Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

StevenSJC

Why the S&P E-Mini Stinks

Recommended Posts

I never was attracted too much by the ES. I was trading the Russell long before the ICE took it over. Look at the ES on a 1min chart or lower (tick chart) and all you will see are a bunch of dots and specks. Look at the same period on the TF and you would have a hard time telling the difference between say a 65 tick chart and a daily or weekly chart in terms of bar structure. If your system is pattern specific the ES blows on short time frames. The TF is the only market that suprised me when I went real time in terms of my fills. Do you find that the ES fills your limit orders 60% of the time when they are just touched

( 2 lots)? The TF does!! Try it for a day and you will be suprised. Also factor in the revised margins rates from the ICE $2900 for overnight!! Contrast that with the ES which is still $5600 I think that the ICE is trying to lure people away from the NQ and ES. That's not to say that you cannot make money with the ES I just think that the TF is a much easier market to trade. I've seen trades that were profitable on the TF that would have resulted in a loss on the ES just because the ES was not volitile enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Trader_Matt said:
Interesting thread everyone. I have been trading the ES Emini for quite some time and have consistently heard the argument made that it cannot be traded or that it isn't the best market for trading.

 

You are not getting the point that is made in this thread!!!

 

Nobody is telling you that it is impossible to make money trading the ES! All we are saying is that if you CAN make money in the ES you can probably make MORE and EASIER, trading other future markets!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say you cannot make money with the ES, I said and I quote "That's not to say that you cannot make money with the ES I just think that the TF is a much easier market to trade."

 

And as for the "Stop saying that you don't get filled that's stupid" comment I didn't say that you don't get filled I said that 60% the of the time trading Russell I get filled on my limiit orders trading 2 lots when they are just touched and not traded through. Not so with the ES. With the ES you would have to hit the bid and ask buttons more often than not as compaired to the Russell when your limit order is not traded through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are talking about ES the way most futures traders talk about Nat Gas or Wheat.

 

The ES is a choppy, mean reverting instrument due to all the algos and arbitrageurs that trade it. If you compare it to other indexes, however, they all track each other intraday. So, some systems would still work on it, choppy or no, and the advantage of the ES is that you can scale your system up like a mother if it works.

 

For example, if you like to fade moves intraday for several ticks, the ES would be an instrument I'd advise you to look at. If you like to ride trends or trade wild markets, I would advise you to stay away. You also have to develop the judgement to know when you need to lift the offer or hit the bid to get in, as AuctionMarket said. The nice thing about the ES is that you could lift in with 100 if you needed to. Try that on the YM and see where it gets you.

 

I'm not advocating that people go and trade Spoo, I just think it's funny that people think it can't be traded, or that all the best traders trade it. Some people who are very good at trading ES would get their ass kicked trading crude, or soybeans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Emotion said:
You are not getting the point that is made in this thread!!!

 

Nobody is telling you that it is impossible to make money trading the ES! All we are saying is that if you CAN make money in the ES you can probably make MORE and EASIER, trading other future markets!

 

 

 

Easier markets to trade is relative to the individual. An easy market for me is not necessarily an easy market for you and your easy market is not necessarily an easy market for another trader. That is what I am saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technical in the sense that they adhere to the same technical setups each day. When the trend fails you can have confidence trading in the new direction because the setups are reliable. (A 15-min chart is my preference).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  StevenSJC said:
I know it's probably sacrilege around here to insult the vaunted S&P e-mini but I'm willing to bet it blows up more traders than any futures market.

 

If more people would start trading the Russell vs. the S&P I guarantee failure rates while high, would be lower.

 

Agreed. Moreover, if everyone learned to trade the currencies (easily the best trending markets on the planet, and way easier to trade), the exchange could just retire the sacred cow altogether...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are some very compelling reasons why some people I know prefer to trade e-mini YM to stocks (off the top of my head).

 

- can day trade without needing $25,000+ in the account

- Comissions are decent $4/round turn trip on the YM

- As I dont have to wake up at 6am and scan for stocks to trade

- Tax Reasons - You don't have to list every sale on your return! (for people in the USA)

- The $5/tick range of the YM makes for lower slippage(ES, ER too volitale=bad slippage)

- The spreads are never going to be huge like they can get on stocks

- Focusing on one instrument day in and day out is less complicated and more productive

- It's liquid enough. Market orders are instant. No weird fills

- Share size allocation is easier. I trade from 3-8 contracts depending on the setup

- I've held a stock that plunged 20 pts due to random company event. While econ reports move the futures. It's never been THAT bad

- There are always shorts available

 

If anyone has any more to add??

 

mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mslk - i dont think anyone would argue futures arent a better day trading vehicle than stocks. well ok then, some people would, but there we go.

