Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

emg

What Demographic is Most Likely to Lose in Trading?

Recommended Posts

What demographics is most likely to lose in trading?

 

 

#1 Women/Female

 

Women are the worst traders ever! However, there are 2 kinds of women: Dyke and barbie doll women. Dyke is most likely to become a successful trader than a barbie doll women. Dyke has balls to trade large quantities.

 

#2 Age 18-30 years old

 

In this group, they are proud to become an adult. They are proud not to live at home with their parent. They are not married or are in the process of getting marry and will do anything to have fun (bars, nightclub vegas, drugs, etc etc etc). They have limited income and look at trading as gambling. These people will most likely to start trading less than $5000. Can't blame them due to limited income.

 

#3 Blue Collar workers

 

In this group, most of them do not have college degree. These group falls in the lower middleclass and lower class. Blue collar define as:

 

A blue-collar worker is a member of the working class who typically performs manual labor and earns an hourly wage. Blue-collar workers are distinguished from those in the service sector

 

Majority of this group search for the holy grail system through google search.

 

#4 Age 65 years old and up

 

In this group, they are retired after 40 years of working and looking to have fun (enjoy life). Majority of this group are the victim of getting scam by the 3rd party educational vendors.

 

#5 Age 30-55 years old

 

In this group, most are in the process of changing career and look at trading as get rich quick after reading many books like soros, warren buffet, etc, etc. They dream of sending their kids to havard. They dream of owning a yacht. They dream of trading at home instead of working at an office. However, it is this group has a higher chance of becoming a successful traders vs others above. They are matured.

 

 

I am looking for a good answer. Bring them up!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow this has the potential to create some angry people!! :-)

 

my vote is #2 Age 18-30 years old for the exact reasons you described. they are gambling hoping to hit it big ...and will most likely end up losing. if they aren't 'trading', they are betting on sports, playing online poker, or spending time in casinos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GREAT(very very bad thought) thanks in name of all women i don't like how ,you describe and paint the women,not all women fortunally aren't so.Sorry but you aren't the holy bible that it's so and stop!

i'm very very angry. .

 

ahimsa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to post a response to this thread but I really don't even know where to begin...

 

How about...do you have any data or studies to back up such a claims, emg?...particularly the section on women? That was pretty low, to say the least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it matters. As much as any member of a particular demographic wishes to believe that there is another group more likely to lose money than theirs, it really doesn't matter. There may be a slight skew at any given time but really there are plenty of trading losers in all walks of life. I actually disagree about women. If they were more inclined to try trading, actually many may do pretty well. Take a look at females in school. Always work hard, prepare well and have little ego. Of course this is general but I would say it's more prevalent in women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First the women had ever worked hard more of man because we further works had family childs and all concern the house family organization.but in trading i don't care that is a sexual or demographic factor,all know that the 90% of traders are looser.maybe.its hard fight whit who made the market. after come the istitutional world and banks and we know the rest 5%that win because applied to trading pshichological ,technical and fundamental path and respect for him/herself and other.without care to discriminate none to apart for gender,age or other.second the profitable trader are more humble and its very difficult that wrote in a forum ,i'm strong i'm very profitable,and i'm the unic bla bla bla.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahimsa,

 

I understand why it might upset you somewhat if someone were to insinuate that women are somehow inferior traders, but don't you think it might be an important idea to explore? On a purely prejudiced level, I think the question has little relevance, but from an intellectual standpoint it's a good question. The way women are naturally and the way women develop based on environmental interactions is clearly very different to men. There must be some useful studies out there on this that actually could help us all to better understand ourselves as traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MadMarketScientist said:
wow this has the potential to create some angry people!! :-)

 

my vote is #2 Age 18-30 years old for the exact reasons you described. they are gambling hoping to hit it big ...and will most likely end up losing. if they aren't 'trading', they are betting on sports, playing online poker, or spending time in casinos.

 

Add drinking, eating like a champ, and a bunch of loose women and you have paradise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the demographics of people who WILL fail according to a poll I took. The sample size was one. I interviewed myself. Attached is a the data file, including statistical analysis.

 

 

People who will fail at trading:

 

  1. People with minivans - It's been proven that people with minivans have to many things to do, and can't become totally obsessed with the study of trading.
  2. People who like watching court television shows - People who like watching Judge Judy have been studied, and it's been proven that their brains have atrophied.
  3. People with degrees in Political Science - People with degrees in Political Science have been proven to not be able to deal with real world situations, and can never face the real solution.
  4. Former World Wrestling Federation (WWF) champions - They smash their computer equipment.

 

 

People who are most likely to succeed at trading:

 

  1. Nudest - They have no fear of things that are immaterial to trading.
  2. Circus Performers - They know how to deal with risk
  3. Septic System Cleaners and Garbage Disposal Collectors - They are persistent in the face of difficulty
  4. Illusionists - They know the difference between a fake price move and the real thing

 

This is original material. I just thought it up. Comedians came in fifth for people most likely to succeed at trading.

