Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Trading Futures: Mini-sized DOW

Recommended Posts

Hello Fellow Traders,

 

I've posted here before and received some helpful advice so I thought I would try again.

 

I starting to dip my toe into in trading Futures, mini-sized Dow. I've researched in quite some depth the nature of the product and I understand the basics. For example, If I bought 10 mini-sized Dow contracts and the current price of the contract was $10548 and it moved 27 points to $10575 that would equate to a profit of $1350.00

 

10575 - 10548 = 27 points

27 Points x $5.00 per point = $135.00

10 Contracts x $135.00 = $1350.00

 

Now, I was wondering if someone to give some idea on how they manage risk? I'm sure some of you would say I ought to manage risk in futures the way I manage risk with equities.

 

However, I'm having problems translating the way I manage equities to the way I might manage futures. For example, when I'm trading stocks I normally base the number of shares I wish to trade on how much I willing to lose/risk on a trade. So if I stock is currently priced at $8 and the high was $10 and the low was $7 my entry would be the high and stop would be the low.

 

Now if I wanted to risk say $100 I would purchase 33 shares:

 

Number of shares: 100/(10-7) = 33

 

Can someone please guide me as to how relate the above risk management to futures, mini-sized DOW?

 

I only intend on buying one contract to start off with. Because the mini-sized DOW works on a point system and I'm only going to be trading a single contract I'm quite confused.

 

If you guys could show me how you manage risk, or point me to relevant websites I would be very grateful.

 

I hope I've explained myself well enough to get some positive feedback, however if you need additional clarification please let me know.

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Fellow Traders,

 

I've posted here before and received some helpful advice so I thought I would try again.

 

I starting to dip my toe into in trading Futures, mini-sized Dow. I've researched in quite some depth the nature of the product and I understand the basics. For example, If I bought 10 mini-sized Dow contracts and the current price of the contract was $10548 and it moved 27 points to $10575 that would equate to a profit of $1350.00

 

10575 - 10548 = 27 points

27 Points x $5.00 per point = $135.00

10 Contracts x $135.00 = $1350.00

 

Now, I was wondering if someone to give some idea on how they manage risk? I'm sure some of you would say I ought to manage risk in futures the way I manage risk with equities.

 

However, I'm having problems translating the way I manage equities to the way I might manage futures. For example, when I'm trading stocks I normally base the number of shares I wish to trade on how much I willing to lose/risk on a trade. So if I stock is currently priced at $8 and the high was $10 and the low was $7 my entry would be the high and stop would be the low.

 

Now if I wanted to risk say $100 I would purchase 33 shares:

 

Number of shares: 100/(10-7) = 33

 

Can someone please guide me as to how relate the above risk management to futures, mini-sized DOW?

 

I only intend on buying one contract to start off with. Because the mini-sized DOW works on a point system and I'm only going to be trading a single contract I'm quite confused.

 

If you guys could show me how you manage risk, or point me to relevant websites I would be very grateful.

 

I hope I've explained myself well enough to get some positive feedback, however if you need additional clarification please let me know.

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

 

my questions: (the answer can affect your venture into futures trading)

 

1. do you use margin to trade stocks? how much margin do you usually use?

 

2. what percentage of your account do you use to buy 1 stock?

 

3. how long do you hold your stock?

 

4. what do you do when a position goes against you? do you have a plan before hand? or react as you go?

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re “how relate the above risk management to futures, mini-sized DOW?”

As you have described it, you are switching from variable sizing with stocks to fixed sizing with YM. So, you will have to change the way you determine your “risk”

 

The ‘guidance’ I would offer you

1. also switch from ‘how much I willing to lose/risk on a trade” to “the tested optimal amount to lose per trade specific to the system I am trading”

2. one contract trading is a tough game to win at. Consider, if you have the capital, re-introducing sizing calculations ie multiple contracts, into the mix…

hth

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams

 

Thanks for responding

 

At the moment, I well capitalized so don't really need margin.

 

I use no more than 2% of my account to buy one stock.

 

I hold my stock for maximum of seven days.

 

I have a pre-defined stop for when I position goes against me..

 

So, any ideas?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

carlton,re "but can you help me or no?"

I can only try :) . Basically, I'm encouraging you to delve a little bit more deeply into mm and sizing

Let me rephrase my suggestions and see if that helps. But first a question - do you understand the difference between variable sizing and fixed sizing and how in the quote below you are switching from variable to fixed?

 

For example, when I'm trading stocks I normally base the number of shares I wish to trade on how much I willing to lose/risk on a trade. So if I stock is currently priced at $8 and the high was $10 and the low was $7 my entry would be the high and stop would be the low.

 

Now if I wanted to risk say $100 I would purchase 33 shares:

 

Number of shares: 100/(10-7) = 33

 

Can someone please guide me as to how relate the above risk management to futures, mini-sized DOW?

 

I only intend on buying one contract to start off with. Because the mini-sized DOW works on a point system and I'm only going to be trading a single contract I'm quite confused.

Your previous method will not transfer directly. The only thing that can transfer is the preferred amount at risk per trade approach ( which I argue against below). So, with one contract, by whatever method the amount is derived - if you are using a dollar amt. stop, then simply divide that $ amt at risk by 5 and that's how many ticks away from your entry to place your stop.

