Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

 

But if you come up with something tangible, I'd love to be the first to know!

 

 

I promise nothing...but I know I have a few (very) old BB squeeze strategies somewhere on a prehistoric computer. I'll run a few verification tests and try to add some rules to show what MightyMouse means with getting better served if you follow price action...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I promise nothing...but I know I have a few (very) old BB squeeze strategies somewhere on a prehistoric computer. I'll run a few verification tests and try to add some rules to show what MightyMouse means with getting better served if you follow price action...

 

Hasn't this entire method been based on price action? You guys are really unbelievable...Haven't heard a single thing I said...

 

Don't bother with the BB studies, really has nothing to do with this "system."

 

Anyway, wish y'all the best of luck in the future...

 

 

Phantom out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hasn't this entire method been based on price action? You guys are really unbelievable...Haven't heard a single thing I said...

 

Don't bother with the BB studies, really has nothing to do with this "system."

 

Anyway, wish y'all the best of luck in the future...

 

 

Phantom out.

 

Awwwh I do hope you keep posting to this thread. Some people have such different terms of reference it is very hard to approach stuff with a completely open mind. That's no bad reflection on you or them, its just how it is. There will be just as many that do get it....hell you wouldn't believe the accumulated nonsense I have buzzing around my noggin but I think I have a good idea of where you are coming from (an imho it's not a bad place).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hasn't this entire method been based on price action? You guys are really unbelievable...Haven't heard a single thing I said...

 

Don't bother with the BB studies, really has nothing to do with this "system."

 

Anyway, wish y'all the best of luck in the future...

 

Phantom out.

 

push on Phantom, push on

 

This is your thread and you need to push on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awwwh I do hope you keep posting to this thread. Some people have such different terms of reference it is very hard to approach stuff with a completely open mind. That's no bad reflection on you or them, its just how it is. There will be just as many that do get it....hell you wouldn't believe the accumulated nonsense I have buzzing around my noggin but I think I have a good idea of where you are coming from (an imho it's not a bad place).

 

I hear ya BlowFish, just that I have issues with obstinance (in adults; I expect it from children). Like I said before, I'm not used to the open forum atmosphere; I didn't expect that generosity would be accepted with folded arms. Maybe I am better off publishing something and selling it because then these guys would be highlighting and hanging on every sentence in the book instead of criticizing the author.

 

Usually, people appreciate freebies, especially when the info could be life changing.

But I guess the trading community is replete with (dare I say sociopaths?) people with underdeveloped social skills.

 

I've seen trading systems costing over $3000 that aren't nearly as financially productive as the stuff I've already given away. And I've barely scratched the surface. (My volatility work would blow you away. Pun intended).

 

I'm not about being one of the trading intelligencia, but I would appreciate it if those that have that need at least keep it to themselves.

 

Luv,

Phantom

Edited by phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Usually, people appreciate freebies, especially when the info could be life changing.

But I guess the trading community is replete with (dare I say sociopaths?) people with underdeveloped social skills.

 

I've seen trading systems costing over $3000 that aren't nearly as financially productive as the stuff I've already given away. And I've barely scratched the surface. (My volatility work would blow you away. Pun intended).

 

I'm not about being one of the trading intelligencia, although I've forgotten more about trading effectively than most traders will ever know.

 

 

And there are the big (hype) words again... prove/backup your words and you get all the credits/respect you demand....also from me...one of the biggest "sociopaths"...!! It's up to you....I promise to keep my mouth shut...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And there are the big (hype) words again... prove/backup your words and you get all the credits/respect you demand....also from me...one of the biggest "sociopaths"...!! It's up to you....I promise to keep my mouth shut...

 

You're already popping off and I wasn't even talking to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're already popping off and I wasn't even talking to you.

 

Dude...you've positioned yourself as the greatest trader alive... Fine with me...back it up... The thread is yours...everybody listens....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

phantom,

 

(Even though thousands may read it and even thousands yap at you about it) Again, I’d ask you to consider writing as if just one person is really listening and benefiting from your work… and just ignore hecklers and others who can only respond with disrespect for methods not on the same wavelengths as their own… most of them have been hurt before...