 

Tradewinds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think about this:

 

if you are a woman, the odds are higher a woman will fall in the 90% catagory.

If you are 21 years old, the odds are higher he/she will fall int eh 90% catagory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  emg said:
think about this:

 

if you are a woman, the odds are higher a woman will fall in the 90% catagory.

If you are 21 years old, the odds are higher he/she will fall int eh 90% catagory.

 

Personally, when I was in my teens and early 20's I made a hell of a lot more trading since it did not matter if I lost everything. Now it does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an interesting article:

 

Sorry, but women can’t trade

 

8 March 2011

 

 

As it’s International Women’s Day and everyone’s bemoaning the fact that women don’t have a better deal in life, I’d like to make a brief point: I have tried to employ women as traders; it doesn’t work.

 

Much as it pains me to say so, the reality seems to be that women can’t trade prop. Show me a woman who’s a competent prop trader. I’ll show you a man in disguise.

 

I have tried very hard to disprove this theory.

 

I have hired plenty of women. None of them have ever stuck at it. They all started off in a very conscientious and analytical manner and were very keen, but after two or three months it was all over.

 

Why?

 

I blame two things: emotion and boredom.

 

When a woman trades, it doesn’t take long before she becomes emotionally involved in what she’s doing. She loses the discipline that’s needed to make money consistently. She fails to maximise profits and fails to minimise losses.

 

She also becomes bored. Staring at a screen all day doesn’t seem to offer the mental stimulation that a woman requires. Women need interactivity. In my experience, they’re better at relationship-based trading. When it’s just them and the screen, it doesn’t work.

 

I wish this wasn’t the case. I wish I didn’t have to be the one to point it out. But someone needs to. This isn't a qualitative judgement. In this industry, performance is measured very simply in terms of P&L. I have given a lot of female traders a chance. None of them have taken it.

 

The author is an anonymous (male) prop trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  emg said:
Here is an interesting article:

 

Sorry, but women can’t trade

 

8 March 2011

 

 

As it’s International Women’s Day and everyone’s bemoaning the fact that women don’t have a better deal in life, I’d like to make a brief point: I have tried to employ women as traders; it doesn’t work.

 

Much as it pains me to say so, the reality seems to be that women can’t trade prop. Show me a woman who’s a competent prop trader. I’ll show you a man in disguise.

 

I have tried very hard to disprove this theory.

 

I have hired plenty of women. None of them have ever stuck at it. They all started off in a very conscientious and analytical manner and were very keen, but after two or three months it was all over.

 

Why?

 

I blame two things: emotion and boredom.

 

When a woman trades, it doesn’t take long before she becomes emotionally involved in what she’s doing. She loses the discipline that’s needed to make money consistently. She fails to maximise profits and fails to minimise losses.

 

She also becomes bored. Staring at a screen all day doesn’t seem to offer the mental stimulation that a woman requires. Women need interactivity. In my experience, they’re better at relationship-based trading. When it’s just them and the screen, it doesn’t work.

 

I wish this wasn’t the case. I wish I didn’t have to be the one to point it out. But someone needs to. This isn't a qualitative judgement. In this industry, performance is measured very simply in terms of P&L. I have given a lot of female traders a chance. None of them have taken it.

 

The author is an anonymous (male) prop trader.

 

That is so silly. It's a mile from proving anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
Ahimsa,

 

I understand why it might upset you somewhat if someone were to insinuate that women are somehow inferior traders, but don't you think it might be an important idea to explore? On a purely prejudiced level, I think the question has little relevance, but from an intellectual standpoint it's a good question. The way women are naturally and the way women develop based on environmental interactions is clearly very different to men. There must be some useful studies out there on this that actually could help us all to better understand ourselves as traders.

 

 

yes could be an important idea to explored ... but only because are 5 on 1000 women try to become a trader or simply studied this topic or inly for passion for financial markets.for me its the same comparison..to the women that try to run in F1 .they ..are a number very very less than a men ..it's only a minority factor..and isn't neither a speech of excellent matematic mind because there are many woman with a excellent matematic mind.I 'm only very angry with who generalize(and if you go away with the posts you can saw that who opened this trhead again continued to generalize the debate.very,very banal )why said woman are bored in trading......depends in that way they trade.if i work with a more big rest,maybe is different...but if i made scalping ...i'm not bored.but that i must read that woman can't trade is ridicolus.i trade for myself i used my money(but is more the time that i observe and study the market) and i never hear that there are so many man that give a chance for trade for other people.another banal thing is the woman with balls trade with more qualtity.......i will say ....the woman and the man if had a big quantity of money to invest in financial market maybe trade with more quantity because the pain if they lose is less.for the simple way that who had less money if lose all the day after don't can trade the magnate the day after can begining a new day ...for trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  emg said:
I have hired plenty of women. None of them have ever stuck at it.

