Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

rocky9281

Trading F&O by Time and Sales

Recommended Posts

  rocky9281 said:
un filtered, un coalesced data

 

 

Hello Blowfish,

 

I asked some people about unfiltered, uncoalesced data. They haven't heard these terms earlier.

 

IMHO,I think:

 

Unfiltered means - they should disclose every trade as they occur and don't hide any trade.right?

 

Uncoalesced means- they don't add up two or more trades and show them as one trade... like bought 50@ 200.5 and bought 25@200.5. These 2 trades add up to give bought 75@200.5,and show this 75@200.5 in the T&S instead of the two separate trades of 50 and 25. Am I correct?

Please tell me what do they mean,in case I am wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, actually I always used the term un aggregated but seems that un coalesced is the more popular term :) Can't be that popular from what yo say. Anyway you are right, sometimes someone down the line will 'aggregate' several trades at the same price/time (report them as one trade). At one time the CME intimated they where doing it on some instruments but that is not the case now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello BlowFish,

 

Those vendors who provide true tick by tick data are too expensive for me.

 

Most of the data vendors here provide data with ticks updated for every 1 second(although the exchange publishes every tick, these vendors can't incorporate it that fast and accurately).Please see the screenshot attached at post #49 for a sample of this kind of data.This is from eSignal.

 

So this is bit inferior than true tick by tick data.Will that lead to data aggregation? Will that kind of data work for T&S analysis? Shall I go for it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IQ feed is way better than esignal, IQ feed has better data but their platform stinks so you'll need your own to tie into it...(ie..ninjatrader), esignal has a prettier platform but their data stinks.....

 

What is it you want to do?

 

If your Scalping or an Intraday trader... then I like T4 or x-trader....

Longer term trades, Trade Navigator...

You can learn scalping from TradeNavigator but I don't trust their stability for scalping

 

I use X-Trader myself & have been a full time trader since 1991

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please throw some light on Time and sales refreshing.

 

1.Why does the T&S refreshes?

 

2.What does it mean when we see the time and sales data/window refreshes?

 

3.What to look for after the refresh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some possible price and volume combinations in time and sales window are:

 

1. High volume trading going off-both in bid and ask, with intervening small/medium trades in both bid and ask.I don't think this pattern should be ignored just because it is indeterminate as both bid and ask sides are traded heavily, but should be watched closely because the high volumes indicates professionals are participating.

 

2. High volume trading going off in bid,not a single trade is of small/medium volume.Also, not a single trade going on in the ask. (vice versa)

 

3. High volume trading going off in bid.Along with that,small/medium volume trades going off at ask. (vice versa)

 

4. Large number of small/medium sized trades going off at bid.None of the trades is of high volume.May not seem to be professional activity,but at the end of the day the summation of the volume of trades at bid at that price level comes out to be very high.

 

What does each of the above four combinations indicate, and hence, what the tape reader should do when he sees them in his time and sales?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Compression(or expansion)of the bid-ask spread.Any idea what it indicates?

 

How to use bid-ask spread in trading?

 

I think the compression(or expansion)of the bid-ask spread has got something to do with an intraday short lived rally or reaction.Can you please elaborate on this?

 

Also, please mention why does this happen..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What does it mean when I see the same volume figure appearing again and again in the time and sales window, also, it comes constantly in the same side (either the bid or the ask).

 

Please note that these are intervened by many other trades.But this number appear too frequently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard this from some traders that, if we see large prints in the time and sales, we must stay out of the trade and let the buyer and seller battle it out. After that, we should go with the one who wins.

 

My question is, how do you determine who won?

IMHO, if price gives breakout to the upper side, the buyer has won and we should buy, and vice versa for breakdown. So we are just waiting for a breakout either to the upside or downside.

Is there anything more to it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly I would ask wherever you heard it. Secondly I think there is more to it than that. For example a seller may bid up the price to 'test' supply and demand at those levels (of for a variety of other reasons). Broadly speaking you can assume who one by price direction tests and stop runs not withstanding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Firstly I would ask wherever you heard it. Secondly I think there is more to it than that. For example a seller may bid up the price to 'test' supply and demand at those levels (of for a variety of other reasons). Broadly speaking you can assume who one by price direction tests and stop runs not withstanding.

 

Thanks Blowfish

 

Blowfish, please explain briefly what do you mean by

1.price direction tests ,and

2.stop runs not withstanding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look in the Whyckoff (and the VSA section to some extent) section there is lost of information on 'tests'. A top run is where price is marked up or down to trigger resting orders...most people have got a pretty good idea where they are likely clustered. Price direction is simply the direction price moves away from somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  rocky9281 said:
Please help with this question.

How does large institutions enter or exit positions?

 

I know about the following options:

 

1 Large block trades and

2. Algorithms

 

What are the others?

 

Oh, they're very creative, they can hold a bid or ask to dump or scoop up contracts. Mostly though they just buy gradually at certain levels, from what I've noticed so far. If you check out the tick volume on a chart you can see where the big players are accumulating or distributing. The average volume per tick candle is huge compared to what us little guys are doing.:2c:

 

Cheers,

 

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The T/S and DOM is a crazy place that is for sure. To be able to see Iceberg and other institutional orders is a big help with any trading method.

 

I have created Software that works with Ninja Trader and plots these orders on a chart in real time. I have been a trader for 11 years and have always looked at the order flow on the DOM and T/S but a lot of orders have become way to fast for the human eye or are hidden in tiny lots. I have examples and screen shots to help explain. This will help anyone that is trying to understand the market by tape reading.

 

Have a great day!

Edited by MadMarketScientist
links

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is a stale buyer and why should he MUST buy and MUST suffer losses?

 

If he knows he is about to suffer loss, why didn't he cancel his bids and avoid unwanted fillings?

 

Lastly,

Can stale buyers buy with:

1.algorithms like TWAP

2.perfect prints on ask

3.double prints

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we see a small bid rising up tick by tick, is it true that the bid is actually very large, and is placed by a pro?

 

For example,

 

bid qty=158,bid rate=123.11

bid qty=158,bid rate=123.12

bid qty=158,bid rate=123.13

bid qty=158,bid rate=123.14

bid qty=158,bid rate=123.15

 

 

See how the bid rose from 123.11 to 123.15, but the size remained constant (158).

 

1.Should we go long here?

 

2.Is this a phenomenon that we will search for BOTH in the best bid ,as well as in all the tiers of bid that are below the Best Bid ?

 

3.Are the reverse things true for ask?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a general question here. If anybody knows the answer, please help me

 

Are the stock(etc.) exchanges a source of income for the large institutions?

If yes:

1. What %age of their annual income comes from trading stocks,futures etc?

2. Do u think that these large institutions will quit operating on these trading vehicles someday in the future?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.