Other suggestions –

> Start a blog on TL or elsewhere. Feedback in general, but esp. neg. feedback, tends to drop off considerably.

> Open same kind of thread over on ET or T2W and see what happens… this bunch here will suddenly start to seem as reverent as a bunch of long bearded old rabbi’s…;)

> Request that posters on your thread only ask questions and post images of realtime setup examples of your stuff… and if they want to challenge, confront, or disagree they can start a separate 'bash the phantom' thread.

> Start a new thread... move the good stuff from this one over... you might get weeks before someone starts up crap...

 

All the best.

 

zdo

Edited by zdo
One more >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe I am better off publishing something and selling it

 

Not a bad idea. You could use this thread, or a blog as a way to refine and edit the text. Make posts, then copy them out to your book, and edit it as needed. If you develop a following here, that would help launch the book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phantom,

 

Thank you for sharing your well thought out TA in a rational and clear way.

 

This is a discussion forum, hence ............ You are doing great keeping things on topic and under control. It does get frustrating at times. In my opinion, as long as the discussion stays civil and about the merits, the back and forth is more enlightening than writing an article or blog.

 

As you probably know, the annals of T/A are full of "perfect setups". Respectfully, it seems rather naive to believe that any one of these setups, regardless of how technically sound and well articulated, will lead aspiring traders to consistent profitability, as you surmise.

 

"I'll leave trade management for another discussion."

 

Along these lines, perhaps you can take your desire to help to the next level. A threshold seldom if ever crossed in these discussions. Provide examples and explanations of less perfect (precise), yet tradeable setups, setups which result in a loss, whipsaws, targets, entry and exit considerations, unanticipated price developments after entry ..................... The market has no shortage of challenges. In my opinion this is one of the areas were most traders fail. An oh so simple setup constantly morphing into a riddle - in real time.

 

I realize that to solve this riddle takes great effort and expense. Maybe you can find a way to shed light in this area without giving away key proprietary information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Flex,

do you ever trade or do you just backtest systems until your old computers give out??

 

You got me...as you can judge from my number of posts I am just a forum junkie....

 

Just read the post of Peterthemonkey...he explains it perfectly...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My background is in nuclear engineering but I've been day trading for a living since 1999.

 

My hope is that at least some of you traders can relate...

Phantom

 

It's not often I have the opportunity to rub cyber elbows with a nuclear engineer, keep it up phantom, I'm here and taking notes. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Phantom is back with reservations and restrictions...

 

 

 

The examples I posted in this thread were actual trades that occurred this and last week. Please reread the logic of those trades and start paper trading them for yourself!

 

No matter how many winning or losing examples of real or imaginary trades I post here, the collective You will not believe me until you prove it to yourself!!!

 

So the burden of proof lies on you, not me.

 

 

I will post my next instruction soon. I must work out some details before I post it.

 

The following users are from this point on blacklisted from any future responses from the Phantom: Steve46, Mighty Mouth, Flex-whatever.

 

If I sense any ill-tenored remark from any other user, that user will go on the blacklist immediately and without reply.

 

I'm going to start a private blog on my own website soon, and the intelligent, pertinent replies I receive will become a part of my blog posts, so you must heretofore give permission for your username and question/remarks to be used by me at my discretion.

 

If you don't agree to this, don't remark on my thread. No exceptions.

 

Talk soon.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

ps Darn, I just missed a 50 tic breakout in the euro writing this post. I'll show you the setup next week.

Edited by phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So the burden of proof lies on you, not me.

 

Talk soon.

Luv,

Phantom

 

That is the spirit Phantom ... you write what you feel and think and the Readers can take it or leave it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you are going to continue. The principles underlying your approach seem sound to me (though what do I know?) You can happily quote me fwiw, always wanted to see my name in lights! :cinema: haha

 

It's some while that we have seen a new thread at TL by someone talking in reasonable detail about how they approach the market. Personally I greatly prefer them to the 'never trade whilst water skiing' type threads. So, again, good that you are continuing TL needs threads like this (whether one agrees or disagrees with the content) if it is to remain a première destination for traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dearest Flex, Mighty Mouse, and anyone else who only visits my thread only to look for inconsistencies and spread quasi-malicious comments,

 

My posts are fully intended to be didactic in nature.