 

Now to rephrase

Suggestion 1 was a more general trading suggestion to base placing your stops in the neighborhood of what has tested out to be the best stop method for your particular trading system instead of placing your stops on how much you are comfortable losing (ie syschological reasons). If you transfer the "Now if I wanted to risk say $100 " way of setting risk over to one contract YM trading, you might get lucky enough to put your stops close to where they actually should be and survive - but I doubt very seriously that approach would thrive.

Suggestion 2 was simply pushing you to delve a little bit more deeply into mm and sizing on your own

 

All the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Fellow Traders,

 

 

10575 - 10548 = 27 points

27 Points x $5.00 per point = $135.00

10 Contracts x $135.00 = $1350.00

 

Carlton

 

Hey, Carlton.

 

Here is how I reduce risk. It has worked very well for me for several years now.

I use scaling out to reduce risk. I set my 1st target or half my position at 10 ticks. It is the magic number for me. Not the holy grail but works a high percentage of the time. This gives me a break even cushion and reduced the % of my loses.

 

From your scenario above:

 

Your trade earned 270 ticks

 

Scaling out:

5 contacts x 10 ticks = 50 ticks

5 contracts x 27 ticks = 135 ticks

 

Scaling out earned 185 tick but it reduced the risk from 100% to 0% once you've captured the 1st 10 ticks. It's nothing new. Scaling has been around for a very long time because is lowers the overall risk to your portfolio.

 

Trade Well!

 

BigAl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm pretty sure that a Russian resident would say that recessions are real today. Their prime interest rate is 21%, their corporate military contractors are threatening to file bankruptcy, and sticks of butter are kept under lock and key in their grocery stores because shoplifters are stealing it in bulk so they can resell it on the black market. A downturn is cyclical until it turns into a collapse. I really don't think anyone will be buying-into this mess.😬
    • Well said. This principle is highly analogous to trading. Any human can easily click buy or sell when they "feel" that price is about to go up or down. The problem with feeling, commonly referred to as "instinctive" trading, is that it cannot be quantified. And because it cannot be quantified, it cannot be empirically tested. Instinctive trading has the lowest barrier to entry and therefore returns the lowest reward. As this is true for most things in life, this comes as no surprise. Unfortunately, the lowest barrier to entry is attractive to new traders for obvious reasons. This actually applied to me decades ago.🤭   It's only human nature to seek the highest amount of reward in exchange for the lowest amount of work. In fact, I often say that there is massive gray area between efficiency and laziness. Fortunately, losing for a living inspired me to investigate the work of Wall Street quants who refer to us as "fishfood" or "cannonfodder." Although I knew that we as retail traders cannot exploit execution rebates or queues like quants do, I learned that we can engage in automated scalp, swing, and trend trading. The thermonuclear caveat here, is that I had no idea how to write code (or program) trading algorithms. So I gravitated toward interface-based algorithm builders that required no coding knowledge (see human nature, aforementioned). In retrospect, I should never have traded code written by builder software because it's buggy and inefficient. However, my paid subscription to the builder software allowed me to view the underlying source code of the generated trading algo--which was written in MQL language. Due to a lack of customization in the builder software, I inevitably found myself editing the code. This led me to coding research which, in turn, led me to abandoning the builder software and coding custom algo's from scratch. Fast forward to the present, I can now code several trading strategies per day across 2 different platforms. Considering how inefficient manual backtesting is, coding is a huge advantage. When a new trading concept hits me, I can write the algo, backtest it, and optimize it within an hour or so--across multiple exchanges and symbols, and cycle through hundreds of different settings for each input. And then I get pages upon pages of performance metrics with the best settings pre-highlighted. Having said all of this, I am by no means an advanced programmer. IMHO, advanced programmers write API gateways, construct their own custom trading platforms, use high end computers with field programmable gateway array chips, and set up shop in close proximity to the exchanges. In any event, a considerable amount of work is required just to get toward the top of the "fishfood"/"cannonfodder" pool. Another advantage of coding is that it forces me to write trade entry and exit conditions (triggers) in black & white, thereby causing me to think microscopically about my precise trade trigger conditions. For example, I have to decide whether the algo should track the slope, angle, and level of each bar price and indicator to be used. Typing a hard number like 50 degrees of angle into code is a lot different than merely looking at a chart myself and saying, that's close enough.  Code doesn't acknowledge "maybe" nor "feelings." Either the math (code) works (is profitable) or doesn't work (is a loser). It doesn't get angry, sad, nor overly optimistic. And it can trade virtually 24 hours per day, 5 days per week. If you learn to code, you'll eventually reach a point where coding an algo that trades as you intended provides its own sense of accomplishment. Soon after, making money in the market merely becomes a side effect of your new job--coding. This is how I compete, at least for now, in this wide world of trading. I highly recommend it.  
    • VRA Vera Bradley stock watch, pull back to 5.08 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?VRA
    • MU Micron stock watch, pull back to 102.83 gap support area with high trade quality at https://stockconsultant.com/?MU
    • ACLX Arcellx stock watch, trending at 84.6 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?ACLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.