Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MadMarketScientist

Advice for All - Stop Fighting the Trend!

Recommended Posts

I've have been watching for a correction (across all sectors) to kick in for some time now. Yet after the big down drop on this past week, why aren't I ready to get short with all my chips? Well its because the current trend is an up one, and pullbacks need to be looked at as buying opportunities, not an automatic change of trend. If there's one thing that has cost me the most money over the years, it's been trying to short the market because it has gone up “enough”, or bought because a stock has gone down “too far”. As chained-to-the-PC hyper-anxious traders, we tend to jump in on the first blip in the direction we are leaning, only to be slapped(!) when the dominant trend resumes. It definitely takes more patience to wait out a correction, but as the saying goes, “I'd rather be bored than broke”. You have to adjust your trend relativity to the time interval you are trading ... a market can be in a screaming uptrend, but even a one day correction is a downtrend on the small time frames.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just watch the markets intraday when they are moving down to see if it's a correction or a trend reversal. To me, at the moment whenever there is a correction, big buyers are lurking still. Speculator shorts dry up and get caught. Then in the next couple of days, a big move back up happens as the shorts are forced to cover. Before going short for the trend or larger correction trade, I'd have to not see that demand stepping in and for a continuation through important levels for a couple of days at least. Missing out on perfect location when trend trading is not as bad as being wrong about the reversal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

while I agree - there is the other flipside that its more important to match the system of exits and entries....if you are short term enough then a correction may in fact be a trend :)

 

Personally I cringe when I hear the words over bought, oversold, expensive and cheap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...if you are short term enough then a correction may in fact be a trend :)

 

I agree. Which brings up an interesting point. What is a trend anyway? What you are saying, is that the definition of a trend is partly defined by how long a trader usually plans to stay in the trade.

 

I guess my idea of a trend is very much tied to whether price followed a high probability, typical pattern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree. Which brings up an interesting point. What is a trend anyway? What you are saying, is that the definition of a trend is partly defined by how long a trader usually plans to stay in the trade.

 

I guess my idea of a trend is very much tied to whether price followed a high probability, typical pattern.

 

if you are a day trader, then a trend lasts a day.

If you are entering on 5min charts then 12 of these might be enough to form a reasonable trend, but the hourly chart might be in chop.

so yes ..... how to define a trend is completely up the the trader, but not necessarily how long they plan to stay in the trade....you could enter on 5 min entries, and let things ride for days or months.

More important is to match what you are trying to do, in defining for yourself which trend you are trying to become friends with. Some trends are downright treacherous bas...ds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re: "the trend is your friend"

 

... with friends like that, who needs enemies ? ;)

 

 

///

 

... and which is a better friend for you* ?

The trend of your own 'timeframe' or the trend of 1 (or more) 'timeframe(s)' up?

 

* and I say "for you" because it really is system dependent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you are a day trader, then a trend lasts a day.

If you are entering on 5min charts then 12 of these might be enough to form a reasonable trend, but the hourly chart might be in chop.

so yes ..... how to define a trend is completely up the the trader, but not necessarily how long they plan to stay in the trade....you could enter on 5 min entries, and let things ride for days or months.

More important is to match what you are trying to do, in defining for yourself which trend you are trying to become friends with. Some trends are downright treacherous bas...ds.

 

for a daytrader, a trend lasts less than a day.

 

you can have a "\" day,

or a "V" day,

or a "W" day,

or a "N" day,

or a "M" day,

or an "A" day,

or a ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
for a daytrader, a trend lasts less than a day.

 

I like to think that most "swings" are just little multi-day "trends"

 

I day trade the currency swings by getting in and out at the beginning of a new swing and then reentering after the culmination of the first multi-hour consolidation sometime after the 5 pm Chicago opening (the next day, technically speaking) and ride the continuation to the next consolidation zone. Think of it as "surfing two waves off the same storm" while never carrying risk through a market close.

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
for a daytrader, a trend lasts less than a day.

 

you can have a "\" day,

or a "V" day,

or a "W" day,

or a "N" day,

or a "M" day,

or an "A" day,

or a ...

 

Yes, I agree. With something like the ES, S&P e-mini, where the smoothest trends are limited to only about an hour and a half or less in the morning, a trend can be half an hour. If you wait 5 to 10 minutes after the open to see where the ES is going, and if price gets choppy and slow at 10:30am, then you are looking at less than an hours worth of trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You forgot a Z day ....oh wait time cant run backwards though I guess if you straighten the centre section you get a ledge drop ledge. (You let Siuya straighten the 7) Then there is U (cup without handle).

 

My Platitude for the day "platitudes will not improve your trading":D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before we get all painted into corners here, some clarification.

While Trend has not been my most trustworthy, faithful friend – it has been a growing friendship. Over the years, we have become closer. Where the bottom line is concerned, my side of the friendship is just as responsible for our results as is Trend’s. Haven't been in fights with Trend across the years as often as I've fallen into that 'don't stay' bias some of us seem to be more susceptible to than others. I've done a lot of work on that... and I’m still working on our overall relationship…

 

btw, Trend will never be a best friend. My bff is Cycle…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Before we get all painted into corners here, some clarification.