 

If, for whatever reason, my posts offend you, you are all certainly invited to refrain from coming here. I can tell by the sheer numbers of visits that some of the folks who frequent my thread are actually interested in learning something.

 

I just hope that the folks who are well intended are not put off by your comments because I intend to continue teaching in spite of all your off-color comments.

 

Furthermore, I will teach on indicators when I am ready, and refuse to be pushed around by the few of you who don't have the patience to wait, and don't know a good thing when you have it right in your hands.

 

Now go do something constructive with your time and leave us alone if you can't behave yourselves...

 

 

Phantom

 

 

Hey Phantom!

 

I'm been lurking in here for a while, and have very much admired your patience with some of the other posters in this thread. You know, those folks that assume you're selling something, running a scam, and so forth. All I've seen you post is EXCELLENT tidbits of very helpful, concise, and if used properly, potentially very profitable infromation, tools and techniques. Please don't let those dense, argumentative knuckleheads deter you from what you obviously love doing.

 

I believe it was Mark Twain who said something like: "You should never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig."

 

Some just can't stand that someone might actually know more than they do.

 

Cheers

 

Jerry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Glad you are going to continue. The principles underlying your approach seem sound to me (though what do I know?) You can happily quote me fwiw, always wanted to see my name in lights! :cinema: haha

 

It's some while that we have seen a new thread at TL by someone talking in reasonable detail about how they approach the market. Personally I greatly prefer them to the 'never trade whilst water skiing' type threads. So, again, good that you are continuing TL needs threads like this (whether one agrees or disagrees with the content) if it is to remain a première destination for traders.

 

Interesting comment Blowfish...and it dovetails nicely with what I want to say...

First, I don't have a comment one way or another about the sytematic approach...in my business we don't throw money at a system just because someone suggests that it is viable...that would be silly in the extreme....

Second..in terms of "what works"...if we move forward from point one...what "works" once you have an idea in mind is to test it...and the idea that one might have trouble testing this system (or any system for that matter) is a bit suspicious...In my opinion, every systematic approach can be reduced to a testable format, and if you can't readily do that, then you are left with manual tests of tha database...

Finally, I realize that the popular conception is that you only need 30 data points to evaluate a system...ah no...that won't do it...I leave it to others to figure this one out but lets just say that to really get an idea of whether a system "works" (is tradeable, makes money, has a acceptable drawdown, etc) I think you need to have data that reflects several kinds of market conditions over a period of several years at minimum...

Just a quick comment for those interested in more than green light/buy, red light/sell approaches....

 

 

Good luck

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Phantom!

 

I'm been lurking in here for a while, and have very much admired your patience with some of the other posters in this thread. You know, those folks that assume you're selling something, running a scam, and so forth. All I've seen you post is EXCELLENT tidbits of very helpful, concise, and if used properly, potentially very profitable infromation, tools and techniques. Please don't let those dense, argumentative knuckleheads deter you from what you obviously love doing.

 

I believe it was Mark Twain who said something like: "You should never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig."

 

Some just can't stand that someone might actually know more than they do.

 

Cheers

 

Jerry

 

Didn't Mark Twain have a real knack for hitting the nail square on the head? I believe Mr Twain also said something to the effect of "There's lies, damn lies and statistics." That's why I never had much faith in backtesting "systems." I test my research with real money, not computer simulations.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Didn't Mark Twain have a real knack for hitting the nail square on the head? I believe Mr Twain also said something to the effect of "There's lies, damn lies and statistics." That's why I never had much faith in backtesting "systems." I test my research with real money, not computer simulations.

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

 

That's more the type of comment one might hear from a "sanitary engineer" as opposed to a "nuclear" engineer".....

 

So at this point, we can pretty much conclude that this gentleman (or lady) has never been anywhere near a Engineering curriculum (of any kind)....