 

i say tom-at-oh, you say tom-aye-toe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mslk- most of the benefits on that list encompass futures as a whole not just the /YM. Multi-item futures offer superior tax treatment and accounting benefits for sure. I also find those markets to adhere to technical systems better than some individual stocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'll bite... Why does this subject slam the ES? Of course there are reasons to trade futures over stocks, but after a long time trading them both, I think the ES is a superior instrument over the YM (for funded, experienced traders). Both products have personalities, but they are different. Traders must know the characteristics of their preferred products. To do otherwise will only make you a DONOR.

 

I liken it to hunting... know your prey, know it's habits. Stalk it patiently, and with a plan. Take your prize and get on with your life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well as a newbie trader myself, i'm looking for the 'most probable' market to make money in. if my daily target is $250, thats only 5 points x $50\point - easy right? well no, as the mini S&P only moves 20 points or so a day so I'm trying to capture 25% of the daily movement ... which has been tough! but the currency futures move much more and so it appears there is more opportunity to capture the equivalent points trading fx vs. emini. is this correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually like the ES for the most part......very stable with LOTS of liquidity and LOTS of commercial (not retailers) participation. The more commercial participation the better for using Cumulative Delta Volume as a proxy to track the ongoing open interest.

 

I think one reason many developing traders have problems with Equity Index instruments like the ES is not paying attention to Equities action (during US cash session and during EU cash session hours). For example, during US cash session hours Equities BUY and SELL program activity tugs the ES around most of the day. The large liquidity participants holding open interest in the ES then have to constantly adjust/react to this Equities action. Traders that do not understand how to track this process then get perplexed by the price action. When Equities action is dormant, the ES is a range bound chop fest. When Equities is pounding BUY or SELL programs, the ES can trend into great runs of covering action (large liquidity participants dumping out of held inventory) dominating the order flow.

 

Find a way to track the cycling of the Equities BUY and SELL program activity and you will get a much better perspective into the ES price action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Fulcrum, I look at the NYSE and NASDAQ Breadth, AD Line, Tick, and Trin throughout the day when I trade the ES. Acts as a great barometer for what's really going on 'under the hood' with the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I trade the ES almost exclusively. A lot of people say it is the hardest market but I like it: it is easy for me. Honestly, most of the markets are correlated now and so it doesn't matter what you trade, if you can call direction.

 

I've only just started trading the crude. From my personal experience, the ES tends to trend more clearly and throughout the day whereas the crude likes to jump around and make some violent moves. You just need to find a market/style that suites you. If you like selling at the open and holding to the close (selling/buying) then the ES is a pretty good market. If you like buying an intraday sell off then you may like crude better or for scalping.

 

Having said that, day trading in a bull market can be difficult because the moves occur overnight and then you are left with a tiny range. For DAY TRADING only then I don't like stocks but it would be hard to deny that there is probably more opportunity in stocks.

 

One aspect about the ES that makes it popular is that I feel it is fairly level playing field. I am not so sure that the playing field is as level when dealing with commodities or Forex for that matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one of the initial remarks in this thread was that it very often seems your order is only filled when the price breaks through. It seems that there is always a lot in front of you and you are always last in line. Not sure if front running is possible. I do not trade ES at the moment. My system automatically sends orders to the market but I send the last price as the limit price. Often I have to wait fro the order to get filled. ES gives far more problems than for instance TF, EMD and CL even though ES is far more liquid. Anyway, this is my observation. I guess front running is not possible but I do not use L2 so did not study it. With stocks they front run for sure using these fractional prices like 25.2400001. ES does not have these fractional prices as far as I know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya I only have it happen every so often (getting filled at the bid/ask without it trading through). Sometimes have my order or a handful of contracts will fill at the bid then it trades through and the remainder is filled. It has everything to do with your data connection and where you are in line (FIFO) First in First Out.

 

You can also setup 'market if touched' orders instead of using a straight limit order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  StevenSJC said:

It's very difficult at times to get a fill unless price moves through your price. It is quite subjective because your system might hit target but you won't so what do you do?

 

Read this whole thread, and no one mentioned this, ironically other than the OP: there's also more volume. Create a rough ratio of TradeVolume:BestBidorAskVolume and compare. Below I used very rough estimates of the best bid/ask sizes, keep in mind I only trade the ES so that's what I'm most familiar with. TradeVolume is today's average volume on a 5min chart from 9:30-12:00est. The numbers below look very close if you consider statistical noise. Furthermore, given that the numbers don't include slippage (ES never has a spread greater than 1 tick in the day), ES looks better.

 

And no, I don't feel like a badass trading the S&P, maybe if I trade it in the pit or trade CL/6E (controlling 125000 euros yo).

 

ES:

26k/400 = 65

 

TF:

1500/30 = 50

 

YM:

1500/25 = 60

 

NQ:

3100/40 = 78

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.