While Trend has not been my most trustworthy, faithful friend – it has been a growing friendship. Over the years, we have become closer. Where the bottom line is concerned, my side of the friendship is just as responsible for our results as is Trend’s. Haven't been in fights with Trend across the years as often as I've fallen into that 'don't stay' bias some of us seem to be more susceptible to than others. I've done a lot of work on that... and I’m still working on our overall relationship…

 

btw, Trend will never be a best friend. My bff is Cycle…

 

zdo, I wonder if "Future Trends from Past Cyles" by Brian Millard was of any use to you then? Just thought I'd ask.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

macD,

 

Haven’t read Future Trends from Past Cycles by Brian Millard, but from looking at the TOC, it looks like an amplification / expansion of JMHurst’s published work.

Keeping this on topic... even Hurst blved that trend had more percentage weight on pricing that did cycles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo, if you don't mind can you recommend any particular book when it comes to cycles. Sorry to be a little off topic, just wanted to see if you'd found anything useful. I'm at that stage in my studies. Thanks.

Edited by clmacdougall
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are interested from a signal processing point of view Ehlers stuff is interesting. Needs quite good maths (degree level probably). Actually most of his stuff starts with separating the cyclical component from the trending component and goes from there. Pretty much all the time (that I can recall) he uses the hillbert transform to accomplish this. Several papers and indicators on the interwebz to see if worth splashing out on his books (not that they are that expensive)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Before we get all painted into corners here, some clarification.

While Trend has not been my most trustworthy, faithful friend – it has been a growing friendship. Over the years, we have become closer. Where the bottom line is concerned, my side of the friendship is just as responsible for our results as is Trend’s. Haven't been in fights with Trend across the years as often as I've fallen into that 'don't stay' bias some of us seem to be more susceptible to than others. I've done a lot of work on that... and I’m still working on our overall relationship…

 

btw, Trend will never be a best friend. My bff is Cycle…

 

only a psycho would want to be a friend of cycle. ;)

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using Stochastics, Cycles & R.S.I: …to the moment of decision … by George C. Lane is the first practical material on the subject I read... at about the same time I was being exposed to all the articles about how linear cycles don't exist/ work btw. (and it's true - linear cycles are much more reliable for both volatility and volume than they are for price) . This remains the simplest ( just using your eyeballs / no fancy math) book I have on the subject.

 

But first would be JM Hurst’s The Profit Magic of …. book

 

Finally, maybe study Glenn Suprenard’s work at Cycles?? What Cycles?

Glenn is an active daytrader who has pulled out the essence and filtered the Hurst techniques down into the shorter time frames (nominal 5 day, whole day, hourly, cycles. etc)

 

I do have all of John Ehlers books but haven’t personally derived much value from them, maybe because I only skimmed them and haven’t really read them ?? ;)

 

These are the only 'large body' cycles publications I have studied…(and be aware GC Lane's book is anything but large)

 

Most of my trading is off my own theories ... these theories don't conflict with the works above, rather they complicate them beyond what is comfortable for most…have also spent time researching and coding various cycle id methods (like Hilbert, etc)

have spent most time in research, testing, nn, etc the particular conditions conducive to using 'cycles' ….hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
only a psycho would want to be a friend of cycle.

 

:rofl:

stay out of my psychosis !

 

dude, your bff Trend is a ‘two faced’ (if not a completely multiple headed split personality) deviant. While I have had issues with fighting Trend at some points, as I discussed above, my bigger issue is with Trends’ hypocrisies … :helloooo:

Maybe Trend lies less to you than he does to me...

 

Bottom line though – only any given chart, my friend Cycle presents me with many more opportunities than does my friend Trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Borrowed but well used.

 

"Because man is subject to rhythmical procedure, calculations having to do with his activities can be projected far into the future with a justification and certainty heretofore unattainable" said Ralph Nelson Elliot, the creator of Elliot Wave theory.

 

A combination of Larger & Smaller time frames would help one get the most out of an established trend and a correction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made my first ever trade using an elliott wave count. I tripled my money in one trade on a sugar option in a day. But subsequently saw the elliott wave fail many times. I'm not so sure it's ideas are sound or predictive in nature, although I do agree with you that using multiple frames ( not necessarily time frames ) is essential to deciding upon bias, context and trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... But subsequently saw the elliott wave fail many times. I'm not so sure it's ideas are sound or predictive in nature...

 

re EW in general

Like macD, I also went through an Elliott phase and also had some amazing, windfall ‘Elliott’ trades at the beginning, then…

 

Over the years my favorite author on the subject is definitely Glenn Neely. However, your education will not be complete without some deep study of some of the other greats – Zoran Gayer and Dominick Mazza, to name a couple (of, unfortunately for us, dead guys).

 

Some of my more cynical thoughts on the subject can be found at

Trading Chaos by Bill Williams - Page 2 | Trade2Win Forums with particular emphasis on ‘response # 144’

…response # 377 was fun too…

 

Then one day it hit me – there is not one Elliott Wave pattern (and how it unfolds for real instead of the way it’s ‘supposed’ to) that can not be fully comprehended via the Summation of Cycles principle…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
re EW in general

 

Then one day it hit me – there is not one Elliott Wave pattern (and how it unfolds for real instead of the way it’s ‘supposed’ to) that can not be fully comprehended via the Summation of Cycles principle…

 

yes - where it starts where it stops and where you are at any one particular time depends on the person and as clmacdougall says - bias, context and trend.

 

Elliot wave for me works best when it presents itself......you can often see 5 clear waves in something with a clear 3rd wave.....that is a clear alert for me the trend for those waves might be tiring..... but I never try and count the waves....I let them appear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.