Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MightyMouse

Emini S&P 500 Short Term Trading

Recommended Posts

Filled on the first add and my stop is brought up to 1318.25. Hopefully, the days activity acts as a cushion against any attempt to go down.

 

Oh, I love trading.

Edited by MightyMouse

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The trade I am in isn't over yet. But, I did want to make a comment to anyone new who thinks you have to catch the bottom tick to make money.

 

I entered this trade at 1310 and took almost no heat. 1310 was 20 points from the low of 1290ish. If someone other than I were in this trade, he could take about 25 points and put them in his pocket and spend them. I am not that person. Not only would he have taken 25 points, but he would have missed the low by 20 points. I know that a lot of traders who miss getting the low for a long start to want to take a short.

 

I am staying in it because there is really no good reason to get out, but in addition, there is a really good chance that we go to new highs and if that happens, I want to try to be in it. I am not going to throw caution to the wind, but i am going to do my damnedest to try and ride it I will likely have about 7 contracts crossing 1350. I will continue to add above it at a faster and faster rate, until I get to around 20 contracts. This could end up being the largest gain I have ever had.

 

Of course things could change as early as tonight and i will have to bail at a small gain or with no profit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice job MM.

 

I am one of those who feels the need to stand by if I don't get in to the low tick, BUT I am starting to change my perspective. In oil today, for example, I was looking for longs, but missed the initial move up even though there was clear evidence to go long at 10:15ET (near retest of previous day's high after moving up in Globex, duh). I thought a reversal was going to happen at 110.85, but after we broke through I waited for a retest of the 85 and while I didn't quite have the cajones to enter the trade, I was at least looking for longs, not shorts. That's improvement, in my book, and in my theoretical paper trade, my target is 114.00. At this point that trade would be in the money over 100 ticks and I'd have my stop tight enough where I would likely get stopped out (111.79), BUT it would have been a good entry and a good trade so far.

 

Thanks for allowing me to see your perspective.. while I want a good entry, often times what I think is "chasing" is really just jumping on the train for what could be a long long ride. If the move is to be 800 ticks, as we've seen happen in 2 days with crude, then jumping in after 100 or 200 or even 400 ticks is jumping in relatively early. If you think about when oil was valued at $40 a barrel, then buying anywhere up here is buying "at the top" ... BUT, if the top is to be $150 a barrel, which is completely realistic even before the summer is over, then buying at this "top" is in fact a bargain!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
Nice job MM.

 

I am one of those who feels the need to stand by if I don't get in to the low tick, BUT I am starting to change my perspective. In oil today, for example, I was looking for longs, but missed the initial move up even though there was clear evidence to go long at 10:15ET (near retest of previous day's high after moving up in Globex, duh). I thought a reversal was going to happen at 110.85, but after we broke through I waited for a retest of the 85 and while I didn't quite have the cajones to enter the trade, I was at least looking for longs, not shorts. That's improvement, in my book, and in my theoretical paper trade, my target is 114.00. At this point that trade would be in the money over 100 ticks and I'd have my stop tight enough where I would likely get stopped out (111.79), BUT it would have been a good entry and a good trade so far.

 

Thanks for allowing me to see your perspective.. while I want a good entry, often times what I think is "chasing" is really just jumping on the train for what could be a long long ride. If the move is to be 800 ticks, as we've seen happen in 2 days with crude, then jumping in after 100 or 200 or even 400 ticks is jumping in relatively early. If you think about when oil was valued at $40 a barrel, then buying anywhere up here is buying "at the top" ... BUT, if the top is to be $150 a barrel, which is completely realistic even before the summer is over, then buying at this "top" is in fact a bargain!

 

Josh,

 

Thanks.

 

It's not over until its over Though, I cannot lose right now, a possibility exists that I do not win too, Pressing for more has a double edge to it.

 

There were a few times when I had the the right direction, the right bias, etc and I had a limit order in to get long and it went to my limit order and no fill and proceeds to go higher and higher. Like a fool I started taking shorts for reasons that I could explain, but just were not good. That had to stop.

 

A market is going to go where it is going to go regardless of whether we think it is going to go there or not. So, I want to simply be on it and not question if it should be going where it is going.

 

In oil, I wouldn't look for a "top" and also consider that in days it could be back down in the 70's 80's, 60's, etc. Everything falls faster than it goes up. Either way just try to be on it.