 

If 90% of all traders fail, you would have needed to have hired at least 10 women to get one that could make money. If the failure rate is 95%, you would have needed to hire 20 women to assure that one succeeded. 20 * 0.5 = 1

 

Of course, you may have noticed a success rate in men, that you didn't see in women, regardless of what the statistics are. I don't know.

 

I'm not trying to make a case either way. But there is a serious problem with making absolute statements without some kind of information that is then used for some kind of a rational proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tradewinds said:
These are the demographics of people who WILL fail according to a poll I took. The sample size was one. I interviewed myself. Attached is a the data file, including statistical analysis.

 

 

People who will fail at trading:

 

  1. People with minivans - It's been proven that people with minivans have to many things to do, and can't become totally obsessed with the study of trading.
  2. People who like watching court television shows - People who like watching Judge Judy have been studied, and it's been proven that their brains have atrophied.
  3. People with degrees in Political Science - People with degrees in Political Science have been proven to not be able to deal with real world situations, and can never face the real solution.
  4. Former World Wrestling Federation (WWF) champions - They smash their computer equipment.

 

 

People who are most likely to succeed at trading:

 

  1. Nudest - They have no fear of things that are immaterial to trading.
  2. Circus Performers - They know how to deal with risk
  3. Septic System Cleaners and Garbage Disposal Collectors - They are persistent in the face of difficulty
  4. Illusionists - They know the difference between a fake price move and the real thing

 

This is original material. I just thought it up. Comedians came in fifth for people most likely to succeed at trading.

 

Tradewinds

 

nice...i like more the second list ...especially..the 1 and the 4...very nice interwiew,,,:).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  emg said:
What demographics is most likely to lose in trading?

 

 

#1 Women/Female

 

Women are the worst traders ever! However, there are 2 kinds of women: Dyke and barbie doll women. Dyke is most likely to become a successful trader than a barbie doll women. Dyke has balls to trade large quantities.

 

#2 Age 18-30 years old

 

In this group, they are proud to become an adult. They are proud not to live at home with their parent. They are not married or are in the process of getting marry and will do anything to have fun (bars, nightclub vegas, drugs, etc etc etc). They have limited income and look at trading as gambling. These people will most likely to start trading less than $5000. Can't blame them due to limited income.

 

#3 Blue Collar workers

 

In this group, most of them do not have college degree. These group falls in the lower middleclass and lower class. Blue collar define as:

 

A blue-collar worker is a member of the working class who typically performs manual labor and earns an hourly wage. Blue-collar workers are distinguished from those in the service sector

 

Majority of this group search for the holy grail system through google search.

 

#4 Age 65 years old and up

 

In this group, they are retired after 40 years of working and looking to have fun (enjoy life). Majority of this group are the victim of getting scam by the 3rd party educational vendors.

 

#5 Age 30-55 years old

 

In this group, most are in the process of changing career and look at trading as get rich quick after reading many books like soros, warren buffet, etc, etc. They dream of sending their kids to havard. They dream of owning a yacht. They dream of trading at home instead of working at an office. However, it is this group has a higher chance of becoming a successful traders vs others above. They are matured.

 

 

I am looking for a good answer. Bring them up!!

 

1 - they have less emotional attachment apparently, and make good traders in general though few are attracted to a male dominated industry

 

2 - nothing to lose and so little fear. if they screw up, they just find another career. They have more objectivity but their ego can destroy them if theyre not cut out for it.

 

3 - these guys tend to have more street smart. more instinct. they dont have the education that blinds college kids into believing theory, laws, natural order, the world owes them a living attitude that just doesnt exist in the market.

 

4- may get scammed, but also may have the money/nest egg for it to be a hobby and not care, thus benefiting from #2. Depends if they have a good nest egg or not

 

5- sound desperate to change their lives and unhappy with the 9-5 job/rat race. Too eager to win rather than understand to change their lot in life. I dont think they can win if desperate - they are more likely to gamble in the hope of the dream. Keep throwing money into accounts and losing it. Probably the biggest demographic of losers.

 

The fact is, if you trade for the money/American dream, the odds are slim. Those who win dont worry about the money. Its only if you can look at the market without a care that you can see what the market is doing and put a position on and manage it with a clear head.

 

Thats why the boards are full of paper trader millionaires, but as soon as it comes to real money, it all falls apart.

 

Be happy with what you have in life now. Appreciate it. You have a lot more than 2/3 of the

world who live in poverty. Youre lucky. Markets dont matter. Be happy with what you have, truly happy, then you can move forward.

 

Read the Bible. Understand Gods Word.

 

The Dude abides.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EMG - post 12 - Show me a woman who’s a competent prop trader. I’ll show you a man in disguise.

 

I have worked with female traders who are good, and this is an apt description. Its not that women cannot trade, its just that often it seems that they adopt male characteristics to do so. Otherwise EMG, have you recently become divorced or broken up with the girlfriend? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.