST @ 158.30 hello

500 UST @ 158.20

1000 UST @158.30 hello

BUY

Today the volume is so much higher ,the system is difficult to apply.

Unless you work for Trade Guiders.

Do you trade like Darvas?

Do you make a living?

And if Mighty Mouse reads this, he will ask for your trading statement.

Kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His technical system involved "boxes". Once a stock broke into a new high, he would buy the breakout. When the move stopped, and price fell from the high for 3 days (or more), he would mark the high as the top of the box. After the pull back, when the stock made a low and then rallied for 3 days (or more), that pivot low would be the bottom of the box. He would move his stop loss a small percentage below the low of the box. Then, it was just a matter of following the stock, and then watching it move up, make new boxes, while trailing the stop below the low of the box.

 

Sounds like the Ross hook, also the 3 day ringed high/low breakout system.

 

This is the basis of many a fund manager, very technically sound in a trending market.

 

A little trickier in day trading...

 

Thanks to you for the input!

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By David Carter
      My broker (Jones Mutual) advised me to use candlesticks when CFD trading, as the simple line graph option does not give you enough information - is this correct?
    • By inthemoneystocks
      One of the most important reasons why traders take big losses is because they often fail to recognize when a trade has gone wrong. You see, stopping out of a trade is probably the biggest fault of traders and investors. Often, this happens to young and inexperienced traders and investors, but I know many veteran traders and investors that struggle with this as well. Early in my own career I struggled with stopping out of a bad trade myself, so I can sympathize with this problem. 

      The problem with taking a loss is really two fold. First, the trader has to admit that he is wrong. As you all know, as human beings we all hate to be wrong. The ego simply gets in the way and we all want to always be right all the time. The first secret in this business is to check the ego at the door. The market does not care about your the color of your skin, religion or anything else. It will move in the direction of the money and that is the bottom line. Once a trader or investor goes into what I call 'hope mode' the trade is over. I'm sure everyone has been in this position at one time or another. Simply put there is no room for ego or hope in the stock market. The market is always right and there is no reason to fight it. 

      Here is the second problem with taking a loss, it hurts. Pain and pleasure are the two reasons why humans do anything at all. As a human being, we are always looking to have pleasure and avoid pain. Well, losing money is painful and many people would rather simply hold a losing equity than lock in a small loss and move on. I cannot tell you how often I see a trader hold a losing trade only to see the position move further out of the money. Many years ago I watched a day trader blow up a $200,000 account in a single day averaging in on a bad day trade. To this day I can remember the look on his face as his money vanished in thin air. Believe it or not, this trader could have exited the position with a $500.00 loss, but instead he kept averaging in and fighting the position until he was wiped out. As a rule, once you have your full position you should never average in on a trade. At that point, it is critical to know where your max loss is going to be and stop out if that level is breached.

      Now when should we stop out? The answer to this question is not that simple, but here is what I personally do. I always place my stop loss below an important breakout or pivot on the chart. You see, prior breakout or pivot levels are usually defended when retested. After all, this is usually an area where institutional traders and investors got involved, that is why there is a pivot low or high on the chart to begin with. If that level is breached on a closing basis then I will move out of the position. So If I took a trade based on a daily chart pattern then I will usually check the daily and weekly chart levels. If there is a major pivot on the weekly chart then I will use a week chart close as my stop out level. While this method may not be perfect, it has saved me from much bigger losses when I have been wrong.



        Nicholas Santiago
    • By LindsayBev
      Hello!  I am new to this forum.  I am interested in learning about candlestick reading.  I would appreciate hearing from any that will answer this post WHICH book you found the most helpful?  
    • By trading4life
      Hello, My name is trading4life.
      I just joined this forum.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing Karmela has made her positions clear on and really stood up for this whole dam campaign is abortion ‘rights’.   A lot of ‘liberal’ women don’t understand how men can have ANY say in the matter.   “It’s my body” etc etc.  Well, men start to get a say when the interests of the unborn male or female person are completely fkn disregarded - that’s when.  I don’t quite know what it’s like to go through utero process in an unloved, or maybe worse, an ambivalent ‘field’, but speaking as a human, adoption seems to be preferable to a saline abortion or a knitting needles abortion or a drug that starves the fetus to death abortion or a plain old standard black clinical abortion.  Karmela has definitely not made friends with unborn babies... Tim Tampon Walz also hasn’t made friends with unborn babies.  Instead he literally said “I’ve made friends with school shooters”.  Folks on some levels it’s ok to be a school shooter if it’s ok to be an abortion doctor... both performing the same task... both ending lives.  Absurd?  Yes.  But no more absurd than the devaluation of life shit ‘social engineering’ is attempting to normalize... just sayin’ 
    • SHOP Shopify stock holding at the 79.87 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?SHOP
    • VCYT Veracyte stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 35.38 at https://stockconsultant.com/?VCYT
    • Thanks for sharing, also have a demo for backtesting and refining any current or new strategy before implementing on the live accounts.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.