 

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To state the obvious, we are in an obvious shorter term down move. At this point if we get above 1333, I would feel comfortable thinking that the move down is over.

 

At that point it will look like a lot of selling occurred in a very small range and to me that is bullish if the shorter term direction turns to up. But, for now this looks like it wants to continue lower.

 

Going out a bit wider, the span my trade is in, the direction is still up and I am staying long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am leaving my order in at 3975 for an add. I somehow doubt it will get there before the European open if it gets there at all.

 

Currently if we do not move above 1334.50, which is the current high, I will get out of all positions at 1326.25. If we do move above it, I will trail it up by 33 ticks until we hit 1337 At that point. I will put the stop back at 1318.25. And see what develops next

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
Why not use 1335.75 as that was a double top on 6th & 8th April?

 

I do not use highs or lows of days or weeks as entry or exit signals. They certainly are curious monuments and they do get reactions, but they do not cause me to react. At times they work and I give some up and other times they accelerate the direction of my trade.

 

Additionally, I am doing everything i can to stay in this trade, not get out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lucky Lucky Lucky.

 

My stop is back to 1318.25 and I will move it up to 1323.75 if I get another add filled at 1339.75.

 

I survived being stopped out purely by luck. All that had to happen for me to get taken out at 1327 was to have one more very large institutional market order execute and push prices down when price was at 1327.25. But, it didn't happen. My safety stop at 1327 was not randomly placed there, but it is random luck that I did not get taken out there. Whatever you do, do not mistake the stop at 1327 as some stroke of brilliance, because I assure you it wasn't.

 

It could all backfire today, or maybe not. But in order to get a larger gain you have to risk losing the small gain. No pain no gain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adding at 43.75 next if it continues to go higher. If we do not go higher than 40.25, i will likely bail out of all at 1332 if conditions remain the same.

 

I love trading!

Edited by MightyMouse
Forgot to say I love trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop is moved back to 1323.75. If i get filled at 1343.75, I'll move my stop to 1327.75.

 

I move the stop when i think there is a high risk of me being trapped in the wrong direction. Whether it is right or wrong, it makes me feel good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally, I trade CL in a similar fashion and the move that has occurred from 1310 to here usually happens in about 30 minutes or so.

 

My experience with these trades as the adds increase the profit and the stop gets moved up, is that pressure builds in your head as you have more and more of a profit to lose. You have to experience it to understand it fully.

 

In CL it is so fast sometimes when the adds come on that I literally find myself not breathing at that point I hit market order to get out. Es is slow so I do not see the need for the panicked exit yet, but I do feel the pressure building as we move up. I am hoping I can remain rational.

 

At this pont, if we do not go above 1344.25 and we hit 1336, I am out of all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Normally, I trade CL in a similar fashion and the move that has occurred from 1310 to here usually happens in about 30 minutes or so.

 

You posted this at 11:45 and around 12:15 a nice move down happened on CL. I assume that's what you meant? Good job! Good job with your trade management here as well MM. Any reason you can think of for the timing on these moves? Any other times of day you pay attention to on CL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

stop is off 38 and is now at 1334. It is going to suck if this doesn't go back. My stop being movedf to 1334 is part of the plan and not an emotional decision. If condsitions change i will move the stop back to 1338, but in no way will it go lower than 1334 now.

 

If it does go up, I am adding at 1347 and again at 1349.75 and will get out by the end of the day if I get those fills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  joshdance said:
You posted this at 11:45 and around 12:15 a nice move down happened on CL. I assume that's what you meant? Good job! Good job with your trade management here as well MM. Any reason you can think of for the timing on these moves? Any other times of day you pay attention to on CL?

 

ha ha. no. The move in es from 1310 to where it is. If the comment coincided with a move in CL that is plain awesome but I had no idea it would move.

 

A 30 point move which is 120 ticks took a week in es, but it takes no time in CL. Cl can do 120 ticks in minutes as I am sure you are completely aware.

 

Cl is very much like ES in the sense that there is a London or European move, and then a move starting around 830 est, and then maybe a move at the end of the pit session starting after lunch and stopping usually at 2:30. Sometimes the petroleum report moves it.

 

Moves are usually around 100 to 150 ticks and then profit taking. Usually, not always though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope we have the power hour so I can get out of this. I would be incredibly happy if we got over 1350. I am probably biased but I think we should push above the current high so that some of these accumulated longs can sell into the buy stops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.