Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MadMarketScientist

Beliefs About Retirement

Recommended Posts

most people will not have enough money for retirement - they get sold on the idea of driving off into the sunset to spend their money.

newsflash - 20 years of retirement money disappears very quickly when you have a speed hump like the GFC, your promised double digit returns only come in at 6%pa, inflation is at 4%, and you actually live for 30 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is disgusting more now than ever, is that if you retire and your home is paid, cars are paid, and you have $1,000,000 in liquid assets that you need to use as income, you can only earn about 3.5% safely on the money which means that you have 35k of income.

 

SS will give you, if married somewhere around 2500, so between ss and your interest income you will be making around 60k in retirement.

 

Keep in mind that when you are retired, you are not working so you cannot invest aggressively because you cannot replace the capital if you lose it and you need the capital to generate income. You do not need it next year, you need it now.

 

If you live in the new york metro area, your home is probably still worth about 500k or higher so you have a total net worth of 1.5 million, but you pay about 10k in taxes on your house so your net income is about 45k.

 

You retire a millionaire and you live like a peasant. Most don't try to make the money last.

Its part of my business and I assure you that not many people retire with the million to begin with and they quickly go through their assets and are broke in about 5-7 years. It is pretty sad. These guys where successful executives and are broke before they are 75.

 

Its also difficult to gauge what costs are going to be. Costs generally triple every 20 years, the fed tries to make them double but misses by a little. In addition, we do not know what technologies we are going to have in the future that we are going to want to have or need to pay for. A person retiring in 1980 did not have a cell phone or cable TV and the internet. Cable TV, internet and a cell phone cost about $300 a month. We can hardly imagine living without them now.

 

But thank god that an Ipad2 is relatively less expensive.

 

The people who I deal with who do enjoy retirement have ongoing family businesses. You need to have good relationships with your children and they need to want to be in the business and you need to trust that they are capable of operating the business. Technically, these people never retire, they sort of just slow down and take long vacations and then get sick and die. Its not too likely that a corporation will let you do that. Large corporations do not tolerate the aged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
What is disgusting more now than ever, is that if you retire and your home is paid, cars are paid, and you have $1,000,000 in liquid assets that you need to use as income, you can only earn about 3.5% safely on the money which means that you have 35k of income.

 

SS will give you, if married somewhere around 2500, so between ss and your interest income you will be making around 60k in retirement.

 

Keep in mind that when you are retired, you are not working so you cannot invest aggressively because you cannot replace the capital if you lose it and you need the capital to generate income. You do not need it next year, you need it now.

 

If you live in the new york metro area, your home is probably still worth about 500k or higher so you have a total net worth of 1.5 million, but you pay about 10k in taxes on your house so your net income is about 45k.

 

You retire a millionaire and you live like a peasant. Most don't try to make the money last.

Its part of my business and I assure you that not many people retire with the million to begin with and they quickly go through their assets and are broke in about 5-7 years. It is pretty sad. These guys where successful executives and are broke before they are 75.

 

Its also difficult to gauge what costs are going to be. Costs generally triple every 20 years, the fed tries to make them double but misses by a little. In addition, we do not know what technologies we are going to have in the future that we are going to want to have or need to pay for. A person retiring in 1980 did not have a cell phone or cable TV and the internet. Cable TV, internet and a cell phone cost about $300 a month. We can hardly imagine living without them now.

 

But thank god that an Ipad2 is relatively less expensive.

 

The people who I deal with who do enjoy retirement have ongoing family businesses. You need to have good relationships with your children and they need to want to be in the business and you need to trust that they are capable of operating the business. Technically, these people never retire, they sort of just slow down and take long vacations and then get sick and die. Its not too likely that a corporation will let you do that. Large corporations do not tolerate the aged.

 

You live in a great world MM ... imagine having to worry about managing a $1.5 million asset, and that still not being enough to retire on.

 

I will never be able to retire. I have few assets, and few prospects of ever amassing anything worth a mugger's time. But I got over that years ago - as soon as the situation became plain to me, I began learning how to understand and manage the financial markets.

 

That has largely been unsuccessful, and I am beginning to wonder whether break-even is all there is to this game. I don't want to just "break-even" - I would rather just leave it alone, and go spend time with my grand-kids.

 

However, with the material stuff behind, there is still much in life to be happy and pleased about. I would love to have an income of about half my current salary, but that isn't going to happen either. So I turn to less stressful thoughts - of music, poetry, achievement in non-material areas, and writing. And I wonder a lot more about the truth and meaning of life, spirituality, and what it is all about.

 

I'll bet you a sneeze to a cream-puff that I will be happier in my retirement than you might be in yours ... except that I will still be doing something ... ... anything except enjoying the fruit of my life's labour. And you know what - I don't mind at all - I'd rather be active and busy, than redundant and affluent, strangely enough.

 

Someone once said: "A speculator who dies wealthy, dies before his time."

 

Don't get me wrong - I am not making any distinction about the situation by any means - the truth is I would like to be in your situation.

 

But that dog ain't gonna hunt!

 

To borrow a quote: "I have never worked so hard for easy money."

To which I have to add - "Obviously I am still not working hard enough."

 

It keeps me humble, and identifying with the bulk of the world's people.

And I have absolutely no stress about taxes and the government taking anything from me ... they already have it all! And I have no fear of anyone stealing any of my assets, or of any bank failing and taking me out in the process!

 

If you want to see how you are doing, look no further than here ... Global Rich List

 

Be well

Be happy

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TjXy2pJXJI]YouTube - Jim Rohn: How to Avoid Being Broke and Stupid[/ame]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.