Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

iwshares

Coin Toss and Money Management

Recommended Posts

At the moment my trading system allows for a 2:1 profit loss ratio e.g. 16 pip limit, 8 pip loss. So far using analysis to pick the direction of the trade I've had a 13:10 win:loss ratio. This morning was 11:9 e.g. almost 50/50.

 

This made me think:

Why not drop the charts and pick up a coin to decide whether to buy or sell? It has no memory of what side it landed on so would seem to be as a good an analyst as me at the moment (lets ignore the rare chance of it landing on the side)...

 

Any thoughts guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  iwshares said:
At the moment my trading system allows for a 2:1 profit loss ratio e.g. 16 pip limit, 8 pip loss. So far using analysis to pick the direction of the trade I've had a 13:10 win:loss ratio. This morning was 11:9 e.g. almost 50/50.

 

This made me think:

Why not drop the charts and pick up a coin to decide whether to buy or sell? It has no memory of what side it landed on so would seem to be as a good an analyst as me at the moment (lets ignore the rare chance of it landing on the side)...

 

Any thoughts guys?

 

If you want to engage in purely random activity, go to a casino. At least there you get to see some short tight skirts on a variety of women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

brokerage will kill you, plus assuming you only trade longs=heads or similar a large run of heads or tails in a row can still take you out, or at least set you back enough that it will take a long time to recover if ever. But I guess if the return is always 2 to one, then it makes sense.

Maths geeks are better at explaining it than I but I think you need to run the profits longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SIUYA said:
brokerage will kill you, plus assuming you only trade longs=heads or similar a large run of heads or tails in a row can still take you out, or at least set you back enough that it will take a long time to recover if ever. But I guess if the return is always 2 to one, then it makes sense.

Maths geeks are better at explaining it than I but I think you need to run the profits longer.

 

I would recommend that you choose tails to go long instead of heads. I too like to live dangerously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, the first post was partially in jest but really happy for the constructive input. SIUYA I see what you mean about the 2:1 limit/stop. I've been thinking I need to reduce my stake anyway to have more pips both ways for the 1% of capital I risk each trade. I'll reduce my stake and try 3:1 so I can get it wrong 3 times for each trade I get right.

 

Hope you have a great Easter and good trading next week!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  iwshares said:

Why not drop the charts and pick up a coin to decide whether to buy or sell? ...

 

this topic came up a few years back when i was on Woodies CCi site, so woodie put it to a test. go long / short on next bar open determined by coin flip. target = 10, stop =5. it was profitable. not rocket science...price is either going up or down, no?

 

peter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  peterjerome said:
this topic came up a few years back when i was on Woodies CCi site, so woodie put it to a test. go long / short on next bar open determined by coin flip. target = 10, stop =5. it was profitable. not rocket science...price is either going up or down, no?

 

peter

 

Peter,

 

I think you might improve results over a random flip of a coin if you look at the aroon oscilator before you consider the cci patterns. But, I would only do so if the chaiken monyflow index confirmed the darvas box break out. At that point I would make sure that price stayed within the donchian channels and watched for a fib retracement of a fisher transform signal.

 

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Peter,

 

I think you might improve results over a random flip of a coin if you look at the aroon oscilator before you consider the cci patterns. But, I would only do so if the chaiken monyflow index confirmed the darvas box break out. At that point I would make sure that price stayed within the donchian channels and watched for a fib retracement of a fisher transform signal.

 

MM

 

MM,

true enough...taking a random Long position when market is already headed north, and converse for a Short positon will significantly improve the odds. however, the whole point of the coin flip (as i understand it) was could you be successful with a random entry when using a 2-1 reward / risk.

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  peterjerome said:
MM,

true enough...taking a random Long position when market is already headed north, and converse for a Short positon will significantly improve the odds. however, the whole point of the coin flip (as i understand it) was could you be successful with a random entry when using a 2-1 reward / risk.

peter.

 

Peter, I was really only kidding. I only had time to get to the f's in my list of indicators.

 

But if you do are in the habit of trading in the direction of a trend, and care less whether you win more times than you lose, you will end up better off than a random coin flip if you give it enough time. The fact that people are willing to lose money and quit, virtually guarantees there will be some there for you.

 

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Peter, I was really only kidding. I only had time to get to the f's in my list of indicators.

 

MM,

i knew that!

i love sharing ideas...my biggest fear is that eventually everyone will figure out my methodology and there goes my edge. it's the "fallacy of composition"., like arriving early to get a good seat.

peter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Peter,

 

I think you might improve results over a random flip of a coin if you look at the aroon oscilator before you consider the cci patterns. But, I would only do so if the chaiken monyflow index confirmed the darvas box break out. At that point I would make sure that price stayed within the donchian channels and watched for a fib retracement of a fisher transform signal.

 

MM

Now, THAT's funny. Kudos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it'd be a foolish endeavor bound to fail.... unless you assigned an action to when it falls on the side. I'd say sell all of your belongings, divorce your spouse if you have one, and move to Taipei to marry a prostitute (or three), but I'm pretty conservative so you might want to get a little crazier :missy:.

 

If not for this you'd be sure to perish under the fickle futures trading gods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  samanthasing said:
I think it'd be a foolish endeavor bound to fail.... unless you assigned an action to when it falls on the side. I'd say sell all of your belongings, divorce your spouse if you have one, and move to Taipei to marry a prostitute (or three), but I'm pretty conservative so you might want to get a little crazier :missy:.

 

If not for this you'd be sure to perish under the fickle futures trading gods.

 

The trading gods are fair and honest. They take exactly what you are willing to give and give exactly what you are willing to take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
In all seriousness, the coin toss is a really bad idea for *long term* success, I think.

 

Conversely I'd argue that you can learn a great deal by taking random entries. I strongly advise that people try it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zupcon said:
Conversely I'd argue that you can learn a great deal by taking random entries. I strongly advise that people try it.

 

 

zupcon,

so true..i searched years for the holy grail and ultimately learned simple is better.

you do NOTneed the holy grail to be a successful position trader

peter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zupcon said:
Conversely I'd argue that you can learn a great deal by taking random entries. I strongly advise that people try it.

 

For practice only you mean? In doing so, are you shifting the focus on managing the trade, instead of the entry--is that the purpose of this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, what about time? I mean, when do you toss the coin? You can have a rule on that.. things like '30 minutes after London open'. Or something like 'after ADX turned up". Personally, I had the idea of random entries with SL at 1.5 ATR and take profit at 2.5 ATR (but never actualize it). This in demo, to compare that performance to the one of real trading, to get a measure of how one eventually mess up things :crap: I think you have to take all your responsibilities, and choosing the entry is one of them. That's why I was interested in comparing to random entries. I'm sure many people will be better off with them - but you want being better than many people right?

 

Oh ya, another possibility is trading with the trend and let the random variable to timing.

By the way, of course managing trades is the main thing and a random entry can be a good stratagem in order to focus on that (as people tend to focus on entries instead). Again, I'm talking about exercises.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.