 

Maybe he should have suggested that he was "Superhero", or "Astronaut" perhaps....

 

OK then enough joking around...frankly its of little interest to me, but to those with the capacity for critical thought THIS last comment really causes me to wonder

 

and the idea that at some point in the near future we can ALL find his precious comments if we will only go to HIS BLOG.....ahhhhhhh yes..

 

Well then...enough balloon popping for tonight...Sorry Phantom.....please carry on as you were.

 

"Luv"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Random thoughts on testing.

 

My uncle was an engineer he taught me the scientific method when I was... I dunno about 8 years old I guess. In my view (fwiw) though pretty simple it is very useful in many aspects of life for acquiring and integrating knowledge.

 

Computerised back testing is just a tool. Nine times out of ten people draw un-reliable conclusions from it. There's a whole bunch of reasons for this that go beyond the scope of this thread. For most things I far prefer testing 'by hand/eyeball'. Performance analysis has its place too (to call that statistics is a bit grand for what is essentially keeping a tally). Market generated statistics have there place too but this thread is not one of them :)

 

This is one of those areas where expertise in other walks of life can be detrimental to your outcomes if you expect trading to 'work in the same way'.

 

DBPhoenix in his blog here (the journal section) outlines an iterative process to find test and refine an edge/pattern/idea. If memory serves he has talked at greater length if forums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By David Carter
      My broker (Jones Mutual) advised me to use candlesticks when CFD trading, as the simple line graph option does not give you enough information - is this correct?
    • By inthemoneystocks
      One of the most important reasons why traders take big losses is because they often fail to recognize when a trade has gone wrong. You see, stopping out of a trade is probably the biggest fault of traders and investors. Often, this happens to young and inexperienced traders and investors, but I know many veteran traders and investors that struggle with this as well. Early in my own career I struggled with stopping out of a bad trade myself, so I can sympathize with this problem. 

      The problem with taking a loss is really two fold. First, the trader has to admit that he is wrong. As you all know, as human beings we all hate to be wrong. The ego simply gets in the way and we all want to always be right all the time. The first secret in this business is to check the ego at the door. The market does not care about your the color of your skin, religion or anything else. It will move in the direction of the money and that is the bottom line. Once a trader or investor goes into what I call 'hope mode' the trade is over. I'm sure everyone has been in this position at one time or another. Simply put there is no room for ego or hope in the stock market. The market is always right and there is no reason to fight it. 

      Here is the second problem with taking a loss, it hurts. Pain and pleasure are the two reasons why humans do anything at all. As a human being, we are always looking to have pleasure and avoid pain. Well, losing money is painful and many people would rather simply hold a losing equity than lock in a small loss and move on. I cannot tell you how often I see a trader hold a losing trade only to see the position move further out of the money. Many years ago I watched a day trader blow up a $200,000 account in a single day averaging in on a bad day trade. To this day I can remember the look on his face as his money vanished in thin air. Believe it or not, this trader could have exited the position with a $500.00 loss, but instead he kept averaging in and fighting the position until he was wiped out. As a rule, once you have your full position you should never average in on a trade. At that point, it is critical to know where your max loss is going to be and stop out if that level is breached.

      Now when should we stop out? The answer to this question is not that simple, but here is what I personally do. I always place my stop loss below an important breakout or pivot on the chart. You see, prior breakout or pivot levels are usually defended when retested. After all, this is usually an area where institutional traders and investors got involved, that is why there is a pivot low or high on the chart to begin with. If that level is breached on a closing basis then I will move out of the position. So If I took a trade based on a daily chart pattern then I will usually check the daily and weekly chart levels. If there is a major pivot on the weekly chart then I will use a week chart close as my stop out level. While this method may not be perfect, it has saved me from much bigger losses when I have been wrong.



        Nicholas Santiago
    • By LindsayBev
      Hello!  I am new to this forum.  I am interested in learning about candlestick reading.  I would appreciate hearing from any that will answer this post WHICH book you found the most helpful?  
    • By trading4life
      Hello, My name is trading4life.
      I just joined this forum.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.